Globalization involves an extension of social, political and economic activities beyond borders, so that events, decisions and activities in one region of the world can have meaning, consequences and risks for individuals and communities in distant regions of the globe.[7]​.

Globalization manifests a change in the relationships between scales, on the one hand, and modalities of territorialization, on the other. Faced with this change, geographical actors linked to a peculiar modality of territorialization see their position modified in the system of actors: for example, National-States lose importance, while metropolitan elites recover more power of territorial planning.[6]​

Likewise, globalization tends to uproot people, things and ideas. Without harming their origins, something comes off or is indifferent. Everything tends to be uprooted, thus the surprising process of deterritorialization develops, a characteristic of the global society in formation.[8]​.

A central paradox in the educational field of globalization is that, at the same time that culture becomes globalized, the claims of primary cultural identities resurface with greater force, deterritorialization causes new cultural Territorializations.[7]​.

Territory, territoriality and territorialization occur simultaneously, when there is a physical space with a symbolic dimension. So that just as there is territorialization, there is also deterritorialization and reterritorialization.[1]​.

Deterritorialization refers to the detachment of a human group from its link with its territory and entails sociocultural, political and economic consequences. For this reason, it seeks to experience a process of reestablishment (reterritorialization) and construction of a place to once again feel identification, a cultural roots that allows the vital projects of human beings to be carried out.[9]​.

Globalization involves an extension of social, political and economic activities beyond borders, so that events, decisions and activities in one region of the world can have meaning, consequences and risks for individuals and communities in distant regions of the globe.[7]​.

Globalization manifests a change in the relationships between scales, on the one hand, and modalities of territorialization, on the other. Faced with this change, geographical actors linked to a peculiar modality of territorialization see their position modified in the system of actors: for example, National-States lose importance, while metropolitan elites recover more power of territorial planning.[6]​

Likewise, globalization tends to uproot people, things and ideas. Without harming their origins, something comes off or is indifferent. Everything tends to be uprooted, thus the surprising process of deterritorialization develops, a characteristic of the global society in formation.[8]​.

A central paradox in the educational field of globalization is that, at the same time that culture becomes globalized, the claims of primary cultural identities resurface with greater force, deterritorialization causes new cultural Territorializations.[7]​.

Territory, territoriality and territorialization occur simultaneously, when there is a physical space with a symbolic dimension. So that just as there is territorialization, there is also deterritorialization and reterritorialization.[1]​.

Deterritorialization refers to the detachment of a human group from its link with its territory and entails sociocultural, political and economic consequences. For this reason, it seeks to experience a process of reestablishment (reterritorialization) and construction of a place to once again feel identification, a cultural roots that allows the vital projects of human beings to be carried out.[9]​.