Subsystem

A subsystem is a set of elements, which is a system in itself and a component of a larger system. The IBM Mainframe Job Entry Subsystem family (JES1"), JES2"), JES3"), and their predecessors HASP")/ASP")) are examples. The main "things" they have in common are the components that handle input, scheduling, spooling, and output; they also have the ability to interact with local and remote operators.

A subsystem description is a system object that contains information that defines the characteristics of a system-controlled operating environment.[8]​ Data testing is performed to verify the accuracy of individual subsystem configuration data (e.g., MA length, static velocity profile, etc.) and is related to a single subsystem to test its specific application (SA).[9]​.

There are many types of systems that can be analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. For example, in an analysis of the dynamics of urban systems, A .W. Steiss defined five intersecting systems, including the physical subsystem and the behavioral system. For sociological models influenced by systems theory,[10] Kenneth D. Bailey&action=edit&redlink=1 "Kenneth D. Bailey (sociologist) (not yet drafted)" systems defined in terms of conceptual"), concrete "Concrete (philosophy)"), and abstract systems, whether isolated, closed, or open&action=edit&redlink=1 "Open system (systems theory) (not yet redacted)").[11]​ Walter F. Buckley") defined systems in sociology in terms of mechanics, organic&action=edit&redlink=1 "Organic (model) (not yet redacted)") and process models.[12]​ Bela H. Banathy warned that for any investigation of a system, understanding its type is crucial, and he defined "natural" and "designed", as well as artificial systems.[13]​ For example, natural systems include systems. subatomic (subatomic), living systems), the solar system, galaxies and the Universe, while artificial systems systems include man-made physical structures, hybrids of natural and artificial systems, and conceptual knowledge. The human elements of organization and functions are emphasized with their corresponding abstract systems and representations.

Artificial systems inherently have a major flaw: they must be based on one or more fundamental assumptions upon which additional knowledge is built. This is in strict alignment with Gödel's incompleteness theorems. The artificial system can be defined as a "consistent formalized system containing elementary arithmetic".[14] These fundamental assumptions are not inherently harmful, but by definition they must be assumed to be true, and if they are truly false, then the system is not as structurally comprehensive as assumed (i.e., it is clear that if the initial expression is false, then the artificial system is not a "consistent formalized system"). For example, in geometry this is very evident in the postulation of theorems and the extrapolation of proofs from them.

George J. Klir")[15]​ argued that no "classification is complete and perfect for all purposes", and defined systems as abstract, physical systems real and conceptual), bounded and unbounded systems), discrete to continuous, pulse to hybrid systems, etc. Interactions between systems and their environments are classified as relatively closed and open systems&action=edit&redlink=1 "Open system (systems theory) (not yet drafted)"). It seems very It is unlikely that an absolutely closed system could exist or, if it did, that it could be known to the human being, physical systems possible from methods such as systems engineering, operations research, and quantitative systems analysis - and "soft" systems involving people and organizations, commonly associated with concepts developed by Peter Checkland and Brian Wilson&action=edit&redlink=1 action") and emphasis on participation designs where hard systems can be identified as more "scientific", the distinction between them is often difficult to achieve.

A conceptual system, formal system or ideal system is a construct "Construct (epistemology)") composed of concepts of four different types:

Thus, concepts are not conceptual systems, but only components of conceptual systems. Yes, they are conceptual systems.

Contenido

Un sistema material, sistema concreto o sistema real es una cosa "Cosa (ontología)") compuesta por dos o más cosas relacionadas, que posee propiedades que no poseen sus componentes, llamadas propiedades emergentes; por ejemplo, la tensión superficial es una propiedad emergente que poseen los líquidos pero que no poseen sus moléculas componentes. Al ser cosas, los sistemas materiales poseen las propiedades de las cosas, como tener energía (e intercambiarla), tener historia, yuxtaponerse con otras cosas y ocupar una posición en el espacio tiempo.

El esfuerzo por encontrar leyes generales del comportamiento de los sistemas materiales es el que funda la teoría de sistemas y, más en general, el enfoque de la investigación científica a la que se alude como sistemismo, sistémica o pensamiento sistémico, en cuyo marco se encuentran disciplinas y teorías como la cibernética, la teoría de la información, la teoría del caos, la dinámica de sistemas y otras.

Science as a system

Any science or discipline of knowledge can be considered a system if it explains a more or less extensive part of human knowledge. Such is the idea of ​​the Spanish philosopher José Ortega y Gasset in his work History as a system in which he refers to the fact that history is a system (explanatory, of course) that allows us to understand the present. The same idea has been expressed by other authors.

CEEM analysis

The simplest analysis of the concept of a material system is that which includes the concepts of composition, environment, structure and mechanism "Mechanism (philosophy)") (CEEM, for its acronym). The composition of a system is the set of its component parts. The environment of a system is the set of things that act on the components of the system, or on which the components of the system act. The internal structure or endostructure of a system is the set of relationships between the components of the system. The external structure or exostructure of a system is the set of relationships between the components of the system and the elements of its environment. The total structure of a system is the union of its exostructure and its endostructure. The most important relationships are links, those that affect related components; spatiotemporal relationships are not links. The mechanism of a system is the set of internal processes that cause it to change some properties, while preserving others.

Furthermore, the boundary of a system is the set of components that are directly linked (without anything intervening) with the elements of its environment. The boundary of a physical system can be rigid or mobile, permeable or impermeable, thermally conductive (adiabatic) or not, electrically conductive or not, and can even be an insulator of audio frequencies. Additionally, some systems have figure (form); but not every system with a border necessarily has a figure. If there is some exchange of matter between a physical system and its environment across its boundary, then the system is open; otherwise, the system is closed. If a closed system also does not exchange energy, then the system is isolated. Strictly speaking, the only isolated system is the universe. If a system has the necessary organization to control its own development, ensuring the continuity of its composition and structure (homeostasis) and that of the flows and transformations with which it functions (homeorhesis) - as long as the disturbances produced from its environment do not exceed a certain degree - then the system is autopoietic.

Subsystem

A subsystem is a set of elements, which is a system in itself and a component of a larger system. The IBM Mainframe Job Entry Subsystem family (JES1"), JES2"), JES3"), and their predecessors HASP")/ASP")) are examples. The main "things" they have in common are the components that handle input, scheduling, spooling, and output; they also have the ability to interact with local and remote operators.

A subsystem description is a system object that contains information that defines the characteristics of a system-controlled operating environment.[8]​ Data testing is performed to verify the accuracy of individual subsystem configuration data (e.g., MA length, static velocity profile, etc.) and is related to a single subsystem to test its specific application (SA).[9]​.

There are many types of systems that can be analyzed both quantitatively and qualitatively. For example, in an analysis of the dynamics of urban systems, A .W. Steiss defined five intersecting systems, including the physical subsystem and the behavioral system. For sociological models influenced by systems theory,[10] Kenneth D. Bailey&action=edit&redlink=1 "Kenneth D. Bailey (sociologist) (not yet drafted)" systems defined in terms of conceptual"), concrete "Concrete (philosophy)"), and abstract systems, whether isolated, closed, or open&action=edit&redlink=1 "Open system (systems theory) (not yet redacted)").[11]​ Walter F. Buckley") defined systems in sociology in terms of mechanics, organic&action=edit&redlink=1 "Organic (model) (not yet redacted)") and process models.[12]​ Bela H. Banathy warned that for any investigation of a system, understanding its type is crucial, and he defined "natural" and "designed", as well as artificial systems.[13]​ For example, natural systems include systems. subatomic (subatomic), living systems), the solar system, galaxies and the Universe, while artificial systems systems include man-made physical structures, hybrids of natural and artificial systems, and conceptual knowledge. The human elements of organization and functions are emphasized with their corresponding abstract systems and representations.

Artificial systems inherently have a major flaw: they must be based on one or more fundamental assumptions upon which additional knowledge is built. This is in strict alignment with Gödel's incompleteness theorems. The artificial system can be defined as a "consistent formalized system containing elementary arithmetic".[14] These fundamental assumptions are not inherently harmful, but by definition they must be assumed to be true, and if they are truly false, then the system is not as structurally comprehensive as assumed (i.e., it is clear that if the initial expression is false, then the artificial system is not a "consistent formalized system"). For example, in geometry this is very evident in the postulation of theorems and the extrapolation of proofs from them.

George J. Klir")[15]​ argued that no "classification is complete and perfect for all purposes", and defined systems as abstract, physical systems real and conceptual), bounded and unbounded systems), discrete to continuous, pulse to hybrid systems, etc. Interactions between systems and their environments are classified as relatively closed and open systems&action=edit&redlink=1 "Open system (systems theory) (not yet drafted)"). It seems very It is unlikely that an absolutely closed system could exist or, if it did, that it could be known to the human being, physical systems possible from methods such as systems engineering, operations research, and quantitative systems analysis - and "soft" systems involving people and organizations, commonly associated with concepts developed by Peter Checkland and Brian Wilson&action=edit&redlink=1 action") and emphasis on participation designs where hard systems can be identified as more "scientific", the distinction between them is often difficult to achieve.

A conceptual system, formal system or ideal system is a construct "Construct (epistemology)") composed of concepts of four different types:

Thus, concepts are not conceptual systems, but only components of conceptual systems. Yes, they are conceptual systems.

Contenido

Un sistema material, sistema concreto o sistema real es una cosa "Cosa (ontología)") compuesta por dos o más cosas relacionadas, que posee propiedades que no poseen sus componentes, llamadas propiedades emergentes; por ejemplo, la tensión superficial es una propiedad emergente que poseen los líquidos pero que no poseen sus moléculas componentes. Al ser cosas, los sistemas materiales poseen las propiedades de las cosas, como tener energía (e intercambiarla), tener historia, yuxtaponerse con otras cosas y ocupar una posición en el espacio tiempo.

El esfuerzo por encontrar leyes generales del comportamiento de los sistemas materiales es el que funda la teoría de sistemas y, más en general, el enfoque de la investigación científica a la que se alude como sistemismo, sistémica o pensamiento sistémico, en cuyo marco se encuentran disciplinas y teorías como la cibernética, la teoría de la información, la teoría del caos, la dinámica de sistemas y otras.

Science as a system

Any science or discipline of knowledge can be considered a system if it explains a more or less extensive part of human knowledge. Such is the idea of ​​the Spanish philosopher José Ortega y Gasset in his work History as a system in which he refers to the fact that history is a system (explanatory, of course) that allows us to understand the present. The same idea has been expressed by other authors.

CEEM analysis

The simplest analysis of the concept of a material system is that which includes the concepts of composition, environment, structure and mechanism "Mechanism (philosophy)") (CEEM, for its acronym). The composition of a system is the set of its component parts. The environment of a system is the set of things that act on the components of the system, or on which the components of the system act. The internal structure or endostructure of a system is the set of relationships between the components of the system. The external structure or exostructure of a system is the set of relationships between the components of the system and the elements of its environment. The total structure of a system is the union of its exostructure and its endostructure. The most important relationships are links, those that affect related components; spatiotemporal relationships are not links. The mechanism of a system is the set of internal processes that cause it to change some properties, while preserving others.

Furthermore, the boundary of a system is the set of components that are directly linked (without anything intervening) with the elements of its environment. The boundary of a physical system can be rigid or mobile, permeable or impermeable, thermally conductive (adiabatic) or not, electrically conductive or not, and can even be an insulator of audio frequencies. Additionally, some systems have figure (form); but not every system with a border necessarily has a figure. If there is some exchange of matter between a physical system and its environment across its boundary, then the system is open; otherwise, the system is closed. If a closed system also does not exchange energy, then the system is isolated. Strictly speaking, the only isolated system is the universe. If a system has the necessary organization to control its own development, ensuring the continuity of its composition and structure (homeostasis) and that of the flows and transformations with which it functions (homeorhesis) - as long as the disturbances produced from its environment do not exceed a certain degree - then the system is autopoietic.