Map of interested parties
Introduction
In planning, stakeholder analysis is the process of understanding the social stakeholders involved and possible adjustments to maximize their participation and positive impact. It is used in project management and conflict resolution, business administration, decision making in environmental health sciences,[1] industrial ecology, among other domains.
This information is used to evaluate how stakeholder interests should be addressed in a project, policy, program, or other action.[2] Stakeholder analysis involves weighing and balancing competing demands. It does not exclude particular interests, but ensures that all those affected will be considered.[3].
Stakeholder analysis is frequently used during the preparation phase of a project to assess stakeholder attitudes toward potential changes. Stakeholder analysis can be done once or on a regular basis to track changes in stakeholder attitudes over time.
Types of interested parties
Types of stakeholders include:.
Other types of interested parties:
Stakeholder Mapping
Contenido
La siguiente lista identifica algunos de los métodos más conocidos y más utilizados para el mapeo de partes interesadas:.
Las técnicas de mapeo incluyen las siguientes técnicas de análisis utilizadas por agencias de ayuda, gobiernos o grupos de consultores:.
Stakeholder Mapping Procedure
The list of potential stakeholders for any project often exceeds both the time available for analysis and the ability to map and display the results in a sensible manner.[10] The challenge is to focus on the right stakeholders who are currently important and create a visual representation of this critical subset of the total community: the key stakeholders.
The most common presentation style uses a two-dimensional array. Power and influence are commonly seen with a third dimension shown by the color or size of the symbol representing individual stakeholders, often attitude.
The salience model
This model[7] uses three dimensions: legitimacy (A), power (B) and urgency (C). It is represented in a Venn diagram, which has 8 regions each associated with a specific type of stakeholder.[12].
Types of stakeholders as described by the salience model:.
Benefits
Stakeholder analysis helps identify:[11][13][14].
References
- [1] ↑ Coble, Yank; Coussens, Christine; Quinn, eds. (2009). «4. Stakeholder Perspectives on Environmental Health Sciences Decision Making». Environmental Health Sciences Decision Making: Risk Management, Evidence, and Ethics - Workshop Summary.. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. ISBN 978-0-309-12454-6. doi:10.17226/12444.: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK50712/
- [2] ↑ Ketema, D.M.; Chisholm, N.; Enright, P. (2017). «Chapter 20: Examining the Characteristics of Stakeholders in Lake Tana Sub-basin Resource Use, Management and Governance». En Stave, K.; Goshu, G.; Aynalem, S., eds. Social and Ecological System Dynamics. Springer. p. 318. ISBN 9783319457550.: https://books.google.com/books?id=vNifDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA318
- [3] ↑ DeGeorge, R.T. (2010). Business Ethics. Pearson Education, Inc. p. 192. ISBN 9780205015108.
- [4] ↑ De Mascia, S. (2016). Project Psychology: Using Psychological Models and Techniques to Create a Successful Project. CRC Press. pp. 73-74. ISBN 9781317075011.: https://books.google.com/books?id=G5XsCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA73
- [5] ↑ Cameron, B.G.; Seher, T.; Crawley, E.F. (2011). «Goals for space exploration based on stakeholder value network considerations». Acta Astronautica 68 (11–12): 2088-97. Bibcode:2011AcAau..68.2088C. doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2010.11.003.: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011AcAau..68.2088C
- [6] ↑ Fletcher, A.; Guthrie, J.; Steane, P. (2003). «Mapping stakeholder perceptions for a third sector organization». Journal of Intellectual Capital 4 (4): 505-27. doi:10.1108/14691930310504536.: https://dx.doi.org/10.1108%2F14691930310504536