The complete list by country is available on the World Bank website.[4]​.

In the 2023 edition of the LPI, it is relevant to highlight that several new KPIs were incorporated into the general report. However, these indicators were not considered in the calculation of the final score, which continues to be based mainly on perception surveys.

The LPI 2023 evaluated a total of 139 countries. For the first time, several countries share the same position in the ranking: Denmark, Germany, Switzerland and the Netherlands are all in third place. Singapore tops the rankings with a score of 4.3, while Afghanistan is at the bottom with a score of 1.9.

In the 2018 edition of the Logistics Performance Index, Germany returns to first place with a score of 4.20. They are followed, completing the top five, by Sweden, Belgium, Austria and Japan. High-income countries have 48% higher LPI scores compared to low-income countries. Afghanistan is in last position, with a score of just 1.73.

In the 2016 edition of the LPI, Germany once again ranked first with a score of 4.23. In contrast, Syria, impacted by the civil war conflict, ranked last with a score of 1.60.

Various research has highlighted that the LPI methodology, based exclusively on subjective perceptions of logistics operators, can introduce biases and lead to an undervaluation of certain countries with objectively higher logistics performance[7][8]. Furthermore, studies have shown that the LPI was much more influenced by social than economic factors.[9] As of 2023, the World Bank has modified the LPI methodology to some extent to address these issues.

The complete list by country is available on the World Bank website.[4]​.

In the 2023 edition of the LPI, it is relevant to highlight that several new KPIs were incorporated into the general report. However, these indicators were not considered in the calculation of the final score, which continues to be based mainly on perception surveys.

The LPI 2023 evaluated a total of 139 countries. For the first time, several countries share the same position in the ranking: Denmark, Germany, Switzerland and the Netherlands are all in third place. Singapore tops the rankings with a score of 4.3, while Afghanistan is at the bottom with a score of 1.9.

In the 2018 edition of the Logistics Performance Index, Germany returns to first place with a score of 4.20. They are followed, completing the top five, by Sweden, Belgium, Austria and Japan. High-income countries have 48% higher LPI scores compared to low-income countries. Afghanistan is in last position, with a score of just 1.73.

In the 2016 edition of the LPI, Germany once again ranked first with a score of 4.23. In contrast, Syria, impacted by the civil war conflict, ranked last with a score of 1.60.

Various research has highlighted that the LPI methodology, based exclusively on subjective perceptions of logistics operators, can introduce biases and lead to an undervaluation of certain countries with objectively higher logistics performance[7][8]. Furthermore, studies have shown that the LPI was much more influenced by social than economic factors.[9] As of 2023, the World Bank has modified the LPI methodology to some extent to address these issues.