The Cantabrian Sea is a coastal sea of the Atlantic Ocean that is located on the northern coast of Spain and the southwestern end of the Atlantic coast of France, being the southernmost part of the Bay of Biscay. of the department of Pyrénées-Atlantiques and the French Basque Country.[note 1][1][2][3] It covers 800 km of coastline shared by the Spanish autonomous communities of Galicia (provinces of La Coruña and Lugo), Asturias, Cantabria and the Basque Country (provinces of Vizcaya and Guipúzcoa), and the French department of Pyrénées-Atlantiques.
This marginal sea is an exceptionally rich and diverse ecosystem, which is home to a wide variety of marine species and birds, and whose complex interaction has given rise to a unique and fragile environment. The Cantabrian region, with its ancient history, has witnessed the presence of diverse cultures that have left a deep historical, cultural and identity legacy, which has shaped the identity and heritage of the region.
The Cantabrian Sea is not recognized by the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) in its publication Limits of Oceans and Seas, third edition of 1953 (in force), nor in the updated draft of its fourth edition of 2002.[4][5].
Etymology
The Cantabrian Sea was named by the Romans in the century BC. C. as Cantabricus Oceanus in reference to one of the peoples that populated its coasts: the Cantabrians.[6] In other older classical quotes it appears under the name of Britannicus Oceanus and Gallicus Oceanus.[7].
Physical characteristics
Contenido
El mar Cantábrico es en realidad una cubeta marina que se formó por la colisión entre las placas indoeuropea e ibérica hace entre 115 a 75 millones de años.[8] Hoy día esas placas aún están en movimiento, de hecho, Galicia y la Bretaña francesa se separan unos pocos centímetros al año, y el cañón submarino que forman se abre cada vez más. Topográficamente hablando la plataforma continental del Cantábrico se puede dividir en dos partes:.
• - La primera se extiende desde la desembocadura del río Bidasoa hasta el cabo Vidio, y se caracteriza por tener una orientación Norte-Sur y ser extremadamente estrecha, con una pendiente poco acusada y afectada por floraciones rocosas a menor escala. A lo largo de la costa cantábrica la plataforma se puede reducir hasta menos de 10 km (8 km frente al cabo de Ajo) ensanchándose hacia el oeste. El talud continental, una zona de transición entre la plataforma y la profundidad del mar, es muy pronunciado con una pendiente de alrededor de 10-12 %, cayendo hasta los 4000 m de profundidad y está cruzado por numerosos cañones.[1].
Evaluation of urban logistics hubs
Introduction
The Cantabrian Sea is a coastal sea of the Atlantic Ocean that is located on the northern coast of Spain and the southwestern end of the Atlantic coast of France, being the southernmost part of the Bay of Biscay. of the department of Pyrénées-Atlantiques and the French Basque Country.[note 1][1][2][3] It covers 800 km of coastline shared by the Spanish autonomous communities of Galicia (provinces of La Coruña and Lugo), Asturias, Cantabria and the Basque Country (provinces of Vizcaya and Guipúzcoa), and the French department of Pyrénées-Atlantiques.
This marginal sea is an exceptionally rich and diverse ecosystem, which is home to a wide variety of marine species and birds, and whose complex interaction has given rise to a unique and fragile environment. The Cantabrian region, with its ancient history, has witnessed the presence of diverse cultures that have left a deep historical, cultural and identity legacy, which has shaped the identity and heritage of the region.
The Cantabrian Sea is not recognized by the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO) in its publication Limits of Oceans and Seas, third edition of 1953 (in force), nor in the updated draft of its fourth edition of 2002.[4][5].
Etymology
The Cantabrian Sea was named by the Romans in the century BC. C. as Cantabricus Oceanus in reference to one of the peoples that populated its coasts: the Cantabrians.[6] In other older classical quotes it appears under the name of Britannicus Oceanus and Gallicus Oceanus.[7].
Physical characteristics
Contenido
El mar Cantábrico es en realidad una cubeta marina que se formó por la colisión entre las placas indoeuropea e ibérica hace entre 115 a 75 millones de años.[8] Hoy día esas placas aún están en movimiento, de hecho, Galicia y la Bretaña francesa se separan unos pocos centímetros al año, y el cañón submarino que forman se abre cada vez más. Topográficamente hablando la plataforma continental del Cantábrico se puede dividir en dos partes:.
• - La plataforma en la zona que va desde cabo Vidio hasta la desembocadura del río Miño, es más ancha y uniforme. La anchura máxima, de 80 km, se alcanza frente a La Coruña, mientras que frente a cabo Ortegal se reduce hasta los 30 km.[1].
Al ser un mar muy abierto al océano, tiene características diferentes a otros mares más cerrados. Su fondo marino es desigual: cerca de las costas españolas es más profundo y desciende rápido, mientras que junto a las costas francesas es necesario penetrar muchos kilómetros mar adentro, para encontrar profundidades de más de 1000 m.[9].
El fondo marino se divide en unidades por la presencia de montes y bancos submarinos, así como de profundos cañones submarinos. Entre los cañones más característicos de esta zona destacan los sistemas de Capbreton"), Santander "Santander (España)"), Torrelavega, Llanes, Lastres y Avilés. Algunos de estos desfiladeros son muy pronunciados, como el de Capbreton, donde la cabeza del cañón se encuentra a menos de 200 m de la orilla y el fondo marino desciende 1000 m a menos de 3 km de la costa, alcanzando la zona batial de más de 2000 m y llegando a ser uno de los más profundos del mundo.[1][10] Su elevada pendiente hace que se produzcan avalanchas submarinas, como la generada por la tormenta Martin") el 27 de diciembre de 1999, cuyo depósitos sedimentarios se localizaron a 600 m de profundidad. Es probable que tales aludes submarinos fuesen muy frecuentes durante la última desglaciación pirenaica (hace 18000-15000 años).[10].
Geography
The Cantabrian coastline is straight and elongated, with a steep slope towards the sea, abundant cliffs, few beaches and small estuaries. The deposits are generally made of stone and gravel, the sediments are located within the estuaries or estuaries, at the mouths of rivers or in inlets. The waves in the northwest sector determine the net direction of coastal transport in an easterly direction.[11].
This coastal area maintains enclaves of high ecological value and exceptional landscapes, such as cliffs, dune ridges, flysch formations and marshes.[11] In this sense, El Cachucho stands out, a protected marine area of 235,000 hectares located in front of the Asturian town of Ribadesella and at a distance of 65 km from the coast at longitude 5° W, as well as the Avilés submarine canyon system, a structurally very complex area where the continental shelf of the Cantabrian Sea is deeply modified by the action of compressive tectonics, presenting important geomorphological elements.[12][13] It is in this sector where the maximum depth of the Cantabrian Sea is found, with 4,766 meters in the Carrandi trench.[13][14].
The grain size of the sediments decreases with depth, with medium and fine sands in the shallow waters and silts at greater depths. The finest sediments, such as silt, are located on the continental slope.[1].
The seabed alternates between rock, gravel and mud. During the first kilometers offshore, the continental shelf maintains depths between 200 and 300 m, until reaching the continental slope where it drops to a depth of 4000 m.[1].
Temperature
The Cantabrian sea constitutes a transition sea between the cold seas of the north and the temperate seas of the tropics, which makes it an ecotone for cold-water plant and animal species. The outcrop of deep, cold waters off the Galician coast causes the water temperature to increase as we move towards the East. This surface water temperature presents a marked seasonality, thus during the winter the water temperature can drop to 10 °C, while in summer it reaches approximately 22 °C.[15] These temperatures are unusually high given the geographical region that the Cantabrian Sea occupies, and are due to the warm effects of the Gulf Stream.[15].
In winter, the agitation of the waves means that the temperature gradient as we descend is practically zero and we have to go down to a depth of 1000 m for the temperature to drop to 10 °C. But in summer the relative tranquility of the sea encourages the formation of thermoclines, the surface layer becomes very hot but the heat does not reach the lower layers, producing these sudden changes in temperature. Thus, there is a permanent thermocline at about 200 m depth, almost coinciding with the continental shelf. From 1000 m deep the temperature is 5 °C all year round.[15].
Salinity
The average salinity of the Cantabrian Sea is 35 g/L, although it differs slightly depending on the rainfall regime, the greater or lesser proximity to the coast and the presence of mouths of large rivers.[15] Salinity also varies with depth and experiences a halocline with a significant drop at about 700 m depth.[15].
Tides
The Cantabrian Sea has a significant tidal range, which can reach a maximum of around 5 m, especially during the periods of large tides of September-October and February-March.[16] Two types of tides are experienced: "spring tides" and "neap tides". During the "spring tide" week, low tide occurs in the morning, while high tide occurs in the afternoon. However, in the following week, known as "neap tides" week, these events are reversed. Low tide occurs in the afternoon and high tide in the morning. This cycle is repeated continuously and successively over time.[17].
In the Cantabrian estuaries, tides play a crucial role by inducing fast currents at their mouths, thus promoting the movement of considerable volumes of water. In addition to astronomical tides, the decrease in atmospheric pressure, combined with the influence of wind, can cause the well-known meteorological tides"), which can contribute to coastal flooding.[1].
The tidal range of the northern coast of Spain differs significantly from those that occur in closed seas such as the Mediterranean, which is why tide tables are closely taken into account in the Cantabrian Sea for planning maritime activities.[18].
Winds
During the winter on the Cantabrian coast, northwest and southwest winds predominate, with the former being the one with the greatest impact on navigation due to its impact on maritime currents and its intensity. The Northwest Ocean is the cause of the large coastal storms, and therefore, what makes coastal navigation difficult in winter.[19].
The strong winds, preferably from the northwest, that blow over the Cantabrian Sea have their origin in the low pressures centered over the British Isles and the North Sea in combination with the Azores anticyclone. The distance traveled by the wind and the maintenance of its constant direction and speed cause waves 2 to 3 m high to be generated, which causes quite rough seas. In very particular conditions, more favorable in the months of April-May and September-October, the west winds can reach gale-like magnitudes with waves that exceed 7 m in height.[16].
During spring, winds blow from the North, which in summer acquire a Northeast component. Its low intensity and direction facilitate navigation.[19].
In this general scheme of winds, the one that has a southern component stands out, which has to overcome the Cantabrian mountain range, originating in the descent from the peaks to the coast the phenomenon known as the Foehn effect, which dries out and overheats it extraordinarily.[15] This wind, active both in winter and summer, has a notable impact on coastal navigation and, above all, on approach and docking maneuvers in port.[19].
The frequency of strong winds is much greater in winter and late autumn, although there are times when the dreaded gale occurs in summer, especially in the month of July.[15].
Currents
Generally speaking, in areas with a predominance of west winds, such as the Cantabrian Sea, the water moves slowly in an easterly direction, which is why it has been called the west wind current. More specifically, the currents of the Bay of Biscay are characterized by being derivations of the great current of the West wind in the North Atlantic and, therefore, they tend to be irregular in intensity and direction, depending largely on the prevailing winds. Thus, the most intense currents occur mainly in winter, with a clear component towards the East. In this period, the Iberian Poleward Current (IPC) occurs, a warm and salty current of subtropical origin (which is also called the Christmas Current) or Iberian Poleward Current) that flows from the central Atlantic and penetrates the Cantabrian Sea, running from west to east along the slope of the northern coast of Spain, and then flowing north along the French continental slope.[20].
In the summer months, when the predominance of westerly winds weakens, the surface circulation of Cantabrian waters flows from north to south, from Brittany to the coasts of Aquitaine, and from east to west along the Cantabrian coast to join the general southern circulation in the Cape Finisterre area.[19].
In the Bay of Biscay, the ocean goes from abyssal depths of several thousand meters (up to 2,790 m) to just a few hundred, forcing ocean currents to rise to the surface. When these currents meet waves and winds, extreme marine conditions can be generated.[21].
On the high seas, near the province of La Coruña, the winds are diverted as they are channeled through the Cantabrian mountains. This phenomenon can give rise to vertical waves with gaps between them of more than 6 to 8 meters deep.[22].
Biodiversity
As mentioned, the Cantabrian Sea forms the subtropical/boreal transition zone of the eastern Atlantic, where species typical of southern temperate waters are found along with those of northern origin. As a consequence, there are high biodiversity indices compared to adjacent areas. To this we must add that the topographic complexity and the wide range of substrates on its continental shelf result in many different types of habitat.
The Northeast Atlantic, including this specific region, experiences a seasonal climate cycle that has a profound influence on the pelagic ecosystem. This cycle manifests itself through three key interconnected factors that vary throughout the year: the intensity and duration of solar exposure, heat transfer between the atmosphere and the ocean, and the mechanical stress on the ocean surface generated by winds.[20].
The spring phytoplankton bloom, a crucial event for marine productivity and ocean food webs, typically occurs between March and early April. This phenomenon coincides with the moment when solar radiation reaches optimal levels of intensity and duration to sustain high rates of photosynthesis. This proliferation of primary producers is fundamental for the ecosystem, since it establishes the energetic base for higher trophic levels and has significant implications for marine biogeochemical cycles.[20].
During the summer months, a notable decrease in phytoplankton biomass "Biomass (ecology)") is observed, which reaches minimum levels. This decline is mainly attributed to the depletion of nutrients in the surface layers of the ocean, a result of thermal stratification that inhibits the vertical exchange of water and, therefore, the replenishment of nutrients from the deep layers.[20].
In contrast, the winter period is characterized by conditions that, paradoxically, inhibit phytoplankton growth despite high nutrient availability. Two main factors contribute to this phenomenon: first, the intense vertical mixing of waters caused by strong winter winds, which constantly displaces phytoplankton cells outside the photic zone; and second, the reduced solar irradiance typical of the station, which limits the photosynthetic capacity of phytoplankton.[20].
The Cantabrian Sea is also the spawning area in winter and spring for some species, such as hake, roosterfish, sea bream, mackerel, horse mackerel and anchovy, and the feeding area for others, for example, tuna.[3] These species, together with monkfish and crayfish, are the main components of the catches of the fishing fleet that fishes these waters.[3].
The number of fish species decreases progressively with depth, with coastal waters having greater productivity in contrast to the inverse phenomena that appear in invertebrates, which prefer deeper waters and muddy substrates due to their predominance of detritivorous feeding habits.[3].
Due to its special location, the Avilés submarine canyon system has well-preserved cold-water coral reefs, the only ones described so far on the platform and slope of the Iberian Peninsula. Many species typical of these deep-water coral reefs of the Atlantic live here, being an ecosystem of high biological productivity. Based on the records of strandings and the numerous sightings of cetaceans in the area, it is believed that they look for one of their favorite foods here: the giant squid.[13][14].
Regarding algae, the Cantabrian Sea is home to around 500 species, classified as green, brown and red:[23].
• - Green algae are common in intertidal pools and in exposed rocky areas during low tide. Some species have developed adaptive mechanisms to temporarily survive out of water, such as the production of a mucilaginous substance that helps retain moisture and allows them to withstand desiccation during hours of exposure to air. One of the most common groups of green algae in this region is the uvalas. The most representative species is Ulva lactuca, popularly known as sea lettuce, due to its lamellar, thin and bright green appearance. It is attached to hard substrates by means of a small basal disc, and can grow both in exposed areas and in more protected environments.[24].
• - Brown algae include kelps (Laminaria, Saccorhiza polyschides) forming underwater forests, and fucals (Fucus spp., Himanthalia elongata"), Cystoseira) creating characteristic littoral bands.[23].
• - Red algae present greater identification complexity, with examples such as Corallina officinalis, Gelidium corneum (used for agar), and edible species such as Palmaria palmata and Chondrus crispus, also known as Irish moss.[23].
Colpomenia peregrina"), an invasive species of algae native to the Pacific coast of North America, was first found on the French coast in 1906 in oyster farms.[25].
Fishing industry and aquaculture
The Bay of Biscay has traditionally been an area of intense fishing activity and nearly 5,000 fishing boats operate there.[26] The fisheries that have operated for centuries in the Cantabrian Sea have been especially industrialized since the middle of the century. While in the north of Spain pickling was especially used for the processing and preservation of fish, in the Mediterranean it is salting that had notable roots. At the end of the century, the arrival of Italian salatoris, attracted by the wealth of the Cantabrian Sea, represented a de facto transformation that influenced and conditioned both the development of the manufacturing sector and the extractive sector itself, and even the growth of the different coastal towns where they decided to settle. It was these Italian industrialists who introduced anchovy salting (engraulis encrassicholus) to Spain and taught the Cantabrian population how to make the well-known anchovy fillets in oil.[27].
Trawlers operate on the muddy bottoms of the continental shelf, while longliners work mainly on the bottom of the shelf and gillnets are used in rocky terrain near the coast and shelf. There are also seasonal pelagic fisheries for anchovy (purse seine), mackerel (hand line), trawl, purse seine) and tuna (troll and bait) during their spring and summer migrations.[3]
Fisheries have had a strong impact on seabed communities and have induced changes in their structure. This impact has been mainly direct (mortality from fishing of target species and bycatch) and indirect through habitat modifications due to sediment erosion and damage to the benthos by different elements of fishing gear. Fishing discards, which in 2009 constituted more than 20% of the total catches in the Cantabrian Sea, also have an indirect impact, causing changes in biological interactions.[3] One of the main consequences of fishing pressure on the structure of communities is that it benefits species with high growth rates and wide distribution, while the most specialized ones and those with low development rates are eliminated, resulting in a simplification of the communities. Associated with this comes an increase in dominance values "Dominance (genetics)") and a drop in biodiversity, both of which have been collected in scientific reports on the fish communities of the Cantabrian Sea.[28].
The impact of fishing in the Cantabrian Sea is comparable to that of the most intensely exploited temperate shelf ecosystems in the world. Most of the commercially important continental shelf stocks in the area are or have been fully exploited or overexploited. This has been reflected in a gradual transition in landings of long-lived, high-trophic-level piscivorous groundfish (hake, anglerfish, roosterfish) towards lower-trophic-level planktivorous fish (blue whiting, horse mackerel). According to scientific studies, there has been no further decline since 1993 and it is possible that fisheries reached their lowest historical trophic level limit that year.[29].
Every year scientific campaigns are carried out to estimate the biomass of anchovy in the Cantabrian Sea, a fishery that together with that of the northern albacore (thunnus alalunga) constitutes the main source of income for the inshore fleet of most of the fishing ports on the Cantabrian coast. 1970s. Starting in 1975, there was a relative increase, most likely related to the introduction of technological improvements in fishing, and starting in 1978, a sharp decrease in catches was experienced again, culminating in the historical minimums of 1982 and 1986, of around 5,000 and 8,000 MT respectively. At the beginning of the 1990s there was an important recovery of the species, reaching total catches of 1993.
The low number of new fry, caused by factors such as sea temperature, salinity or currents, together with overfishing for decades, caused the Cantabrian anchovy fishing ground to collapse in 2005, with catches that barely exceeded 200 tons, which forced the European Commission to order a prolonged closure sine die.[31] This fact, which had been warned by scientists for some time, turned out to be be a real disaster for the fishing sector: the inshore fleet was destined to see one of its main fisheries disappear due to the uncertain recovery of the species; and the powerful Cantabrian canning industry was forced to import anchovies from Argentina and the Mediterranean to supply itself.[32] Since that fateful year, the Cantabrian fishing and canning sector has been forced to adapt to sustainability criteria. Five years after the decree completely closing the fishing ground, and after a costly recovery of the species, the ban was ended when a biomass index was found to be 33% higher than that of 2005.[31].
By 2022, the annual scientific evaluation campaign for anchovy estimated for that year a biomass of the adult population of about 230,000 tons, a figure well above the minimum value that guarantees the sustainability of the species (21,000 tons), which confirmed the recovery of the species and the effectiveness of the environmental sustainability management plans of the purse-seine fishing sector.
In 2025, scientific assessments carried out that year indicated a high abundance of the species, with a biomass of juveniles estimated at 544,781 tons. This figure represented a significant increase compared to the 2024 records, when 255,344 tons were recorded, and doubled the historical average. [33] At the same time, since the 1990s there has been an upward trend in zooplankton and specifically copepods, which constitute the food of anchovies, increasing by 2.4% per decade.[34].
At the same time, studies have determined a decrease in the size of anchovy specimens according to scientific data collected in recent decades (1990-2021), which seems to be related to factors such as food availability, selective fishing and fundamentally the increase in water temperature caused by climate change, which accelerates the early growth of specimens but reduces the size of adults.[35].
Regarding alguiculture, on the coasts of the Cantabrian Sea, algae of the genus Gelidium, such as Gelidium corneum and Gelidium spinosum, are highlighted for their abundance and economic relevance. These red algae form extensive meadows on rocky bottoms and are found at depths of up to 20 m. Known locally as "ocle" in Asturias and "caloca" in Cantabria, they have historically been used as fertilizer for pastures. After World War II, these algae gained commercial importance due to their agar. Currently, its exploitation is carried out through various methods of collecting seaweed from the seaweed, capture with nets from boats, manual removal and cutting with scuba diving.[36] Its final destination is the food, medical and pharmaceutical industry, for the extraction of agar-agar, a polysaccharide obtained from the cell wall of this red algae.[37].
Maritime transport
El golfo de Vizcaya, y por ende el mar Cantábrico, se encuentra en la ruta marítima principal de los petroleros que transportan petróleo desde Oriente Medio y África a los puertos de la Unión Europea (UE). Más del 70 % del total de petróleo consumido en la UE se transporta a través del paso de Finisterre "Finisterre (España)") directamente hacia el Canal de la Mancha y luego al destino final en diferentes puertos europeos. Por ello el riesgo de vertidos ha sido siempre importante y ha convertido a esta región en la más afectada por este tipo de accidentes en el mundo, con importantes naufragios desde 1976 y en algunos casos en intervalos de menos de una década, como el del Mar Egeo (1992) "Aegean Sea (petrolero)"), el Erika (1999) "Erika (petrolero)") y el Prestige (2002).[3] El petróleo derramado es degradado por bacterias en un proceso muy lento que puede llevar años. La mayoría de los ecosistemas marinos expuestos a grandes cantidades de petróleo crudo requieren unos tres años para su recuperación. Sin embargo, los ecosistemas marinos contaminados por petróleo refinado, como fue el caso del Prestige, precisan de diez años o más para su recuperación, en especial en los estuarios, como los que caracterizan la costa cantábrica.[38].
Las rutas marítimas Ro-Pax, como las que opera la naviera Britany Ferry, conectan regularmente los puertos de Santander y Bilbao con Irlanda y Reino Unido a través de Rosslare, Portsmouth y Plymouth. Estas rutas atienden el mercado de las islas británicas, que tras el Brexit se han convertido en muchos casos en imprescindibles para transportistas y operadores logísticos.[39].
Main ports on the Cantabrian coast
The ports of the Cantabrian coast play a key role in maritime transport in the European Atlantic Arc, with a prominent participation in logistics, the automotive industry and freight handling. Among the most important are:
• - Port of Bilbao. It is the main logistics and transport hub on the Cantabrian coast and one of the most relevant in the European Atlantic Arc. Traditionally located in the interior of the Bilbao estuary, its growth was limited by the need for constant dredging and widening, preventing the arrival of large tonnage ships. However, the construction of the outer port in the 1980s solved these restrictions, providing the container terminal with a deep draft. "Draft (nautical)") of 32 m, the deepest in Spain, which allows the reception of any type of vessel or cargo.[40] It operates with a wide variety of merchandise.[41][42].
• - Port of La Coruña. Located in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula, the port of La Coruña is the second most important on the Cantabrian coast. It is a port specialized in liquid and solid bulk, with much of its traffic linked to the activity of the Repsol oil refinery in the city. It leads the movement of agri-food bulk and cereals for the production of compound feed, being a strategic node for animal feeding.[41].
• - Port of Gijón. It stands out as the largest Spanish port in solid bulk traffic and the first in freight transport by rail. These characteristics position it as one of the most important ports in the Atlantic Arc, mainly due to the high volume of solid bulk it handles.[41].
• - Port of Santander. It is a natural port located within the bay of the same name, which allows it to operate without the need for large shelter infrastructure. Specialized in general merchandise and in cargo traffic break bulk (fragmented cargo), ro-ro (ro-ro cargo) and con-ro (hybrid between ro-ro and container ships), it stands out for its connection with the automotive industry, serving factories such as Volkswagen in Landaben (Navarra), Mercedes-Benz in Vitoria, and Renault in Palencia and Valladolid.[43][44] It is also relevant in passenger traffic, both on regular ferry lines and on "Cruise (passenger ship)" cruises.[41][45].
Along with these four main ports, the Cantabrian route is complemented by the following:
• - Port of Ferrol (La Coruña). It is specialized in the handling of solid bulk, being especially important for the multinational Alcoa. Its activity depends largely on the aluminum manufacturing plant in San Cibrao.[41].
• - Port of Avilés (Asturias). Located in the estuary of the same name, it is relevant for its traffic of solid bulk, such as scrap metal and zinc concentrate, which are linked to the steel processes of the ArcelorMittal and Asturiana de Zinc plants.[46] In addition, it is an important fishing port.[47].
• - Port of Passages (Guipúzcoa). Located at the mouth of the Oyarzun River, this natural port has access to the sea through a narrow mouth, which limits the size and draft of ships.[41] It specializes in steel and vehicle traffic, serving the automobile factories of Volkswagen in Landaben (Navarra), Mercedes in Vitoria, and General Motors in Figueruelas (Zaragoza).[48][49].
History
Las comunidades humanas del flanco atlántico de la Cornisa Cantábrica han estado históricamente condicionadas por las restricciones de una orografía y un ecosistema que les ha obligado a depender en materia alimentaria, sobre todo cerealística, de espacios foráneos. Los territorios de los que se abastecían han sido históricamente dos, a cada cual más complicado: de un lado, la meseta Norte, a cuyo acceso se interponía la cadena montañosa de la cordillera Cantábrica; y del otro la Galicia atlántica y especialmente el interior de Aquitania, cuyo acceso se encontraba limitado por la travesía de un mar relativamente difícil.[50].
En este sentido el Cantábrico ha sido considerado frecuentemente como un mare tenebrosum, cerrado, peligroso y de difícil tránsito. No obstante, las investigaciones arqueológicas actualmente están cuestionando esta visión.[51] Desde finales del siglo d. C., de sus resguardadas bahías y ensenadas surgieron asentamientos que con el tiempo llegaron a tener gran importancia, como demuestra el surgimiento de la Hermandad de las Cuatro Villas o la de las Marismas, federaciones de puertos que conformaron un poder naval y económico de primer orden en el Arco Atlántico.[52].
The ancient Cantabrian Sea as a resource in the Paleolithic
During the Upper Paleolithic, the human communities that inhabited the coast of the Cantabrian Sea developed a close relationship with the marine environment, ingeniously taking advantage of the resources it offered them. Thus, recent studies have shown that between 20,000 and 14,000 years ago, these populations used the bones of large cetaceans to make tools, especially projectile points and shafts, in a context of very cold and dry climatic conditions, typical of the Last Glacial Maximum and the transition to the Tardiglacier.[53] The sea level during this period was between 100 and 120 meters lower than in the current situation due to the enormous volume of water retained in continental glaciers. This implied that the coastline in the Bay of Biscay was several kilometers further out to sea than the current one, which also means that part of the remains of activity and occupation of these Magdalenian communities remains hidden under the current marine sediments.[53].
Researchers have identified at least five species of whales then present in the Bay of Biscay: the glacial right whale (Eubalaena glacialis), the fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus), the northern whale (B. borealis), the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) and the gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus). These species occasionally stranded on coastlines, possibly due to storms or disease, giving human groups access to large quantities of bone. The variety of species suggests that the Cantabrian Sea was an area rich in biodiversity and seasonally frequented by these large mammals.[53].
The concentration of whalebone tools found in more than twenty Magdalenian sites in the north of the Iberian Peninsula and southwestern France indicates a management and dissemination of technical knowledge about the work of this material. In a glacial environment, with a shortage of wood and other organic resources, the use of cetacean bones reflects a notable capacity to adapt to climatic challenges, consolidating the sea as an essential provider for the survival and cultural development of these coastal communities.[53].
Navigation during the Metal Age
Since ancient times there has been a widespread idea that knowledge about navigation in recent prehistoric Europe was very rudimentary compared to the great Mediterranean commercial civilizations. This image comes from the notion of barbarian Europe facing the civilized East developed by historians contemporary with the Roman conquest. For this reason, it was considered unlikely that Atlantic peoples could carry out deep-sea navigation before the Iron Age.
However, it must be taken into account that in the Atlantic countries land communications were complicated until the arrival of the railway, and that maritime transport was the most common for travel.[54].
For a long time it was believed that the Celts were not a seafaring people, since it was believed that their origin was in the interior of Europe. However, more recent research offers a different view: it suggests that the first Celts could have emerged in the Atlantic regions of Europe. If so, they would have possessed the maritime knowledge necessary to navigate from the south of the Iberian Peninsula to the British Isles. [56].
The works of archaeologists such as Richard Bradley or Jon Henderson lead us to think of Atlantic Europe as a series of promontories that would be in the Atlantic endlands along the coast of the British Isles, France, Spain and Portugal. These would be connected by coastal shipping routes that helped spread the Celtic world.[57] Examining the evidence of settlements, maritime trade and material culture of each area, experts point out areas of similarity fostered by maritime links, and that forged the character and perception that these communities had of themselves.[58][59].
Human settlements of tribes such as Astures, Cantabrians, Autrigones, Caristios and Várdulos arose along the entire coast of the Cantabrian Sea. It is worth highlighting the coastal settlements of maritime forts "Castro (fortification)"), most common in Asturias and Galicia, which took advantage of easily defendable sea promontories and which were configured as true watchtowers over the ocean.[57].
The common cultural sequence during the Iron Age between the castreño culture of the Celtic peoples of the northern peninsula with that of Brittany, southern England or the north of the British Isles (iron metallurgy, the appearance of the oppida, etc.), leads us to deduce the existence of this Atlantic axis of contact and interaction.[59].
The Celts who lived in western Europe had to resort to navigation to communicate and travel by sea to Britain and Ireland. Sailing at sea required different skills and boats than those used on rivers or lakes, so it was necessary to build more stable boats with greater loading capacity, suitable for transporting people and goods, especially metals such as gold and tin.[56].
Authors such as Julius Caesar, Strabo and Avienus mention that the Lusitanians, Galicians and Britons used leather boats called , similar to the Irish currach or the Welsh coracles. This has led some researchers to propose that the indigenous populations of the north of the Iberian Peninsula also used them, mainly for fishing, river navigation or short trips along the coast.[54][60].
Navigation and maritime trade during Roman times
The incorporation of the north and northwest of Hispania into the Roman Empire, after the Cantabrian Wars and the arrival of the Pax Augusta, opened a new economic scenario on the Atlantic coast.[74] However, on the Cantabrian coast, the Romanization process advanced mainly by land, thanks to the construction of roads such as the Via Legione VII Gemina Ad Portum Blendium, rather than by sea route.[75].
This was due to the bad reputation of the Atlantic, considered an extremely virulent and dangerous sea. Despite this, driven by strategic and economic interests, the Romans ventured to navigate these waters, connecting the Bay of Biscay with the North Sea. This audacity transformed the mare Cantabricum during the reign of Augustus into a vital commercial artery of the nascent empire, connecting from Gades to Britain and Germany.
Navigation on the Cantabrian coast offered specific challenges that clearly differentiated it from the Mediterranean:.
• - Adverse weather: Strong winds and frequent storms predominated.
• - Notable tides: In contrast to the Mediterranean, where they are barely noticeable, the Cantabrian tides required synchronized and flexible navigation.
• - Lack of visibility: Cloud cover and fog made it difficult to use techniques based on astronomical observation or terrestrial reference points, as well as the use of rudimentary solar compasses.
Due to these risks, navigation in winter continued to be almost non-existent, declaring mare clausum or closed sea. This term does not indicate that navigation was really prohibited, but rather that it was a practice that was not recommended between the months of November to March, reflecting the paralysis of maritime activity in the winter season or hiems, as opposed to the good summer season or aestas.[19].
To mitigate the dangers, the Romans likely recruited local pilots knowledgeable about the dangers of the coast and the importance of timing with the tides.
The Romans adapted their boats to these harsher conditions of the North Atlantic. The hulls were designed with raised bows and sterns to resist waves and storms, and often had flat bottoms, which facilitated navigation in shallow waters and during low tides, common in Cantabrian estuaries.[76].
Roman ships were not designed for the comfort of passengers. They lacked cabins, although small canvas shelters were occasionally installed. Before setting sail, it was customary to make propitiatory sacrifices in the port temples. On larger ships there could even be an altar on board. If the omens were unfavorable, the departure was postponed; On the other hand, positive signs and favorable weather were interpreted as guarantees for a safe crossing. Travelers, for their part, used to entrust themselves to Mercury "Mercury (mythology)"), protector of roads and safe travels.[76].
Crisis and raids by northern peoples during the Early Middle Ages
With the Roman decline, a turbulent period began with few historiographical sources. Bishop Hydatius points out in his chronicle that around the year an expedition of Heruli attacked Lucus without success and on their return they plundered the coasts of the Cantabrian Sea and Vardulia.[84] On the way to Baética they would try again, plundering the Cantabrian and Atlantic coasts.[84].
During this period, the Cantabrian coast was defenseless against the razzias of the peoples of northern Europe. Although the sea would probably be open to coastal navigation, there is no evidence of the existence of maritime trade or exchanges. It is unknown whether the Roman ports were still active, were abandoned or only served local trade.[85]
Authors such as Sean McGrail consider that the trend in Western Europe was not the existence of ports, which did not become widespread until well into the historical age, but rather that there must have been more informal docking places, for example roadsteads with secluded beaches, with hardly any modifications by the hand of man.[54].
During this period and despite the presence of pirates, the northern Cantabrian coast maintained its dependence on the Aquitaine world. In this sense we know from Gregory of Tours that around the year 580 a Cantabrian named Mauranus undertook a pilgrimage trip to the sanctuary of Martin of Tours "Basilica of Saint Martin of Tours (Tours)"), in France, in demand of healing. For this voyage he embarked on one of the three ships that left for Bordeaux from an unspecified important port in Cantabria.[86].
Until the beginning of the 20th century, the historical evolution of the Cantabrian coastal region can barely be identified with that of the peninsular interior, whose context and transformation followed other paths. During that long period of time, the eastern Cantabrian coast materialized its peculiar historical development, establishing a direct relationship with the Franks, although its dependence would probably be limited to pure taxation as a sign of recognition.[50] In the century the coastal population would become sailors by necessity, although their naval reach was limited. They built their own ships and were mainly dedicated to cabotage, that is, coastal navigation.
It is in this period when the first documented arrival of the Vikings to the Iberian Peninsula through the Cantabrian Sea is recorded in the year 844, the second being in the year 858. reject.[88].
Over the course of 200 years, the Vikings would ravage with greater or lesser intensity a coastal strip that would go from the Cantabrian north to the entire Spanish and Portuguese Atlantic coast. These plundering raids on the Iberian Peninsula would cease in the year 1045 with the defeat of the Lordemanes in the battle of the Torres del Oeste"), in the town of Catoira (Galicia).[89].
Commercial expansion in the late Middle Ages
The centuries of the Early Middle Ages had dismantled the economic and human fabric inherited from Antiquity, and we would have to wait for the century to see a new period of prosperity in Cantabrian societies that would give rise to urban and economic growth through fishing and commercial activity through the sea.[90] Alternatives to trade and fishing were scarce in the central and eastern Cantabrian Sea. The testimonies of the time speak of the surroundings of the ports of the northern peninsula as a poor region, deficient in cereal and with infertile soils, incapable of producing food in sufficient quantities for the population. Therefore, it was key to economic sustenance to risk traveling across the Atlantic to import food through maritime trade or to resort to fishing to satisfy domestic demand and sell surpluses.[91].
With the natural exit to the sea closed through Oporto, via the Duero River, due to the independence of Portugal in 1179, the great Castilian wool region redirected its export through the Cantabrian ports.[92].
It would not be strange if the Cantabrian Sea, as the main sea of Castile, was the place where the incipient Navy of Castile was developed. The influence of neighboring maritime kingdoms drove the need to establish political and commercial relations. These relationships, together with strategic marriage links, meant that, from the beginning of the century, Cantabria showed the first signs of military activity. Thus, the process of formation and development of their navies became evident.[93].
Starting in 1230, when Ferdinand III the Saint definitively united the kingdoms of Castile and León, Castilian naval projection intensified. The reconquest of Seville in 1248 by Cantabrian ships made King Ferdinand III see the need to create a naval force, a task he entrusted to Admiral Ramón Bonifaz. This would be the germ of the Royal Navy of Castile.[93].
Through the Cantabrian Sea, the Castilians began to trade with France, Flanders and England from the end of the century. This trade prospered despite occasional tensions between these countries and the crown of Castile.[93] Trade with northern Europe stimulated mercantile activity along the Cantabrian coast, transforming cities in northern Castile, such as Burgos, into important commercial centers. This also promoted a notable expansion of the Cantabrian navy.
The fame of the Cantabrian towns as shipyards became such that it was necessary to grant them privileges and privileges in everything related to the Navy, high-altitude trade and cabotage.[94] These privileges and freedoms granted by the monarchs through the privileges granted to the port towns, led to a rapid increase in fishing and commercial activity, which provided naval strength. enough to collaborate significantly in the advance of the so-called Reconquista towards the south, being key in the incorporation of the kingdoms of Murcia "Kingdom of Murcia (Crown of Castile)") and Andalusia to Castilla. Boatgirl. They all had their famous guilds of seafarers") limited in each port to the internal regime, fishing operations, cargo, lookouts, mutual aid, etc.[94].
The Race of the Indies and the rise of privateering during the Modern Age
At the end of the century and the beginning of the century, storms in the Atlantic were frequent and of great intensity. It coincides with the beginning of the period called the Little Ice Age and there are numerous testimonies of catastrophes related to storms. The sea had a hostile nature and the loss of human life transcended beyond the maritime sphere, directly threatening the populations of the Cantabrian coastline when storms broke out. The number of deaths at sea each year is not easy to count; the residents of San Vicente de la Barquera claimed that they lost about 100 men between 1515 and 1516, some especially disastrous years in terms of tragedies at sea.[91].
During the first third of the century, corsair activity continued at sea, but despite these attacks, trade with Flanders continued to be very active in these years. The rivalry between the Hanseatic League and the crown of Castile led to frequent seizures of ships by both sides, without prior declaration of war and by virtue of the compensation that each one believed they should receive for the acts of the other. This meant that commercial expeditions were only carried out with strong and numerous fleets as the waters between the Cantabrian ports and the North Seas were increasingly full of pirates or privateers. Things continued in this situation in such a way that no Hansa ship was seen on the Iberian coasts. Such animosity between Hanseatics and Castilians would be settled in 1444, the year in which peace was reached. By then the unification of the Spanish monarchy under the reign of Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile, the establishment of consulates in other nations and above all the great discoveries of the end of the century, gave new directions to trade, causing the irremediable decline of the great Hanseatic League and the end of the reasons for enmities.[115].
With the discovery of America in 1492, the active participation of the men of the Cantabrian region in the great oceanic expansion led by the Hispanic Monarchy, through the ships built on its banks and the men who piloted them, increased relations with communities from other latitudes. This had the virtue of leaving deep marks on the minds of the population of the areas closest to the coast, manifested in a notable capacity for adaptation and an open receptive attitude towards new developments.[116].
The historian José Luis Casado Soto points out that "if from the beginning of the century the Crown of Castile became the dominant maritime power on the European Atlantic coast and, from the end of the 19th century, Spain was a front-line player in the Renaissance oceanic expansion of the old continent, it was thanks to the fact that the most efficient and robust ships of those times were built on the Cantabrian coasts."[117].
Contemporary Age: from traditional fishing to the canning industry and spa tourism
By the middle of the century, on the coasts of the Cantabrian Sea, whaling and cod fishing, which used to be the main fishing activities, had almost completely disappeared. Instead, short-distance inshore fishing became the predominant activity in most ports, and in some, it was the only source of fishing. To organize these activities, the so-called "coastal" activities were used, which consisted of taking advantage of the migratory movements of certain marine species, such as pelagics, which approached the coast in large groups at certain times of the year. You could even fish for bottom species during these coastal ones.[131].
Two coastal fishing activities stood out above the others at that time: sardine fishing in spring and summer, and sea bream fishing in winter. Sardines were caught near the coast using boats called "lanchas traineras", while sea bream fishing was carried out further from the coast with larger boats known as "lanchas besugueras".[131][132].
Fishermen were at the mercy of especially burdensome outcomes. One of the greatest risks was forced conscription by the Navy, to which sailors were exposed due to the registration system in force until 1873. Service campaigns in the Navy lasted between three and four years, which involved long separations from their families and communities. In addition, workplace accidents were high, and numerous shipwrecks occurred in the area each year.[131].
To this day, tragedies that occurred at that time have survived in collective memory, such as the deadly gale on Glory Saturday in 1878 or the explosion of the steamship Cabo Machichaco in 1893, considered the worst civil catastrophe recorded in the contemporary history of Spain.[135] These tragic events continue to be remembered by the communities and have left an indelible mark on the maritime history of the region.
In the first years of the century, the emergence of the so-called steamboat contributed to boosting fisheries in general and, more specifically, purse seine fisheries.[132][136].
After the end of the Great War, the fishing situation in the Cantabrian ports normalized, beginning a time of good anchovy catches that managed to reach fishing volumes unknown until then, which promoted a flood of new warehouses and salting markets throughout the north of the peninsula.[136].
If at the beginning of the century the steam engine would completely change the fishing industry, it would be the introduction of the combustion engine that would represent a disruptive technology in the sector. Derived from its ease of installation in smaller boats as well as its low cost, the internal combustion engine provided a boost to the modest economies of Cantabrian fishermen dedicated to the sardine and anchovy fishery.[136].
The Cantabrian Sea as a theater of naval operations in the 20th century
The Cantabrian Sea, and by extension the Bay of Biscay, played a highly relevant role in the main war conflicts that shook Europe during the first half of the century. These events include the First World War, the Spanish Civil War and the Second World War, where the region became a theater of operations of particular importance.
In that period, a significant technological advance occurred that marked the transition to modern mechanized warfare. This advance was not limited to land, but also extended to the naval field, with the appearance of an innovation that would revolutionize warfare at sea: the submarine. The incorporation of this new ship completely changed the dynamics of conflicts on the seas and it was not going to be any less so in the Cantabrian Sea.
Submarines became a weapon of area denial, meaning they hindered control of the seas and trade routes. These ships were capable of crippling surface traffic and posed a significant threat to the naval supremacy of the warring powers. Their ability to operate stealthily and attack enemy fleets from the depths of the ocean made them a fearsome force.[144].
Despite Spain's neutrality during the First World War, the Cantabrian Sea became a scene of bloody battles, where both conflicting factions fought an intense naval war. One of the most notable innovations of the war was the introduction of the new submarine weapon. Germany, whose surface fleet was insufficient to compete with the Allies (World War I)), adopted an ingenious strategy by employing submarines to attack enemy shipping traffic. Unexpectedly, the Imperial German Navy managed to sink almost 13 million tons of merchant ships, both Allied and neutral, a figure that seemed unimaginable before the conflict.[145]
In July 1914, the outbreak of war generated a massive demand for neutral ships due to the seizure and intervention of the ships of the countries at war by their respective national navies. This situation led to a notable increase in maritime traffic, providing enormous benefits to Spanish shipping companies, especially those located in Vizcaya, which housed most of the merchant fleet.[146].
The unprecedented increase in international traffic between various European ports, such as those in the Mediterranean, Atlantic, North Sea and Baltic, carried significant risks. The British Government, while granting charters to the Atlantic and Mediterranean ports, established demanding conditions. In exchange for allowing transportation, it required neutral ships to provide iron, various minerals, and food supplies. These resources were essential to the British war effort.[146].
In the first months of 1916, several Spanish cargo ships sailing from the Cantabrian Sea to Great Britain were attacked and sunk by German submarines. Despite these attacks, the Spanish government's reactions were limited to diplomatic protests. The Allies, who were engaged in brutal battles on the Western Front (World War I) and increasingly dependent on supplies from Spain and other nations, faced increasing difficulties in ensuring the safe arrival of these supplies due to the presence of German submarines.[145]
Changes and challenges in the last half century
In the last fifty years, the Cantabrian Sea has witnessed changes that have profoundly altered its ecosystem and the relationship between human beings and this marine environment. These transformations range from land use in coastal areas to the exploitation of living resources, reflecting the rapid population growth and socioeconomic development of the region.
In the last century, human settlements on the eastern seaboard have grown exponentially, giving rise to large urban agglomerations with all the challenges that this entails. The rise of tourism has been a determining factor in this process, driving the urbanization of previously virgin coastal areas and increasing pressure on beaches and coasts due to their recreational use. This demographic and economic expansion has generated significant environmental imbalances, putting the delicate ecology of the region in check. Tourism and associated nautical activities have also flourished along the coastline of the Basque Country, Cantabria and Asturias, adding a new dimension to the use of maritime space.[158].
Parallel to these changes on land, the Cantabrian Sea has experienced a considerable increase in maritime traffic. This increase is closely linked to the growth of the global market and policies that favor the transport of goods by sea. The most important ports in the Iberian north - Bilbao, Santander, Gijón and La Coruña - have intensified their exchanges with the large French ports of the Bay of Biscay, such as Nantes/Saint-Nazaire, La Rochelle and Bordeaux, complemented by other regular cargo and passenger routes that connect the region with the British Isles. This increase is not only reflected in the number of vessels, but also in the size and load of the vessels that ply these waters.[159][160].
The main shipping route that connects a large part of the world markets with the European continent crosses the Bay of Biscay, therefore affecting the Cantabrian Sea. The large shipping lines use this maritime corridor, vital for Europe and which connects the Suez Canal with the main ports of northern Europe. The ships that follow this route, where ships crossing the Mediterranean passing through the Strait of Gibraltar meet with those coming from Africa, before reaching the English Channel.[161].
Various studies on maritime transport in the Atlantic arc indicate that the northern coast of Spain has become one of the areas with the highest concentration of fishing vessels, comparable to regions such as the Celtic Sea, the English Channel and the Skagerrak Sea. The Bay of Biscay, in particular, has seen one of the largest increases in vessel density, especially small, slow vessels. This increase in maritime traffic has had significant consequences for the marine ecosystem. Among the most notable impacts are the spread of non-native species, increased noise, chemical and atmospheric pollution, collisions with wildlife, and increased marine litter.[162].
References
[1] ↑ Hay autores que extiende el límite oeste hasta el cabo Finisterre, a 43° N de latitud, con el fin de obtener un análisis más consistente de sus características oceanográficas, geomorfológicas y biológicas.
[2] ↑ Otros investigadores identifican este petroglifo con una embarcación fenicia.[66].
[3] ↑ En ocasiones se cita también como Portus Samanum, topónimo que se ha conservado en el valle próximo de Sámano.
[4] ↑ Siglos después el normando Gerardo de Gales afirmaba que, en su época —el siglo XII d. C.—, las embarcaciones podían viajar desde el sur de Irlanda hasta Galicia en tan solo tres días. Este era el mismo tiempo que se necesitaba para navegar desde el norte de Irlanda hasta Islandia.
[5] ↑ Estrabón, III, 4, 18 y Orosio, VI, 21,11.
[6] ↑ Esta especie de ballena gris (Eubalaena robustus) actualmente solo sobrevive en el norte del Océano Pacífico tras haber desaparecido del océano Atlántico en torno al siglo XVI.
[7] ↑ Los términos anchoa y bocarte se refieren al mismo pez (Engraulis encrasicolus) pero se utilizan en diferentes contextos. El bocarte es el nombre que se le da a este pescado en su estado fresco y no procesado, mientras que la anchoa es el nombre que recibe el bocarte después de haber sido sometido a un proceso de conservación, generalmente mediante la salazón.
[8] ↑ Las sucesivas
[9] ↑ Los bous fueron pesqueros artillados utilizados en acciones de guerra naval en aguas del Cantábrico durante la Guerra Civil. Fueron usados por ambos bandos en el desempeño de funciones, servicios y acciones de guerra diversos. Su falta absoluta de capacidad militar fue compensada por el valor y entusiasmo demostrado por sus respectivas dotaciones. Prestaron servicios en el Cantábrico hasta la caída del frente Norte en octubre de 1937.
[12] ↑ a b c d e f g Le Cann, Bernard; Serpette, Alain (2009-04). «Intense warm and saline upper ocean inflow in the southern Bay of Biscay in autumn–winter 2006–2007». Continental Shelf Research 29 (8): 1014-1025. ISSN 0278-4343. doi:10.1016/j.csr.2008.11.015. Consultado el 26 de septiembre de 2021.: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2008.11.015
[13] ↑ «Limits of Oceans a Seas» (pdf). Special publication n.º 23 (en inglés) (3.ª edición) (Montecarlo: Imp. Monegasque). 1953. Consultado el 30 de septiembre de 2023.: https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/29772/1/IHO1953a.pdf
[18] ↑ Hellín Medina, José (4 de septiembre de 2009). Análisis climatológico del Mar Cantábrico y su influencia en la navegación. Consultado el 26 de septiembre de 2024.: https://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2099.1/7451
[24] ↑ a b c d e f g José., Hellín Medina, (2009). Análisis climatológico del Mar Cantábrico y su influencia en la navegación. OCLC 804271785. Consultado el 18 de septiembre de 2021.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/804271785
[25] ↑ a b Cantabria., Editorial (1985). Gran enciclopedia de Cantabria. Cantabria. ISBN 84-86420-00-8. OCLC 435264243. Consultado el 18 de septiembre de 2021.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/435264243
[27] ↑ José., Hellín Medina, (2009). Análisis climatológico del Mar Cantábrico y su influencia en la navegación. OCLC 804271785. Consultado el 10 de febrero de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/804271785
[28] ↑ a b c d e Iglesias Gil, José Manuel; Muniz Castro, Juan Antonio. Las Comunicaciones en la Cantabria Romana. Ediciones de Librería Estudio. ISBN 84-87412-90-4. OCLC 964093477. Consultado el 18 de septiembre de 2021.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/964093477
[29] ↑ a b c d e Valdés, Luis; Lavín, Alicia (2002). 10 Dynamics and human impact in the bay of biscay:An ecological perspective. Elsevier. pp. 293-320. Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2024. - [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1570-0461(02)80062-3](https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1570-0461(02)80062-3)
[37] ↑ Francisco., Sánchez, (1993). Las comunidades de peces de la plataforma del Cantábrico. Ministerio de agricultura, pesca y alimentación. ISBN 84-491-0020-8. OCLC 853070042. Consultado el 26 de septiembre de 2021.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/853070042
[38] ↑ Sánchez, Francisco; Olaso, Ignacio (2004-03). «Effects of fisheries on the Cantabrian Sea shelf ecosystem». Ecological Modelling 172 (2-4): 151-174. ISSN 0304-3800. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.005. Consultado el 26 de septiembre de 2021.: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.005
[39] ↑ Kepa, Astorkiza, Inmaculada Valle Erkiaga, Ikerne del Astorkiza Ikazuriaga, (1998). La pesquería de la anchoa del Cantábrico: evolución y perspectivas. Gobierno Vasco: Departamento de Hacienda y Administración Pública = Ogasun eta Herri Administrazio Saila. OCLC 808693213. Consultado el 1 de agosto de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/808693213
[44] ↑ Taboada, Fernando G.; Chust, Guillem; Santos Mocoroa, María; Aldanondo, Naroa; Fontán, Almudena; Cotano, Unai; Álvarez, Paula; Erauskin‐Extramiana, Maite et al. (2024-01). «Shrinking body size of European anchovy in the Bay of Biscay». Global Change Biology (en inglés) 30 (1). ISSN 1354-1013. doi:10.1111/gcb.17047. Consultado el 5 de diciembre de 2023. Se sugiere usar |número-autores= (ayuda).: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17047
[51] ↑ España944 871 200, Autoridad Portuaria de Bilbao https://www bilbaoport eus Autoridad Portuaria de Bilbao Autoridad Portuaria de Bilbao Autoridad Portuaria de Bilbao Autoridad Portuaria de Bilbao Muelle de la Ampliación-48980 Santurtzi Bizkaia. «Navegación». Bilbaoport. Consultado el 6 de octubre de 2024.: https://www
[61] ↑ a b Mercapide Compains, Nemesio (1974). Crónica de Guarnizo y su Real Astillero : desde sus orígenes hasta el año 1800. Institución Cultural de Cantabria, Centro de Estudios Montañeses, Diputación Provincial de Santander. ISBN 84-600-6387-9. OCLC 2357369. Consultado el 13 de febrero de 2022.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/2357369
[62] ↑ a b c d McGrath, Krista; van der Sluis, Laura G.; Lefebvre, Alexandre; Charpentier, Anne; Rodrigues, Ana S. L.; Álvarez-Fernández, Esteban; Baleux, François; Berganza, Eduardo et al. (27 de mayo de 2025). «Late Paleolithic whale bone tools reveal human and whale ecology in the Bay of Biscay». Nature Communications (en inglés) 16 (1): 4646. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 12117114. PMID 40425559. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59486-8. Consultado el 29 de mayo de 2025. Se sugiere usar |número-autores= (ayuda).: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-59486-8
[64] ↑ a b c d Camino Mayor, Jorge; Villa Valdés, Ángel (2003). «La bahía de Gijón y las rutas marítimas prerromanas en la costa cantábrica de la Península Ibérica». Gijón, puerto romano : navegación y comercio en el Cantábrico durante la antigüedad: [exposición], 2003, ISBN 84-9785-022-X, págs. 45-59 (Lunwerg): 45-59. ISBN 978-84-9785-022-3. Consultado el 28 de diciembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3636946
[65] ↑ a b c d e f g Alonso Romero, Fernando (2011). «Las embarcaciones prerromanas del área atlántica europea». Anuario brigantino (34): 93-158. ISSN 1130-7625. Consultado el 22 de octubre de 2025.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4017685
[67] ↑ Bradley, Richard (1997). Rock art and the prehistory of Atlantic Europe: signing the land. Routledge. ISBN 0-585-45715-8. OCLC 52701521. Consultado el 27 de noviembre de 2022.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/52701521
[68] ↑ a b Jon., Henderson, (2007). The Atlantic Iron Age: Settlement and Identity in the First Milennium BC.. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-203-93846-1. OCLC 476122517. Consultado el 27 de noviembre de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/476122517
[69] ↑ a b Ruiz-Gálvez Priego, Marisa (1994). La Europa atlántica en la Edad del Bronce: un viaje a las raíces de la Europa occidental (1.º edición). Barcelona: Crítica. p. 390. ISBN 9788474239065.
[70] ↑ Cunliffe, Barry W.; Koch, John T. (2019). Exploring Celtic origins: new ways forward in archaeology, linguistics, and genetics. ISBN 978-1-78925-089-3. OCLC 1128816242. Consultado el 27 de noviembre de 2022.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1128816242
[75] ↑ Fundación Juan March (26 de junio de 2024), Los fenicios (VI): la expansión territorial· La March, consultado el 8 de julio de 2024 .: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw-8wTFMrpc
[76] ↑ Martín, Almagro-Corbea, (1995). La navegación prehistórica y el mundo atlántico. Universidade da Coruña. OCLC 808423127. Consultado el 27 de noviembre de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/808423127
[77] ↑ Martín Ruiz, Juan Antonio (2018). «Mirando hacia Finisterre: el comercio fenicio en la fachada noroccidental de la Península Ibérica». Saitabi: revista de la Facultat de Geografia i Història (68): 187-206. ISSN 0210-9980. Consultado el 28 de diciembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7267473
[78] ↑ Almagro Gorbea, Martín (1995). «La navegación prehistórica y el mundo atlántico». Guerra, exploraciones y navegación : del mundo antiguo a la edad moderna : curso de verano (U.I.M.P., Universidade de A Coruña) : Ferrol, 18 a 21 de julio de 1994, 1995, ISBN 84-88301-13-8, págs. 13-36 (Servizo de Publicacións): 13-36. ISBN 978-84-88301-13-0. Consultado el 28 de diciembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1201516
[79] ↑ S.P, Fon (21 de junio de 2022). [[1](https://astures.es/la-ora-maritima-de-avieno-como-fuente-para-el-estudio-de-los-astures/) «¿La Ora Maritima de Avieno como fuente para el estudio de los astures?»]. Astures, historia y arqueología del noroeste de Hispania. Consultado el 21 de enero de 2024.: https://astures.es/la-ora-maritima-de-avieno-como-fuente-para-el-estudio-de-los-astures/
[84] ↑ Iglesias Gil, José Manuel; Muñiz Castro, Juan Antonio (1990). «Aportaciones al análisis tipográfico y tipológico de la vía Iuliobriga Portus Blendium». Simposio sobre la red viaria en la Hispania romana, 1990, ISBN 84-7820-051-7, págs. 277-292 (Institución "Fernando el Católico"): 277-292. ISBN 978-84-7820-051-1. Consultado el 22 de octubre de 2025.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1396276
[86] ↑ Strabo; García Blanco, J. (1991). Geografía. 1: Libros I-II. Biblioteca Clásica Gredos. Ed. Gredos. ISBN 978-84-249-1473-8. |fechaacceso= requiere |url= (ayuda).
[87] ↑ Bello Diéguez et al., José María (1991). Ciudad y torre: Roma y la Ilustración en La Coruña (1.ª edición). La Coruña: Ayuntamiento de La Coruña. p. 389.
[88] ↑ Barandiarán Maestu, Ignacio (1973). «Notas para el estudio de la romanización de Guipúzcoa». Crónica del XII Congreso Arqueológico Nacional.
[89] ↑ Martin Bueno, M. A.; Rodríguez Salis, Jaime (1975-09). «The anchorage of El Cabo de Higuer (Fuenterrabía, Guipúzcoa)». International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 4 (2): 331-333. ISSN 1057-2414. doi:10.1111/j.1095-9270.1975.tb00921.x. Consultado el 4 de febrero de 2022.: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-9270.1975.tb00921.x
[90] ↑ Ángel, Marcos García, Miguel. Un enfoque crítico sobre los textos antiguos de la Cantabria romana. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca (España). OCLC 703714812. Consultado el 4 de febrero de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/703714812
[91] ↑ Estrabón. (2001). Geografía. Gredos. ISBN 84-249-2297-2. OCLC 1010908679. Consultado el 4 de febrero de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/1010908679
[94] ↑ Javier Arce (2013). Bárbaros y romanos en Hispania: (400-507 A.D.). Marcial Pons Historia. ISBN 9788496467576.
[95] ↑ Joaquín., González Echegaray, (1998). Cantabria en la transición al medievo : los siglos oscuros, IV-IX. Librería Estudio. ISBN 84-87934-63-3. OCLC 432638560. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2021.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/432638560
[96] ↑ Morales Romero, Eduardo (2004). Historia de los vikingos en España: ataques e incursiones contra los reinos cristianos y musulmanes de la Península Ibérica en los siglos IX-XI. Miraguano Ediciones. ISBN 84-7813-270-8. OCLC 56330520. Consultado el 28 de mayo de 2021.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/56330520
[97] ↑ Esparza, José Javier (2009). La gran aventura del Reino de Asturias : así empezó la Reconquista. La esfera de los libros. ISBN 978-84-9734-887-4. OCLC 465205730. Consultado el 28 de mayo de 2021.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/465205730
[99] ↑ Miguel Calleja Puerta (2004). «Los privilegios fundacionales de las villas marítimas del Cantábrico: Una perspectiva diplomática» (pdf). Consultado el 4 de diciembre de 2020.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/1251665.pdf
[100] ↑ a b Valladolid, Añíbarro Rodríguez, Javier Ediciones Universidad de (2016). Peligros marítimos de marineros del norte de la corona de Castilla a finales de la Edad Media. OCLC 1125052232. Consultado el 18 de septiembre de 2021.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/1125052232
[106] ↑ a b Favreau, Robert (1986). «La Rochelle, port français sur l'Atlantique au XIIIe siècle». Actes de la Société des historiens médiévistes de l'enseignement supérieur public 17 (1): 49-76. ISSN 1261-9078. doi:10.3406/shmes.1986.1451. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2021.: https://dx.doi.org/10.3406/shmes.1986.1451
[109] ↑ a b c Ruiz de la Peña Solar, Juan Ignacio (2000). «Las villas castellanas de la costa cantabro-atlántica y su proyección comercial en el Mediterráneo occidental». Revista d'historia medieval (11): 41-66. ISSN 1131-7612. Consultado el 11 de septiembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1171363
[110] ↑ Sánchez Roiz, Ángel (20 de junio de 2018). La Corona de Castilla ante el corso y los ataques marítimos. Resolución de conflictos en el contexto internacional (1350-1500). Consultado el 7 de febrero de 2022.: https://repositorio.unican.es/xmlui/handle/10902/14630
[119] ↑ Parks Canada Agency, Government of Canada (29 de enero de 2024). «Red Bay National Historic Site». parks.canada.ca. Consultado el 30 de octubre de 2024.: https://parks.canada.ca/lhn-nhs/nl/redbay
[124] ↑ (España), Fundación Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes, Editor Fabié, Antonio María, 1832-1899 Real Academia de la Historia (2006-1896). Apuntes para la historia sajona [Recurso electrónico]. Fundación Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes. OCLC 743537933. Consultado el 19 de febrero de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/743537933
[126] ↑ Casado Soto, José Luis (2009). «Nuevo Museo Marítimo del Cantábrico». Museo: Revista de la Asociación Profesional de Museólogos de España (14): 195-220. ISSN 1136-601X. Consultado el 2 de noviembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6930280
[127] ↑ Casado Soto, José Luis (2006). «Barcos para la guerra: soporte de la monarquía hispánica». Cuadernos de Historia Moderna. Anejos (5): 15-53. ISSN 1579-3826. Consultado el 2 de noviembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2165057
[128] ↑ a b Michael, Barkham, (3 de octubre de 2008). La construcción naval vasca en el siglo XVI : la nao de uso múltiple. Eusko Ikaskuntza. OCLC 1138696518. Consultado el 13 de febrero de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/1138696518
[129] ↑ Jáuregui-Lobera, Ignacio (18 de enero de 2020). «Navegación e historia de la ciencia: La vida a bordo: los hombres de la mar en el siglo XVI». Journal of Negative and No Positive Results 5 (3): 347-358. ISSN 2529-850X. doi:10.19230/jonnpr.3433. Consultado el 13 de febrero de 2022.: https://revistas.proeditio.com/jonnpr/article/view/3433
[132] ↑ a b c López Vela, Roberto (2019). El comercio internacional castellano a través del puerto de Laredo en la época de Felipe II. ISBN 978-84-8102-910-9. OCLC 1184757738. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2021.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1184757738
[133] ↑ Grafe, R. (1 de agosto de 2002). «Northern Spain between the Iberian and the Atlantic worlds: Trade and regional specialisation, 1550-1650». European Review of Economic History 6 (2): 269-275. ISSN 1361-4916. doi:10.1017/s1361491602000138. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2021.: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1361491602000138
[135] ↑ Palacio Ramos, Rafael (2000). El ataque del Arzobispo de Burdeos a las villas de Laredo y Santoña en 1639. Baldomero Brígido Gabiola. ISBN 84-699-1988-1. OCLC 1081404863. Consultado el 22 de febrero de 2022.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1081404863
[136] ↑ Isidro Dubert, Hortensio Sobrado Correa, Manuel-Reyes García Hurtado... [et al.] (impr. 2009). «Una caída en desgracia naval: el arzobispo almirante Escoubleau de Sourdis y el fracaso del sitio de Tarragona. 1641». El mar en los siglos modernos = o mar nos séculos modernos. Xunta de Galicia. pp. 87-99. ISBN 978-84-613-0648-0. OCLC 495199445. Consultado el 22 de febrero de 2022.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/495199445
[138] ↑ a b c d Zabala Uriarte, Aingeru (1982). «Acerca de la flota comercial del Cantábrico en el siglo XVIII». Estudis històrics i documents dels arxius de protocols (10): 235-280. Consultado el 23 de julio de 2023.: https://www.raco.cat/index.php/EHDAP/article/download/287917/480791
[140] ↑ a b c Díez Montoya, Eloy; Ansola Fernández, Alberto (1992). «La industria de la pesca en la costa cantábrica. Estudio político-social de la situación del pescador en esta industria (1908)». Norte. Serie Documentación (3): 1-57. ISSN 1130-6912. Consultado el 5 de agosto de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6526771
[141] ↑ a b Escudero Domínguez, Luis Javier (2002). «La mecanización de los barcos pesqueros: lanchas de vapor en la historia de Santoña y primeras referencias en Cantabria». Monte Buciero (8): 31-74. ISSN 1138-9680. Consultado el 9 de agosto de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=496694
[145] ↑ a b c d Escudero Domínguez, Luis Javier (2008). «Del esplendor a la crisis: evolución de la industria de la salazón a través de los fabricantes italianos (1920-1936)». Areas: revista internacional de ciencias sociales (27): 105-115. ISSN 0211-6707. Consultado el 5 de agosto de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2593263
[148] ↑ a b c d e f Escudero Domínguez, Luis Javier (2 de febrero de 2007). Historia de los salazoneros italianos en Cantabria. Editorial de la Universidad de Cantabria. ISBN 978-84-8102-667-2. Consultado el 5 de agosto de 2023.: https://dx.doi.org/10.22429/euc2013.009
[149] ↑ a b c d Beascoechea Gangoiti, José María (2002). «Veraneo y urbanización en la costa cantábrica durante el siglo XIX: las playas del Abra de Bilbao». Historia contemporánea (25): 181-202. ISSN 1130-2402. Consultado el 5 de agosto de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=638428
[150] ↑ Laborde, Pierre (2002). Nacimiento y desarrollo del turismo en Biarritz durante el Segundo Imperio. ISSN 1130-2402. Consultado el 8 de agosto de 2023.: http://addi.ehu.es/handle/10810/37934
[151] ↑ Gil de Arriba, Carmen (1992). Casas para baños de ola y balnearios marítimos en el litoral montañés, 1868-1936. Universidad de Cantabria. ISBN 978-84-87412-91-2. Consultado el 5 de agosto de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=69726
[152] ↑ Reseña de los establecimientos balnearios y baños de mar situados en las provincias del norte de España y Mediodía de Francia. Madrid: Imprenta de M. Minuesa. 1872. p. 111.
[155] ↑ a b c d e f g h i j Jiménez de Aberasturi Corta, Juan Carlos (2006). «La II Guerra Mundial en el golfo de Vizcaya». Itsas memoria: revista de estudios marítimos del País Vasco (5): 517-546. ISSN 1136-4963. Consultado el 19 de noviembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2377000
[159] ↑ a b c d e f g Alpert, Michael (1987). La guerra civil española en el mar. Historia. Siglo veintiuno. ISBN 978-84-323-0609-9. |fechaacceso= requiere |url= (ayuda).
[161] ↑ a b c Gutiérrez de la Cámara Señán, José Manuel (2014). «Importancia de las operaciones navales en el desenlace final de la Guerra Civil. La lucha por el control del Estrecho y el Mediterráneo Occidental». Cuadernos de pensamiento naval: Suplemento de la revista general de marina (16): 5-40. ISSN 1697-2333. Consultado el 15 de octubre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4828977
[162] ↑ a b Cerezo Martínez, Ricardo (1984). «La estrategia naval en la guerra civil española». Revista de historia naval 2 (6): 5-24. ISSN 0212-467X. Consultado el 15 de octubre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2778310
[163] ↑ Preston, Paul (1994). Franco: caudillo de España. Hojas Nuevas. Grijalbo. ISBN 842532498X. |fechaacceso= requiere |url= (ayuda).
[167] ↑ Borja, Angel; Amouroux, David; Anschutz, Pierre; Gómez-Gesteira, Moncho; Uyarra, María C.; Valdés, Luis (1 de enero de 2019). Sheppard, Charles, ed. Chapter 5 - The Bay of Biscay. Academic Press. pp. 113-152. ISBN 978-0-12-805068-2. Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2024.: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780128050682000061
[168] ↑ «Figure 1: The ferry routes travelled between Plymouth—Santander—Portsmouth through the English Channel and Bay of Biscay, and from Penzance—St Mary’s in the Celtic Sea.». dx.doi.org. Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2024.: https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8335/fig-1
[170] ↑ Jalkanen, J.-P. (11 de marzo de 2015). «A comprehensive inventory of ship traffic exhaust emissions in the European sea areas in 2011». dx.doi.org. Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2024.: https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-7459-2015
[171] ↑ Robbins, James R.; Bouchet, Phil J.; Miller, David L.; Evans, Peter G.H.; Waggitt, James; Ford, Alex T.; Marley, Sarah A. (2022-06). «Shipping in the north-east Atlantic: Identifying spatial and temporal patterns of change». Marine Pollution Bulletin 179: 113681. ISSN 0025-326X. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113681. Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2024.: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113681
[172] ↑ «"Fue probablemente el mayor acto de amor colectivo en defensa de la naturaleza": el hundimiento del Prestige, la mayor catástrofe ambiental de la historia de España». BBC News Mundo. Consultado el 25 de septiembre de 2024.: https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-63588107
[173] ↑ a b c Borja, Angel; Amouroux, David; Anschutz, Pierre; Gómez-Gesteira, Moncho; Uyarra, María C.; Valdés, Luis (1 de enero de 2019). Sheppard, Charles, ed. Chapter 5 - The Bay of Biscay. Academic Press. pp. 113-152. ISBN 978-0-12-805068-2. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805068-2.00006-1. Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2024.: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128050682000061
• - La primera se extiende desde la desembocadura del río Bidasoa hasta el cabo Vidio, y se caracteriza por tener una orientación Norte-Sur y ser extremadamente estrecha, con una pendiente poco acusada y afectada por floraciones rocosas a menor escala. A lo largo de la costa cantábrica la plataforma se puede reducir hasta menos de 10 km (8 km frente al cabo de Ajo) ensanchándose hacia el oeste. El talud continental, una zona de transición entre la plataforma y la profundidad del mar, es muy pronunciado con una pendiente de alrededor de 10-12 %, cayendo hasta los 4000 m de profundidad y está cruzado por numerosos cañones.[1].
• - La plataforma en la zona que va desde cabo Vidio hasta la desembocadura del río Miño, es más ancha y uniforme. La anchura máxima, de 80 km, se alcanza frente a La Coruña, mientras que frente a cabo Ortegal se reduce hasta los 30 km.[1].
Al ser un mar muy abierto al océano, tiene características diferentes a otros mares más cerrados. Su fondo marino es desigual: cerca de las costas españolas es más profundo y desciende rápido, mientras que junto a las costas francesas es necesario penetrar muchos kilómetros mar adentro, para encontrar profundidades de más de 1000 m.[9].
El fondo marino se divide en unidades por la presencia de montes y bancos submarinos, así como de profundos cañones submarinos. Entre los cañones más característicos de esta zona destacan los sistemas de Capbreton"), Santander "Santander (España)"), Torrelavega, Llanes, Lastres y Avilés. Algunos de estos desfiladeros son muy pronunciados, como el de Capbreton, donde la cabeza del cañón se encuentra a menos de 200 m de la orilla y el fondo marino desciende 1000 m a menos de 3 km de la costa, alcanzando la zona batial de más de 2000 m y llegando a ser uno de los más profundos del mundo.[1][10] Su elevada pendiente hace que se produzcan avalanchas submarinas, como la generada por la tormenta Martin") el 27 de diciembre de 1999, cuyo depósitos sedimentarios se localizaron a 600 m de profundidad. Es probable que tales aludes submarinos fuesen muy frecuentes durante la última desglaciación pirenaica (hace 18000-15000 años).[10].
Geography
The Cantabrian coastline is straight and elongated, with a steep slope towards the sea, abundant cliffs, few beaches and small estuaries. The deposits are generally made of stone and gravel, the sediments are located within the estuaries or estuaries, at the mouths of rivers or in inlets. The waves in the northwest sector determine the net direction of coastal transport in an easterly direction.[11].
This coastal area maintains enclaves of high ecological value and exceptional landscapes, such as cliffs, dune ridges, flysch formations and marshes.[11] In this sense, El Cachucho stands out, a protected marine area of 235,000 hectares located in front of the Asturian town of Ribadesella and at a distance of 65 km from the coast at longitude 5° W, as well as the Avilés submarine canyon system, a structurally very complex area where the continental shelf of the Cantabrian Sea is deeply modified by the action of compressive tectonics, presenting important geomorphological elements.[12][13] It is in this sector where the maximum depth of the Cantabrian Sea is found, with 4,766 meters in the Carrandi trench.[13][14].
The grain size of the sediments decreases with depth, with medium and fine sands in the shallow waters and silts at greater depths. The finest sediments, such as silt, are located on the continental slope.[1].
The seabed alternates between rock, gravel and mud. During the first kilometers offshore, the continental shelf maintains depths between 200 and 300 m, until reaching the continental slope where it drops to a depth of 4000 m.[1].
Temperature
The Cantabrian sea constitutes a transition sea between the cold seas of the north and the temperate seas of the tropics, which makes it an ecotone for cold-water plant and animal species. The outcrop of deep, cold waters off the Galician coast causes the water temperature to increase as we move towards the East. This surface water temperature presents a marked seasonality, thus during the winter the water temperature can drop to 10 °C, while in summer it reaches approximately 22 °C.[15] These temperatures are unusually high given the geographical region that the Cantabrian Sea occupies, and are due to the warm effects of the Gulf Stream.[15].
In winter, the agitation of the waves means that the temperature gradient as we descend is practically zero and we have to go down to a depth of 1000 m for the temperature to drop to 10 °C. But in summer the relative tranquility of the sea encourages the formation of thermoclines, the surface layer becomes very hot but the heat does not reach the lower layers, producing these sudden changes in temperature. Thus, there is a permanent thermocline at about 200 m depth, almost coinciding with the continental shelf. From 1000 m deep the temperature is 5 °C all year round.[15].
Salinity
The average salinity of the Cantabrian Sea is 35 g/L, although it differs slightly depending on the rainfall regime, the greater or lesser proximity to the coast and the presence of mouths of large rivers.[15] Salinity also varies with depth and experiences a halocline with a significant drop at about 700 m depth.[15].
Tides
The Cantabrian Sea has a significant tidal range, which can reach a maximum of around 5 m, especially during the periods of large tides of September-October and February-March.[16] Two types of tides are experienced: "spring tides" and "neap tides". During the "spring tide" week, low tide occurs in the morning, while high tide occurs in the afternoon. However, in the following week, known as "neap tides" week, these events are reversed. Low tide occurs in the afternoon and high tide in the morning. This cycle is repeated continuously and successively over time.[17].
In the Cantabrian estuaries, tides play a crucial role by inducing fast currents at their mouths, thus promoting the movement of considerable volumes of water. In addition to astronomical tides, the decrease in atmospheric pressure, combined with the influence of wind, can cause the well-known meteorological tides"), which can contribute to coastal flooding.[1].
The tidal range of the northern coast of Spain differs significantly from those that occur in closed seas such as the Mediterranean, which is why tide tables are closely taken into account in the Cantabrian Sea for planning maritime activities.[18].
Winds
During the winter on the Cantabrian coast, northwest and southwest winds predominate, with the former being the one with the greatest impact on navigation due to its impact on maritime currents and its intensity. The Northwest Ocean is the cause of the large coastal storms, and therefore, what makes coastal navigation difficult in winter.[19].
The strong winds, preferably from the northwest, that blow over the Cantabrian Sea have their origin in the low pressures centered over the British Isles and the North Sea in combination with the Azores anticyclone. The distance traveled by the wind and the maintenance of its constant direction and speed cause waves 2 to 3 m high to be generated, which causes quite rough seas. In very particular conditions, more favorable in the months of April-May and September-October, the west winds can reach gale-like magnitudes with waves that exceed 7 m in height.[16].
During spring, winds blow from the North, which in summer acquire a Northeast component. Its low intensity and direction facilitate navigation.[19].
In this general scheme of winds, the one that has a southern component stands out, which has to overcome the Cantabrian mountain range, originating in the descent from the peaks to the coast the phenomenon known as the Foehn effect, which dries out and overheats it extraordinarily.[15] This wind, active both in winter and summer, has a notable impact on coastal navigation and, above all, on approach and docking maneuvers in port.[19].
The frequency of strong winds is much greater in winter and late autumn, although there are times when the dreaded gale occurs in summer, especially in the month of July.[15].
Currents
Generally speaking, in areas with a predominance of west winds, such as the Cantabrian Sea, the water moves slowly in an easterly direction, which is why it has been called the west wind current. More specifically, the currents of the Bay of Biscay are characterized by being derivations of the great current of the West wind in the North Atlantic and, therefore, they tend to be irregular in intensity and direction, depending largely on the prevailing winds. Thus, the most intense currents occur mainly in winter, with a clear component towards the East. In this period, the Iberian Poleward Current (IPC) occurs, a warm and salty current of subtropical origin (which is also called the Christmas Current) or Iberian Poleward Current) that flows from the central Atlantic and penetrates the Cantabrian Sea, running from west to east along the slope of the northern coast of Spain, and then flowing north along the French continental slope.[20].
In the summer months, when the predominance of westerly winds weakens, the surface circulation of Cantabrian waters flows from north to south, from Brittany to the coasts of Aquitaine, and from east to west along the Cantabrian coast to join the general southern circulation in the Cape Finisterre area.[19].
In the Bay of Biscay, the ocean goes from abyssal depths of several thousand meters (up to 2,790 m) to just a few hundred, forcing ocean currents to rise to the surface. When these currents meet waves and winds, extreme marine conditions can be generated.[21].
On the high seas, near the province of La Coruña, the winds are diverted as they are channeled through the Cantabrian mountains. This phenomenon can give rise to vertical waves with gaps between them of more than 6 to 8 meters deep.[22].
Biodiversity
As mentioned, the Cantabrian Sea forms the subtropical/boreal transition zone of the eastern Atlantic, where species typical of southern temperate waters are found along with those of northern origin. As a consequence, there are high biodiversity indices compared to adjacent areas. To this we must add that the topographic complexity and the wide range of substrates on its continental shelf result in many different types of habitat.
The Northeast Atlantic, including this specific region, experiences a seasonal climate cycle that has a profound influence on the pelagic ecosystem. This cycle manifests itself through three key interconnected factors that vary throughout the year: the intensity and duration of solar exposure, heat transfer between the atmosphere and the ocean, and the mechanical stress on the ocean surface generated by winds.[20].
The spring phytoplankton bloom, a crucial event for marine productivity and ocean food webs, typically occurs between March and early April. This phenomenon coincides with the moment when solar radiation reaches optimal levels of intensity and duration to sustain high rates of photosynthesis. This proliferation of primary producers is fundamental for the ecosystem, since it establishes the energetic base for higher trophic levels and has significant implications for marine biogeochemical cycles.[20].
During the summer months, a notable decrease in phytoplankton biomass "Biomass (ecology)") is observed, which reaches minimum levels. This decline is mainly attributed to the depletion of nutrients in the surface layers of the ocean, a result of thermal stratification that inhibits the vertical exchange of water and, therefore, the replenishment of nutrients from the deep layers.[20].
In contrast, the winter period is characterized by conditions that, paradoxically, inhibit phytoplankton growth despite high nutrient availability. Two main factors contribute to this phenomenon: first, the intense vertical mixing of waters caused by strong winter winds, which constantly displaces phytoplankton cells outside the photic zone; and second, the reduced solar irradiance typical of the station, which limits the photosynthetic capacity of phytoplankton.[20].
The Cantabrian Sea is also the spawning area in winter and spring for some species, such as hake, roosterfish, sea bream, mackerel, horse mackerel and anchovy, and the feeding area for others, for example, tuna.[3] These species, together with monkfish and crayfish, are the main components of the catches of the fishing fleet that fishes these waters.[3].
The number of fish species decreases progressively with depth, with coastal waters having greater productivity in contrast to the inverse phenomena that appear in invertebrates, which prefer deeper waters and muddy substrates due to their predominance of detritivorous feeding habits.[3].
Due to its special location, the Avilés submarine canyon system has well-preserved cold-water coral reefs, the only ones described so far on the platform and slope of the Iberian Peninsula. Many species typical of these deep-water coral reefs of the Atlantic live here, being an ecosystem of high biological productivity. Based on the records of strandings and the numerous sightings of cetaceans in the area, it is believed that they look for one of their favorite foods here: the giant squid.[13][14].
Regarding algae, the Cantabrian Sea is home to around 500 species, classified as green, brown and red:[23].
• - Green algae are common in intertidal pools and in exposed rocky areas during low tide. Some species have developed adaptive mechanisms to temporarily survive out of water, such as the production of a mucilaginous substance that helps retain moisture and allows them to withstand desiccation during hours of exposure to air. One of the most common groups of green algae in this region is the uvalas. The most representative species is Ulva lactuca, popularly known as sea lettuce, due to its lamellar, thin and bright green appearance. It is attached to hard substrates by means of a small basal disc, and can grow both in exposed areas and in more protected environments.[24].
• - Brown algae include kelps (Laminaria, Saccorhiza polyschides) forming underwater forests, and fucals (Fucus spp., Himanthalia elongata"), Cystoseira) creating characteristic littoral bands.[23].
• - Red algae present greater identification complexity, with examples such as Corallina officinalis, Gelidium corneum (used for agar), and edible species such as Palmaria palmata and Chondrus crispus, also known as Irish moss.[23].
Colpomenia peregrina"), an invasive species of algae native to the Pacific coast of North America, was first found on the French coast in 1906 in oyster farms.[25].
Fishing industry and aquaculture
The Bay of Biscay has traditionally been an area of intense fishing activity and nearly 5,000 fishing boats operate there.[26] The fisheries that have operated for centuries in the Cantabrian Sea have been especially industrialized since the middle of the century. While in the north of Spain pickling was especially used for the processing and preservation of fish, in the Mediterranean it is salting that had notable roots. At the end of the century, the arrival of Italian salatoris, attracted by the wealth of the Cantabrian Sea, represented a de facto transformation that influenced and conditioned both the development of the manufacturing sector and the extractive sector itself, and even the growth of the different coastal towns where they decided to settle. It was these Italian industrialists who introduced anchovy salting (engraulis encrassicholus) to Spain and taught the Cantabrian population how to make the well-known anchovy fillets in oil.[27].
Trawlers operate on the muddy bottoms of the continental shelf, while longliners work mainly on the bottom of the shelf and gillnets are used in rocky terrain near the coast and shelf. There are also seasonal pelagic fisheries for anchovy (purse seine), mackerel (hand line), trawl, purse seine) and tuna (troll and bait) during their spring and summer migrations.[3]
Fisheries have had a strong impact on seabed communities and have induced changes in their structure. This impact has been mainly direct (mortality from fishing of target species and bycatch) and indirect through habitat modifications due to sediment erosion and damage to the benthos by different elements of fishing gear. Fishing discards, which in 2009 constituted more than 20% of the total catches in the Cantabrian Sea, also have an indirect impact, causing changes in biological interactions.[3] One of the main consequences of fishing pressure on the structure of communities is that it benefits species with high growth rates and wide distribution, while the most specialized ones and those with low development rates are eliminated, resulting in a simplification of the communities. Associated with this comes an increase in dominance values "Dominance (genetics)") and a drop in biodiversity, both of which have been collected in scientific reports on the fish communities of the Cantabrian Sea.[28].
The impact of fishing in the Cantabrian Sea is comparable to that of the most intensely exploited temperate shelf ecosystems in the world. Most of the commercially important continental shelf stocks in the area are or have been fully exploited or overexploited. This has been reflected in a gradual transition in landings of long-lived, high-trophic-level piscivorous groundfish (hake, anglerfish, roosterfish) towards lower-trophic-level planktivorous fish (blue whiting, horse mackerel). According to scientific studies, there has been no further decline since 1993 and it is possible that fisheries reached their lowest historical trophic level limit that year.[29].
Every year scientific campaigns are carried out to estimate the biomass of anchovy in the Cantabrian Sea, a fishery that together with that of the northern albacore (thunnus alalunga) constitutes the main source of income for the inshore fleet of most of the fishing ports on the Cantabrian coast. 1970s. Starting in 1975, there was a relative increase, most likely related to the introduction of technological improvements in fishing, and starting in 1978, a sharp decrease in catches was experienced again, culminating in the historical minimums of 1982 and 1986, of around 5,000 and 8,000 MT respectively. At the beginning of the 1990s there was an important recovery of the species, reaching total catches of 1993.
The low number of new fry, caused by factors such as sea temperature, salinity or currents, together with overfishing for decades, caused the Cantabrian anchovy fishing ground to collapse in 2005, with catches that barely exceeded 200 tons, which forced the European Commission to order a prolonged closure sine die.[31] This fact, which had been warned by scientists for some time, turned out to be be a real disaster for the fishing sector: the inshore fleet was destined to see one of its main fisheries disappear due to the uncertain recovery of the species; and the powerful Cantabrian canning industry was forced to import anchovies from Argentina and the Mediterranean to supply itself.[32] Since that fateful year, the Cantabrian fishing and canning sector has been forced to adapt to sustainability criteria. Five years after the decree completely closing the fishing ground, and after a costly recovery of the species, the ban was ended when a biomass index was found to be 33% higher than that of 2005.[31].
By 2022, the annual scientific evaluation campaign for anchovy estimated for that year a biomass of the adult population of about 230,000 tons, a figure well above the minimum value that guarantees the sustainability of the species (21,000 tons), which confirmed the recovery of the species and the effectiveness of the environmental sustainability management plans of the purse-seine fishing sector.
In 2025, scientific assessments carried out that year indicated a high abundance of the species, with a biomass of juveniles estimated at 544,781 tons. This figure represented a significant increase compared to the 2024 records, when 255,344 tons were recorded, and doubled the historical average. [33] At the same time, since the 1990s there has been an upward trend in zooplankton and specifically copepods, which constitute the food of anchovies, increasing by 2.4% per decade.[34].
At the same time, studies have determined a decrease in the size of anchovy specimens according to scientific data collected in recent decades (1990-2021), which seems to be related to factors such as food availability, selective fishing and fundamentally the increase in water temperature caused by climate change, which accelerates the early growth of specimens but reduces the size of adults.[35].
Regarding alguiculture, on the coasts of the Cantabrian Sea, algae of the genus Gelidium, such as Gelidium corneum and Gelidium spinosum, are highlighted for their abundance and economic relevance. These red algae form extensive meadows on rocky bottoms and are found at depths of up to 20 m. Known locally as "ocle" in Asturias and "caloca" in Cantabria, they have historically been used as fertilizer for pastures. After World War II, these algae gained commercial importance due to their agar. Currently, its exploitation is carried out through various methods of collecting seaweed from the seaweed, capture with nets from boats, manual removal and cutting with scuba diving.[36] Its final destination is the food, medical and pharmaceutical industry, for the extraction of agar-agar, a polysaccharide obtained from the cell wall of this red algae.[37].
Maritime transport
El golfo de Vizcaya, y por ende el mar Cantábrico, se encuentra en la ruta marítima principal de los petroleros que transportan petróleo desde Oriente Medio y África a los puertos de la Unión Europea (UE). Más del 70 % del total de petróleo consumido en la UE se transporta a través del paso de Finisterre "Finisterre (España)") directamente hacia el Canal de la Mancha y luego al destino final en diferentes puertos europeos. Por ello el riesgo de vertidos ha sido siempre importante y ha convertido a esta región en la más afectada por este tipo de accidentes en el mundo, con importantes naufragios desde 1976 y en algunos casos en intervalos de menos de una década, como el del Mar Egeo (1992) "Aegean Sea (petrolero)"), el Erika (1999) "Erika (petrolero)") y el Prestige (2002).[3] El petróleo derramado es degradado por bacterias en un proceso muy lento que puede llevar años. La mayoría de los ecosistemas marinos expuestos a grandes cantidades de petróleo crudo requieren unos tres años para su recuperación. Sin embargo, los ecosistemas marinos contaminados por petróleo refinado, como fue el caso del Prestige, precisan de diez años o más para su recuperación, en especial en los estuarios, como los que caracterizan la costa cantábrica.[38].
Las rutas marítimas Ro-Pax, como las que opera la naviera Britany Ferry, conectan regularmente los puertos de Santander y Bilbao con Irlanda y Reino Unido a través de Rosslare, Portsmouth y Plymouth. Estas rutas atienden el mercado de las islas británicas, que tras el Brexit se han convertido en muchos casos en imprescindibles para transportistas y operadores logísticos.[39].
Main ports on the Cantabrian coast
The ports of the Cantabrian coast play a key role in maritime transport in the European Atlantic Arc, with a prominent participation in logistics, the automotive industry and freight handling. Among the most important are:
• - Port of Bilbao. It is the main logistics and transport hub on the Cantabrian coast and one of the most relevant in the European Atlantic Arc. Traditionally located in the interior of the Bilbao estuary, its growth was limited by the need for constant dredging and widening, preventing the arrival of large tonnage ships. However, the construction of the outer port in the 1980s solved these restrictions, providing the container terminal with a deep draft. "Draft (nautical)") of 32 m, the deepest in Spain, which allows the reception of any type of vessel or cargo.[40] It operates with a wide variety of merchandise.[41][42].
• - Port of La Coruña. Located in the northwest of the Iberian Peninsula, the port of La Coruña is the second most important on the Cantabrian coast. It is a port specialized in liquid and solid bulk, with much of its traffic linked to the activity of the Repsol oil refinery in the city. It leads the movement of agri-food bulk and cereals for the production of compound feed, being a strategic node for animal feeding.[41].
• - Port of Gijón. It stands out as the largest Spanish port in solid bulk traffic and the first in freight transport by rail. These characteristics position it as one of the most important ports in the Atlantic Arc, mainly due to the high volume of solid bulk it handles.[41].
• - Port of Santander. It is a natural port located within the bay of the same name, which allows it to operate without the need for large shelter infrastructure. Specialized in general merchandise and in cargo traffic break bulk (fragmented cargo), ro-ro (ro-ro cargo) and con-ro (hybrid between ro-ro and container ships), it stands out for its connection with the automotive industry, serving factories such as Volkswagen in Landaben (Navarra), Mercedes-Benz in Vitoria, and Renault in Palencia and Valladolid.[43][44] It is also relevant in passenger traffic, both on regular ferry lines and on "Cruise (passenger ship)" cruises.[41][45].
Along with these four main ports, the Cantabrian route is complemented by the following:
• - Port of Ferrol (La Coruña). It is specialized in the handling of solid bulk, being especially important for the multinational Alcoa. Its activity depends largely on the aluminum manufacturing plant in San Cibrao.[41].
• - Port of Avilés (Asturias). Located in the estuary of the same name, it is relevant for its traffic of solid bulk, such as scrap metal and zinc concentrate, which are linked to the steel processes of the ArcelorMittal and Asturiana de Zinc plants.[46] In addition, it is an important fishing port.[47].
• - Port of Passages (Guipúzcoa). Located at the mouth of the Oyarzun River, this natural port has access to the sea through a narrow mouth, which limits the size and draft of ships.[41] It specializes in steel and vehicle traffic, serving the automobile factories of Volkswagen in Landaben (Navarra), Mercedes in Vitoria, and General Motors in Figueruelas (Zaragoza).[48][49].
History
Las comunidades humanas del flanco atlántico de la Cornisa Cantábrica han estado históricamente condicionadas por las restricciones de una orografía y un ecosistema que les ha obligado a depender en materia alimentaria, sobre todo cerealística, de espacios foráneos. Los territorios de los que se abastecían han sido históricamente dos, a cada cual más complicado: de un lado, la meseta Norte, a cuyo acceso se interponía la cadena montañosa de la cordillera Cantábrica; y del otro la Galicia atlántica y especialmente el interior de Aquitania, cuyo acceso se encontraba limitado por la travesía de un mar relativamente difícil.[50].
En este sentido el Cantábrico ha sido considerado frecuentemente como un mare tenebrosum, cerrado, peligroso y de difícil tránsito. No obstante, las investigaciones arqueológicas actualmente están cuestionando esta visión.[51] Desde finales del siglo d. C., de sus resguardadas bahías y ensenadas surgieron asentamientos que con el tiempo llegaron a tener gran importancia, como demuestra el surgimiento de la Hermandad de las Cuatro Villas o la de las Marismas, federaciones de puertos que conformaron un poder naval y económico de primer orden en el Arco Atlántico.[52].
The ancient Cantabrian Sea as a resource in the Paleolithic
During the Upper Paleolithic, the human communities that inhabited the coast of the Cantabrian Sea developed a close relationship with the marine environment, ingeniously taking advantage of the resources it offered them. Thus, recent studies have shown that between 20,000 and 14,000 years ago, these populations used the bones of large cetaceans to make tools, especially projectile points and shafts, in a context of very cold and dry climatic conditions, typical of the Last Glacial Maximum and the transition to the Tardiglacier.[53] The sea level during this period was between 100 and 120 meters lower than in the current situation due to the enormous volume of water retained in continental glaciers. This implied that the coastline in the Bay of Biscay was several kilometers further out to sea than the current one, which also means that part of the remains of activity and occupation of these Magdalenian communities remains hidden under the current marine sediments.[53].
Researchers have identified at least five species of whales then present in the Bay of Biscay: the glacial right whale (Eubalaena glacialis), the fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus), the northern whale (B. borealis), the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) and the gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus). These species occasionally stranded on coastlines, possibly due to storms or disease, giving human groups access to large quantities of bone. The variety of species suggests that the Cantabrian Sea was an area rich in biodiversity and seasonally frequented by these large mammals.[53].
The concentration of whalebone tools found in more than twenty Magdalenian sites in the north of the Iberian Peninsula and southwestern France indicates a management and dissemination of technical knowledge about the work of this material. In a glacial environment, with a shortage of wood and other organic resources, the use of cetacean bones reflects a notable capacity to adapt to climatic challenges, consolidating the sea as an essential provider for the survival and cultural development of these coastal communities.[53].
Navigation during the Metal Age
Since ancient times there has been a widespread idea that knowledge about navigation in recent prehistoric Europe was very rudimentary compared to the great Mediterranean commercial civilizations. This image comes from the notion of barbarian Europe facing the civilized East developed by historians contemporary with the Roman conquest. For this reason, it was considered unlikely that Atlantic peoples could carry out deep-sea navigation before the Iron Age.
However, it must be taken into account that in the Atlantic countries land communications were complicated until the arrival of the railway, and that maritime transport was the most common for travel.[54].
For a long time it was believed that the Celts were not a seafaring people, since it was believed that their origin was in the interior of Europe. However, more recent research offers a different view: it suggests that the first Celts could have emerged in the Atlantic regions of Europe. If so, they would have possessed the maritime knowledge necessary to navigate from the south of the Iberian Peninsula to the British Isles. [56].
The works of archaeologists such as Richard Bradley or Jon Henderson lead us to think of Atlantic Europe as a series of promontories that would be in the Atlantic endlands along the coast of the British Isles, France, Spain and Portugal. These would be connected by coastal shipping routes that helped spread the Celtic world.[57] Examining the evidence of settlements, maritime trade and material culture of each area, experts point out areas of similarity fostered by maritime links, and that forged the character and perception that these communities had of themselves.[58][59].
Human settlements of tribes such as Astures, Cantabrians, Autrigones, Caristios and Várdulos arose along the entire coast of the Cantabrian Sea. It is worth highlighting the coastal settlements of maritime forts "Castro (fortification)"), most common in Asturias and Galicia, which took advantage of easily defendable sea promontories and which were configured as true watchtowers over the ocean.[57].
The common cultural sequence during the Iron Age between the castreño culture of the Celtic peoples of the northern peninsula with that of Brittany, southern England or the north of the British Isles (iron metallurgy, the appearance of the oppida, etc.), leads us to deduce the existence of this Atlantic axis of contact and interaction.[59].
The Celts who lived in western Europe had to resort to navigation to communicate and travel by sea to Britain and Ireland. Sailing at sea required different skills and boats than those used on rivers or lakes, so it was necessary to build more stable boats with greater loading capacity, suitable for transporting people and goods, especially metals such as gold and tin.[56].
Authors such as Julius Caesar, Strabo and Avienus mention that the Lusitanians, Galicians and Britons used leather boats called , similar to the Irish currach or the Welsh coracles. This has led some researchers to propose that the indigenous populations of the north of the Iberian Peninsula also used them, mainly for fishing, river navigation or short trips along the coast.[54][60].
Navigation and maritime trade during Roman times
The incorporation of the north and northwest of Hispania into the Roman Empire, after the Cantabrian Wars and the arrival of the Pax Augusta, opened a new economic scenario on the Atlantic coast.[74] However, on the Cantabrian coast, the Romanization process advanced mainly by land, thanks to the construction of roads such as the Via Legione VII Gemina Ad Portum Blendium, rather than by sea route.[75].
This was due to the bad reputation of the Atlantic, considered an extremely virulent and dangerous sea. Despite this, driven by strategic and economic interests, the Romans ventured to navigate these waters, connecting the Bay of Biscay with the North Sea. This audacity transformed the mare Cantabricum during the reign of Augustus into a vital commercial artery of the nascent empire, connecting from Gades to Britain and Germany.
Navigation on the Cantabrian coast offered specific challenges that clearly differentiated it from the Mediterranean:.
• - Adverse weather: Strong winds and frequent storms predominated.
• - Notable tides: In contrast to the Mediterranean, where they are barely noticeable, the Cantabrian tides required synchronized and flexible navigation.
• - Lack of visibility: Cloud cover and fog made it difficult to use techniques based on astronomical observation or terrestrial reference points, as well as the use of rudimentary solar compasses.
Due to these risks, navigation in winter continued to be almost non-existent, declaring mare clausum or closed sea. This term does not indicate that navigation was really prohibited, but rather that it was a practice that was not recommended between the months of November to March, reflecting the paralysis of maritime activity in the winter season or hiems, as opposed to the good summer season or aestas.[19].
To mitigate the dangers, the Romans likely recruited local pilots knowledgeable about the dangers of the coast and the importance of timing with the tides.
The Romans adapted their boats to these harsher conditions of the North Atlantic. The hulls were designed with raised bows and sterns to resist waves and storms, and often had flat bottoms, which facilitated navigation in shallow waters and during low tides, common in Cantabrian estuaries.[76].
Roman ships were not designed for the comfort of passengers. They lacked cabins, although small canvas shelters were occasionally installed. Before setting sail, it was customary to make propitiatory sacrifices in the port temples. On larger ships there could even be an altar on board. If the omens were unfavorable, the departure was postponed; On the other hand, positive signs and favorable weather were interpreted as guarantees for a safe crossing. Travelers, for their part, used to entrust themselves to Mercury "Mercury (mythology)"), protector of roads and safe travels.[76].
Crisis and raids by northern peoples during the Early Middle Ages
With the Roman decline, a turbulent period began with few historiographical sources. Bishop Hydatius points out in his chronicle that around the year an expedition of Heruli attacked Lucus without success and on their return they plundered the coasts of the Cantabrian Sea and Vardulia.[84] On the way to Baética they would try again, plundering the Cantabrian and Atlantic coasts.[84].
During this period, the Cantabrian coast was defenseless against the razzias of the peoples of northern Europe. Although the sea would probably be open to coastal navigation, there is no evidence of the existence of maritime trade or exchanges. It is unknown whether the Roman ports were still active, were abandoned or only served local trade.[85]
Authors such as Sean McGrail consider that the trend in Western Europe was not the existence of ports, which did not become widespread until well into the historical age, but rather that there must have been more informal docking places, for example roadsteads with secluded beaches, with hardly any modifications by the hand of man.[54].
During this period and despite the presence of pirates, the northern Cantabrian coast maintained its dependence on the Aquitaine world. In this sense we know from Gregory of Tours that around the year 580 a Cantabrian named Mauranus undertook a pilgrimage trip to the sanctuary of Martin of Tours "Basilica of Saint Martin of Tours (Tours)"), in France, in demand of healing. For this voyage he embarked on one of the three ships that left for Bordeaux from an unspecified important port in Cantabria.[86].
Until the beginning of the 20th century, the historical evolution of the Cantabrian coastal region can barely be identified with that of the peninsular interior, whose context and transformation followed other paths. During that long period of time, the eastern Cantabrian coast materialized its peculiar historical development, establishing a direct relationship with the Franks, although its dependence would probably be limited to pure taxation as a sign of recognition.[50] In the century the coastal population would become sailors by necessity, although their naval reach was limited. They built their own ships and were mainly dedicated to cabotage, that is, coastal navigation.
It is in this period when the first documented arrival of the Vikings to the Iberian Peninsula through the Cantabrian Sea is recorded in the year 844, the second being in the year 858. reject.[88].
Over the course of 200 years, the Vikings would ravage with greater or lesser intensity a coastal strip that would go from the Cantabrian north to the entire Spanish and Portuguese Atlantic coast. These plundering raids on the Iberian Peninsula would cease in the year 1045 with the defeat of the Lordemanes in the battle of the Torres del Oeste"), in the town of Catoira (Galicia).[89].
Commercial expansion in the late Middle Ages
The centuries of the Early Middle Ages had dismantled the economic and human fabric inherited from Antiquity, and we would have to wait for the century to see a new period of prosperity in Cantabrian societies that would give rise to urban and economic growth through fishing and commercial activity through the sea.[90] Alternatives to trade and fishing were scarce in the central and eastern Cantabrian Sea. The testimonies of the time speak of the surroundings of the ports of the northern peninsula as a poor region, deficient in cereal and with infertile soils, incapable of producing food in sufficient quantities for the population. Therefore, it was key to economic sustenance to risk traveling across the Atlantic to import food through maritime trade or to resort to fishing to satisfy domestic demand and sell surpluses.[91].
With the natural exit to the sea closed through Oporto, via the Duero River, due to the independence of Portugal in 1179, the great Castilian wool region redirected its export through the Cantabrian ports.[92].
It would not be strange if the Cantabrian Sea, as the main sea of Castile, was the place where the incipient Navy of Castile was developed. The influence of neighboring maritime kingdoms drove the need to establish political and commercial relations. These relationships, together with strategic marriage links, meant that, from the beginning of the century, Cantabria showed the first signs of military activity. Thus, the process of formation and development of their navies became evident.[93].
Starting in 1230, when Ferdinand III the Saint definitively united the kingdoms of Castile and León, Castilian naval projection intensified. The reconquest of Seville in 1248 by Cantabrian ships made King Ferdinand III see the need to create a naval force, a task he entrusted to Admiral Ramón Bonifaz. This would be the germ of the Royal Navy of Castile.[93].
Through the Cantabrian Sea, the Castilians began to trade with France, Flanders and England from the end of the century. This trade prospered despite occasional tensions between these countries and the crown of Castile.[93] Trade with northern Europe stimulated mercantile activity along the Cantabrian coast, transforming cities in northern Castile, such as Burgos, into important commercial centers. This also promoted a notable expansion of the Cantabrian navy.
The fame of the Cantabrian towns as shipyards became such that it was necessary to grant them privileges and privileges in everything related to the Navy, high-altitude trade and cabotage.[94] These privileges and freedoms granted by the monarchs through the privileges granted to the port towns, led to a rapid increase in fishing and commercial activity, which provided naval strength. enough to collaborate significantly in the advance of the so-called Reconquista towards the south, being key in the incorporation of the kingdoms of Murcia "Kingdom of Murcia (Crown of Castile)") and Andalusia to Castilla. Boatgirl. They all had their famous guilds of seafarers") limited in each port to the internal regime, fishing operations, cargo, lookouts, mutual aid, etc.[94].
The Race of the Indies and the rise of privateering during the Modern Age
At the end of the century and the beginning of the century, storms in the Atlantic were frequent and of great intensity. It coincides with the beginning of the period called the Little Ice Age and there are numerous testimonies of catastrophes related to storms. The sea had a hostile nature and the loss of human life transcended beyond the maritime sphere, directly threatening the populations of the Cantabrian coastline when storms broke out. The number of deaths at sea each year is not easy to count; the residents of San Vicente de la Barquera claimed that they lost about 100 men between 1515 and 1516, some especially disastrous years in terms of tragedies at sea.[91].
During the first third of the century, corsair activity continued at sea, but despite these attacks, trade with Flanders continued to be very active in these years. The rivalry between the Hanseatic League and the crown of Castile led to frequent seizures of ships by both sides, without prior declaration of war and by virtue of the compensation that each one believed they should receive for the acts of the other. This meant that commercial expeditions were only carried out with strong and numerous fleets as the waters between the Cantabrian ports and the North Seas were increasingly full of pirates or privateers. Things continued in this situation in such a way that no Hansa ship was seen on the Iberian coasts. Such animosity between Hanseatics and Castilians would be settled in 1444, the year in which peace was reached. By then the unification of the Spanish monarchy under the reign of Ferdinand II of Aragon and Isabella I of Castile, the establishment of consulates in other nations and above all the great discoveries of the end of the century, gave new directions to trade, causing the irremediable decline of the great Hanseatic League and the end of the reasons for enmities.[115].
With the discovery of America in 1492, the active participation of the men of the Cantabrian region in the great oceanic expansion led by the Hispanic Monarchy, through the ships built on its banks and the men who piloted them, increased relations with communities from other latitudes. This had the virtue of leaving deep marks on the minds of the population of the areas closest to the coast, manifested in a notable capacity for adaptation and an open receptive attitude towards new developments.[116].
The historian José Luis Casado Soto points out that "if from the beginning of the century the Crown of Castile became the dominant maritime power on the European Atlantic coast and, from the end of the 19th century, Spain was a front-line player in the Renaissance oceanic expansion of the old continent, it was thanks to the fact that the most efficient and robust ships of those times were built on the Cantabrian coasts."[117].
Contemporary Age: from traditional fishing to the canning industry and spa tourism
By the middle of the century, on the coasts of the Cantabrian Sea, whaling and cod fishing, which used to be the main fishing activities, had almost completely disappeared. Instead, short-distance inshore fishing became the predominant activity in most ports, and in some, it was the only source of fishing. To organize these activities, the so-called "coastal" activities were used, which consisted of taking advantage of the migratory movements of certain marine species, such as pelagics, which approached the coast in large groups at certain times of the year. You could even fish for bottom species during these coastal ones.[131].
Two coastal fishing activities stood out above the others at that time: sardine fishing in spring and summer, and sea bream fishing in winter. Sardines were caught near the coast using boats called "lanchas traineras", while sea bream fishing was carried out further from the coast with larger boats known as "lanchas besugueras".[131][132].
Fishermen were at the mercy of especially burdensome outcomes. One of the greatest risks was forced conscription by the Navy, to which sailors were exposed due to the registration system in force until 1873. Service campaigns in the Navy lasted between three and four years, which involved long separations from their families and communities. In addition, workplace accidents were high, and numerous shipwrecks occurred in the area each year.[131].
To this day, tragedies that occurred at that time have survived in collective memory, such as the deadly gale on Glory Saturday in 1878 or the explosion of the steamship Cabo Machichaco in 1893, considered the worst civil catastrophe recorded in the contemporary history of Spain.[135] These tragic events continue to be remembered by the communities and have left an indelible mark on the maritime history of the region.
In the first years of the century, the emergence of the so-called steamboat contributed to boosting fisheries in general and, more specifically, purse seine fisheries.[132][136].
After the end of the Great War, the fishing situation in the Cantabrian ports normalized, beginning a time of good anchovy catches that managed to reach fishing volumes unknown until then, which promoted a flood of new warehouses and salting markets throughout the north of the peninsula.[136].
If at the beginning of the century the steam engine would completely change the fishing industry, it would be the introduction of the combustion engine that would represent a disruptive technology in the sector. Derived from its ease of installation in smaller boats as well as its low cost, the internal combustion engine provided a boost to the modest economies of Cantabrian fishermen dedicated to the sardine and anchovy fishery.[136].
The Cantabrian Sea as a theater of naval operations in the 20th century
The Cantabrian Sea, and by extension the Bay of Biscay, played a highly relevant role in the main war conflicts that shook Europe during the first half of the century. These events include the First World War, the Spanish Civil War and the Second World War, where the region became a theater of operations of particular importance.
In that period, a significant technological advance occurred that marked the transition to modern mechanized warfare. This advance was not limited to land, but also extended to the naval field, with the appearance of an innovation that would revolutionize warfare at sea: the submarine. The incorporation of this new ship completely changed the dynamics of conflicts on the seas and it was not going to be any less so in the Cantabrian Sea.
Submarines became a weapon of area denial, meaning they hindered control of the seas and trade routes. These ships were capable of crippling surface traffic and posed a significant threat to the naval supremacy of the warring powers. Their ability to operate stealthily and attack enemy fleets from the depths of the ocean made them a fearsome force.[144].
Despite Spain's neutrality during the First World War, the Cantabrian Sea became a scene of bloody battles, where both conflicting factions fought an intense naval war. One of the most notable innovations of the war was the introduction of the new submarine weapon. Germany, whose surface fleet was insufficient to compete with the Allies (World War I)), adopted an ingenious strategy by employing submarines to attack enemy shipping traffic. Unexpectedly, the Imperial German Navy managed to sink almost 13 million tons of merchant ships, both Allied and neutral, a figure that seemed unimaginable before the conflict.[145]
In July 1914, the outbreak of war generated a massive demand for neutral ships due to the seizure and intervention of the ships of the countries at war by their respective national navies. This situation led to a notable increase in maritime traffic, providing enormous benefits to Spanish shipping companies, especially those located in Vizcaya, which housed most of the merchant fleet.[146].
The unprecedented increase in international traffic between various European ports, such as those in the Mediterranean, Atlantic, North Sea and Baltic, carried significant risks. The British Government, while granting charters to the Atlantic and Mediterranean ports, established demanding conditions. In exchange for allowing transportation, it required neutral ships to provide iron, various minerals, and food supplies. These resources were essential to the British war effort.[146].
In the first months of 1916, several Spanish cargo ships sailing from the Cantabrian Sea to Great Britain were attacked and sunk by German submarines. Despite these attacks, the Spanish government's reactions were limited to diplomatic protests. The Allies, who were engaged in brutal battles on the Western Front (World War I) and increasingly dependent on supplies from Spain and other nations, faced increasing difficulties in ensuring the safe arrival of these supplies due to the presence of German submarines.[145]
Changes and challenges in the last half century
In the last fifty years, the Cantabrian Sea has witnessed changes that have profoundly altered its ecosystem and the relationship between human beings and this marine environment. These transformations range from land use in coastal areas to the exploitation of living resources, reflecting the rapid population growth and socioeconomic development of the region.
In the last century, human settlements on the eastern seaboard have grown exponentially, giving rise to large urban agglomerations with all the challenges that this entails. The rise of tourism has been a determining factor in this process, driving the urbanization of previously virgin coastal areas and increasing pressure on beaches and coasts due to their recreational use. This demographic and economic expansion has generated significant environmental imbalances, putting the delicate ecology of the region in check. Tourism and associated nautical activities have also flourished along the coastline of the Basque Country, Cantabria and Asturias, adding a new dimension to the use of maritime space.[158].
Parallel to these changes on land, the Cantabrian Sea has experienced a considerable increase in maritime traffic. This increase is closely linked to the growth of the global market and policies that favor the transport of goods by sea. The most important ports in the Iberian north - Bilbao, Santander, Gijón and La Coruña - have intensified their exchanges with the large French ports of the Bay of Biscay, such as Nantes/Saint-Nazaire, La Rochelle and Bordeaux, complemented by other regular cargo and passenger routes that connect the region with the British Isles. This increase is not only reflected in the number of vessels, but also in the size and load of the vessels that ply these waters.[159][160].
The main shipping route that connects a large part of the world markets with the European continent crosses the Bay of Biscay, therefore affecting the Cantabrian Sea. The large shipping lines use this maritime corridor, vital for Europe and which connects the Suez Canal with the main ports of northern Europe. The ships that follow this route, where ships crossing the Mediterranean passing through the Strait of Gibraltar meet with those coming from Africa, before reaching the English Channel.[161].
Various studies on maritime transport in the Atlantic arc indicate that the northern coast of Spain has become one of the areas with the highest concentration of fishing vessels, comparable to regions such as the Celtic Sea, the English Channel and the Skagerrak Sea. The Bay of Biscay, in particular, has seen one of the largest increases in vessel density, especially small, slow vessels. This increase in maritime traffic has had significant consequences for the marine ecosystem. Among the most notable impacts are the spread of non-native species, increased noise, chemical and atmospheric pollution, collisions with wildlife, and increased marine litter.[162].
References
[1] ↑ Hay autores que extiende el límite oeste hasta el cabo Finisterre, a 43° N de latitud, con el fin de obtener un análisis más consistente de sus características oceanográficas, geomorfológicas y biológicas.
[2] ↑ Otros investigadores identifican este petroglifo con una embarcación fenicia.[66].
[3] ↑ En ocasiones se cita también como Portus Samanum, topónimo que se ha conservado en el valle próximo de Sámano.
[4] ↑ Siglos después el normando Gerardo de Gales afirmaba que, en su época —el siglo XII d. C.—, las embarcaciones podían viajar desde el sur de Irlanda hasta Galicia en tan solo tres días. Este era el mismo tiempo que se necesitaba para navegar desde el norte de Irlanda hasta Islandia.
[5] ↑ Estrabón, III, 4, 18 y Orosio, VI, 21,11.
[6] ↑ Esta especie de ballena gris (Eubalaena robustus) actualmente solo sobrevive en el norte del Océano Pacífico tras haber desaparecido del océano Atlántico en torno al siglo XVI.
[7] ↑ Los términos anchoa y bocarte se refieren al mismo pez (Engraulis encrasicolus) pero se utilizan en diferentes contextos. El bocarte es el nombre que se le da a este pescado en su estado fresco y no procesado, mientras que la anchoa es el nombre que recibe el bocarte después de haber sido sometido a un proceso de conservación, generalmente mediante la salazón.
[8] ↑ Las sucesivas
[9] ↑ Los bous fueron pesqueros artillados utilizados en acciones de guerra naval en aguas del Cantábrico durante la Guerra Civil. Fueron usados por ambos bandos en el desempeño de funciones, servicios y acciones de guerra diversos. Su falta absoluta de capacidad militar fue compensada por el valor y entusiasmo demostrado por sus respectivas dotaciones. Prestaron servicios en el Cantábrico hasta la caída del frente Norte en octubre de 1937.
[12] ↑ a b c d e f g Le Cann, Bernard; Serpette, Alain (2009-04). «Intense warm and saline upper ocean inflow in the southern Bay of Biscay in autumn–winter 2006–2007». Continental Shelf Research 29 (8): 1014-1025. ISSN 0278-4343. doi:10.1016/j.csr.2008.11.015. Consultado el 26 de septiembre de 2021.: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2008.11.015
[13] ↑ «Limits of Oceans a Seas» (pdf). Special publication n.º 23 (en inglés) (3.ª edición) (Montecarlo: Imp. Monegasque). 1953. Consultado el 30 de septiembre de 2023.: https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/29772/1/IHO1953a.pdf
[18] ↑ Hellín Medina, José (4 de septiembre de 2009). Análisis climatológico del Mar Cantábrico y su influencia en la navegación. Consultado el 26 de septiembre de 2024.: https://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2099.1/7451
[24] ↑ a b c d e f g José., Hellín Medina, (2009). Análisis climatológico del Mar Cantábrico y su influencia en la navegación. OCLC 804271785. Consultado el 18 de septiembre de 2021.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/804271785
[25] ↑ a b Cantabria., Editorial (1985). Gran enciclopedia de Cantabria. Cantabria. ISBN 84-86420-00-8. OCLC 435264243. Consultado el 18 de septiembre de 2021.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/435264243
[27] ↑ José., Hellín Medina, (2009). Análisis climatológico del Mar Cantábrico y su influencia en la navegación. OCLC 804271785. Consultado el 10 de febrero de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/804271785
[28] ↑ a b c d e Iglesias Gil, José Manuel; Muniz Castro, Juan Antonio. Las Comunicaciones en la Cantabria Romana. Ediciones de Librería Estudio. ISBN 84-87412-90-4. OCLC 964093477. Consultado el 18 de septiembre de 2021.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/964093477
[29] ↑ a b c d e Valdés, Luis; Lavín, Alicia (2002). 10 Dynamics and human impact in the bay of biscay:An ecological perspective. Elsevier. pp. 293-320. Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2024. - [https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1570-0461(02)80062-3](https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1570-0461(02)80062-3)
[37] ↑ Francisco., Sánchez, (1993). Las comunidades de peces de la plataforma del Cantábrico. Ministerio de agricultura, pesca y alimentación. ISBN 84-491-0020-8. OCLC 853070042. Consultado el 26 de septiembre de 2021.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/853070042
[38] ↑ Sánchez, Francisco; Olaso, Ignacio (2004-03). «Effects of fisheries on the Cantabrian Sea shelf ecosystem». Ecological Modelling 172 (2-4): 151-174. ISSN 0304-3800. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.005. Consultado el 26 de septiembre de 2021.: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.09.005
[39] ↑ Kepa, Astorkiza, Inmaculada Valle Erkiaga, Ikerne del Astorkiza Ikazuriaga, (1998). La pesquería de la anchoa del Cantábrico: evolución y perspectivas. Gobierno Vasco: Departamento de Hacienda y Administración Pública = Ogasun eta Herri Administrazio Saila. OCLC 808693213. Consultado el 1 de agosto de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/808693213
[44] ↑ Taboada, Fernando G.; Chust, Guillem; Santos Mocoroa, María; Aldanondo, Naroa; Fontán, Almudena; Cotano, Unai; Álvarez, Paula; Erauskin‐Extramiana, Maite et al. (2024-01). «Shrinking body size of European anchovy in the Bay of Biscay». Global Change Biology (en inglés) 30 (1). ISSN 1354-1013. doi:10.1111/gcb.17047. Consultado el 5 de diciembre de 2023. Se sugiere usar |número-autores= (ayuda).: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.17047
[51] ↑ España944 871 200, Autoridad Portuaria de Bilbao https://www bilbaoport eus Autoridad Portuaria de Bilbao Autoridad Portuaria de Bilbao Autoridad Portuaria de Bilbao Autoridad Portuaria de Bilbao Muelle de la Ampliación-48980 Santurtzi Bizkaia. «Navegación». Bilbaoport. Consultado el 6 de octubre de 2024.: https://www
[61] ↑ a b Mercapide Compains, Nemesio (1974). Crónica de Guarnizo y su Real Astillero : desde sus orígenes hasta el año 1800. Institución Cultural de Cantabria, Centro de Estudios Montañeses, Diputación Provincial de Santander. ISBN 84-600-6387-9. OCLC 2357369. Consultado el 13 de febrero de 2022.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/2357369
[62] ↑ a b c d McGrath, Krista; van der Sluis, Laura G.; Lefebvre, Alexandre; Charpentier, Anne; Rodrigues, Ana S. L.; Álvarez-Fernández, Esteban; Baleux, François; Berganza, Eduardo et al. (27 de mayo de 2025). «Late Paleolithic whale bone tools reveal human and whale ecology in the Bay of Biscay». Nature Communications (en inglés) 16 (1): 4646. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 12117114. PMID 40425559. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-59486-8. Consultado el 29 de mayo de 2025. Se sugiere usar |número-autores= (ayuda).: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-59486-8
[64] ↑ a b c d Camino Mayor, Jorge; Villa Valdés, Ángel (2003). «La bahía de Gijón y las rutas marítimas prerromanas en la costa cantábrica de la Península Ibérica». Gijón, puerto romano : navegación y comercio en el Cantábrico durante la antigüedad: [exposición], 2003, ISBN 84-9785-022-X, págs. 45-59 (Lunwerg): 45-59. ISBN 978-84-9785-022-3. Consultado el 28 de diciembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3636946
[65] ↑ a b c d e f g Alonso Romero, Fernando (2011). «Las embarcaciones prerromanas del área atlántica europea». Anuario brigantino (34): 93-158. ISSN 1130-7625. Consultado el 22 de octubre de 2025.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4017685
[67] ↑ Bradley, Richard (1997). Rock art and the prehistory of Atlantic Europe: signing the land. Routledge. ISBN 0-585-45715-8. OCLC 52701521. Consultado el 27 de noviembre de 2022.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/52701521
[68] ↑ a b Jon., Henderson, (2007). The Atlantic Iron Age: Settlement and Identity in the First Milennium BC.. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0-203-93846-1. OCLC 476122517. Consultado el 27 de noviembre de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/476122517
[69] ↑ a b Ruiz-Gálvez Priego, Marisa (1994). La Europa atlántica en la Edad del Bronce: un viaje a las raíces de la Europa occidental (1.º edición). Barcelona: Crítica. p. 390. ISBN 9788474239065.
[70] ↑ Cunliffe, Barry W.; Koch, John T. (2019). Exploring Celtic origins: new ways forward in archaeology, linguistics, and genetics. ISBN 978-1-78925-089-3. OCLC 1128816242. Consultado el 27 de noviembre de 2022.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1128816242
[75] ↑ Fundación Juan March (26 de junio de 2024), Los fenicios (VI): la expansión territorial· La March, consultado el 8 de julio de 2024 .: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rw-8wTFMrpc
[76] ↑ Martín, Almagro-Corbea, (1995). La navegación prehistórica y el mundo atlántico. Universidade da Coruña. OCLC 808423127. Consultado el 27 de noviembre de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/808423127
[77] ↑ Martín Ruiz, Juan Antonio (2018). «Mirando hacia Finisterre: el comercio fenicio en la fachada noroccidental de la Península Ibérica». Saitabi: revista de la Facultat de Geografia i Història (68): 187-206. ISSN 0210-9980. Consultado el 28 de diciembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7267473
[78] ↑ Almagro Gorbea, Martín (1995). «La navegación prehistórica y el mundo atlántico». Guerra, exploraciones y navegación : del mundo antiguo a la edad moderna : curso de verano (U.I.M.P., Universidade de A Coruña) : Ferrol, 18 a 21 de julio de 1994, 1995, ISBN 84-88301-13-8, págs. 13-36 (Servizo de Publicacións): 13-36. ISBN 978-84-88301-13-0. Consultado el 28 de diciembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1201516
[79] ↑ S.P, Fon (21 de junio de 2022). [[1](https://astures.es/la-ora-maritima-de-avieno-como-fuente-para-el-estudio-de-los-astures/) «¿La Ora Maritima de Avieno como fuente para el estudio de los astures?»]. Astures, historia y arqueología del noroeste de Hispania. Consultado el 21 de enero de 2024.: https://astures.es/la-ora-maritima-de-avieno-como-fuente-para-el-estudio-de-los-astures/
[84] ↑ Iglesias Gil, José Manuel; Muñiz Castro, Juan Antonio (1990). «Aportaciones al análisis tipográfico y tipológico de la vía Iuliobriga Portus Blendium». Simposio sobre la red viaria en la Hispania romana, 1990, ISBN 84-7820-051-7, págs. 277-292 (Institución "Fernando el Católico"): 277-292. ISBN 978-84-7820-051-1. Consultado el 22 de octubre de 2025.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1396276
[86] ↑ Strabo; García Blanco, J. (1991). Geografía. 1: Libros I-II. Biblioteca Clásica Gredos. Ed. Gredos. ISBN 978-84-249-1473-8. |fechaacceso= requiere |url= (ayuda).
[87] ↑ Bello Diéguez et al., José María (1991). Ciudad y torre: Roma y la Ilustración en La Coruña (1.ª edición). La Coruña: Ayuntamiento de La Coruña. p. 389.
[88] ↑ Barandiarán Maestu, Ignacio (1973). «Notas para el estudio de la romanización de Guipúzcoa». Crónica del XII Congreso Arqueológico Nacional.
[89] ↑ Martin Bueno, M. A.; Rodríguez Salis, Jaime (1975-09). «The anchorage of El Cabo de Higuer (Fuenterrabía, Guipúzcoa)». International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 4 (2): 331-333. ISSN 1057-2414. doi:10.1111/j.1095-9270.1975.tb00921.x. Consultado el 4 de febrero de 2022.: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-9270.1975.tb00921.x
[90] ↑ Ángel, Marcos García, Miguel. Un enfoque crítico sobre los textos antiguos de la Cantabria romana. Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca (España). OCLC 703714812. Consultado el 4 de febrero de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/703714812
[91] ↑ Estrabón. (2001). Geografía. Gredos. ISBN 84-249-2297-2. OCLC 1010908679. Consultado el 4 de febrero de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/1010908679
[94] ↑ Javier Arce (2013). Bárbaros y romanos en Hispania: (400-507 A.D.). Marcial Pons Historia. ISBN 9788496467576.
[95] ↑ Joaquín., González Echegaray, (1998). Cantabria en la transición al medievo : los siglos oscuros, IV-IX. Librería Estudio. ISBN 84-87934-63-3. OCLC 432638560. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2021.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/432638560
[96] ↑ Morales Romero, Eduardo (2004). Historia de los vikingos en España: ataques e incursiones contra los reinos cristianos y musulmanes de la Península Ibérica en los siglos IX-XI. Miraguano Ediciones. ISBN 84-7813-270-8. OCLC 56330520. Consultado el 28 de mayo de 2021.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/56330520
[97] ↑ Esparza, José Javier (2009). La gran aventura del Reino de Asturias : así empezó la Reconquista. La esfera de los libros. ISBN 978-84-9734-887-4. OCLC 465205730. Consultado el 28 de mayo de 2021.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/465205730
[99] ↑ Miguel Calleja Puerta (2004). «Los privilegios fundacionales de las villas marítimas del Cantábrico: Una perspectiva diplomática» (pdf). Consultado el 4 de diciembre de 2020.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/1251665.pdf
[100] ↑ a b Valladolid, Añíbarro Rodríguez, Javier Ediciones Universidad de (2016). Peligros marítimos de marineros del norte de la corona de Castilla a finales de la Edad Media. OCLC 1125052232. Consultado el 18 de septiembre de 2021.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/1125052232
[106] ↑ a b Favreau, Robert (1986). «La Rochelle, port français sur l'Atlantique au XIIIe siècle». Actes de la Société des historiens médiévistes de l'enseignement supérieur public 17 (1): 49-76. ISSN 1261-9078. doi:10.3406/shmes.1986.1451. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2021.: https://dx.doi.org/10.3406/shmes.1986.1451
[109] ↑ a b c Ruiz de la Peña Solar, Juan Ignacio (2000). «Las villas castellanas de la costa cantabro-atlántica y su proyección comercial en el Mediterráneo occidental». Revista d'historia medieval (11): 41-66. ISSN 1131-7612. Consultado el 11 de septiembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1171363
[110] ↑ Sánchez Roiz, Ángel (20 de junio de 2018). La Corona de Castilla ante el corso y los ataques marítimos. Resolución de conflictos en el contexto internacional (1350-1500). Consultado el 7 de febrero de 2022.: https://repositorio.unican.es/xmlui/handle/10902/14630
[119] ↑ Parks Canada Agency, Government of Canada (29 de enero de 2024). «Red Bay National Historic Site». parks.canada.ca. Consultado el 30 de octubre de 2024.: https://parks.canada.ca/lhn-nhs/nl/redbay
[124] ↑ (España), Fundación Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes, Editor Fabié, Antonio María, 1832-1899 Real Academia de la Historia (2006-1896). Apuntes para la historia sajona [Recurso electrónico]. Fundación Biblioteca Virtual Miguel de Cervantes. OCLC 743537933. Consultado el 19 de febrero de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/743537933
[126] ↑ Casado Soto, José Luis (2009). «Nuevo Museo Marítimo del Cantábrico». Museo: Revista de la Asociación Profesional de Museólogos de España (14): 195-220. ISSN 1136-601X. Consultado el 2 de noviembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6930280
[127] ↑ Casado Soto, José Luis (2006). «Barcos para la guerra: soporte de la monarquía hispánica». Cuadernos de Historia Moderna. Anejos (5): 15-53. ISSN 1579-3826. Consultado el 2 de noviembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2165057
[128] ↑ a b Michael, Barkham, (3 de octubre de 2008). La construcción naval vasca en el siglo XVI : la nao de uso múltiple. Eusko Ikaskuntza. OCLC 1138696518. Consultado el 13 de febrero de 2022.: http://worldcat.org/oclc/1138696518
[129] ↑ Jáuregui-Lobera, Ignacio (18 de enero de 2020). «Navegación e historia de la ciencia: La vida a bordo: los hombres de la mar en el siglo XVI». Journal of Negative and No Positive Results 5 (3): 347-358. ISSN 2529-850X. doi:10.19230/jonnpr.3433. Consultado el 13 de febrero de 2022.: https://revistas.proeditio.com/jonnpr/article/view/3433
[132] ↑ a b c López Vela, Roberto (2019). El comercio internacional castellano a través del puerto de Laredo en la época de Felipe II. ISBN 978-84-8102-910-9. OCLC 1184757738. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2021.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1184757738
[133] ↑ Grafe, R. (1 de agosto de 2002). «Northern Spain between the Iberian and the Atlantic worlds: Trade and regional specialisation, 1550-1650». European Review of Economic History 6 (2): 269-275. ISSN 1361-4916. doi:10.1017/s1361491602000138. Consultado el 17 de septiembre de 2021.: https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1361491602000138
[135] ↑ Palacio Ramos, Rafael (2000). El ataque del Arzobispo de Burdeos a las villas de Laredo y Santoña en 1639. Baldomero Brígido Gabiola. ISBN 84-699-1988-1. OCLC 1081404863. Consultado el 22 de febrero de 2022.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/1081404863
[136] ↑ Isidro Dubert, Hortensio Sobrado Correa, Manuel-Reyes García Hurtado... [et al.] (impr. 2009). «Una caída en desgracia naval: el arzobispo almirante Escoubleau de Sourdis y el fracaso del sitio de Tarragona. 1641». El mar en los siglos modernos = o mar nos séculos modernos. Xunta de Galicia. pp. 87-99. ISBN 978-84-613-0648-0. OCLC 495199445. Consultado el 22 de febrero de 2022.: https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/495199445
[138] ↑ a b c d Zabala Uriarte, Aingeru (1982). «Acerca de la flota comercial del Cantábrico en el siglo XVIII». Estudis històrics i documents dels arxius de protocols (10): 235-280. Consultado el 23 de julio de 2023.: https://www.raco.cat/index.php/EHDAP/article/download/287917/480791
[140] ↑ a b c Díez Montoya, Eloy; Ansola Fernández, Alberto (1992). «La industria de la pesca en la costa cantábrica. Estudio político-social de la situación del pescador en esta industria (1908)». Norte. Serie Documentación (3): 1-57. ISSN 1130-6912. Consultado el 5 de agosto de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=6526771
[141] ↑ a b Escudero Domínguez, Luis Javier (2002). «La mecanización de los barcos pesqueros: lanchas de vapor en la historia de Santoña y primeras referencias en Cantabria». Monte Buciero (8): 31-74. ISSN 1138-9680. Consultado el 9 de agosto de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=496694
[145] ↑ a b c d Escudero Domínguez, Luis Javier (2008). «Del esplendor a la crisis: evolución de la industria de la salazón a través de los fabricantes italianos (1920-1936)». Areas: revista internacional de ciencias sociales (27): 105-115. ISSN 0211-6707. Consultado el 5 de agosto de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2593263
[148] ↑ a b c d e f Escudero Domínguez, Luis Javier (2 de febrero de 2007). Historia de los salazoneros italianos en Cantabria. Editorial de la Universidad de Cantabria. ISBN 978-84-8102-667-2. Consultado el 5 de agosto de 2023.: https://dx.doi.org/10.22429/euc2013.009
[149] ↑ a b c d Beascoechea Gangoiti, José María (2002). «Veraneo y urbanización en la costa cantábrica durante el siglo XIX: las playas del Abra de Bilbao». Historia contemporánea (25): 181-202. ISSN 1130-2402. Consultado el 5 de agosto de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=638428
[150] ↑ Laborde, Pierre (2002). Nacimiento y desarrollo del turismo en Biarritz durante el Segundo Imperio. ISSN 1130-2402. Consultado el 8 de agosto de 2023.: http://addi.ehu.es/handle/10810/37934
[151] ↑ Gil de Arriba, Carmen (1992). Casas para baños de ola y balnearios marítimos en el litoral montañés, 1868-1936. Universidad de Cantabria. ISBN 978-84-87412-91-2. Consultado el 5 de agosto de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/libro?codigo=69726
[152] ↑ Reseña de los establecimientos balnearios y baños de mar situados en las provincias del norte de España y Mediodía de Francia. Madrid: Imprenta de M. Minuesa. 1872. p. 111.
[155] ↑ a b c d e f g h i j Jiménez de Aberasturi Corta, Juan Carlos (2006). «La II Guerra Mundial en el golfo de Vizcaya». Itsas memoria: revista de estudios marítimos del País Vasco (5): 517-546. ISSN 1136-4963. Consultado el 19 de noviembre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2377000
[159] ↑ a b c d e f g Alpert, Michael (1987). La guerra civil española en el mar. Historia. Siglo veintiuno. ISBN 978-84-323-0609-9. |fechaacceso= requiere |url= (ayuda).
[161] ↑ a b c Gutiérrez de la Cámara Señán, José Manuel (2014). «Importancia de las operaciones navales en el desenlace final de la Guerra Civil. La lucha por el control del Estrecho y el Mediterráneo Occidental». Cuadernos de pensamiento naval: Suplemento de la revista general de marina (16): 5-40. ISSN 1697-2333. Consultado el 15 de octubre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4828977
[162] ↑ a b Cerezo Martínez, Ricardo (1984). «La estrategia naval en la guerra civil española». Revista de historia naval 2 (6): 5-24. ISSN 0212-467X. Consultado el 15 de octubre de 2023.: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=2778310
[163] ↑ Preston, Paul (1994). Franco: caudillo de España. Hojas Nuevas. Grijalbo. ISBN 842532498X. |fechaacceso= requiere |url= (ayuda).
[167] ↑ Borja, Angel; Amouroux, David; Anschutz, Pierre; Gómez-Gesteira, Moncho; Uyarra, María C.; Valdés, Luis (1 de enero de 2019). Sheppard, Charles, ed. Chapter 5 - The Bay of Biscay. Academic Press. pp. 113-152. ISBN 978-0-12-805068-2. Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2024.: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780128050682000061
[168] ↑ «Figure 1: The ferry routes travelled between Plymouth—Santander—Portsmouth through the English Channel and Bay of Biscay, and from Penzance—St Mary’s in the Celtic Sea.». dx.doi.org. Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2024.: https://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8335/fig-1
[170] ↑ Jalkanen, J.-P. (11 de marzo de 2015). «A comprehensive inventory of ship traffic exhaust emissions in the European sea areas in 2011». dx.doi.org. Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2024.: https://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-7459-2015
[171] ↑ Robbins, James R.; Bouchet, Phil J.; Miller, David L.; Evans, Peter G.H.; Waggitt, James; Ford, Alex T.; Marley, Sarah A. (2022-06). «Shipping in the north-east Atlantic: Identifying spatial and temporal patterns of change». Marine Pollution Bulletin 179: 113681. ISSN 0025-326X. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113681. Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2024.: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113681
[172] ↑ «"Fue probablemente el mayor acto de amor colectivo en defensa de la naturaleza": el hundimiento del Prestige, la mayor catástrofe ambiental de la historia de España». BBC News Mundo. Consultado el 25 de septiembre de 2024.: https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-63588107
[173] ↑ a b c Borja, Angel; Amouroux, David; Anschutz, Pierre; Gómez-Gesteira, Moncho; Uyarra, María C.; Valdés, Luis (1 de enero de 2019). Sheppard, Charles, ed. Chapter 5 - The Bay of Biscay. Academic Press. pp. 113-152. ISBN 978-0-12-805068-2. doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805068-2.00006-1. Consultado el 22 de septiembre de 2024.: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128050682000061
However, there are factors that work against the theory that Bronze Age navigators used leather boats, such as the enormous cost of covering the hull with skins, or the need to make landfalls to let the leather dry and waterproof it again (which seriously limits the distances and duration of the journeys).[54].
There is evidence of monoxillary canoes for river navigation, which makes it logical to think that wooden boats, but with suitable characteristics, were also used for oceanic navigation. Bronze.[57].
New archaeological finds have revealed the connections between the Celtic peoples of the north of the Iberian Peninsula and the Atlantic European world during the first millennium BC. C.[61][57] Research in the field of genetics also demonstrates the existence of maritime contacts beyond the Cantabrian coasts.[62].
The typology of manufacturing and its technological characteristics generate notable similarities along the Cantabrian slope with the regions bordering the Atlantic, from the south of the British Isles to the western façade of the Iberian Peninsula. This phenomenon gives rise to the cultural identity known as Atlantic Bronze"), which replicates, on a certain scale, the commercial circuits observed in the Mediterranean.[55].
Finds such as the Cabárceno cauldron in Cantabria, similar to those found near Battersea (London) or Dublin (Ireland), or the Moñes diadem in Asturias, with representations of Irish and Welsh Celtic mythology, seem to show that maritime trade exchanges existed at least 600 years before the arrival of the Romans between the inhabitants of the northern part of the Peninsula and those of the European Atlantic zone.[55][63].
During the pre-Roman period, the Trasmontana population reached a certain level of development and, faced with the food problem, the solution consisted of coming into contact with the Aquitaine area. In the middle of the century BC. C. the interrelation with said territory seemed to have already reached a certain consistency.[50].
There is evidence of contacts with Mediterranean sailors, probably interested in the gold and tin trade. Petroglyphs such as Borna") (Monte Faro de Domaio, Vigo) or Laxe Auga dos Cebros") (Santa María de Oia "Oia (Pontevedra)"), Pontevedra) seem to document the arrival of these first ships. central and elevated bow and stern.[67].
These commercial expeditions followed the so-called tin route. The Tartessian, Phoenician or Carthaginian ships sailed along the Atlantic coast, going up the Lusitanian coast, doubling the Finis Terrae and, following the Cantabrian and Aquitaine coast, they finally arrived at the Cassiterides (or Oestrímnidas) islands, from where they obtained this precious metal.[55][68][69].
Rufo Festo Avieno, in his Ora maritima, used very ancient sources such as the Massaliota journey. In it, he locates the Cantabrian coast between Cape Venus (probably Cape Higuer) and Cape Aryium (Ortegal). According to the poem, this area was presumably occupied by the pre-Roman people of the Dragans), who inhabited "the snowy north", identified with the Picos de Europa, easily distinguishable in coastal navigation.[70].
During this period navigation would be non-instrumental, based on the observation of natural phenomena such as winds, currents and tides; the movement of stars and planets; or the use of animals for maritime orientation such as birds.[54][71].
Seasonality was crucial. The end of spring and the entire summer season would be the only period suitable for long coastal and deep-sea navigation. During the rest of the year the trips would cover short distances, dedicated mainly to fishing, and never far from the coast.
On the coasts of northwestern Europe, storms of force 7 are eight times more frequent in winter, and the average number of days with rough seas is four times greater than in summer. Therefore, the most prudent thing for the navigators of the Metal Age was to make their trips in summer. It has been estimated that a frame boat could withstand storms of force 5 (fresh breeze of 20 knots), and a leather boat could even handle a storm of grade 6 (22 to 27 knots).[60].
In the time of Julius Caesar, the sea journey from Brittany to northern Galicia usually lasted about three days.[56] The Atlantic ships of that time sailed and used square sails, very similar to those of the Nordic ships of later centuries. This crossing time coincides with what Strabo tells about the Greek navigator Pytheas, who also took three days to go from the Galician coast to Cape Finisterre, in Brittany.[77] In general, navigation was faster from the north of Europe to the south, since in the Cantabrian Sea the north and northwest winds predominate, which favored the course of those ships that only had sails. square.[56][note 4].
Archaeological, epigraphic and numismatic finds have shed light on the port network and communications in the area, which were part of an integrated Atlantic economy.
Archaeological data indicate that the chronological evolution of the Cantabrian ports presents notable similarities. Thus, no data supports their existence during the turbulent period of the Cantabrian Wars and the immediate aftermath.[51] However, there must have been the availability of a port infrastructure capable of hosting the landing of the classis Aquitanica") mentioned by Orosio, probably at a time when land routes were formally non-existent and transport by sea was cheaper and faster.[50][74].
It would not be until the time of Tiberius, from the year 14 to , when the beginning of a confirmed commercial activity can be established.[51] During the period of the Julio-Claudian dynasty (from 27 to ) the growth of enclaves such as Gijón, a Romanized indigenous settlement, and the appearance of others of lesser importance will take place.
However, it was not until the Flavian emperors that the definitive articulation of the Cantabrian ports took place, with the takeoff or consolidation of settlements such as Flavium Brigantium"), Noega, Portus Amanum-Flaviobriga, Oiasso and Portus Victoriae. These were strategic locations chosen either because they were located sheltered from the north and northwest winds, or because they were important connections with Roman roads that gave access inside.[51].
A set of main ports, secondary ports and vicus (coastal settlements) will configure the Cantabrian route as support points for deep-sea navigation and cabotage, intended for the repair of boats and the supply of provisions.[50][78].
Although we do not have enough information to establish a clear hierarchy, it is known that Flavium Brigantium") (La Coruña) and Flaviobriga (Castro Urdiales), which acquired the status of municipium and colony respectively during the Flavian dynasty (from 69 to ) had a higher legal-administrative category. On the other hand, archaeological evidence highlights the importance of Oiasso (Irun) in the region.[74].
During the century AD. C. all the mentioned ports would enjoy their maximum splendor. After the deep imperial crisis of the century, a recovery occurred at the beginning of the century, in which an increase in the import of foreign products was seen.[51].
The Roman presence in the north has gone from being considered marginal to recognizing a much higher level of Romanization. The discoveries support the existence of an Atlantic economic space, autonomous from the control of Rome and the Mediterranean, characterized by free trade.[74].
The intense navigability of this Sinus Aquitanus (Bay of Biscay) appears confirmed by literary sources and archaeological evidence, as a large number of Roman remains and even shipwrecks have been attested, concentrating especially in the area of Fuenterrabía and Cape Higuer.[note 5][79][80].
These data, together with the Cantabrian iron trade and the finds of South Gallic terra sigillata, suggest the possible existence of a maritime trade route that linked the entire Cantabrian Sea with Burdigala (present-day Bordeaux), and from here, a waterway along the Garonne River and the Midi plain, to Narbo Martius (present-day Narbonne) with access to the Mediterranean Sea.[81].
The Aquitaine region would be one of the great granaries of the Roman world. Already during the Cantabrian Wars Strabo points out how the Romans supplied wheat and other provisions from Aquitania.[82] The commercial genesis of the Cantabrian ports would follow an expansion from east to west, taking into account the chronology of materials in Oiasso and Flaviobriga, places near Burdigala.[51].
This interrelation had different consequences:
• - The eastern half (Cantabria and Vasconia) dispensed with developing its own large agrarian system due to its immediacy to the supplying granary of Aquitaine.
• - The western half (Galicia and Asturias), conditioned by distance, was forced to develop on the coast itself a vilaria system of certain importance on which agricultural production fell.
The interrelation was established to such an extent that in imperial times the Sinus Aquitanus functioned as an authentic "Roman lake."[50] According to Pliny in the century BC. C. the Cantabrian Sea had become a transit sea between the North Atlantic and the Mediterranean: ships leaving from Gades and the Pillars of Hercules could sail throughout the West around Hispania and Gaul.[83][56].
Under the reign of Alfonso XI, the navy of Castile became a respectable force. The important naval fleet that emerged in the middle of the century on the coast of the Cantabrian Sea expanded throughout the European Atlantic arc. This expansion continued to grow and consolidate, until it became a dominant power in the Atlantic waters during the following centuries.[96] During this century La Rochelle, the main French port in the Bay of Biscay, was already frequented by ships that made the Atlantic route to England and Flanders.[97].
At this time, powerful confederations of port towns in the Cantabrian Sea emerged, such as the Brotherhood of the Four Towns or the Brotherhood of the Marismas, which formed a first-rate maritime power at the service of the Crown of Castile, maintaining autonomy in their international commercial relations.[52] The ports of the Brotherhood became important centers of maritime trade or naval arsenals, being a fundamental piece of the kingdom's economy. Slowly at its beginnings at the end of the century and at greater speed since the end of the century, a trade route was created with great effort that in a transversal direction linked the Cantabrian ports with those of the North Sea.[97].
From Cantabrian ports, regular routes were opened to Mediterranean and North Sea ports, and the high-water fisheries were visited on an annual basis in the Gran Sol fishing ground (in the Northeast Atlantic) or the Canary Islands, where ships ventured to capture economically advantageous pelagic species.[98].
Over the centuries, the small Cantabrian gauged ports continued to affirm their presence in the maritime arc that spanned from the western Mediterranean to the North Sea. Already in 1304, the Florentine chronicler Giovanni Villani evidenced the important change in maritime trade in the Western Middle Ages and one of the great events of the maritime life of the Tyrrhenian era: the union of the two key commercial areas, the Atlantic and the Mediterranean.[99][100].
The end of the Middle Ages began to notice a timid but growing presence of ships from the Castilian coastal ports of the Cantabrian-Atlantic coast that ventured into the Mediterranean. They followed the opposite path that the Genoese and Mallorcans had already been preparing a few years before with their activities in northern Europe.[100].
This change in maritime trade had a profound impact on the economy and commercial relations of the time and would not have been possible without the long process of creation and consolidation of a coastal urban network in the Cantabrian Sea. The population of these towns found in their nautical vocation the basis of their rapid economic prosperity and the active participation of their vessels in European commercial circuits, first in the Atlantic area and later, during the 19th century, expanding towards the western Mediterranean.[100] The main Cantabrian ports would confirm a maritime power with a hegemonic aspect, capable of acting as an arbiter between the other maritime nations during the Hundred Years' War and stopping conflicts. expansive pretensions of an entity as powerful as the Hanseatic League.[98].
Throughout the Middle Ages, commercial traffic between the ports of the Celtic Sea was frequently interrupted by wars and conflicts, sometimes only maintained between certain towns or cities, and which nourished and increased the corsair traditions of the local seafaring populations. Castellanos and French on one side and English on the other fought in a give and take that conditioned maritime traffic in the English Channel and the Bay of Biscay, claiming numerous ships from both sides. On the Castilian side, it is worth highlighting the sackings of Walsingham, Isle of Wight, Dover "Dover (Kent)"), Rye "Rye (Eastern Sussex)"), Portsmouth, Plymouth and the taking of Roche-Guyon in the Seine estuary. In 1380, a Castilian fleet under the command of Fernando Sánchez de Tovar sailed up the River Thames, daring to disembark in Gravesend, a few kilometers from London. On the English side, the corsair Arripaye") transported pilgrims with license to Santiago de Compostela and on the return voyage he filled the holds, plundering the coasts of Castile and France, even burning Gijón and sacking Finisterre "Finisterre (Spain)").[92][102] In response in the year 1405, Pero Niño captained a combined Castilian and French fleet that completely destroyed Poole, home port of the English privateer. In his particular revenge, the Englishman led a fleet of 15 ships through the English Channel in 1407, capturing numerous Castilian and French cargo ships.[103]
The important fleets necessary to sustain all this maritime activity were designed to navigate the difficult waters of the European Atlantic coast. This gave rise to a shipyard activity along the bays and inlets of the Cantabrian coast in which the traditional construction techniques of medieval sailing ships were refined, incorporating new technologies that would allow high-altitude voyages to be carried out and achieve the Renaissance geographical expansion of later centuries. All this in addition to the hand of a school of skilled sailors and pilots born in the aforementioned towns and hardened in the complicated Atlantic waters.[98].
This naval power remained with certain ups and downs during the century, laying the necessary foundations, in terms of sailors, ships and nautical knowledge, to achieve the feat of Discovery.[104].
Fishing became a fundamental economic activity for the communities dependent on the Cantabrian Sea, especially the capture of whales, which are now extinct in the region. During the Late Middle Ages, whaling began in these waters. Normally the abadengo places in the Cantabrian Sea were the ones that had rights over these fisheries, almost always reserving a part of the animal.[105] Thus, right whale hunting became widespread among the ports of the Basque Country, Cantabria, Asturias and Galicia, whose activity marked the customs and personality of many of these populations over the centuries. The French geographer André Thevet alludes to the flourishing whaling industry in the Bay of Biscay in the century :[106].
The right whale moves in shallow waters near the coast, approaching bays and inlets, which favored its hunting and exploitation. In the eastern Atlantic this species migrated in winter to waters located between the Azores and Madeira archipelagos, the Bay of Biscay and the coasts of Western Sahara. In summer they moved to the seas between Iceland, Svalbard and the coasts of Norway.[107].
The first documentary record of whale hunting in the Cantabrian Sea comes from the French Basque Country (Bayonne "Bayonne (France)") and corresponds to the year 1059, followed by one from Santoña, dated 1190 and another from Motrico from 1200.[107][108] In Asturias the first known document is dated 1232 and in Galicia the first mention whaling dates back to the year 1371.[107] Although there is archaeological evidence of the use of bone remains of the gray whale species in pre-Roman times in the fort "Castro (fortification)") of Campa Torres (Gijón) in the century BC. C. or a. C., it cannot be assured that they were actively hunted or rather that their use came from occasional strandings, so whaling on the Cantabrian coasts during the Ancient Age is not proven.[note 6]
[107]
[109].
From the whale, saín or blubber was mainly obtained, intended for lighting, and baleen, a material appreciated for its flexibility, products that, because they were not perishable, could be transported to the interior of the Iberian Peninsula at a time when, as already mentioned, the routes through the Cantabrian Mountains were complicated. The meat was barely consumed in Spain and was exported to the French Basque Country preserved in brine.[107].
Historians place the peak of whaling in the Cantabrian Sea between the 19th and 18th centuries.[107] During the early times, the different coastal populations built watchtowers "Watchtower (construction)") from which they could monitor the sea and watch the whales' snorts during the breeding season, between October and March.[111]
Hunting was carried out from pinnaces "Pinaza (ship's boat)") or longboats with about eight components, including rowers, harpooner and helmsman. After being harpooned, the whale fled by diving into the depths of the sea, dragging the fragile boat to which it was attached by a rope, in a dangerous haul that had something epic about it. Once dead, the cetacean was towed to the boat's port of origin, where it was stranded on the beach and cut up.[111]
[112].
As time went by, whale capture became increasingly widespread, as demonstrated by the importance of transatlantic fisheries to Newfoundland. Around the year 1520, Basque whalers established themselves in the Labrador Peninsula (Canada) to hunt whales.[113]
Specialists from these centuries maintain that the trips and inshore fisheries in the Cantabrian Sea, along with those carried out in Ireland and England, served in a certain way as preparation and training for the later transatlantic voyages to the coasts of Newfoundland.[114].
The right whale was hunted in the Cantabrian Sea for at least eight centuries until its extinction. Currently it has almost disappeared from the eastern Atlantic where it can be seen only sporadically, now concentrating its forces on the North American coast.[111].
In the Cantabrian Coast, three subregions were worth highlighting in the production of ships. The Galician subregion focused on fishing associated with its rich fisheries, the Asturian coast faced important geographical challenges, and finally there was the easternmost area, made up of the provinces of Cantabria (then called Cuatro Villas de la Costa de la Mar), the lordship of Vizcaya and the province of Guipúzcoa. This last area was the most productive in the construction of ships, which contributed to the economic development of the region.[118].
The demand for ships derived from the Race of the Indies caused the number of ships built along the Cantabrian coast to increase since 1505, from Fuenterrabía to Santander "Santander (Spain)"). On the other hand, the caravel, weighing 60 to 80 tons and whose origin lies in small fishing boats on the coast of Galicia, Portugal and Atlantic Andalusia, began to be built in the Cantabrian Sea in the middle of the century. Merchant galleons would be the vessels with the greatest tonnage during these centuries and with the passage of time referred to those built expressly for war under the protection of the Spanish Crown.[119][120].
If previously the largest ships were built on the Mediterranean coast, in the century there was a shift of these activities to the Atlantic, especially to the shipyards of Cantabria, Vizcaya and Cádiz, and later to Ferrol, while the Mediterranean shipyards were left for smaller vessels.[121].
On the Cantabrian coasts, the abundant oak trees and their iron veins led to the construction of many of the best ships of the time. Important shipyards such as Pasajes, Zumaya, Zorroza, Deusto, Colindres or Guarnizo took advantage of the enormous reserves of nearby forests to build these boats. The construction work involved many "river carpenters and caulkers", repositories of knowledge inherited from a long tradition that dated back to the Middle Ages.[122].
The shipyards on the banks of the Cantabrian Sea had extensive infrastructure. They had banks to keep the wood moist; sheds and warehouses to store materials; forges and workshops; staff accommodations; slipways, scaffolding and other wooden structures necessary for the assembly of the boats. There were also docks and auxiliary boats. Around all of them there was also an important auxiliary industry of elements and components necessary for the finishing of the ships, which were manufactured in the shipyard itself. Sails "Vela (nautical)"), ropes "Cape (nautical)"), cooperage, motorboat, oars, pitch and resin, used in caulking"), were also obtained elsewhere. Even large pines, essential for the rigging "Rigging (nautical)"), were brought from places as far away as the North Sea or the Baltic.[122].
The large iron ore resources existing in the eastern area of the Cantabrian Coast favored the establishment, since Antiquity, of numerous forges and forges "Fragua (workshop)"), some of which specialized over time in the manufacture of nails "Nail (object)"), anchors, weapons and other accessories.[122] Added to this were important manufacturing facilities such as the Royal Artillery Factory of La Cavada, whose blast furnaces supplied the cannons necessary to gun all these ships.
Between the centuries and hundreds of ships would be built in the Cantabrian shipyards that the Crown and private shipowners used for war and oceanic trade.[122] The importance would become such that during the century the kings issued pragmatic paths "Pragmatic (law)") prohibiting any ship that had not been built in the Cantabrian from participating in the Race of the Indies.[98].
The Cantabrian ports played a key role in this booming Castilian commercial activity, especially from the 16th century onwards. . Thanks to their ships, the sailors made it possible to connect Castilla with the different European commercial centers, transporting the consumer products necessary to satisfy an ever-increasing demand. The rise of trade resulted in the development of maritime transport in the Cantabrian ports.
This mid-century commercial success is related to factors such as a rising economic situation; the formation of merchant associations such as the consulate of Burgos in 1494 and, later, that of Bilbao" in 1511; the generalization of new Italian commercial techniques; and the establishment of extensive networks of commercial companies based in the main European places.[123].
Wool is progressively added to the export of Biscayan iron, which is replacing English wool in the supply of the Flemish textile industry. To this important commercial link are added other traffic and other destinations such as the French coast of Brittany, Nantes, the Norman ports of Rouen and Calais and the English ports.[123] Cantabrian trade is mainly supported by goods coming not only from the Atlantic ports but also from those located in the North Sea and the Baltic, and which were destined for Castile.[124].
With the Hanseatic enemy gone, in Flanders, the main center of European trade, people from Bilbao and Burgos dispute their commercial differences. During the century Bilbao held the undisputed supremacy in the entire Cantabrian merchandise traffic, finally winning the game over the consulate of Burgos, which had directed its trade through the ports of Santander and Laredo "Laredo (Cantabria)"). In practice, trade from Bilbao was controlled mainly by English and Dutch merchants.[92].
The low importance of the ports of Asturias compared to the rest of the Cantabrian communities is explained by the relative isolation that the layout of the relief imposed on this territory. The transport of goods arriving at the Asturian ports towards the interior presented even greater difficulties than for the other Cantabrian coastal territories, increasing transport costs, if not making them absolutely impossible during the winters that made the mountain passes through the Cantabrian Mountains impassable.[123].
The privateer ship, with an official marquee license, was a vessel authorized by the states to attack enemy ships and ports. The patent of marque was an economical and regulated measure to protect the coasts and sea routes, avoiding the high cost of maintaining a stable war fleet. Corsair ships, lighter and faster than warships, were usually merchant boats or pataches armed with cannons. They operated alone or in small squads, many of them having bases in the ports of the Cantabrian Sea.
Francis I of France, in his wars against Emperor Charles I of Spain, resorted to privateers in his ambition to attack ships loaded with wealth from trade with the Americas. In response, the Gipuzkoan corsairs were a real scourge for the Gauls between the years 1553 and 1555, cutting off communications with Newfoundland and seriously damaging French trade.[125] Although Gipuzkoan privateering was the most active in this war, the movement of enemy corsairs did not disappear either. Thus, for example, the Norman privateer François Le Clerc, known as Pie de Palo, made raids along the Cantabrian coast, burning Santa Cruz de La Palma and plundering Cuba and Hispaniola.[125] Upon his return he encountered the convoy of Pedro Menéndez de Avilés, also with a marquee license in the service of Philip II, who sank one of his ships.[92] Not all of the privateering was professionalized but many of them Shipowners or skippers, whose main activity was commercial, armed their vessels in private and merchandise in case they encountered poorly protected Gallic merchants simply to try to capture them.[125].
The following year The same with Laredo in the battle of the Bay of Santoña, also capturing the captain and forcing the crew to burn the admiral of the Galician Squadron, these ships newly built in the Deusto shipyards on the way to La Coruña that had taken refuge from the French in the bay and that were still insufficiently armed and manned. The archbishop's fleet continued to harass the Cantabrian coasts, blocking the fleet. Spanish fleet arriving at the port of La Coruña.[126][127].
These resounding French victories resulted in the disappearance of the Colindres shipyards, which were heavily damaged and revealed their vulnerability from a military point of view, and the transfer of their work to the Guarnizo shipyard, in a much more protected Santander bay.[128].
The century meant for the Cantabrian shipyards a decrease in the construction of new vessels compared to previous times. Both Spain and the Netherlands had lagged behind in terms of nautical technological advances, leaving the French and English with a clear advantage in this field.[129].
The challenge at that time was to find a balance between stimulating national shipbuilding to compete with foreign powers and meeting the military demands of the royal shipyards, which attracted specialists and left private construction in an unfavorable position.[129].
At the same time, privateering activity in the Atlantic was intense over the centuries and, as has been noted, with different monarchies granting letters of countermark to captains to go privateering and be able to capture and loot enemy ships. This flooded the market with high-quality ships at low prices, which negatively affected the local shipbuilding industry. The buying and selling of captured vessels became lucrative for private shipowners who financed the creation of privateer squadrons and also for the royal treasury, which obtained a part of the privateering profits.[129].
With the War of Spanish Succession, alliances changed and Spain joined France, which affected the areas of action of the Basque corsairs, the most powerful at that time. As French trade dominated the Bay of Biscay, privateering activities in that region practically disappeared by 1713, at the end of the war. However, a few decades later, during the Asiento War, privateering resurfaced to support the Spanish Navy, which had risen from the ashes but was still too weak to confront the Royal Navy. The Basque corsairs filled the port of San Sebastián with numerous prizes that were then auctioned, with even merchants from outside the kingdom bidding through subterfuge even despite their prohibition.[125].
The Royal Guipuzcoan Company of Caracas stood out in this context, since its ships received patents for "private and merchandise" to stop the illegal trade of other European powers with America in exchange for maintaining its commercial monopoly with the overseas viceroyalties.[125].
Over time, the hegemony of the port of San Sebastián gave way to the entry of France into the war, competition from privateers from Bayonne "Bayonne (France)") and the greater effectiveness of the British Royal Navy against privateer activity. Consequently, Bilbao became the main port of the Cantabrian Sea.
The final phase of the Seven Years' War, in 1762, also generated an increase in applications for patents of marque by the Spanish intervention.[125].
After the Peace of Basel (1795) and the start of hostilities against Great Britain, maritime privateering once again experienced notable growth in the Western Cantabrian Sea. In 1799, Galician ships with a private marque managed to capture 21 English merchant ships, which generated prosperity in coastal cities such as Vigo.[130].
On the other hand, in the Eastern Cantabrian, privateering presented distinctive characteristics during this period, marked mainly by a sustained decline in contrast to the boom experienced in the western sector. During the reign of Charles IV, Basque corsair activity was conditioned by several structural factors. Given the notable absence of Spanish Navy ships capable of guaranteeing the effective defense of territorial waters, the authorities tried to promote the arming of various vessels in privateering. As a consequence, the protection of the coasts fell fundamentally into the hands of its own inhabitants. The port of Bilbao became the main starting point for the corsairs, followed by San Sebastián and, in significantly smaller proportions, by Bermeo, Lequeitio and Pasajes.[130].
The Gipuzkoan corsairs, who had historically exercised undisputed hegemony in the Cantabrian Sea, experienced an accelerated process of disappearance until they were reduced to almost anecdotal interventions. This decline and virtual disappearance was fundamentally due to economic reasons. This phenomenon finds its main explanation in the development of free trade with America during the 19th century, an economic activity that was considerably more profitable and less risky than traditional privateering operations.[130].
In 1778, a regulation was published allowing free trade "Free Trade Regulations (1778)") between several Spanish ports and the New Continent, except Mexico and Venezuela, which maintained the monopoly of the Guipuzcoan Company of Caracas. The Basque Country was excluded from this trade due to its own regional regime and internal customs, although San Sebastián obtained permission in 1788. Basque merchants were forced to look for indirect ways to trade, using permitted ports such as Santander if they could not do so from Bilbao or San Sebastián.[125][129].
Finally, the disappearance of privateering in the Cantabrian Sea was mainly due to economic evolution. Trade with America became more profitable and productive, providing an opportunity for commercial development that did not exist before. When Carlos III broke the monopoly of Cádiz and allowed free trade, he opened new business possibilities. Furthermore, trade with the rest of Europe was competitive, while the American market was still reserved, in theory, for the Spanish.[125].
Certain ports, driven by the increase in the fleet and the consequent increase in catches, became reference centers for anchovy fishing in their territories; This was the case of Motrico in Guipúzcoa, Ondárroa in Vizcaya, Laredo "Laredo (Cantabria)") and Colindres in Cantabria and Cudillero or San Juan de la Arena in Asturias. This did not mean that the traditional ports, such as Guetaria, Bermeo or Santoña, continued to be at the head of this fishery.[136].
An event then occurred that would change the physiognomy of many Cantabrian coastal towns: the development of the canning industry.
During the 20th century, the fishing industry in the communities of northern Spain underwent significant changes that completely altered the way it operated at the beginning of that century. Until approximately mid-century, the main activities focused on traditional preservation methods such as salting, which was mainly used on sardines, and pickling, which was mainly applied to sea bream and to a lesser extent to northern albacore. These methods predominated in the region until the middle of the century, when the fishing industry began to drastically transform.[137].
Until the 19th century, bocarte, which was transformed into anchovy, was a fish of less importance, since fishermen focused on other more abundant and profitable species.[note 7] There were hardly any references about anchovy and its transformation. However, it is at this time that the Cantabrian fish canning industry that we know today begins to acquire great relevance thanks to two fundamental factors: first, the wealth of the Cantabrian Sea, which regularly provides the raw material necessary for canning factories, and the second factor dates back to the end of the century and comes from distant regions of the Cantabrian region.[138].
Throughout the century and attracted by the abundant population of anchovies in the Cantabrian Sea, many Sicilians settled on the Cantabrian coast from a flourishing canning industry in Italy, making their salting techniques known. The Italian industry was booming and the demand for anchovies exceeded production, so the factories needed more anchovies to satisfy it.[139].
The massive arrival of Italians had a significant impact on anchovy fishing in places such as Ondarroa, Getaria and Santoña, and to a lesser extent in Bermeo, Lequeitio and Motrico. In some towns such as Laredo or Castro Urdiales, irregular catches of sardines destined for the canning industry led to anchovy fishing gaining relevance due to its greater value in the salting market.[139].
In Asturias, the impetus for this activity came from Cantabrian industrialists until the 1930s, who focused on certain ports where the bocarte was important in unloading, especially in eastern towns such as Llanes, Ribadesella and Lastres, and also in Cudillero and San Juan de la Arena, in western Asturias.[139].
The number of Italian industrialists on the Cantabrian coast increased considerably, and it was they who promoted the growth and change in the orientation of the fishing and canning sector, positioning the anchovy as the most important species in the entire Cantabrian region.[139].
However, the canning activity was based on a single species, mainly aimed at the Italian market and, to a lesser extent, the American market. This lack of diversification and dependence on the Italian economy and politics affected the development of the sector. The imposition of economic sanctions on Italy by the League of Nations, due to the invasion of Abyssinia, led Mussolini's government to restrict import permits and prohibit the departure of foreign currency from the country necessary to finance the Cantabrian coasts.[139].
The uncertainty generated by these actions seriously affected the Cantabrian fishing economy. With the closure of the Italian market, manufacturers reduced their production and stopped buying bocarte, which directly affected fishermen. This caused a sharp drop in the price of anchovies and the beginning of a crisis that also affected the fishing sector. The outbreak of the Spanish civil war in 1936 worsened the situation, since many Italian families abandoned the Cantabrian towns, and would not return until the end of the war.[139].
During the 20th century, with the Industrial Revolution, the modern concept of vacations and summer vacations became popular in Europe, which caused a cultural change in the use of coastal spaces that were previously considered unpleasant by the upper classes. The combination of economic interests, changes in social customs and the deterioration of life in industrial cities, together with the dissemination of medical practices and healthy hygiene habits, promoted the incipient coastal tourism.[140].
In particular, the fashion for "wave baths" emerged in Great Britain at the end of the century and was introduced in Spain in the middle of the century, bringing with it the model of maritime leisure stay that was already practiced in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea and the English Channel.[140]
Starting in 1750, doctors and hygienists, especially English, began to praise the therapeutic virtues of sea water and promote cold baths. Already in 1765, sea baths were famous in Biarritz, although there were no bathing establishments yet.[141] The perception of the healing properties of sea baths led to the proliferation of treatises explaining how to perform baths and their healing methods.[142].
Although several tourist centers were established in Spain on the Mediterranean and Atlantic coasts, the main development took place on the Cantabrian coast. These centers were modeled on the relevant tourist resorts of Arcachon and Biarritz in France.[140].
Despite the disruption caused by the Carlist War in the 1870s, the basic structure of a system of bathing stations along the entire Cantabrian coast had already been established. The two most important stations, by far, were San Sebastián and Santander. The regular presence of the royal family and the Spanish aristocracy consolidated and provided services to these places, turning them into select and fashionable destinations. Isabel II, Amadeo of Saboya, Alfonso XII and especially Alfonso
The fascination of the elites with sea bathing led to the creation of luxurious spas in the Atlantic region. These spas became wellness havens, where thalassotherapy sessions were only part of the experience. Ostentation and luxury mixed with health and socialization, creating an exclusive world where high society could rejuvenate their bodies or treat their ailments while enjoying the company of their peers.
Thus overall, in 1876, the publication «Review of the spa establishments and sea baths located in the provinces of northern Spain and Midi France» mentioned seven maritime spa resorts in Guipúzcoa, eight in Vizcaya, nine in Cantabria and five in Asturias, the majority arising from the expansion of the railway network in Spain and the drastic reduction in travel times. trip.[143].
The German U-Boat campaign took on a global character, taking place in all the seas of the world, highlighting the North Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea. In the Cantabrian Sea they operated in an area that extended from Finisterre "Finisterre (Spain)") to Vizcaya, with the aim of controlling the passage of enemy ships towards the Atlantic Ocean. The fishermen of the Cantabrian Sea used to spot these submarines and, on occasions, even started conversations with their crew members who were looking to acquire food to supply themselves during their patrols.[147].
The situation in the Cantabrian Sea became even more complicated starting in February 1917, when the Central Empires decided to launch an unrestricted submarine war, interrupting all maritime traffic between neutral countries and allied nations. Germany's naval attacks against Spanish ships en route to and from nations of the Allied bloc became increasingly frequent and striking. Furthermore, the complaint that Spanish ports were being used freely by submarines put the Spanish Government in an unsustainable situation, with strong pressure to join the conflict. The sinking of Spanish ships caused a serious shortage of coal and increased prices of basic products.[note 8][145][148].
Submarine warfare in the Cantabrian Sea would continue until October 1918, when the French cargo ship Lyndiane") was sunk by the submarine U-103") off Sakoneta Beach "Saconeta (beach)"), resulting in the tragic loss of 35 crew members. A month later, the First World War would come to an end.[149].
Eighteen years after being the context of an armed conflict, the Cantabrian Sea would once again become a scene of naval confrontation during the Spanish Civil War, a conflict that would mark a milestone in the history of Spain and leave a deep mark on the country's collective memory.
The war broke out after the military uprising of July 18, 1936, when a part of the Spanish army revolted against the republican government. Immediately, the small fleet of the rebel side took control of the Cantabrian naval theater. Its initial mission was to carry out attack operations on the coast and support General Mola's forces in the Guipúzcoa Campaign, which had already taken the city of San Sebastián. Its initial success made Republican forces realize the need to counter this threat.[150].
Between August and September 1936, the Government of the Republic would deploy four Class C "Class C (1928)") submarines (C-3 "C-3 (1929)"), C-4 "C-4 (1929)"), C-5 "C-5 (1930)") and C-6 "C-6 (1930)") and one of the Class B "Class B (1922)") (the B-6")) to protect merchant traffic and attack the battleship España and the cruiser Almirante Cervera "Almirante Cervera (1928)"), which were operating in the Cantabrian Sea.[150] The purges of submarine officers at the beginning of the war, the distrust between the crew members (sailors and commanders), the frequent changes of commanders and crews due to political reasons, the Deficiencies in the material, as well as discouragement due to the subsequent sinking of the C-5 and B-6, caused the combative spirit of the submarine flotilla to decline.[150][151].
Given the poor results, in September 1936 the Republican command made a crucial strategic decision that would ultimately determine much of the future of the war: sending the majority of its surface naval fleet to the north of the country, to the Cantabrian Sea. This fleet was composed of a battleship, two cruisers "Cruiser (warship)") and six destroyers. The mission of this squad was to prevent the rebel forces from advancing along the Basque coast through the use of naval artillery. Only a small force of five destroyers was left in charge of the blockade of the Strait of Gibraltar, a key strategic location.[152]
The republican strategy was successful, stopping the advance of the rebel forces by land. The superiority of the Republican fleet in the Cantabrian Sea was so overwhelming that during its presence in the region, the navy of the rebel side remained inactive and took refuge in the naval base of Ferrol.[152].
However, a series of events changed the course of the war in the Cantabrian Sea. The majority of the Republican fleet had to return to the Mediterranean, since the national cruisers Canarias "Canarias (C-21)") and Almirante Cervera "Almirante Cervera (1928)") surprisingly broke the blockade of the Strait with hardly any opposition. Only a small squadron of two destroyers, two submarines and a torpedo boat remained, which together with the flotilla of bous&action=edit&redlink=1 "Bous (ship) (not yet written)") of the Euzkadi Auxiliary Navy created by the Basque Government, turned out to be insufficient to maintain control of the region.[150][152][note 9].
The rebels took advantage of this opportunity to consolidate their dominance in the Cantabrian Sea. The battleship España "España (1913)"), the destroyer Velasco "Velasco (V)"), three gunned merchant ships and a flotilla of armed bouses took control of the Cantabrian Sea and blocked access to the Republican ports in the northern strip. They also seized merchant ships that tried to reach these ports at will. The supremacy of the rebellious fleet allowed it to exercise an effective naval and commercial blockade in the region, while providing support to its army's offensives.[150].
The Royal Navy represented one of the main sources of complications for the rebellious Cantabrian Naval Forces, since they prevented the identification of merchant ships heading towards Republican ports, until they reached the limit of three miles from the coast. This constituted a serious inconvenience, since in that area they were already exposed to enemy coastal artillery fire. Despite everything, Republican maritime traffic in this area was increasingly strangled, with the consequent repercussions on the Northern front.[153].
This situation left the Republican side in a vulnerable position, since its Cantabrian Naval Fleet did not have a clear strategy and its main focus was hunting down the rebel cruiser Almirante Cervera "Almirante Cervera (1928)"), the most important ship of the rebel side. However, the attempts of the Republican submarines to sink this objective were not successful, which led to the cruiser not having an enemy capable of matching it in the Cantabrian Sea, its supremacy in this sea would become practically total.[153].
The situation worsened after the fall of Bilbao in June 1937, as the rebel forces advanced towards Santander, backed by the Francoist navy that continued to maintain the naval blockade. To defend Asturias from the blockade, the two destroyers Císcar "Císcar (CR)") and José Luis Díez "José Luis Díez (JD)") remained, as well as three submarines, of which two soon defected to France.[150].
The Cantabrian naval theater of operations during the civil war would come to an end with the sinking of the Republican destroyer Císcar in an air attack on October 20, 1937, and the subsequent escape from Gijón to Bordeaux in a torpedo boat of the General Staff of the Cantabrian Naval Forces.[150].
Since the beginning of the Civil War, the Germans proposed to obtain minerals such as iron from Spanish mines to boost weapons production within the framework of the Four-Year Plan led by Hermann Göring. Francisco Franco's political alliance with the Axis and the debt incurred during the civil war facilitated the exploitation of Spanish mines for the benefit of the German war effort in World War II.[146].
Despite the Spanish position of neutrality during the Second World War, maritime traffic to Bayonne "Bayonne (France)") was organized early, intensifying after the German takeover on June 27, 1940. Strategic minerals on a military level such as iron, zinc, fluorite, copper, pyrite, tin, etc. -not counting the clandestine trafficking of tungsten that will cause so much concern to the Allied services- came from the north of Spain, mainly from Bilbao, Pasajes and Vigo. Through operations of secret diplomacy and undisclosed trade, a merchant ship system based on flags of convenience was developed that covered traffic between the ports of the Cantabrian Sea and Bayonne, seeking through subterfuge to satisfy German needs for its war effort.[146].
At the same time, the German submarines were being supplied and repaired in Spanish ports and their relief crews were allowed to travel through Spain.[154].
Faced with this situation, the Allies "Allies (World War II)") deployed a series of operations in the Bay of Biscay to prevent enemy traffic. Systematic attacks were carried out to hinder the transport of minerals from Spain to Bayonne, even dedicating a flotilla of submarines based at Rosneath to this task.[146]
In an attempt to increase maritime traffic, the Germans considered acquiring ships using Spanish intermediaries or companies legally established but controlled by German services, which sought to acquire small Spanish shipping companies that, if possible, maintained the national flag.[146].
The importance of this clandestine trade led the British Admiralty to launch "Operation Myrmidon" in April 1942 in the estuary of the Adur River, with the aim of interrupting the transport of goods by road and rail between France and Spain. Although the operation failed, the German military authorities were forced to considerably reinforce the fortifications on the coast between Boucau and Hendaye during the following years, as well as the protection of merchant ships engaged in trafficking. of minerals to Bayonne.[146][156].
After the liberation of most of France in 1944, some heavily fortified strongholds persisted on the Atlantic coast, being supplied by sea and maintaining contacts with the Nazi authorities in Germany. The Allies, for their part, waited for circumstances to improve to dislodge the Nazis from these marginal strongholds, hoping that the collapse of Germany before the end of the year would make their conquest unnecessary.
Towards the summer of 1944, the pockets of resistance of the German army on the Atlantic coast, subject to an imperfect maritime blockade, needed supplies and communications. The German high command prioritized the maritime line, bringing supplies from Spain weekly to these fortresses: Lorient, Saint-Nazaire, the port of La Rochelle, Royan, etc. Spanish collaboration in this company was denounced by the Allies, generating diplomatic tensions. The presence of Nazi soldiers and agents in Cantabrian ports was highlighted and the activities of Kriegsmarine sailors belonging to submarines or small boats that were dedicated to supplying these strongholds of German resistance on the French coast were denounced.[146].
As 1945 progressed, French surveillance intensified, and speedboats based in Saint-Jean-de-Luz and planes based in Hourtin (Gironde) made Spanish-German exchanges considerably more difficult. The situation became increasingly difficult for the Germans, with stricter control and more effective actions by the Allied secret services.[146].
Finally, after the tungsten crisis and the Laurel Incident, General Franco began to reconsider his foreign policy, pledging to significantly reduce tungsten exports and suspend collaboration with the Axis powers.
A particularly worrying aspect is oil tanker traffic. More than 70% of the oil consumed in the European Union is transported by ship through the Finisterre Pass "Finisterre (Spain)"), heading towards the English Channel before reaching its final destination in various European ports. This route has turned the Cantabrian Sea into a high-risk area for maritime accidents, especially oil spills.[164] The region has witnessed several devastating accidents involving supertankers. In an interval of just a decade, three major incidents shook the area: the wreck of the Aegean Sea "Aegean Sea (oil tanker)") in 1992 near La Coruña, which spilled more than 70,000 tons of oil; the sinking of the Erika "Erika (tanker)") off the coast of France in 1999, spilling 10,000 tons; and the Prestige disaster in 2002, which produced an oil spill of more than 60,000 tons that seriously affected the Spanish coast. These incidents, along with others such as those of Monte Urquiola (1976), Andros Patria") (1979) and Castillo de Salas (1986), have made this region one of the most affected by this type of accidents in the world.[164].
According to recent studies, the Cantabrian coast is emerging as one of the major beneficiaries of the effects of climate change on the Spanish tourism sector. As extreme heat deters visitors from traditional Mediterranean destinations, the Cantabrian region would become an attractive "climate refuge" thanks to its moderate temperatures. However, this phenomenon would represent a double-edged sword: although it would boost the economy, it would also exert strong pressure on coastal ecosystems and marine biodiversity, with the risk of replicating the errors of overcrowding and overexploitation already visible in other latitudes (touristification").[165].
The Cantabrian Sea is, therefore, at a crossroads. On the one hand, economic development and the growth of maritime transportation have brought prosperity to the region. On the other hand, these same factors have endangered the delicate ecological balance of its waters and coasts. The challenge for the future lies in finding a sustainable balance between economic development and the preservation of the natural environment, guaranteeing the protection of this valuable marine ecosystem.[164].
carabus
However, there are factors that work against the theory that Bronze Age navigators used leather boats, such as the enormous cost of covering the hull with skins, or the need to make landfalls to let the leather dry and waterproof it again (which seriously limits the distances and duration of the journeys).[54].
There is evidence of monoxillary canoes for river navigation, which makes it logical to think that wooden boats, but with suitable characteristics, were also used for oceanic navigation. Bronze.[57].
New archaeological finds have revealed the connections between the Celtic peoples of the north of the Iberian Peninsula and the Atlantic European world during the first millennium BC. C.[61][57] Research in the field of genetics also demonstrates the existence of maritime contacts beyond the Cantabrian coasts.[62].
The typology of manufacturing and its technological characteristics generate notable similarities along the Cantabrian slope with the regions bordering the Atlantic, from the south of the British Isles to the western façade of the Iberian Peninsula. This phenomenon gives rise to the cultural identity known as Atlantic Bronze"), which replicates, on a certain scale, the commercial circuits observed in the Mediterranean.[55].
Finds such as the Cabárceno cauldron in Cantabria, similar to those found near Battersea (London) or Dublin (Ireland), or the Moñes diadem in Asturias, with representations of Irish and Welsh Celtic mythology, seem to show that maritime trade exchanges existed at least 600 years before the arrival of the Romans between the inhabitants of the northern part of the Peninsula and those of the European Atlantic zone.[55][63].
During the pre-Roman period, the Trasmontana population reached a certain level of development and, faced with the food problem, the solution consisted of coming into contact with the Aquitaine area. In the middle of the century BC. C. the interrelation with said territory seemed to have already reached a certain consistency.[50].
There is evidence of contacts with Mediterranean sailors, probably interested in the gold and tin trade. Petroglyphs such as Borna") (Monte Faro de Domaio, Vigo) or Laxe Auga dos Cebros") (Santa María de Oia "Oia (Pontevedra)"), Pontevedra) seem to document the arrival of these first ships. central and elevated bow and stern.[67].
These commercial expeditions followed the so-called tin route. The Tartessian, Phoenician or Carthaginian ships sailed along the Atlantic coast, going up the Lusitanian coast, doubling the Finis Terrae and, following the Cantabrian and Aquitaine coast, they finally arrived at the Cassiterides (or Oestrímnidas) islands, from where they obtained this precious metal.[55][68][69].
Rufo Festo Avieno, in his Ora maritima, used very ancient sources such as the Massaliota journey. In it, he locates the Cantabrian coast between Cape Venus (probably Cape Higuer) and Cape Aryium (Ortegal). According to the poem, this area was presumably occupied by the pre-Roman people of the Dragans), who inhabited "the snowy north", identified with the Picos de Europa, easily distinguishable in coastal navigation.[70].
During this period navigation would be non-instrumental, based on the observation of natural phenomena such as winds, currents and tides; the movement of stars and planets; or the use of animals for maritime orientation such as birds.[54][71].
Seasonality was crucial. The end of spring and the entire summer season would be the only period suitable for long coastal and deep-sea navigation. During the rest of the year the trips would cover short distances, dedicated mainly to fishing, and never far from the coast.
On the coasts of northwestern Europe, storms of force 7 are eight times more frequent in winter, and the average number of days with rough seas is four times greater than in summer. Therefore, the most prudent thing for the navigators of the Metal Age was to make their trips in summer. It has been estimated that a frame boat could withstand storms of force 5 (fresh breeze of 20 knots), and a leather boat could even handle a storm of grade 6 (22 to 27 knots).[60].
In the time of Julius Caesar, the sea journey from Brittany to northern Galicia usually lasted about three days.[56] The Atlantic ships of that time sailed and used square sails, very similar to those of the Nordic ships of later centuries. This crossing time coincides with what Strabo tells about the Greek navigator Pytheas, who also took three days to go from the Galician coast to Cape Finisterre, in Brittany.[77] In general, navigation was faster from the north of Europe to the south, since in the Cantabrian Sea the north and northwest winds predominate, which favored the course of those ships that only had sails. square.[56][note 4].
Archaeological, epigraphic and numismatic finds have shed light on the port network and communications in the area, which were part of an integrated Atlantic economy.
Archaeological data indicate that the chronological evolution of the Cantabrian ports presents notable similarities. Thus, no data supports their existence during the turbulent period of the Cantabrian Wars and the immediate aftermath.[51] However, there must have been the availability of a port infrastructure capable of hosting the landing of the classis Aquitanica") mentioned by Orosio, probably at a time when land routes were formally non-existent and transport by sea was cheaper and faster.[50][74].
It would not be until the time of Tiberius, from the year 14 to , when the beginning of a confirmed commercial activity can be established.[51] During the period of the Julio-Claudian dynasty (from 27 to ) the growth of enclaves such as Gijón, a Romanized indigenous settlement, and the appearance of others of lesser importance will take place.
However, it was not until the Flavian emperors that the definitive articulation of the Cantabrian ports took place, with the takeoff or consolidation of settlements such as Flavium Brigantium"), Noega, Portus Amanum-Flaviobriga, Oiasso and Portus Victoriae. These were strategic locations chosen either because they were located sheltered from the north and northwest winds, or because they were important connections with Roman roads that gave access inside.[51].
A set of main ports, secondary ports and vicus (coastal settlements) will configure the Cantabrian route as support points for deep-sea navigation and cabotage, intended for the repair of boats and the supply of provisions.[50][78].
Although we do not have enough information to establish a clear hierarchy, it is known that Flavium Brigantium") (La Coruña) and Flaviobriga (Castro Urdiales), which acquired the status of municipium and colony respectively during the Flavian dynasty (from 69 to ) had a higher legal-administrative category. On the other hand, archaeological evidence highlights the importance of Oiasso (Irun) in the region.[74].
During the century AD. C. all the mentioned ports would enjoy their maximum splendor. After the deep imperial crisis of the century, a recovery occurred at the beginning of the century, in which an increase in the import of foreign products was seen.[51].
The Roman presence in the north has gone from being considered marginal to recognizing a much higher level of Romanization. The discoveries support the existence of an Atlantic economic space, autonomous from the control of Rome and the Mediterranean, characterized by free trade.[74].
The intense navigability of this Sinus Aquitanus (Bay of Biscay) appears confirmed by literary sources and archaeological evidence, as a large number of Roman remains and even shipwrecks have been attested, concentrating especially in the area of Fuenterrabía and Cape Higuer.[note 5][79][80].
These data, together with the Cantabrian iron trade and the finds of South Gallic terra sigillata, suggest the possible existence of a maritime trade route that linked the entire Cantabrian Sea with Burdigala (present-day Bordeaux), and from here, a waterway along the Garonne River and the Midi plain, to Narbo Martius (present-day Narbonne) with access to the Mediterranean Sea.[81].
The Aquitaine region would be one of the great granaries of the Roman world. Already during the Cantabrian Wars Strabo points out how the Romans supplied wheat and other provisions from Aquitania.[82] The commercial genesis of the Cantabrian ports would follow an expansion from east to west, taking into account the chronology of materials in Oiasso and Flaviobriga, places near Burdigala.[51].
This interrelation had different consequences:
• - The eastern half (Cantabria and Vasconia) dispensed with developing its own large agrarian system due to its immediacy to the supplying granary of Aquitaine.
• - The western half (Galicia and Asturias), conditioned by distance, was forced to develop on the coast itself a vilaria system of certain importance on which agricultural production fell.
The interrelation was established to such an extent that in imperial times the Sinus Aquitanus functioned as an authentic "Roman lake."[50] According to Pliny in the century BC. C. the Cantabrian Sea had become a transit sea between the North Atlantic and the Mediterranean: ships leaving from Gades and the Pillars of Hercules could sail throughout the West around Hispania and Gaul.[83][56].
Under the reign of Alfonso XI, the navy of Castile became a respectable force. The important naval fleet that emerged in the middle of the century on the coast of the Cantabrian Sea expanded throughout the European Atlantic arc. This expansion continued to grow and consolidate, until it became a dominant power in the Atlantic waters during the following centuries.[96] During this century La Rochelle, the main French port in the Bay of Biscay, was already frequented by ships that made the Atlantic route to England and Flanders.[97].
At this time, powerful confederations of port towns in the Cantabrian Sea emerged, such as the Brotherhood of the Four Towns or the Brotherhood of the Marismas, which formed a first-rate maritime power at the service of the Crown of Castile, maintaining autonomy in their international commercial relations.[52] The ports of the Brotherhood became important centers of maritime trade or naval arsenals, being a fundamental piece of the kingdom's economy. Slowly at its beginnings at the end of the century and at greater speed since the end of the century, a trade route was created with great effort that in a transversal direction linked the Cantabrian ports with those of the North Sea.[97].
From Cantabrian ports, regular routes were opened to Mediterranean and North Sea ports, and the high-water fisheries were visited on an annual basis in the Gran Sol fishing ground (in the Northeast Atlantic) or the Canary Islands, where ships ventured to capture economically advantageous pelagic species.[98].
Over the centuries, the small Cantabrian gauged ports continued to affirm their presence in the maritime arc that spanned from the western Mediterranean to the North Sea. Already in 1304, the Florentine chronicler Giovanni Villani evidenced the important change in maritime trade in the Western Middle Ages and one of the great events of the maritime life of the Tyrrhenian era: the union of the two key commercial areas, the Atlantic and the Mediterranean.[99][100].
The end of the Middle Ages began to notice a timid but growing presence of ships from the Castilian coastal ports of the Cantabrian-Atlantic coast that ventured into the Mediterranean. They followed the opposite path that the Genoese and Mallorcans had already been preparing a few years before with their activities in northern Europe.[100].
This change in maritime trade had a profound impact on the economy and commercial relations of the time and would not have been possible without the long process of creation and consolidation of a coastal urban network in the Cantabrian Sea. The population of these towns found in their nautical vocation the basis of their rapid economic prosperity and the active participation of their vessels in European commercial circuits, first in the Atlantic area and later, during the 19th century, expanding towards the western Mediterranean.[100] The main Cantabrian ports would confirm a maritime power with a hegemonic aspect, capable of acting as an arbiter between the other maritime nations during the Hundred Years' War and stopping conflicts. expansive pretensions of an entity as powerful as the Hanseatic League.[98].
Throughout the Middle Ages, commercial traffic between the ports of the Celtic Sea was frequently interrupted by wars and conflicts, sometimes only maintained between certain towns or cities, and which nourished and increased the corsair traditions of the local seafaring populations. Castellanos and French on one side and English on the other fought in a give and take that conditioned maritime traffic in the English Channel and the Bay of Biscay, claiming numerous ships from both sides. On the Castilian side, it is worth highlighting the sackings of Walsingham, Isle of Wight, Dover "Dover (Kent)"), Rye "Rye (Eastern Sussex)"), Portsmouth, Plymouth and the taking of Roche-Guyon in the Seine estuary. In 1380, a Castilian fleet under the command of Fernando Sánchez de Tovar sailed up the River Thames, daring to disembark in Gravesend, a few kilometers from London. On the English side, the corsair Arripaye") transported pilgrims with license to Santiago de Compostela and on the return voyage he filled the holds, plundering the coasts of Castile and France, even burning Gijón and sacking Finisterre "Finisterre (Spain)").[92][102] In response in the year 1405, Pero Niño captained a combined Castilian and French fleet that completely destroyed Poole, home port of the English privateer. In his particular revenge, the Englishman led a fleet of 15 ships through the English Channel in 1407, capturing numerous Castilian and French cargo ships.[103]
The important fleets necessary to sustain all this maritime activity were designed to navigate the difficult waters of the European Atlantic coast. This gave rise to a shipyard activity along the bays and inlets of the Cantabrian coast in which the traditional construction techniques of medieval sailing ships were refined, incorporating new technologies that would allow high-altitude voyages to be carried out and achieve the Renaissance geographical expansion of later centuries. All this in addition to the hand of a school of skilled sailors and pilots born in the aforementioned towns and hardened in the complicated Atlantic waters.[98].
This naval power remained with certain ups and downs during the century, laying the necessary foundations, in terms of sailors, ships and nautical knowledge, to achieve the feat of Discovery.[104].
Fishing became a fundamental economic activity for the communities dependent on the Cantabrian Sea, especially the capture of whales, which are now extinct in the region. During the Late Middle Ages, whaling began in these waters. Normally the abadengo places in the Cantabrian Sea were the ones that had rights over these fisheries, almost always reserving a part of the animal.[105] Thus, right whale hunting became widespread among the ports of the Basque Country, Cantabria, Asturias and Galicia, whose activity marked the customs and personality of many of these populations over the centuries. The French geographer André Thevet alludes to the flourishing whaling industry in the Bay of Biscay in the century :[106].
The right whale moves in shallow waters near the coast, approaching bays and inlets, which favored its hunting and exploitation. In the eastern Atlantic this species migrated in winter to waters located between the Azores and Madeira archipelagos, the Bay of Biscay and the coasts of Western Sahara. In summer they moved to the seas between Iceland, Svalbard and the coasts of Norway.[107].
The first documentary record of whale hunting in the Cantabrian Sea comes from the French Basque Country (Bayonne "Bayonne (France)") and corresponds to the year 1059, followed by one from Santoña, dated 1190 and another from Motrico from 1200.[107][108] In Asturias the first known document is dated 1232 and in Galicia the first mention whaling dates back to the year 1371.[107] Although there is archaeological evidence of the use of bone remains of the gray whale species in pre-Roman times in the fort "Castro (fortification)") of Campa Torres (Gijón) in the century BC. C. or a. C., it cannot be assured that they were actively hunted or rather that their use came from occasional strandings, so whaling on the Cantabrian coasts during the Ancient Age is not proven.[note 6]
[107]
[109].
From the whale, saín or blubber was mainly obtained, intended for lighting, and baleen, a material appreciated for its flexibility, products that, because they were not perishable, could be transported to the interior of the Iberian Peninsula at a time when, as already mentioned, the routes through the Cantabrian Mountains were complicated. The meat was barely consumed in Spain and was exported to the French Basque Country preserved in brine.[107].
Historians place the peak of whaling in the Cantabrian Sea between the 19th and 18th centuries.[107] During the early times, the different coastal populations built watchtowers "Watchtower (construction)") from which they could monitor the sea and watch the whales' snorts during the breeding season, between October and March.[111]
Hunting was carried out from pinnaces "Pinaza (ship's boat)") or longboats with about eight components, including rowers, harpooner and helmsman. After being harpooned, the whale fled by diving into the depths of the sea, dragging the fragile boat to which it was attached by a rope, in a dangerous haul that had something epic about it. Once dead, the cetacean was towed to the boat's port of origin, where it was stranded on the beach and cut up.[111]
[112].
As time went by, whale capture became increasingly widespread, as demonstrated by the importance of transatlantic fisheries to Newfoundland. Around the year 1520, Basque whalers established themselves in the Labrador Peninsula (Canada) to hunt whales.[113]
Specialists from these centuries maintain that the trips and inshore fisheries in the Cantabrian Sea, along with those carried out in Ireland and England, served in a certain way as preparation and training for the later transatlantic voyages to the coasts of Newfoundland.[114].
The right whale was hunted in the Cantabrian Sea for at least eight centuries until its extinction. Currently it has almost disappeared from the eastern Atlantic where it can be seen only sporadically, now concentrating its forces on the North American coast.[111].
In the Cantabrian Coast, three subregions were worth highlighting in the production of ships. The Galician subregion focused on fishing associated with its rich fisheries, the Asturian coast faced important geographical challenges, and finally there was the easternmost area, made up of the provinces of Cantabria (then called Cuatro Villas de la Costa de la Mar), the lordship of Vizcaya and the province of Guipúzcoa. This last area was the most productive in the construction of ships, which contributed to the economic development of the region.[118].
The demand for ships derived from the Race of the Indies caused the number of ships built along the Cantabrian coast to increase since 1505, from Fuenterrabía to Santander "Santander (Spain)"). On the other hand, the caravel, weighing 60 to 80 tons and whose origin lies in small fishing boats on the coast of Galicia, Portugal and Atlantic Andalusia, began to be built in the Cantabrian Sea in the middle of the century. Merchant galleons would be the vessels with the greatest tonnage during these centuries and with the passage of time referred to those built expressly for war under the protection of the Spanish Crown.[119][120].
If previously the largest ships were built on the Mediterranean coast, in the century there was a shift of these activities to the Atlantic, especially to the shipyards of Cantabria, Vizcaya and Cádiz, and later to Ferrol, while the Mediterranean shipyards were left for smaller vessels.[121].
On the Cantabrian coasts, the abundant oak trees and their iron veins led to the construction of many of the best ships of the time. Important shipyards such as Pasajes, Zumaya, Zorroza, Deusto, Colindres or Guarnizo took advantage of the enormous reserves of nearby forests to build these boats. The construction work involved many "river carpenters and caulkers", repositories of knowledge inherited from a long tradition that dated back to the Middle Ages.[122].
The shipyards on the banks of the Cantabrian Sea had extensive infrastructure. They had banks to keep the wood moist; sheds and warehouses to store materials; forges and workshops; staff accommodations; slipways, scaffolding and other wooden structures necessary for the assembly of the boats. There were also docks and auxiliary boats. Around all of them there was also an important auxiliary industry of elements and components necessary for the finishing of the ships, which were manufactured in the shipyard itself. Sails "Vela (nautical)"), ropes "Cape (nautical)"), cooperage, motorboat, oars, pitch and resin, used in caulking"), were also obtained elsewhere. Even large pines, essential for the rigging "Rigging (nautical)"), were brought from places as far away as the North Sea or the Baltic.[122].
The large iron ore resources existing in the eastern area of the Cantabrian Coast favored the establishment, since Antiquity, of numerous forges and forges "Fragua (workshop)"), some of which specialized over time in the manufacture of nails "Nail (object)"), anchors, weapons and other accessories.[122] Added to this were important manufacturing facilities such as the Royal Artillery Factory of La Cavada, whose blast furnaces supplied the cannons necessary to gun all these ships.
Between the centuries and hundreds of ships would be built in the Cantabrian shipyards that the Crown and private shipowners used for war and oceanic trade.[122] The importance would become such that during the century the kings issued pragmatic paths "Pragmatic (law)") prohibiting any ship that had not been built in the Cantabrian from participating in the Race of the Indies.[98].
The Cantabrian ports played a key role in this booming Castilian commercial activity, especially from the 16th century onwards. . Thanks to their ships, the sailors made it possible to connect Castilla with the different European commercial centers, transporting the consumer products necessary to satisfy an ever-increasing demand. The rise of trade resulted in the development of maritime transport in the Cantabrian ports.
This mid-century commercial success is related to factors such as a rising economic situation; the formation of merchant associations such as the consulate of Burgos in 1494 and, later, that of Bilbao" in 1511; the generalization of new Italian commercial techniques; and the establishment of extensive networks of commercial companies based in the main European places.[123].
Wool is progressively added to the export of Biscayan iron, which is replacing English wool in the supply of the Flemish textile industry. To this important commercial link are added other traffic and other destinations such as the French coast of Brittany, Nantes, the Norman ports of Rouen and Calais and the English ports.[123] Cantabrian trade is mainly supported by goods coming not only from the Atlantic ports but also from those located in the North Sea and the Baltic, and which were destined for Castile.[124].
With the Hanseatic enemy gone, in Flanders, the main center of European trade, people from Bilbao and Burgos dispute their commercial differences. During the century Bilbao held the undisputed supremacy in the entire Cantabrian merchandise traffic, finally winning the game over the consulate of Burgos, which had directed its trade through the ports of Santander and Laredo "Laredo (Cantabria)"). In practice, trade from Bilbao was controlled mainly by English and Dutch merchants.[92].
The low importance of the ports of Asturias compared to the rest of the Cantabrian communities is explained by the relative isolation that the layout of the relief imposed on this territory. The transport of goods arriving at the Asturian ports towards the interior presented even greater difficulties than for the other Cantabrian coastal territories, increasing transport costs, if not making them absolutely impossible during the winters that made the mountain passes through the Cantabrian Mountains impassable.[123].
The privateer ship, with an official marquee license, was a vessel authorized by the states to attack enemy ships and ports. The patent of marque was an economical and regulated measure to protect the coasts and sea routes, avoiding the high cost of maintaining a stable war fleet. Corsair ships, lighter and faster than warships, were usually merchant boats or pataches armed with cannons. They operated alone or in small squads, many of them having bases in the ports of the Cantabrian Sea.
Francis I of France, in his wars against Emperor Charles I of Spain, resorted to privateers in his ambition to attack ships loaded with wealth from trade with the Americas. In response, the Gipuzkoan corsairs were a real scourge for the Gauls between the years 1553 and 1555, cutting off communications with Newfoundland and seriously damaging French trade.[125] Although Gipuzkoan privateering was the most active in this war, the movement of enemy corsairs did not disappear either. Thus, for example, the Norman privateer François Le Clerc, known as Pie de Palo, made raids along the Cantabrian coast, burning Santa Cruz de La Palma and plundering Cuba and Hispaniola.[125] Upon his return he encountered the convoy of Pedro Menéndez de Avilés, also with a marquee license in the service of Philip II, who sank one of his ships.[92] Not all of the privateering was professionalized but many of them Shipowners or skippers, whose main activity was commercial, armed their vessels in private and merchandise in case they encountered poorly protected Gallic merchants simply to try to capture them.[125].
The following year The same with Laredo in the battle of the Bay of Santoña, also capturing the captain and forcing the crew to burn the admiral of the Galician Squadron, these ships newly built in the Deusto shipyards on the way to La Coruña that had taken refuge from the French in the bay and that were still insufficiently armed and manned. The archbishop's fleet continued to harass the Cantabrian coasts, blocking the fleet. Spanish fleet arriving at the port of La Coruña.[126][127].
These resounding French victories resulted in the disappearance of the Colindres shipyards, which were heavily damaged and revealed their vulnerability from a military point of view, and the transfer of their work to the Guarnizo shipyard, in a much more protected Santander bay.[128].
The century meant for the Cantabrian shipyards a decrease in the construction of new vessels compared to previous times. Both Spain and the Netherlands had lagged behind in terms of nautical technological advances, leaving the French and English with a clear advantage in this field.[129].
The challenge at that time was to find a balance between stimulating national shipbuilding to compete with foreign powers and meeting the military demands of the royal shipyards, which attracted specialists and left private construction in an unfavorable position.[129].
At the same time, privateering activity in the Atlantic was intense over the centuries and, as has been noted, with different monarchies granting letters of countermark to captains to go privateering and be able to capture and loot enemy ships. This flooded the market with high-quality ships at low prices, which negatively affected the local shipbuilding industry. The buying and selling of captured vessels became lucrative for private shipowners who financed the creation of privateer squadrons and also for the royal treasury, which obtained a part of the privateering profits.[129].
With the War of Spanish Succession, alliances changed and Spain joined France, which affected the areas of action of the Basque corsairs, the most powerful at that time. As French trade dominated the Bay of Biscay, privateering activities in that region practically disappeared by 1713, at the end of the war. However, a few decades later, during the Asiento War, privateering resurfaced to support the Spanish Navy, which had risen from the ashes but was still too weak to confront the Royal Navy. The Basque corsairs filled the port of San Sebastián with numerous prizes that were then auctioned, with even merchants from outside the kingdom bidding through subterfuge even despite their prohibition.[125].
The Royal Guipuzcoan Company of Caracas stood out in this context, since its ships received patents for "private and merchandise" to stop the illegal trade of other European powers with America in exchange for maintaining its commercial monopoly with the overseas viceroyalties.[125].
Over time, the hegemony of the port of San Sebastián gave way to the entry of France into the war, competition from privateers from Bayonne "Bayonne (France)") and the greater effectiveness of the British Royal Navy against privateer activity. Consequently, Bilbao became the main port of the Cantabrian Sea.
The final phase of the Seven Years' War, in 1762, also generated an increase in applications for patents of marque by the Spanish intervention.[125].
After the Peace of Basel (1795) and the start of hostilities against Great Britain, maritime privateering once again experienced notable growth in the Western Cantabrian Sea. In 1799, Galician ships with a private marque managed to capture 21 English merchant ships, which generated prosperity in coastal cities such as Vigo.[130].
On the other hand, in the Eastern Cantabrian, privateering presented distinctive characteristics during this period, marked mainly by a sustained decline in contrast to the boom experienced in the western sector. During the reign of Charles IV, Basque corsair activity was conditioned by several structural factors. Given the notable absence of Spanish Navy ships capable of guaranteeing the effective defense of territorial waters, the authorities tried to promote the arming of various vessels in privateering. As a consequence, the protection of the coasts fell fundamentally into the hands of its own inhabitants. The port of Bilbao became the main starting point for the corsairs, followed by San Sebastián and, in significantly smaller proportions, by Bermeo, Lequeitio and Pasajes.[130].
The Gipuzkoan corsairs, who had historically exercised undisputed hegemony in the Cantabrian Sea, experienced an accelerated process of disappearance until they were reduced to almost anecdotal interventions. This decline and virtual disappearance was fundamentally due to economic reasons. This phenomenon finds its main explanation in the development of free trade with America during the 19th century, an economic activity that was considerably more profitable and less risky than traditional privateering operations.[130].
In 1778, a regulation was published allowing free trade "Free Trade Regulations (1778)") between several Spanish ports and the New Continent, except Mexico and Venezuela, which maintained the monopoly of the Guipuzcoan Company of Caracas. The Basque Country was excluded from this trade due to its own regional regime and internal customs, although San Sebastián obtained permission in 1788. Basque merchants were forced to look for indirect ways to trade, using permitted ports such as Santander if they could not do so from Bilbao or San Sebastián.[125][129].
Finally, the disappearance of privateering in the Cantabrian Sea was mainly due to economic evolution. Trade with America became more profitable and productive, providing an opportunity for commercial development that did not exist before. When Carlos III broke the monopoly of Cádiz and allowed free trade, he opened new business possibilities. Furthermore, trade with the rest of Europe was competitive, while the American market was still reserved, in theory, for the Spanish.[125].
Certain ports, driven by the increase in the fleet and the consequent increase in catches, became reference centers for anchovy fishing in their territories; This was the case of Motrico in Guipúzcoa, Ondárroa in Vizcaya, Laredo "Laredo (Cantabria)") and Colindres in Cantabria and Cudillero or San Juan de la Arena in Asturias. This did not mean that the traditional ports, such as Guetaria, Bermeo or Santoña, continued to be at the head of this fishery.[136].
An event then occurred that would change the physiognomy of many Cantabrian coastal towns: the development of the canning industry.
During the 20th century, the fishing industry in the communities of northern Spain underwent significant changes that completely altered the way it operated at the beginning of that century. Until approximately mid-century, the main activities focused on traditional preservation methods such as salting, which was mainly used on sardines, and pickling, which was mainly applied to sea bream and to a lesser extent to northern albacore. These methods predominated in the region until the middle of the century, when the fishing industry began to drastically transform.[137].
Until the 19th century, bocarte, which was transformed into anchovy, was a fish of less importance, since fishermen focused on other more abundant and profitable species.[note 7] There were hardly any references about anchovy and its transformation. However, it is at this time that the Cantabrian fish canning industry that we know today begins to acquire great relevance thanks to two fundamental factors: first, the wealth of the Cantabrian Sea, which regularly provides the raw material necessary for canning factories, and the second factor dates back to the end of the century and comes from distant regions of the Cantabrian region.[138].
Throughout the century and attracted by the abundant population of anchovies in the Cantabrian Sea, many Sicilians settled on the Cantabrian coast from a flourishing canning industry in Italy, making their salting techniques known. The Italian industry was booming and the demand for anchovies exceeded production, so the factories needed more anchovies to satisfy it.[139].
The massive arrival of Italians had a significant impact on anchovy fishing in places such as Ondarroa, Getaria and Santoña, and to a lesser extent in Bermeo, Lequeitio and Motrico. In some towns such as Laredo or Castro Urdiales, irregular catches of sardines destined for the canning industry led to anchovy fishing gaining relevance due to its greater value in the salting market.[139].
In Asturias, the impetus for this activity came from Cantabrian industrialists until the 1930s, who focused on certain ports where the bocarte was important in unloading, especially in eastern towns such as Llanes, Ribadesella and Lastres, and also in Cudillero and San Juan de la Arena, in western Asturias.[139].
The number of Italian industrialists on the Cantabrian coast increased considerably, and it was they who promoted the growth and change in the orientation of the fishing and canning sector, positioning the anchovy as the most important species in the entire Cantabrian region.[139].
However, the canning activity was based on a single species, mainly aimed at the Italian market and, to a lesser extent, the American market. This lack of diversification and dependence on the Italian economy and politics affected the development of the sector. The imposition of economic sanctions on Italy by the League of Nations, due to the invasion of Abyssinia, led Mussolini's government to restrict import permits and prohibit the departure of foreign currency from the country necessary to finance the Cantabrian coasts.[139].
The uncertainty generated by these actions seriously affected the Cantabrian fishing economy. With the closure of the Italian market, manufacturers reduced their production and stopped buying bocarte, which directly affected fishermen. This caused a sharp drop in the price of anchovies and the beginning of a crisis that also affected the fishing sector. The outbreak of the Spanish civil war in 1936 worsened the situation, since many Italian families abandoned the Cantabrian towns, and would not return until the end of the war.[139].
During the 20th century, with the Industrial Revolution, the modern concept of vacations and summer vacations became popular in Europe, which caused a cultural change in the use of coastal spaces that were previously considered unpleasant by the upper classes. The combination of economic interests, changes in social customs and the deterioration of life in industrial cities, together with the dissemination of medical practices and healthy hygiene habits, promoted the incipient coastal tourism.[140].
In particular, the fashion for "wave baths" emerged in Great Britain at the end of the century and was introduced in Spain in the middle of the century, bringing with it the model of maritime leisure stay that was already practiced in the Baltic Sea, the North Sea and the English Channel.[140]
Starting in 1750, doctors and hygienists, especially English, began to praise the therapeutic virtues of sea water and promote cold baths. Already in 1765, sea baths were famous in Biarritz, although there were no bathing establishments yet.[141] The perception of the healing properties of sea baths led to the proliferation of treatises explaining how to perform baths and their healing methods.[142].
Although several tourist centers were established in Spain on the Mediterranean and Atlantic coasts, the main development took place on the Cantabrian coast. These centers were modeled on the relevant tourist resorts of Arcachon and Biarritz in France.[140].
Despite the disruption caused by the Carlist War in the 1870s, the basic structure of a system of bathing stations along the entire Cantabrian coast had already been established. The two most important stations, by far, were San Sebastián and Santander. The regular presence of the royal family and the Spanish aristocracy consolidated and provided services to these places, turning them into select and fashionable destinations. Isabel II, Amadeo of Saboya, Alfonso XII and especially Alfonso
The fascination of the elites with sea bathing led to the creation of luxurious spas in the Atlantic region. These spas became wellness havens, where thalassotherapy sessions were only part of the experience. Ostentation and luxury mixed with health and socialization, creating an exclusive world where high society could rejuvenate their bodies or treat their ailments while enjoying the company of their peers.
Thus overall, in 1876, the publication «Review of the spa establishments and sea baths located in the provinces of northern Spain and Midi France» mentioned seven maritime spa resorts in Guipúzcoa, eight in Vizcaya, nine in Cantabria and five in Asturias, the majority arising from the expansion of the railway network in Spain and the drastic reduction in travel times. trip.[143].
The German U-Boat campaign took on a global character, taking place in all the seas of the world, highlighting the North Atlantic and the Mediterranean Sea. In the Cantabrian Sea they operated in an area that extended from Finisterre "Finisterre (Spain)") to Vizcaya, with the aim of controlling the passage of enemy ships towards the Atlantic Ocean. The fishermen of the Cantabrian Sea used to spot these submarines and, on occasions, even started conversations with their crew members who were looking to acquire food to supply themselves during their patrols.[147].
The situation in the Cantabrian Sea became even more complicated starting in February 1917, when the Central Empires decided to launch an unrestricted submarine war, interrupting all maritime traffic between neutral countries and allied nations. Germany's naval attacks against Spanish ships en route to and from nations of the Allied bloc became increasingly frequent and striking. Furthermore, the complaint that Spanish ports were being used freely by submarines put the Spanish Government in an unsustainable situation, with strong pressure to join the conflict. The sinking of Spanish ships caused a serious shortage of coal and increased prices of basic products.[note 8][145][148].
Submarine warfare in the Cantabrian Sea would continue until October 1918, when the French cargo ship Lyndiane") was sunk by the submarine U-103") off Sakoneta Beach "Saconeta (beach)"), resulting in the tragic loss of 35 crew members. A month later, the First World War would come to an end.[149].
Eighteen years after being the context of an armed conflict, the Cantabrian Sea would once again become a scene of naval confrontation during the Spanish Civil War, a conflict that would mark a milestone in the history of Spain and leave a deep mark on the country's collective memory.
The war broke out after the military uprising of July 18, 1936, when a part of the Spanish army revolted against the republican government. Immediately, the small fleet of the rebel side took control of the Cantabrian naval theater. Its initial mission was to carry out attack operations on the coast and support General Mola's forces in the Guipúzcoa Campaign, which had already taken the city of San Sebastián. Its initial success made Republican forces realize the need to counter this threat.[150].
Between August and September 1936, the Government of the Republic would deploy four Class C "Class C (1928)") submarines (C-3 "C-3 (1929)"), C-4 "C-4 (1929)"), C-5 "C-5 (1930)") and C-6 "C-6 (1930)") and one of the Class B "Class B (1922)") (the B-6")) to protect merchant traffic and attack the battleship España and the cruiser Almirante Cervera "Almirante Cervera (1928)"), which were operating in the Cantabrian Sea.[150] The purges of submarine officers at the beginning of the war, the distrust between the crew members (sailors and commanders), the frequent changes of commanders and crews due to political reasons, the Deficiencies in the material, as well as discouragement due to the subsequent sinking of the C-5 and B-6, caused the combative spirit of the submarine flotilla to decline.[150][151].
Given the poor results, in September 1936 the Republican command made a crucial strategic decision that would ultimately determine much of the future of the war: sending the majority of its surface naval fleet to the north of the country, to the Cantabrian Sea. This fleet was composed of a battleship, two cruisers "Cruiser (warship)") and six destroyers. The mission of this squad was to prevent the rebel forces from advancing along the Basque coast through the use of naval artillery. Only a small force of five destroyers was left in charge of the blockade of the Strait of Gibraltar, a key strategic location.[152]
The republican strategy was successful, stopping the advance of the rebel forces by land. The superiority of the Republican fleet in the Cantabrian Sea was so overwhelming that during its presence in the region, the navy of the rebel side remained inactive and took refuge in the naval base of Ferrol.[152].
However, a series of events changed the course of the war in the Cantabrian Sea. The majority of the Republican fleet had to return to the Mediterranean, since the national cruisers Canarias "Canarias (C-21)") and Almirante Cervera "Almirante Cervera (1928)") surprisingly broke the blockade of the Strait with hardly any opposition. Only a small squadron of two destroyers, two submarines and a torpedo boat remained, which together with the flotilla of bous&action=edit&redlink=1 "Bous (ship) (not yet written)") of the Euzkadi Auxiliary Navy created by the Basque Government, turned out to be insufficient to maintain control of the region.[150][152][note 9].
The rebels took advantage of this opportunity to consolidate their dominance in the Cantabrian Sea. The battleship España "España (1913)"), the destroyer Velasco "Velasco (V)"), three gunned merchant ships and a flotilla of armed bouses took control of the Cantabrian Sea and blocked access to the Republican ports in the northern strip. They also seized merchant ships that tried to reach these ports at will. The supremacy of the rebellious fleet allowed it to exercise an effective naval and commercial blockade in the region, while providing support to its army's offensives.[150].
The Royal Navy represented one of the main sources of complications for the rebellious Cantabrian Naval Forces, since they prevented the identification of merchant ships heading towards Republican ports, until they reached the limit of three miles from the coast. This constituted a serious inconvenience, since in that area they were already exposed to enemy coastal artillery fire. Despite everything, Republican maritime traffic in this area was increasingly strangled, with the consequent repercussions on the Northern front.[153].
This situation left the Republican side in a vulnerable position, since its Cantabrian Naval Fleet did not have a clear strategy and its main focus was hunting down the rebel cruiser Almirante Cervera "Almirante Cervera (1928)"), the most important ship of the rebel side. However, the attempts of the Republican submarines to sink this objective were not successful, which led to the cruiser not having an enemy capable of matching it in the Cantabrian Sea, its supremacy in this sea would become practically total.[153].
The situation worsened after the fall of Bilbao in June 1937, as the rebel forces advanced towards Santander, backed by the Francoist navy that continued to maintain the naval blockade. To defend Asturias from the blockade, the two destroyers Císcar "Císcar (CR)") and José Luis Díez "José Luis Díez (JD)") remained, as well as three submarines, of which two soon defected to France.[150].
The Cantabrian naval theater of operations during the civil war would come to an end with the sinking of the Republican destroyer Císcar in an air attack on October 20, 1937, and the subsequent escape from Gijón to Bordeaux in a torpedo boat of the General Staff of the Cantabrian Naval Forces.[150].
Since the beginning of the Civil War, the Germans proposed to obtain minerals such as iron from Spanish mines to boost weapons production within the framework of the Four-Year Plan led by Hermann Göring. Francisco Franco's political alliance with the Axis and the debt incurred during the civil war facilitated the exploitation of Spanish mines for the benefit of the German war effort in World War II.[146].
Despite the Spanish position of neutrality during the Second World War, maritime traffic to Bayonne "Bayonne (France)") was organized early, intensifying after the German takeover on June 27, 1940. Strategic minerals on a military level such as iron, zinc, fluorite, copper, pyrite, tin, etc. -not counting the clandestine trafficking of tungsten that will cause so much concern to the Allied services- came from the north of Spain, mainly from Bilbao, Pasajes and Vigo. Through operations of secret diplomacy and undisclosed trade, a merchant ship system based on flags of convenience was developed that covered traffic between the ports of the Cantabrian Sea and Bayonne, seeking through subterfuge to satisfy German needs for its war effort.[146].
At the same time, the German submarines were being supplied and repaired in Spanish ports and their relief crews were allowed to travel through Spain.[154].
Faced with this situation, the Allies "Allies (World War II)") deployed a series of operations in the Bay of Biscay to prevent enemy traffic. Systematic attacks were carried out to hinder the transport of minerals from Spain to Bayonne, even dedicating a flotilla of submarines based at Rosneath to this task.[146]
In an attempt to increase maritime traffic, the Germans considered acquiring ships using Spanish intermediaries or companies legally established but controlled by German services, which sought to acquire small Spanish shipping companies that, if possible, maintained the national flag.[146].
The importance of this clandestine trade led the British Admiralty to launch "Operation Myrmidon" in April 1942 in the estuary of the Adur River, with the aim of interrupting the transport of goods by road and rail between France and Spain. Although the operation failed, the German military authorities were forced to considerably reinforce the fortifications on the coast between Boucau and Hendaye during the following years, as well as the protection of merchant ships engaged in trafficking. of minerals to Bayonne.[146][156].
After the liberation of most of France in 1944, some heavily fortified strongholds persisted on the Atlantic coast, being supplied by sea and maintaining contacts with the Nazi authorities in Germany. The Allies, for their part, waited for circumstances to improve to dislodge the Nazis from these marginal strongholds, hoping that the collapse of Germany before the end of the year would make their conquest unnecessary.
Towards the summer of 1944, the pockets of resistance of the German army on the Atlantic coast, subject to an imperfect maritime blockade, needed supplies and communications. The German high command prioritized the maritime line, bringing supplies from Spain weekly to these fortresses: Lorient, Saint-Nazaire, the port of La Rochelle, Royan, etc. Spanish collaboration in this company was denounced by the Allies, generating diplomatic tensions. The presence of Nazi soldiers and agents in Cantabrian ports was highlighted and the activities of Kriegsmarine sailors belonging to submarines or small boats that were dedicated to supplying these strongholds of German resistance on the French coast were denounced.[146].
As 1945 progressed, French surveillance intensified, and speedboats based in Saint-Jean-de-Luz and planes based in Hourtin (Gironde) made Spanish-German exchanges considerably more difficult. The situation became increasingly difficult for the Germans, with stricter control and more effective actions by the Allied secret services.[146].
Finally, after the tungsten crisis and the Laurel Incident, General Franco began to reconsider his foreign policy, pledging to significantly reduce tungsten exports and suspend collaboration with the Axis powers.
A particularly worrying aspect is oil tanker traffic. More than 70% of the oil consumed in the European Union is transported by ship through the Finisterre Pass "Finisterre (Spain)"), heading towards the English Channel before reaching its final destination in various European ports. This route has turned the Cantabrian Sea into a high-risk area for maritime accidents, especially oil spills.[164] The region has witnessed several devastating accidents involving supertankers. In an interval of just a decade, three major incidents shook the area: the wreck of the Aegean Sea "Aegean Sea (oil tanker)") in 1992 near La Coruña, which spilled more than 70,000 tons of oil; the sinking of the Erika "Erika (tanker)") off the coast of France in 1999, spilling 10,000 tons; and the Prestige disaster in 2002, which produced an oil spill of more than 60,000 tons that seriously affected the Spanish coast. These incidents, along with others such as those of Monte Urquiola (1976), Andros Patria") (1979) and Castillo de Salas (1986), have made this region one of the most affected by this type of accidents in the world.[164].
According to recent studies, the Cantabrian coast is emerging as one of the major beneficiaries of the effects of climate change on the Spanish tourism sector. As extreme heat deters visitors from traditional Mediterranean destinations, the Cantabrian region would become an attractive "climate refuge" thanks to its moderate temperatures. However, this phenomenon would represent a double-edged sword: although it would boost the economy, it would also exert strong pressure on coastal ecosystems and marine biodiversity, with the risk of replicating the errors of overcrowding and overexploitation already visible in other latitudes (touristification").[165].
The Cantabrian Sea is, therefore, at a crossroads. On the one hand, economic development and the growth of maritime transportation have brought prosperity to the region. On the other hand, these same factors have endangered the delicate ecological balance of its waters and coasts. The challenge for the future lies in finding a sustainable balance between economic development and the preservation of the natural environment, guaranteeing the protection of this valuable marine ecosystem.[164].