Evaluation of coastal surveillance towers | Construpedia
Navegación
Evaluation of coastal surveillance towers
Introduction
The Battle of Santa Monica[a] was an armed confrontation that occurred during the early hours of May 4, 1561 in the vicinity of Cartagena "Cartagena (España)") (Spain), in the context of the Spanish-Ottoman War of 1515-1577. The combat occurred during a frustrated surprise attack by Ottoman corsairs led by Uluj Ali on said city, one of the main bastions of the Hispanic Monarchy in the southeast of the Iberian Peninsula. The Spanish forces of Luis Fajardo de la Cueva, Marquis of the Vélez, repelled the attempt and forced the reembarkation of the enemy troops.
The episode is part of the prolonged conflict for control of the Mediterranean Sea between the Hispanic Monarchy and the Ottoman Empire, which since the beginning of the century had promoted the development of privateering in Barbary as an instrument of military and economic pressure. Cartagena, located a short distance from the corsair bases, had suffered raids for decades that seriously affected its trade, supplies and security. Despite the defensive reforms undertaken throughout the century - such as the repair and addition of sections of wall, the installation of artillery and the organization of militias - the city continued to be vulnerable to rapid and well-coordinated operations.
The Spanish victory in the battle did not mean the end of the Turkish-Algerian threat, but it demonstrated the effectiveness of the warning systems and the mobilization of militias, as well as the need to further reinforce the fortifications and improve cooperation between the coastal towns and the inland garrisons. A week later, Uluj Alí's fleet undertook the sack of Sóller "Sacking of Sóller (1561)"), in Mallorca, which highlighted that, although Cartagena had successfully resisted, the Hispanic coast was still exposed to Ottoman naval initiatives.
Background
From Spanish expansion in the Maghreb to the emergence of the Barbarossa
During the Modern Age, North Africa acquired a key strategic relevance for the Hispanic Monarchy, particularly as a result of the intensification of corsairism on the Barbary coast. Although the phenomenon had a history since the 19th century, for centuries it had occupied a marginal place with respect to the interests of the Crown of Castile, which was then more focused on the conflicts with the bordering kingdoms of Aragon and Granada. This situation changed at the beginning of the century, when the conquest of Granada and the dynastic union with Aragon gave way to a Spanish advance on the Maghreb with the declared purpose of eradicating the nests of corsairs. and the rebellion of the Alpujarras of 1499-1501 "Rebellion of the Alpujarras (1499-1501)"), served as a pretext for armed intervention in the region.[15].
Evaluation of coastal surveillance towers
Introduction
The Battle of Santa Monica[a] was an armed confrontation that occurred during the early hours of May 4, 1561 in the vicinity of Cartagena "Cartagena (España)") (Spain), in the context of the Spanish-Ottoman War of 1515-1577. The combat occurred during a frustrated surprise attack by Ottoman corsairs led by Uluj Ali on said city, one of the main bastions of the Hispanic Monarchy in the southeast of the Iberian Peninsula. The Spanish forces of Luis Fajardo de la Cueva, Marquis of the Vélez, repelled the attempt and forced the reembarkation of the enemy troops.
The episode is part of the prolonged conflict for control of the Mediterranean Sea between the Hispanic Monarchy and the Ottoman Empire, which since the beginning of the century had promoted the development of privateering in Barbary as an instrument of military and economic pressure. Cartagena, located a short distance from the corsair bases, had suffered raids for decades that seriously affected its trade, supplies and security. Despite the defensive reforms undertaken throughout the century - such as the repair and addition of sections of wall, the installation of artillery and the organization of militias - the city continued to be vulnerable to rapid and well-coordinated operations.
The Spanish victory in the battle did not mean the end of the Turkish-Algerian threat, but it demonstrated the effectiveness of the warning systems and the mobilization of militias, as well as the need to further reinforce the fortifications and improve cooperation between the coastal towns and the inland garrisons. A week later, Uluj Alí's fleet undertook the sack of Sóller "Sacking of Sóller (1561)"), in Mallorca, which highlighted that, although Cartagena had successfully resisted, the Hispanic coast was still exposed to Ottoman naval initiatives.
Background
From Spanish expansion in the Maghreb to the emergence of the Barbarossa
Although there were preliminary actions such as the taking of Melilla in 1497, the African campaign did not start firmly until the end of the first Italian wars "Italian Wars (1494-1559)"), when King Ferdinand the Catholic was able to have the necessary resources. Between 1505 and 1510, the Castilian troops successively seized Mazalquivir (1505), Cazaza (1506), the rock of Vélez de la Gomera (1508), Orán "Conquest of Orán (1509)") (1509) and, in 1510, the rock of Algiers, Bugía "Conquest of Bugía (1510)") and Tripoli. However, the momentum was cut short after the Jornada de Los Gelves "Jornada de los Gelves (1510)")—now the island of Djerba "Derba (Tunisia)")—of that same year, a setback exacerbated by French pressure on the Italian peninsula, the annexation of Navarre (1512), and Ottoman penetration into the central Maghreb. Such a situation forced other European fronts to be prioritized, but did not reverse the crucial status gained by the ports of the southeast of the Iberian Peninsula, initially Malaga and Cartagena, which became essential logistical bases for military operations: the expedition against Mazalquivir had set sail from Malaga, while that of Oran in 1509—the largest action in this first stage, led by Cardinal Cisneros—did so from Cartagena.[16] This last city, in addition to serving as a starting point for the company, provided supplies and artillery from its castle to the army that achieved the capitulation of the population, obtaining a large amount of loot and the liberation of three hundred Christian captives. With the victory, the so-called "double prison" was established, as Mazalquivir and Orán were integrated into the same administrative unit where the first acted as an anteport for the second. From that moment on, the towns of Cartagena and Alicante maintained a permanent commercial and military link with the North African presidiums, in a relationship that lasted until the definitive loss of Oran in 1792.[17].
In parallel, the entry of a new actor in the western Mediterranean began to take shape: the Ottoman Empire. Already in 1514, Turkish squadrons were sighted off the Alicante coast, coming from Tunis "Tunisia (city)") and dedicated to the plundering of the Italian coasts and the Tyrrhenian Sea, even reaching the kingdoms of Valencia and Murcia "Kingdom of Murcia (Crown of Castile)"). Between 1514 and 1517, at least seven raids were recorded on the Valencian coast, confirming the seriousness of the threat. That same year, a renowned sailor in the eastern Mediterranean, Aruj Barbarossa, tried unsuccessfully to seize Bejaia, being seriously wounded in the arm. He reiterated the attack the following year with greater boldness, but the stronghold resisted thanks to reinforcements from Valencia and Mallorca. It was then that Aruj set his sights on Algiers, where he had been invited by Sultan Salim at-Toumi to expel the Castilians from the rock. The privateer accepted, but took advantage of the opportunity to take control of the city, assassinating the sultan and occupying Algiers without opposition. From that moment on, he gathered around him a plethora of captains of fortune - such as his brother Jeireddín, Salah Reis, Sinán the Jew and Cachidiablo - who, with their fleets, shaped a formidable naval force. With the support of nearby mountain Kabyles, Bedouin tribes from Mitidja, Moorish exiles and local merchants, Aruj strengthened corsair rule over Algiers, whose rise was reflected in an increase in raids and seizures of ships and people on the coasts of southeastern Iberia. However, Aruj's attack found its end with the capture of Tlemcen, where he was defeated and killed during the Spanish counterattack "Fall of Tlemcen (1518)") of 1518.[18]
The Algerian-Ottoman entente and its predominance in the western Mediterranean
Upon Aruj's death, his younger brother Jeireddín assumed command in Algiers and made an offer of vassalage to the Ottoman sultan Selim I, in order to obtain military and political support in exchange for integrating the corsair State as a province of the Sublime Porte. Although, before receiving a response, he had to reject a new Spanish attack "Second expedition against Algiers (1519)"), his diplomatic maneuver resulted in success: the sultan accepted his proposal, appointed him beylerbey—governor—and sent him a personal guard of 2,000 janissaries along with naval reinforcements.[19] The establishment of the Regency of Algiers and its consolidation as an Ottoman vassal have been the subject of discussion. academic about its integration into the historical discourse: Montojo Montojo (1994), following Fernand Braudel, maintains that these events were the initial milestone of the "great galley war" that would loom over the Mediterranean until the so-called "Turkish truces" of 1577-1584, while Velasco Hernández (2019), also influenced by Braudel, places the origin and development of the "first Corsican».[20][21].
During the first years of this alliance, the loss of Spanish control over North Africa - exemplified by the capture of the rock of Algiers in 1529 - was considered by Madrid as an acceptable inconvenience, as long as subsequent corsair incursions remained limited and sporadic, since the priority of the Spanish Monarchy at that time was in the Italian wars.[22] Spain adopted a defensive posture in Barbary, focusing on preserving the conquered places and providing support to dynasties opposed to the Ottomans, such as the Saadis of Morocco and the Hafsids of Tunisia, so that Hispanic military actions became fundamentally reactive, with exceptions such as the expedition of Charles V against Algiers in 1541, whose disastrous result did nothing more than expose Turkish naval supremacy.[23][24] This failure, together with the conflicts with France and The expansion of the Protestant Reformation accelerated the progressive abandonment of North African policy by the emperor, allowing Algiers to shore up its position as a maritime power while Jeireddin Barbarossa, invested as admiral of the Ottoman navy, extended his influence over the entire western Mediterranean, generating a climate of permanent fear on the coasts of Christendom with the exception of the French, whose king Francis I had allied himself with Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent.[25] Since his campaigns From 1534 - which included the conquest of La Goleta, Bizerte, Tunis and other cities belonging to the Hafsids - and 1538 - culminating in the Battle of Préveza - until the Ottoman defeat at Lepanto in 1571, Muslim maritime dominance was incontestable. The coastal populations of Spain and Italy watched with anxiety the arrival of summer, when the corsair expeditions began; many communities retreated inland or sought refuge in fortified enclaves.[26] Barbarossa granted letters of marque to sailors from the eastern Mediterranean, renegades, nationless pirates and Spanish Moors, demanding in exchange a percentage of the loot and contributions for port maintenance, while promoting the rise of other privateers, integrated into a taifa of the rais or guild of arraeces that operated under the orders of an arráez or captain subordinate to the beylerbey and the Diván "Diván (institution)."
With the coming to power of Hasan Pasha "Hasan Pasha (son of Jeireddin Barbarossa)", son of Jeireddin, in 1544, Algiers achieved efficient internal organization and notable economic prosperity. The Regency became a fully functional State, whose captains devastated the Christian coasts with hardly any opposition. After the death of Barbarossa in 1546, a momentary truce was established between the Spanish Monarchy and the Ottoman Empire, which was quickly broken by the actions of Dragut from his base in Los Gelves "Djerba (Tunisia)") and, more subtly, from Algiers itself.[29] The second half of the century saw increasing coordination between prominent privateers such as Dragut, Salah Reis and Uluj Ali with the Turkish navy, beginning a new offensive cycle that notoriously undermined Christian interests: in 1551, Hospitaller Malta lost Tripoli "Siege of Tripoli (1551)") and suffered the occupation of Gozo; Andrea Doria was defeated at the Battle of Ponza "Battle of Ponza (1552)") (1552); Corsica was subject to a joint Franco-Ottoman invasion (1553); and Spanish towns such as Vélez de la Gomera and Bugía fell in 1555, while Oran and Mazalquivir were subjected to siege in 1555-1556 and in 1558. That same year, Ciudadela de Menorca was sacked "Razia de Menorca (1558)") and its population reduced to slavery, and in May 1560, the Spanish expedition against Dragut's stronghold in Los Gelves ended in disaster before the fleet commanded by Pialí Pasha and his lieutenant Uluj Ali.[30] Between the decades of 1550 and 1580, from the accession to the beylerbeyat of Hasan Pasha until the death of Uluj Ali, Algiers experienced a new period of splendor, favored by the influx of renegades and the strength of its garrison of janissaries.[31].
The preponderance of the Corsican shaped a profound social and demographic change in the city. Since the beginning of the century, as a result of the first rebellion of the Alpujarras and the Pragmatic of forced conversion of 1502, thousands of Moriscos began to arrive in Algiers from the Iberian Peninsula. Although many had accepted to convert to Christianity to remain in their lands, the growing tension between old and new Christians translated into rebellions such as that of Espadán (1526), massive escapes to North Africa and active collaboration with the so-called "Moors of Allende" in the assaults on villas "Villa (population)") of the kingdoms of Valencia, Murcia and Granada, particularly in areas such as the Levante Almeria and the Marina Alta of Alicante.[32] During the leadership of Jeireddín Barbarossa, the evacuation of Moriscos became one of the priority objectives of the corsair fleets, and their participation in the naval enterprises of the Regency was constant and enthusiastic.[33] Within Algiers, these migrants were differentiated based on their origin: on the one hand there were the "Tagarins", from Valencia and Aragon, and on the other the "Andalusians", natives of the Kingdom of Granada. Although socially equated with the "baldíes" Moors, their contribution to the Regency was widely recognized until the general expulsion of 1609-1613, when their reception ceased to have the same support.[34] Their arrival was also a factor in the spectacular demographic growth of Algiers: according to Perez de Idiacayz, in 1536 alone there were already between 7,000 and 8,000 Moriscos residing in the city, and throughout the city. century, its arrival caused the population to triple, estimated at around 130,000 inhabitants around 1587 - compared to the 4,000 fogajes recorded in 1516 by Leo African or the 3,000 estimated by Nicolas de Nicolay in 1550 -.[b][41] However, this increase not only responded to sustained Moorish immigration and the political rise of Algiers as the provincial capital. Ottoman, but also to the development of a system of production and distribution of wealth based on plunder and the slave trade.[42].
Cartagena before the birth of Corsicanism under Ottoman protection
At the beginning of the century, Cartagena played a critical role on the Mediterranean coast of the Iberian Peninsula. Its port was considered the main bastion of the Kingdom of Murcia and of the entire coastal strip between Alicante and Almería, to the point that, in 1521, the warden of the Concepción castle, Alonso Vélez de Guevara, described it as the "key to this entire Kingdom of Murcia and up to Toledo."[43] Its proximity to North Africa - about 180 nautical miles from Algiers, a distance that could covered in just over a day of sailing with favorable winds[44]—, along with a coast dotted with coves and islands, made it especially vulnerable to corsair attacks.[45] At the same time, the city began to establish itself as a key logistics center for the military campaigns of the Hispanic Monarchy, serving as a supply and shipping port to the Maghreb and Italy. From Cartagena, for example, the unsuccessful expedition "First expedition against Algiers (1516)") was launched to take from the Barbarossa their newly acquired fiefdom of Algiers in 1516, as well as successive relief to the North African prisons of Oran (1517, 1529, 1555, 1556, 1558, 1563, 1576, 1581) and Bugía (1529, 1554), and contingents destined for European settings such as Portugal and Flanders. Álvaro de Bazán the Elder's campaign against Hunaín in 1530 and part of the imperial operations directed against Tunisia (1535) and Algiers (1541) also set sail from this port.[46][47].
Contemporaneous with its growing military projection, Cartagena experienced an incipient demographic takeoff throughout the century, favored by political and administrative factors. Its return to royal jurisdiction in 1503, together with the disappearance of threats from the Granada and Aragonese borders, allowed the city to capitalize on the privileges accumulated during the Late Middle Ages to attract new settlers. This set of circumstances led to a sustained increase in its population between 1500 and 1530, a period in which it went from 1500 to 2500 inhabitants. However, this process was limited by structural factors such as the periodic incidence of epidemics and supply crises derived from the constant movement of troops, which disturbed the economic and social stability of the city.[48] From 1525-1530, Turkish-Berber military pressure began to manifest itself more frequently, with corsair squadrons stationing themselves a short distance from the port, awaiting the arrival of cargo ships from the Atlantic or saetías from the Mediterranean.[49][50] Sometimes, they remained hidden for weeks in the surrounding area, completely paralyzing commercial activity. As a direct consequence, Cartagena suffered interruptions in the supply of essential goods, especially cereals, which triggered acute episodes of shortages and aggravated the hardships of its inhabitants.[50].
From a military point of view, Cartagena suffered from significant deficiencies in all aspects: human resources, wall infrastructure and artillery capacity.[45] This situation was generalized in the Kingdom of Murcia, which had the most precarious defensive system in the southeast of the peninsula:[51].
• - Unlike the kingdoms of Granada and Valencia, it lacked a permanent system of "atajadores" - mounted forces dedicated to patrolling and sounding the alarm in coastal areas - and "requeridores" - in charge of transmitting warnings to captains of urban militias and wardens of fortresses. Instead, prevention against possible incursions fell to a small number of "coast guards", residents responsible for surveillance and reconnaissance from the most strategic promontories of the coast.[c] Towards the middle of the century, this body consisted of about thirty men in Cartagena, organized in groups of two or three and distributed in eight "stays" or coastal watchtowers, although this number could be increased in situations of special danger. Coordination was carried out by two "overguards" on horseback, in charge of inspecting the watchtowers and transmitting the notices to the Council "Council (history)") and the military authorities.[51] The system used smoke signals during the day and fire signals at night, also extending to points in the interior to warn the rural population.[53].
• - The castle of La Concepción - an old Andalusian citadel rebuilt in the century and reinforced during the time of the Catholic Monarchs with the bastion of Gomera - was the main place of refuge in Cartagena, it issued visual signals towards Murcia through intermediate towers and housed a permanent garrison "Guarrison (militia)") of twenty to twenty-five men under the command of a warden, all of them paid by the Crown.[53][54].
• - Active defense depended on forces such as the territorial militia, the temporary garrison companies and, above all, the urban militia. Until 1550, the residents of Cartagena were distributed in groups - seven in that year -,[d] later becoming organized into companies according to the number of inhabitants: three in 1575. Each company was led by a captain and a sergeant appointed by the Council. amount »—,[e] while the others were required to possess at least a pike "Pike (weapon)"), spear, harquebus, shotgun or crossbow, along with protections such as a morion and breastplate "Pike (armor)").[6][55].
• - During the season of greatest risk - between the end of spring and the beginning of autumn - temporary garrisons of between 200 and 400 soldiers were deployed in Cartagena,[f] and in case of emergency, the city received aid from inland towns such as Murcia, Lorca, Mula "Mula (Murcia)"), Totana, Alhama de Murcia, Aledo and Librilla. Among all of them, Murcia stood out as the main source of aid due to its demographic, economic and political weight, having a militia organized in eleven parishes "Parish (civil)") that allowed more than six hundred infantry to be mobilized in a matter of hours.[60].
• - In the naval aspect, Cartagena did not have a permanent navy dedicated to the protection of its coastline during this period,[45] although it did intermittently have the presence of Spanish galleys and, on occasions, squadrons from allied powers. Although El Puerto de Santa María was the main naval base of the Crown of Castile, the effervescent corsair predation in the Mediterranean motivated the naval forces to prolong their stays in ports in the southeast of Iberia, especially in Malaga and Cartagena. The latter frequently served as a wintering anchorage, which provided seasonal reinforcement of its defenses.[61].
Starting in 1540, the fear caused by the Franco-Ottoman alliance, together with the recent sacking of Gibraltar "Sacking of Gibraltar (1540)") and the visit of Charles V to Cartagena upon his return from the Day of Algiers in 1541, promoted a fortification program promoted by the magistrate Andrés Dávalos.[g] With the support of the Crown, the construction of the town was undertaken. wall of the Dean, the House of the King, the House of Gunpowder and the bastions of Cautor and del Mar, which were armed thanks to the pressure of Pedro Fajardo y Chacón, Marquis of the Vélez. Likewise, the defensive system of the Kingdom of Murcia was reorganized, assigning responsibilities to the Marquis of Vélez as major advance and coordinating efforts with the council militias of Cartagena, Murcia, Lorca and the manorial ones of the marquisates of Vélez and Villena.[65][66] Around 1540, the Council of State "Consejo de Estado (Spain)") determined that the permanent garrison of Cartagena was to be made up of 205 men and two artillerymen, of which thirty would be assigned to the castle, adding to the twenty-five "coast guards" already existing.[67] By the end of that decade, Cartagena had become one of the safest places in the southwestern Mediterranean, a security even more noticeable when the imperial galleys wintered in its port. However, as time demonstrated, these defenses continued to be weak, inconsistent and insufficient against a hypothetical attack by the Turkish-Berber navy, composed in the best times of Barbarossa by more than 110 galleys and 40 galley boats.[68].
The war pressure on the coast of Cartagena also had a strong social impact on the city. Starting in 1516, with the transformation of Algiers into a corsair base, the raids against the Spanish southeastern coast multiplied, and already in 1519 the Council warned the king that "the danger has doubled" due to the understanding between the Turks and the Berbers. organization of "rebatos" or assemblies "Assembly (touch)") of militia and "rides" or departures of urban companies by sea or land in pursuit of the enemy. Although Cartagena represented a secondary objective for the Barbary sailors due to its small population, its distance from the main Moorish centers and its proximity to Oran - which facilitated the reception of their notices -, the pressure on the city was constant. shortage of weapons, he had ordered the accumulation of stones on the roofs as an improvised defense method against a potential assault.[71] To guarantee security, the institutions established rigorous requirements for the settlement of new inhabitants, such as the commitment to reside in the city or in its countryside for more than ten years, have their house inhabited with a wife and children and assume the obligation to participate in the "rebates" in case of threat. In situations of danger, all the inhabitants of the countryside were obliged to take refuge in the walled area, night traffic was prohibited, fishermen - considered especially exposed - were ordered to return to port and pick up their boats, and the five gates of the city were closed. The protocol also included the general mobilization of the neighbors and the organization of the militia, the repair of the weakest sections of the wall and the supply of weapons and ammunition.[72] The situation had the result of inciting a climate of distrust towards the Moorish and Free Berber communities, who were prohibited from residing in the urban center of Cartagena through a royal provision issued after 1532, although its application was irregular in the practice.[73].
The post-Barbarossa corsair climb on the coasts of Cartagena (1546-1560)
During the period between the decades of 1540 and 1560, when the epigones of Barbarossa emerged, Cartagena was experiencing a notable demographic expansion—continuing the trend of the previous period—which was only truncated between 1551 and 1560 due to a chain of crises. Firstly, the city suffered a supply crisis caused by a series of bad harvests that affected the Kingdom of Murcia for five years, in turn triggering a subsistence crisis among the Cartagena population. Added to this situation was the outbreak of a plague epidemic in 1558-1559,[h] which severely hit a society weakened by food shortages. Furthermore, Cartagena saw its economic and human resources diminished due to the war needs of the Spanish Monarchy: in 1555 financial contributions were required to support the ill-fated defense of Bugía, and in 1557 young men were demanded for the war against France. This scenario was further deteriorated by a resurgence of corsair attacks, which exerted greater pressure on an already exhausted community.[75] Despite the virulence of the plague, which according to the estimates of Torres Sánchez (1994) caused the death of at least 801 people - which represented a mortality of 18.2% compared to the statistics calculated for 1551 - the demographic recovery was unusually quick.[76][77] The Neighborhood Survey of 1560 recorded 895 "neighbors",[i][79] and for 1563, Torres Sánchez (1987) places the number of residents between 4,200 and 4,500 people, based on the Memorial of places, houses and people of the Bishopric of Cartagena.[80].
In response to the vicissitudes of the geopolitical context, defensive reforms and expansions were undertaken. Between 1555 and 1570, new bastions were erected—Gibel and Hortichuela, between 1560 and 1561—and repair work was carried out on the pre-existing fortifications. The intensification of raids between 1558 and 1561 raised special concern for the security of the Molinete and the new suburbs outside the walls, such as San Roque - adjacent to the Puerta de Murcia - and San Diego - close to the Puerta de San Ginés -, which were more exposed to possible attacks.[81] One of the most serious episodes of this corsair cycle took place in May 1550, when the Arráez Dragut organized a great expedition against the Spanish Levant. Coming from its bases in Los Gelves and Mahdía, it stopped in Algiers with a flotilla of 26 boats in mid-April of that year, where it was joined by about 300 volunteers, including Turks, Berbers, renegades and exiled Moors. To guarantee the surprise factor, he sent a whip to Palamós with spies in charge of obtaining information about the whereabouts of the Spanish galleys, who were to be picked up in Mazarrón during the passage of Dragut's squadron through the area. However, and despite the secrecy of the operation, his ships were sighted near Oran, which allowed the governor to alert the peninsular authorities about the approach of the privateer. On May 13, the news had already reached Murcia, where infantry and cavalry militias were mobilized to defend Cartagena. Lorca, for his part, began his enlistment two days later. On May 17, one of Dragut's spies was captured, corroborating fears of an imminent incursion. Three days later, his squad was detected at Cabo de Gata, later anchoring near Carboneras. On the night of May 22, the Mazarrón "coast guards" detected his presence, and everything indicates that Dragut arrived near Cartagena in the early hours of the 23rd. After anchoring presumably in the Algamecas, from where he would have prepared a stealthy landing, the escape of one of the galley slaves that made up the expedition allowed the alarm to be raised in the city. Although no documentation is preserved to confirm whether a landing took place, the truth is that the Spanish forces had entrenched themselves at the possible landing points, with the Cartagena militias under the command of their aldermen and the Murcian ones organized by their captains and the corregidor. The women and children were evacuated to the King's House. Thus, Dragut gave up the attack and turned towards the Kingdom of Valencia, where he did manage to wreak havoc: he first sacked San Juan de Alicante, bombarded Villajoyosa and assaulted Cullera "Sacking of Cullera (1550)") before attacking Pollensa "Sacking of Pollensa (1550)"), in the Balearic Islands, and later heading towards Sardinia, where his trace was lost.[82].
The raids continued during the rest of the period, and the most devastating attack on the municipality of Cartagena occurred on June 29, 1558, when eight galley boats landed some 800 soldiers at Cape Palos without being detected, given that there were no "coast guards" deployed in that sector. The assailants advanced to the village of Los Alumbres Nuevos "Alumbres (Cartagena)"), which was unceremoniously looted, and they reembarked in El Gorguel - a short distance from Cartagena - after capturing and killing some of its inhabitants, given the impotence of the local militias. Although the city had asked for help from inland towns, help arrived too late. Lorca, for example, did not send the 300 reinforcement soldiers until July 10, when the danger had disappeared, and they were finally quartered in Mazarrón. In May 1560, the disaster of the Christian expedition against the yerbí refuge of Dragut triggered fear throughout the Spanish southeast of an Ottoman counteroffensive. Both King Felipe II and Luis Fajardo de la Cueva, Marquis of the Vélez, urged the Council of Lorca to prepare a shock force capable of leaving where it was necessary as soon as it received notice. However, the Ottoman navy, after destroying Juan Andrea Doria's fleet, chose to return to Constantinople.[74] Corsair activity, however, did not cease. Taking advantage of the remission of the epidemic of 1558-1559, the Barbary ships resumed their operations. In October 1560, ten of his galley boats captured two Flemish urcas "Urca (ship)") off Mazarrón, and in March of the same year the presence of up to eighteen corsair ships had been documented prowling the port of Cartagena, an indication that a new attempt on the city could be in the making.[83][84].
The assault against Cartagena
The Uluj Alí expedition and the preparations of the Marquis of the Vélez
The corsair expedition against the Spanish Levant in the spring of 1561 is an event for which a partial historical record is managed, since the sources analyzed by historiography exclusively reflect the Spanish perspective. Unlike the raid carried out by Dragut in 1550, this episode also lacks a comprehensive narrative, resulting in a fragmentary knowledge of it that prevents specifying aspects such as the exact date of departure from Algiers, the moment of arrival in the Iberian southeast or details about its journey along the Alicante coast. Despite this, the comparison with the usual patterns of privateer campaigns allows us to plausibly reconstruct its stages and characteristics. By 1561, the Regency of Algiers was once again governed by Hasan Pasha, son of Barbarossa, who had held the title of beylerbey since June 1557, after the death of his predecessor Salah Reis during the plague epidemic that had devastated Algiers since June 1556. Given that in the period 1561-1564 the Ottoman navy barely left port, the organization of this The raid exemplifies the wide degree of autonomy that the Algerian sailors enjoyed with respect to Sultan Suleiman.[85] The most favorable time for an expedition was the period between late spring and early autumn, taking advantage of the favorable weather conditions and reserving the rest of the year to winter the ships and commission maintenance work by caulkers and shore carpenters—mostly Christian slaves—along with specialized Moorish workers.[86] The The main objective of the company was to capture any ships that accidentally crossed paths and carry out raids on inhabited areas near the coast to capture the largest possible number of Christians and supply with them the lucrative slave market of Algiers, without ruling out the looting of urban centers or the evacuation of Moors.[87] As for the theater of operations, it was divided into two areas: "Western", which included the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands; and "Levante", which corresponded to Sicily, Corsica, Sardinia and the coasts of the Tyrrhenian and Adriatic Seas. During the beginning of the war season, almost all of the 12,000 soldiers in the Algiers garrison embarked, leaving only a small detachment on guard.[88]
In 1561, the expedition to "Western" fell under the direction of the arraeces Uluj Alí and Yusuf Rais,[j] the latter a figure practically unknown outside of the chronicles related to this campaign.[3] Uluj Alí, baptized as Giovanni Dionigi Galeni, was approximately 41 years old and was a renegade of Italian origin born in Calabria—Kingdom of Naples—, in The bosom of a Christian family made up of his father, the fisherman Birno Galeni, and his mother Pippa de Cicco. and changing his name to Uluj Alí - "Alí the Renegade". Over time, he managed to acquire a stake in a privateer brig, the performance of which brought him significant financial benefits. He was thus able to climb socially in Algiers, marry the daughter of his former master and obtain a marquee license, and since then he has carried out successful attacks on the Italian coast, in which his new name was phonetically deformed to "Occhiali". during the decades of 1540 and 1550. In 1560 he placed himself under the orders of Piali Pasha in the destruction of the Christian navy that had threatened Dragut, and the following year, while his partner counterattacked with a campaign against "Levant" in which he would subject the port of Naples to a naval blockade "Blockade (strategy)"), Uluj Ali would launch an attack towards "Western".[91]
The number of ships that made up the corsair squadron is a cause of dissension among the sources, because although the original notice from Oran numbered 44 ships of the expedition, the chapter minutes of the councils of Lorca - based on reports from the Council of Mojácar - and Cartagena, written during the occurrence of the expedition or in the days immediately following, include statements in which 26 ships are listed, the preferred figure. by Montojo Montojo (1987) and Velasco Hernández (2019).[5][92] Further numerically and temporally is the scholar Francisco Cascales, who raised the number of Uluj Alí vessels to 36 in 1621.[8] The majority of preserved records do not specify the type of ship used by the corsairs, with the exception of those related to the final sacking of Sóller: in that sense, Joan Binimelis in his account of 1595 and the anonymous parish report published in 1888 coincide in stating that they were mostly galley boats accompanied by some galleys, in contrast to Vicente Mut, who describes "galleys and other rowing vessels" in his chronicle of 1650. Christian use, its design sacrificed size and tonnage by virtue of greater speed, making it ideal for quick surprise attack and subsequent escape with the least possible risk. Their artillery was reduced to a larger piece in the bay "Crujía (nautical)") and two others on its sides, in addition to some grinders "Emeril (artillery)") on the sides, and its lightness was enhanced by the fact that only what was strictly necessary was carried on board: provisions, liquid, weapons and ammunition - which is why they needed to frequently make water. The average crew of a twenty-bank galley boat could amount to about 160 men or more, half of them rowers and the other half soldiers and sailors.[96].
The usual route of the Barbary expeditions included, once they set sail from Algiers, stopovers in Cherchell, the Habibas Islands or the Chafarinas before crossing to the Iberian Peninsula. Velasco Hernández (2019) assumes that Uluj Alí must have passed through the area of Cabo de Gata in the last days of April, linking it with an incursion documented by Cabrillana Ciézar (1982) on the field of Níjar on those same dates. on the way, to then go to attack a town in the Balearic Islands. It was common for them to look for a sheltered spot where they could be safe from winds and storms and from where they could wait in ambush for the transit of a merchant ship, including the Gata and Cope capes, the port of Portmán or the Grosa and Tabarca islands.[99] Generally, these campaigns rarely exceeded 50 or 60 days, a limit imposed by supplies, and they did not go more than five or six miles inland to avoid the risk of being intercepted by reinforcements from the interior and, above all, facing cavalry.[100] Military intelligence was a key resource for the Algerian arraeces: they knew of the importance of Cartagena as one of the main anchorages of the Spanish Navy, and therefore it was common for them to send spies to ensure the whereabouts of their galleys. Dragut had sent several spies before his attempted landing in 1550, and everything indicates that this practice was also resorted to in 1561.[101] In fact, in 1560 a spy had been captured in Mazarrón with instructions to reach Cartagena and investigate the presence and number of galleys.[102] This was not the only method of obtaining strategic information, however, since the privateers often interrogated the captains of ships from Cartagena that they captured at sea, and there was news that some renegade from Cartagena had come to offer to guide the corsairs in a raid against Mazarrón or the suburb of San Roque, in Cartagena.[103].
Counteracting these tactics was precisely the purpose of the firmly established Spanish warning system: the "double presidio" of Oran and Mazalquivir quickly dispatched a brig with the warning to Cartagena as soon as enemy squadrons were sighted, and from there the news spread by land to the coastal towns to the north and south of the city.[104] This happened in the spring of 1561, when thanks to the timely warning from Oran the leaders of the Kingdom of Murcia learned two weeks in advance that a Turkish-Berber fleet had headed towards the Spanish coast. The following movements of the expedition are known thanks to the minutes of the Council of Lorca, which record the receipt of several letters related to it. In the first, on April 24, the Marquis de los Vélez reported the sighting of the Algerian fleet near Oran, "and because they could soon do damage in the city of Cartagena and throughout this coast, [in] especially in the area of Maçarrón, there was no help that could resist it," he ordered the militia to be prepared to leave. On the 30th of the same month, a letter from the Mojácar Council, dated the previous day, warned of the presence of 26 privateer ships in its waters, and therefore begged Lorca for help from 40-50 harquebusiers. It is this letter that allows Velasco Hernández (2019) to conjecture that the expedition had passed Cabo de Gata shortly before that date. On May 2, a new letter from the Marquis of Vélez orders Lorca to send a troop of 200 infantry and 30 cavalry to Mazarrón — where he himself was located — but the next day, when the army was about to march, a final letter was received from the Marquis annulling the previous order, indicating that their movement was unnecessary for the moment, in what Velasco Hernández (2019) considers "a mistake." in bulk" given that that same day at night the corsair expedition had arrived near Cartagena.[8][92].
The Marquis of Vélez, named Luis Fajardo de la Cueva, was approximately 53 years old when he held the position of Major Advance and Captain General of the Kingdom of Murcia in the name of King Philip II in 1561, and was an aristocrat born in Murcia or Vélez-Blanco—Kingdom of Granada—, son of the also aristocrats Pedro Fajardo y Chacón, Marquis of Vélez, and Mencía de la Cueva and Toledo. Married to Leonor Fernández de Córdoba y Silva in 1526, Luis Fajardo was a veteran military man who during his youth had served in the wars of Charles V against the Ottomans in Hungary (1531), against the French in Provence (1536), and against the Turks and their Berber partners in Tunisia (1535) and Algiers (1541), being recognized for a bellicose personality that authors such as Cascales highlight. and Ginés Pérez de Hita.[1][8][105] Regarding the exercise of countermeasures against corsair raids, Fajardo had extensive experience that dated back to at least 1543, when he had served as advance lieutenant in the absence of his father in the Kingdom of Murcia. At that time, it had been known about the possible approach of the Ottoman army from the north after having intervened in the siege of Nice "Siege of Nice (1543)") in favor of its French allies and wintering in Toulon, which is why Luis Fajardo, invested with the authority delegated by the Marquis of the Vélez, toured the Murcian kingdom calling for levies in Lorca, Murcia and in his family manors, where he faced some resistance. in Mula. When the Turkish fleet finally appeared, in November, it was to disembark to slaughter some flocks that were grazing in the countryside of Mazarrón, being rejected by the Velezan lordly militias and the Lorca councillors, led, now, by the Marquis of Vélez in person.[106] Having inherited the marquisate - along with the associated responsibilities - upon the death of his father in 1546, the Marquis de lo Vélez's ability to inspire obedience was tested again in 1551, when rumors spread about the possible arrival of a large Turkish navy to the southeast of the peninsula. The then Prince Felipe then requested the Marquis of the Vélez to move his residence to Campo de Cartagena and warn the lordly and council militias of the Kingdom of Murcia. By September, 1,500 men had been gathered to garrison Cartagena, which, however, were mobilized in vain as it became clear that the alarm was unfounded, so that in November of that year the majority of the soldiers were discharged.[107] Finally, allusions of a laudatory nature are recorded to a combat that would have taken place in Portmán on an imprecise date, in which the marquis, accompanied by the leadership of his led by his half-brother Juan Fajardo de Silva and his son Diego Fajardo y Córdoba, would have repelled a privateer landing and inflicted heavy casualties on the adversary contingent, of which "more than fifty", supposedly, would have occurred at the hands of the marquis himself.[1][8].
opposing forces
Regarding the troops deployed by the Ottoman corsairs under the command of Uluj Ali, the existing documentation shows a substantial divergence both in the calculation of the number of troops and in their nature, just as happens with the ships. The chapter minutes of the Council of Cartagena examined by Montojo Montojo (1987) record a landing force composed of 1,800 soldiers, a figure that has been accepted as credible by that author and by Velasco Hernández (2019), who, recognizing that the contingent "was quite numerous", highlights the quantitative similarity with the cadres used in Sóller a week later, estimated by the Spanish sources between 1600 and 1700 men.[l][4][5][94][95][109] The alternative comes from the hand of Cascales and Pérez de Hita, who deviate from the proposed figure with "more than nine hundred" for the first and "more than two thousand" for the second.[1][8] The classification and origin of these soldiers thrown to the ground by Uluj Alí are also difficult. to ponder based on the available sources, given that the corsairs were a very heterogeneous group that included renegade European, Turkish, Moorish and Moorish elements.[28] The Cartagena capitular minutes describe the attacking force as composed of "Turkish marksmen, riflemen and archers", which, given that the word "Turk" was defined as any Muslim subject of the sultan Ottoman, it could be a characterization pars pro toto.[5][110] Velasco Hernández (2019) introduces a nuance by considering that these combatants must have been janissaries "for the most part."[100] Bover de Rosselló (1856) states the same thing when discussing the attack on Sóller, while the parish report published in 1888 refers to them undoubtedly as "janissaries and Turks."[94][108] The widespread presence of this elite unit in the crews of the Regency of Algiers was a certainly recent phenomenon, since at first they were vetoed by Jeireddín Barbarossa. This circumstance changed after a series of revolts between 1561 and 1568, when the janissaries began to be admitted by the arraeces on their ships and, in exchange, the renegades gained access to the Algerian militia.[111].
In the Spanish counterpart, the primary sources are even more sparse about the forces that the Marquis of Vélez had at the time of facing the corsairs, which must be distinguished from those that finally participated in the battle. The minutes of the Council of Cartagena briefly indicate that, when the time came, the marquis "went out with some people on horseback and on foot", since Cascales, somewhat more illustrative, states that "the marquis then left with his people, and those he could get out of Cartagena, leaving the city with a good guard." With this "people" of the marquis, reference is made to the militias from the manors that the House of Fajardo owned in the Kingdom of Murcia, which included the towns of Mula, Molina de Segura, Librilla and Alhama de Murcia. contemporaries to resort to the study of complementary documentation to indirectly reconstruct the military mobilization that had to be carried out. In this way, according to the data collected by Velasco Hernández (2019), the body of cavalry that attended the "rebatos" usually consisted of between fifty and one hundred horsemen, although it could be increased to over 150 with those from Lorca and Murcia - in the register of volunteer gentlemen with weapons from Murcia and Lorca carried out in 1598, those registered with horses and weapons were 106 in Murcia and 52 in Lorca. In that sense, Velasco Hernández concludes that around a hundred horse soldiers must have been present in Cartagena, since the Lorca units did not participate in the relief of Cartagena.[113] The council militias must have constituted the bulk of the defensive effort in the spring of 1561. In the case of the Murcian militia, Chacón Jiménez (1979) records a recruitment of more than 3,000 men, even though it had been carried out during the night and Murcia was at that time isolated by an overflowing of the Segura River. The author himself highlights it as significant "despite the hyperbolic", while Velasco Hernández judges it exaggerated and, relying on the capitular minutes of the Huertano council, suggests that the Murcian relief would have consisted rather of about 200 harquebusiers. 1,251 troops distributed in three companies.[6] The defense device was completed by the 20-25 soldiers of the permanent garrison of the castle of Concepción under the command of its warden and, in the case of being actually present—since it was usually activated at the end of spring—the temporary garrison with its 200-400 men.[114].
The battle
The historiographic understanding of the Battle of Santa Monica is based on four written sources, all of them individual accounts that respond to different interests:
• - Firstly, we would find the chapter minutes of the Council of Cartagena, documents of an administrative nature and internal use that record the deliberations and agreements of the municipal corporation, and where the details of the assault emerge reflected together with the provisions adopted on the occasion of it. Montojo Montojo (1987) was the first historian who offered an exhaustive narrative of the conflict based on these minutes, and it is on his interpretation that Velasco Hernández's (2019) analysis of the passage of the Uluj Alí expedition through Cartagena rests, which he accepts as reliable.[3][5].
• - The next resource, following a temporal order, is the Book of the population and exploits of the very noble and loyal city of Lorca, written by Ginés Pérez de Hita under commission from the Council of Lorca in 1572 but not published in its entirety until 1929.[115] Despite the fact that its song —«Of the battle that the Marquis of the Vélez had in Cartagena with the Moors of Africa»— offers the exhibition most detailed of the facts, its reliability as a source has been systematically questioned by historiography, considering that in this book Pérez de Hita does not aspire to historicity but to provide Lorca with his own epic inspired by the Trojan cycle, for which he resorts to a fabled story that contains "serious inaccuracies" and chivalric episodes with a factual background but "of a fictional nature inspired by legends local».[116][117][118].
• - The Book of Lorca, as it is commonly abbreviated, served as a draft for the magnum opus of Pérez de Hita: the History of the civil wars of Granada, in the second part of which, published in 1619, the battle of Santa Mónica appears referred to in a succinct introductory passage about the figure of the Marquis of the Vélez.[1][117] Although the first part, set in the struggles between Zegríes and Abencerrajes of the century, is configured as a historical novel, the second, set in the Alpujarras War of 1568-1571, can be considered more "a fictionalized story of medium quality" in the words of Bunes Ibarra (1983), in which Franco Llopis and Moreno Díaz del Campo (2019) appreciate that "the literary artifice is replaced by a greater concern when narrating the events and in which there is less concession to fantasy."[119][120] However, Carrasco Urgoiti (1981) points out the lack of objectivity of Pérez de Hita when he describes the actions of the Marquis of the Vélez: "It is evident that for Pérez de Hita the stately prestige of the great Andalusian houses has not been extinguished, but only when he has a personal relationship with them is he interested in exalting their exploits. This occurs to an eminent degree when it deals with the Marquis of Vélez, Don Luis Fajardo, under whose flags the author served and in whose manor lands he spent part of his life. The exaltation that it is the object of in the book should be attributed, more than to historical facts, to such circumstance and personal knowledge.
Repercussions
Resumption of the corsair expedition
The frustrated assault on Cartagena had consequences that were immediately felt, both in the reinforcement of the urban defenses and in the itinerary of the privateer fleet. In the city, authorities implemented a series of urgent measures aimed at preventing new attacks. Thus, it was arranged that two pairs of horse guards would tour the walls every night and inspect the "coast guards." The Puerta de San Ginés was narrowed so that only one rider could pass through at a time, and a sentry box with capacity for four or six soldiers was erected above it. In addition, the blocking of the Puerta del Mar, located in the Arenal area, was ordered, along with the houses that faced the Plaza de la Pescadería. The Murcia council militia received instructions to remain in Cartagena until the definitive departure of the corsair expedition was confirmed. Finally, the obligation was established for all residents to spend the night within the walled enclosure, without leaving it until dawn and in broad daylight, with failure to comply with this rule being punished with six days in prison and a fine of one hundred maravedis.[129].
For its part, Uluj Alí's squadron landed on Grosa Island, both to give its crew a rest after having hastily set sail from the Algamecas and to stalk potential prey. Although there is no evidence of the corsairs' subsequent crossing of the Alicante coast, it is likely that they tried to plunder some other coastal enclave. On the other hand, the incursion of Sóller —Mallorca— on May 11, 1561, just a week after the failed attempt on Cartagena, is documented. As was usual in Barbary expeditions, Uluj Alí had first looked for a point to supply himself with drinking water, finding it on the island of Ibiza. However, this stopover revealed their presence to the warning system of the Kingdom of Mallorca, which allowed Lieutenant General Guillem de Rocafull to alert the captain of Sóller, Joan Angelats, and the neighboring towns of Buñola, Santa María del Camino and Alaró, which he urged to prepare to provide aid. Despite the precautions, the Algiers Regency squadron managed to anchor in a nearby cove and disembark around 1,600 troops without the "coast guards" detecting it. The invading forces were divided into two columns: one advanced directly towards the port, while the other made a detour and attacked Sóller from the north, obtaining considerable loot. The Sollerico militiamen, who had initially concentrated in the port, found themselves cornered between both corsair contingents, so they decided to launch a counterattack on the group that occupied the port and, after recovering it, they awaited the return of the second party, which returned loaded with the proceeds of the looting and numerous captives, mostly women and children. Seeing themselves pursued, the assailants fled towards the cliffs, where they abandoned part of what they had stolen and executed many prisoners before managing to reembark.[130].
This constituted Uluj Ali's last campaign against the Spanish coasts. After the new disaster in Sóller, his fleet headed towards Algiers, where in September 1561 a period of political interim was inaugurated, sparked by the dismissal and transfer of Hasan Pasha to Constantinople to stand trial. During this interregnum, the government of the Regency fell successively to four provisional beylerbeys - Hassan Agha, Cuça Mohammed, Ahmed Pasha and Yahia - whose administrations lasted barely a year, until the return of Barbarossa's son in September 1562, once exonerated from the accusations. That same year, the Ottoman Sultan Selim II summoned Uluj Ali to the imperial capital and entrusted him with command of the Alexandria Guard, a position that accredited him as de facto vice admiral of the Ottoman navy, subordinate to Piali Pasha. In 1565 he intervened in the ill-fated siege of Malta "Siege of Malta (1565)"), where his friend Dragut perished, although this setback did not cut short his career: in 1566 he personally commanded the Ottoman naval forces in a raid through the Tyrrhenian Sea, devastating several towns in Corsica and Sardinia.[131]
In 1568, Uluj Ali assumed the beylerbeyato of Algiers, beginning a mandate marked by two events: the second rebellion of the Alpujarras (1568-1571) and the preparations for the overthrow of the Hafsi dynasty in Tunisia. During the Granada conflict, he authorized privateers—mostly Moorish in origin—to join the insurrection, to which he also provided logistical support. However, its main strategic ambition focused on the weakened Hafsi sultanate of Abu al-Abbas Ahmad III, whose vassalage to the Spanish Monarchy had undermined its legitimacy among its Muslim subjects. Through a combined offensive by sea and land, backed by the surrounding Kabyles, Uluj Ali conquered Tunisia in January 1569, proclaiming himself bey of the city and unifying the two main regencies of the Maghreb under his aegis, a feat that only Jeireddin Barbarossa had previously accomplished. In 1571, the sultan claimed him to participate in the great expedition against the Holy League "Holy League (1571)") that led to the battle of Lepanto. Despite the Ottoman defeat against the forces of John of Austria, the privateer managed to save thirty ships and return to Constantinople, where he was received with honors and invested as commander of the Ottoman navy in the process of reconstruction, with which he would carry out raids in 1572 and 1573. That last year, the victor of Lepanto recovered Tunisia "Conquest of Tunisia (1573)") for Spain, causing a Uluj Ali's swift reaction: at the head of more than 250 galleys, he reconquered "Conquest of Tunis (1574)") both the city and its port of La Goleta in the summer of 1574. Between 1575 and 1577 he established himself in Constantinople, away from significant war actions, but in 1578 he set out to sea with 50 galleys to quell a revolt in Cyprus. The following year he was assigned to the Black Sea as part of the war effort against the Safavid Persians, in what would be his last relevant mission in the service of the sultan. At more than seventy years old, he retired from active life and died in 1587.[132].
Consolidation of Cartagena as a stronghold
The attempt of 1561 made Cartagena's defensive vulnerabilities evident and left a lasting mark on the collective consciousness of its citizens, generating an environment of insecurity that lasted for years. In the following months, any rumor about a possible return of the privateer fleet was enough to induce the exodus of entire families along with their most precious assets. At the end of May, the false news that the Ottoman and Algerian squads were preparing a new assault against Cartagena caused panic and triggered a mass flight, forcing the Council to act:[133].
Three years later, in 1564, the council minutes continued to include references to the frustrated landing, among them the conviction among the councilors that its primary objective would have been the looting of the San Roque suburb.[129] The Turkish-Berberian pressure remained constant throughout the decade: in 1562 forty ships were seen - far exceeding the force of the previous year - prowling the port, while in Mazarrón intercepted a spy sent to find out how many galleys were anchored in Cartagena; and the naval harassment would continue, to a lesser extent, in 1563, 1565, 1566 and 1567. The Cartagena defense device even received a setback in 1573, when the mayor Pedro Monreal was ambushed and captured while practicing a "ride" in La Manga del Mar Menor against the corsairs, who obtained 1000 ducats "Ducado (currency)") for their rescue.[134].
The attack of 1561 highlighted that, although Cartagena within the walls enjoyed relative security, its periphery continued to require urgent improvements.[135] The suburb of San Roque, lacking wall protection and crowded with flimsy and low-rise homes, was identified as a critical point because it made it easier to overcome the walls in the Puerta de Murcia sector. The Council decreed its abandonment during the first years of the decade 1561-1570, but it continued to be inhabited and received new grants of licenses to build on plots between 1567 and 1591, coinciding with the period of demographic growth that would lead the city to reach 9,500 inhabitants in 1600.[81][129][136] The second rebellion of the Alpujarras provided the definitive stimulus for a fortification program more ambitious than all the previous ones. In the spring of 1570, Philip II sent the military engineers Vespasiano Gonzaga and Juan Bautista Antonelli to Cartagena to direct the modernization of the defensive framework, a project that this time had significant financing and manpower. the reinforcement of the gates of San Ginés and the Dock, as well as the construction of a new fence that complemented the wall of the Dean. Towards mid-1571 the works were practically completed, at which time Cartagena was considered fully fortified.[138][139] The notable improvement in the defenses was reflected in the words that Leonardo Donato addressed to the Venetian Senate, at the end of his term as ambassador of the Republic of Venice in Spain (1573):
Rebalance of powers and decline of the "great galley war"
At the beginning of the 1560s, the Hispanic Monarchy faced a period of naval reconstruction and gradual restoration of its warlike capacity in the Mediterranean, which was not cut short even by disasters such as the Los Gelves expedition (1560) or the multiple shipwreck of La Herradura (1562). In 1563, the Beylerbey of Algiers, Hasan Pasha, mobilized the resources of the Regency to undertake the conquest of the square of Oran, but had to lift the siege due to the arrival of a relief force composed of ships from Genoa, Spain and Naples under the command of Andrea Doria, and whose preparations in Cartagena had been assisted by Luis Fajardo, Marquis of the Vélez.[8][150] The process of Spanish maritime recovery continued to bear fruit with the reconquest of the rock of Vélez de la Gomera in 1564 and with the transcendental intervention in the relief of Malta in 1565, actions that preluded the victory of the Holy League in Lepanto, in 1571.[150][151].
The outbreak of the second rebellion of the Alpujarras in 1568 represented a parenthesis in this impulse, by modifying the military priorities of the Monarchy and forcing it to divert a large part of its naval resources to guard the coasts of the Kingdom of Granada, to prevent Turkish-Berber support. This strategic reorientation implied the neglect of other fronts and facilitated the fall of Tunisia into Ottoman hands in 1569.[151] For their part, the rebellious Moriscos were unable to capture any port that would allow them to receive foreign aid on a sustained basis, although they besieged several cities on the Almeria coast for that purpose. The first effective response of the Monarchy came from the Marquis of the Vélez, who gathered a contingent of 5,000 infantry and 300 cavalry from the militias of Lorca, Murcia and Cartagena to assist the governor of Almería, García de Villarroel, against the insurgent threat. However, the marquis' campaign was hindered by desertions and violent looting committed by his insubordinate troops, to the point of suffering a personal attack when he tried to reestablish discipline. Finally, Governor García de Villarroel was able to see the pressure on his city relieved thanks to the approach of the Murcian army and the sending, in January 1569, of six frigates loaded with men and supplies from Cartagena, which committed so many troops to land and naval relief that it was practically unguarded, requiring Murcia to send 266 men to ensure its own defense.[152].
That same month, the episode known as the "Inox business" took place, in which the Almeria militias and the crews of the Cartagena ships captained by Gil de Andrada captured more than 3,000 Moriscos on the rock of Inox who were awaiting transport to Barbary by corsairs, being reduced to slavery; Of them, 333 women and girls were destined as loot to Cartagena. The limited progress obtained by the campaigns of the Marquises of Vélez and Mondéjar aroused the dissatisfaction of Philip II, which motivated the appointment of his half-brother, Juan de Austria, as captain general of Granada.[153] Fajardo thus ended, demoted in the chain of command, his last service to the Crown, before dying at nearly 66 years of age in 1574.[105] Meanwhile, Granadan emissaries had tried to persuade Uluj Ali to take an active part in the uprising, assuring him that, after the Moorish uprising, those of Aragon and Valencia would follow, and that they would give him the port of Cartagena as the nerve center for an invasion of the Iberian Peninsula. The Beylerbey chose, however, to focus his efforts on Hafsi Tunisia, although in January 1569 six Algerian galley slaves landed artillery, ammunition and reinforcements near Almería, in contrast to the inability of the Ottoman navy, which was engaged in the "Turkish-Venetian War (1570-1573)" conquest of Venetian Cyprus. In Spain, Philip II ordered Gil de Andrada to patrol the coast and requested naval support from Genoa, Naples and Sicily, which resulted in the interception of numerous privateer ships, although by the spring of 1570 it was estimated that there were some 4,000 Turkish and Berber volunteers fighting in the Alpujarras. Given the intensification of hostilities, the Cartagena militias were mobilized repeatedly to continue integrating into the forces in charge of quelling the rebellion.[154].
References
[1] ↑ Aunque el episodio ha sido cubierto por la historiografía contemporánea española desde que Escobar Barberán (1929) recopilara por primera vez el relato de los hechos contenido en las obras de Pérez de Hita y Cascales,[9] y que Montojo Montojo (1987) publicara el informe relativo a lo acontecido presente en la documentación original del Concejo de Cartagena,[10] no sería hasta Gómez Vizcaíno y Munuera Navarro (2002) cuando la contienda recibiría una denominación específica, alusiva a la onomástica del día en que tuvo lugar el enfrentamiento: el ataque del día de Santa Mónica.[11] Pérez Adán (2021) se hizo eco de esta designación, adaptándola como «batalla de Santa Mónica».[12].
[2] ↑ Al margen de los moriscos, la población argelina del siglo XVI presentaba una singular heterogeneidad, estructurada en los siguientes grupos:
[3] ↑ Entre 1526 y 1542 estas «guardas» se disponían, desde Cabo de Palos a Cartagena, en Cabo de Palos, Juncos, Portmán, Escombreras, la Dargeta –de localización desconocida según Grandal López (1986)[52]–, cabezo de San Julián y en las «puntas» del puerto, llamadas Cala Cortina y de los Peces. Desde Cartagena a Isla Plana lo hacían en las Algamecas, Roldán, El Portús, La Azohía e Isla Plana. La «guarda» responsable de avisar a los habitantes del campo era la del cabezo de la Atalaya, mientras que las de comunicación con Murcia estaban en las torres del Albujón y del Castellar. En 1556-1557 se colocaban también en Moscas, El Gorguel, Algameca Grande y Chica, el cabo Roche y Lomas del Cedacero.[53].
[4] ↑ Compuesta cada una de ellas por 25 o 50 hombres según Montojo Montojo (1994),[55] o por una cifra oscilante entre 65 y 130 de acuerdo a Velasco Hernández (2019).[56].
[5] ↑ La «caballería de cuantía» fue un modelo de milicia ecuestre instaurado por las Cortes de Alcalá de 1348 como sucesor de la caballería villana, hasta su disolución en 1619.[57] En Cartagena, a diferencia de lo ocurrido en Lorca o Murcia, su continuidad se vio entrecortada por las persistentes maniobras políticas de los regidores del Concejo, quienes abogaban por su supresión alegando una presunta ineficacia de la caballería en el accidentado relieve de la costa cartagenera. Montojo Montojo (1991) contempla dicho argumento como un subterfugio de la oligarquía para coartar la movilidad social que podía derivarse de la incorporación de mercaderes y letrados a esta milicia.[58][56].
[6] ↑ La horquilla es aportada por Velasco Hernández (2019) en referencia al periodo 1532-1562. A partir de la década de 1570, el fin de la «gran guerra de galeras», el viraje de la política hispánica hacia el Atlántico –que consumía gran parte de los recursos de la Real Hacienda–, la expulsión de los moriscos del Reino de Granada y la gradual repoblación de la costa del sureste fueron difuminando la necesidad de las guarniciones temporales.[59].
[7] ↑ El corregimiento era una institución político-administrativa castellana que fue introducida en el municipio de Murcia en 1394, agregando en la misma demarcación a Lorca en 1475 y a Cartagena en 1503, tras reintegrarse la ciudad portuaria en la jurisdicción de realengo. A partir de entonces, Cartagena, Lorca y Murcia compartieron un único corregidor, residente en la capital del reino, hasta 1645. En aquel año, Lorca accedió a un corregimiento propio, una vicisitud que replicaría Cartagena en 1706.[62][63][64].
[8] ↑ El brote epidémico se había originado en Valencia en abril de 1557, desde donde empezó a propagarse, primero a Cataluña y después al Reino de Murcia, para extenderse posteriormente a Andalucía Oriental.[74].
[9] ↑ En los recuentos de población del Antiguo Régimen de España –enmarcados en la época preestadística–, «vecino» refería al cabeza de una unidad familiar. En ese sentido, las averiguaciones de vecindades tenían el propósito de actualizar la lista de contribuyentes obligados al pago de alcabalas.[78].
[10] ↑ Escobar Barberán (1929) especula que el responsable de la expedición pudo haber sido el corsario Kara Mustafa, quien operó desde el peñón de Vélez de la Gomera hasta su reconquista por la Monarquía Hispánica en 1564, tras haber sido ocupado por los otomanos desde 1522.[89].
[11] ↑ El término turco otomano ʿulūj –en turco moderno ʿuluç; procedente del árabe 'ildj–, con el cual se designaba a los renegados, se traduce literalmente como «bárbaro» o «extranjero», en el sentido de persona originaria de un contexto cultural cristiano.[90].
[12] ↑ Cabe señalar que, en el caso de Sóller, únicamente Bover de Rosselló (1856) se aparta de estas evaluaciones al situar la cifra en 1300.[108].
[13] ↑ Velasco Hernández (2019) considera muy probable que tuviera lugar en las Algamecas el desembarco corsario de 1502, que avanzó en dirección a Cartagena hasta ser repelido por el alcaide del castillo de la Concepción en las proximidades de la rambla de Benipila. El mismo autor indica que la expedición de Dragut en 1550, en la que sospecha que estuvo presente el propio Uluj Alí, habría seguido ese mismo patrón en su aproximación a la ciudad, aunque no exista certeza sobre si llegó efectivamente a desembarcar. Esta familiaridad con la orografía cartagenera respondería a la colaboración de renegados y moriscos de la zona con los corsarios.[123]
[14] ↑ Este «raso» era una llanura situada al noroeste de Cartagena, en un camino paralelo a la rambla de Benipila –cuyo cauce original, hasta que fue desviado por las obras de construcción del Arsenal en 1731, desembocaba en el mar de Mandarache– desde las Algamecas.[12][125][126] En el entorno de esa llanura se encontraban unas salinas operadas por el Concejo, que habían empezado a explotarse entre 1529 y 1541 precisamente por la imposibilidad de utilizar las de Cabo de Palos por la amenaza corsaria.[127].
[15] ↑ Esta supuesta fama del marqués de los Vélez entre sus enemigos es explayada por Cascales, quien afirma que había retratos de Fajardo «armado con una lança en la mano y en la punta de la lança una cabeça de un turco» expuestos en la residencia del beylerbey en la ciudadela de Argel, en el palacio de Topkapı en Constantinopla y en la casa del regidor Nicolás Garre de Cáceres –citado como «Nicolás Garri»– en Cartagena.[1] Muñoz Rodríguez (2005) da por cierto que un retrato así existiera en el domicilio de Garre de Cáceres, atendiendo a que su familia mantenía una relación clientelar con la Casa de Fajardo.[128].
[16] ↑ Esta aparente presencia de un contingente lorquino en Cartagena durante los días 3 y 4 de mayo de 1561 parece contradecir la información proporcionada por las actas capitulares del Concejo de Lorca. Según estos documentos, resultaría irrefutable que las milicias lorquinas, aunque preparadas para movilizarse, permanecieron en su ciudad al recibir el 3 de mayo una comunicación del marqués de los Vélez que revocaba una orden previa de desplazamiento hacia la costa amenazada.[92].
[17] ↑ a b c d e f g h i j Pérez de Hita, 1915, p. 44.
[18] ↑ a b Chacón Jiménez, 1979, p. 471.
[19] ↑ a b c d e Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 215.
[20] ↑ a b c d e f Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 219.
[21] ↑ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n ñ Montojo Montojo, 1987, p. 73.
[22] ↑ a b c Gómez Vizcaíno y Montojo Montojo, 1993, p. 327.
[23] ↑ a b Chacón Jiménez, 1979, p. 169.
[24] ↑ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Cascales, 1874, p. 22.
[25] ↑ Escobar Barberán, 1929, pp. LII-LVI, 139-150.
[26] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1987, pp. 73-4.
[27] ↑ Gómez Vizcaíno y Munuera Navarro, 2002, p. 138.
[36] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 491, 493-494, 511.
[37] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 62.
[38] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 13, 162.
[39] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 494.
[40] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 47.
[41] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 24, 47.
[42] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 46-47.
[43] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 50, 81.
[44] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 24.
[45] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 47, 198.
[46] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 494-495.
[47] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 199-200.
[48] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 24, 91.
[49] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 44.
[50] ↑ a b c Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 52.
[51] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 87-88.
[52] ↑ Cresti, 2008, p. 436.
[53] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 51-52.
[54] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 52, 88.
[55] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 51, 84, 200.
[56] ↑ Cresti, 2008, p. 417.
[57] ↑ Cresti, 2008, pp. 412, 417, 436.
[58] ↑ Cresti, 2008, p. 437.
[59] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 491.
[60] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 20.
[61] ↑ a b c Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 497.
[62] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 39.
[63] ↑ a b Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 548.
[64] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1993, pp. 23-24, 27-28.
[65] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1993, p. 27.
[66] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 68.
[67] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 138.
[68] ↑ Grandal López, 1986, p. 6.
[69] ↑ a b c Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 525-526.
[70] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 140.
[71] ↑ a b Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 522.
[72] ↑ a b c Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 141.
[73] ↑ Guerrero Arjona, 2019, pp. 115, 122.
[74] ↑ Montojo Montojo (parte 3), 1991, pp. 52-53.
[75] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 142-143.
[76] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 141-144.
[77] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 143.
[78] ↑ Tornel Cobacho, 2001, pp. 172, 250.
[79] ↑ Martín-Consuegra Blaya, Muñoz Rodríguez y Abad González, 2009, pp. 26-27.
[80] ↑ Membrado, 2020, p. 52.
[81] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 503, 530.
[82] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 190.
[83] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 193.
[84] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 128, 190.
[85] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 41.
[86] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 499-500, 519.
[87] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 128.
[88] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 67.
[89] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 516.
[90] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 213-214.
[91] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1993, pp. 32-36.
[92] ↑ Torres Sánchez, 1994, p. 76.
[93] ↑ Montojo Montojo (parte 1), 1991, pp. 58-59.
[94] ↑ Montojo Montojo (parte 1), 1991, p. 107.
[95] ↑ Montojo Montojo (parte 1), 1991, p. 59.
[96] ↑ Torres Sánchez, 1987, p. 249.
[97] ↑ a b Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 530-531.
[98] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 203-205.
[99] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 214.
[100] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 504.
[101] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 211-212, 215.
[102] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 100.
[103] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 97.
[104] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 87.
[105] ↑ Escobar Barberán, 1929, p. LV.
[106] ↑ a b Benzoni, Gino (1998). «Galeni, Gian Dionigi». Diccionario biográfico de los italianos (en italiano) 51. Instituto de la Enciclopedia Italiana. Consultado el 28 de noviembre de 2025. - [https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/gian-dionigi-galeni_(Dizionario-Biografico)/](https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/gian-dionigi-galeni_(Dizionario-Biografico)/)
[107] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 216.
[108] ↑ a b c d Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 218.
[109] ↑ Mut, 1841, p. 584.
[110] ↑ a b c Anónimo, 1888, p. 1155.
[111] ↑ a b Binimelis, 2014, pp. 193-201, 619-627.
[112] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 96-97.
[113] ↑ Cabrillana Ciézar, 1982, p. 168.
[114] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 101-102, 215.
[115] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 102-103.
[116] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 130.
[117] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 116.
[118] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 507.
[119] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 129, 226.
[120] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 101.
[121] ↑ a b Vázquez de Prada, Valentín. «Luis Fajardo de la Cueva». Historia Hispánica. Real Academia de la Historia. Consultado el 28 de noviembre de 2025.: https://historia-hispanica.rah.es/biografias/16266
[122] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 182-183, 185-186.
[123] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 206-207.
[124] ↑ a b Bover de Rosselló, 1856, p. 46.
[125] ↑ Mut, 1841, p. 526.
[126] ↑ Bunes Ibarra, 1988, p. 69.
[127] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 87, 200.
[128] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 182.
[129] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 218-219.
[130] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 140, 142.
[131] ↑ a b Escobar Barberán, 1929, pp. 139-150.
[132] ↑ Carrasco Urgoiti, 1976, p. 80.
[133] ↑ a b Mimura, 2006, p. 167.
[134] ↑ Fernández Rubio, 2019, pp. 226-227.
[135] ↑ Bunes Ibarra, 1983, p. 28.
[136] ↑ Franco Llopis y Moreno Díaz del Campo, 2019, p. 189.
[137] ↑ Carrasco Urgoiti, 1981, p. 60.
[138] ↑ Centenero de Arce, 2005, pp. 71-75.
[139] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 156, 204.
[140] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 207.
[141] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2023, p. 65.
[142] ↑ Conesa García y García García, 2003, p. 93.
[143] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1983, p. XXXVI.
[144] ↑ Muñoz Rodríguez, 2005, p. 60.
[145] ↑ a b c d Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 220.
[146] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 215, 220-221.
[147] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 216-217, 221.
[148] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 217-218.
[149] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 219-220.
[150] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 507, 504, 510.
[151] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 510.
[152] ↑ Gómez Vizcaíno y Munuera Navarro, 2002, p. 126.
[153] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 532.
[154] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 498.
[155] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 140, 245.
[156] ↑ García Mercadal, 1952, pp. 1213-1214.
[157] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 498-499.
[158] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 245.
[159] ↑ Gómez Vizcaíno y Munuera Navarro, 2002, p. 157.
[160] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 537.
[161] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 245-247.
[162] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 138-139, 245-247.
[163] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 227.
[164] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 227, 230-231.
[165] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 549.
[166] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 199, 223.
[167] ↑ a b c Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 495.
[168] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 231-236.
[169] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 233.
[170] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 234-236.
[171] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 92-93.
[172] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 238-239.
[173] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 511.
[174] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 239.
[175] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 244.
[176] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 20-22, 24-25.
During the Modern Age, North Africa acquired a key strategic relevance for the Hispanic Monarchy, particularly as a result of the intensification of corsairism on the Barbary coast. Although the phenomenon had a history since the 19th century, for centuries it had occupied a marginal place with respect to the interests of the Crown of Castile, which was then more focused on the conflicts with the bordering kingdoms of Aragon and Granada. This situation changed at the beginning of the century, when the conquest of Granada and the dynastic union with Aragon gave way to a Spanish advance on the Maghreb with the declared purpose of eradicating the nests of corsairs. and the rebellion of the Alpujarras of 1499-1501 "Rebellion of the Alpujarras (1499-1501)"), served as a pretext for armed intervention in the region.[15].
Although there were preliminary actions such as the taking of Melilla in 1497, the African campaign did not start firmly until the end of the first Italian wars "Italian Wars (1494-1559)"), when King Ferdinand the Catholic was able to have the necessary resources. Between 1505 and 1510, the Castilian troops successively seized Mazalquivir (1505), Cazaza (1506), the rock of Vélez de la Gomera (1508), Orán "Conquest of Orán (1509)") (1509) and, in 1510, the rock of Algiers, Bugía "Conquest of Bugía (1510)") and Tripoli. However, the momentum was cut short after the Jornada de Los Gelves "Jornada de los Gelves (1510)")—now the island of Djerba "Derba (Tunisia)")—of that same year, a setback exacerbated by French pressure on the Italian peninsula, the annexation of Navarre (1512), and Ottoman penetration into the central Maghreb. Such a situation forced other European fronts to be prioritized, but did not reverse the crucial status gained by the ports of the southeast of the Iberian Peninsula, initially Malaga and Cartagena, which became essential logistical bases for military operations: the expedition against Mazalquivir had set sail from Malaga, while that of Oran in 1509—the largest action in this first stage, led by Cardinal Cisneros—did so from Cartagena.[16] This last city, in addition to serving as a starting point for the company, provided supplies and artillery from its castle to the army that achieved the capitulation of the population, obtaining a large amount of loot and the liberation of three hundred Christian captives. With the victory, the so-called "double prison" was established, as Mazalquivir and Orán were integrated into the same administrative unit where the first acted as an anteport for the second. From that moment on, the towns of Cartagena and Alicante maintained a permanent commercial and military link with the North African presidiums, in a relationship that lasted until the definitive loss of Oran in 1792.[17].
In parallel, the entry of a new actor in the western Mediterranean began to take shape: the Ottoman Empire. Already in 1514, Turkish squadrons were sighted off the Alicante coast, coming from Tunis "Tunisia (city)") and dedicated to the plundering of the Italian coasts and the Tyrrhenian Sea, even reaching the kingdoms of Valencia and Murcia "Kingdom of Murcia (Crown of Castile)"). Between 1514 and 1517, at least seven raids were recorded on the Valencian coast, confirming the seriousness of the threat. That same year, a renowned sailor in the eastern Mediterranean, Aruj Barbarossa, tried unsuccessfully to seize Bejaia, being seriously wounded in the arm. He reiterated the attack the following year with greater boldness, but the stronghold resisted thanks to reinforcements from Valencia and Mallorca. It was then that Aruj set his sights on Algiers, where he had been invited by Sultan Salim at-Toumi to expel the Castilians from the rock. The privateer accepted, but took advantage of the opportunity to take control of the city, assassinating the sultan and occupying Algiers without opposition. From that moment on, he gathered around him a plethora of captains of fortune - such as his brother Jeireddín, Salah Reis, Sinán the Jew and Cachidiablo - who, with their fleets, shaped a formidable naval force. With the support of nearby mountain Kabyles, Bedouin tribes from Mitidja, Moorish exiles and local merchants, Aruj strengthened corsair rule over Algiers, whose rise was reflected in an increase in raids and seizures of ships and people on the coasts of southeastern Iberia. However, Aruj's attack found its end with the capture of Tlemcen, where he was defeated and killed during the Spanish counterattack "Fall of Tlemcen (1518)") of 1518.[18]
The Algerian-Ottoman entente and its predominance in the western Mediterranean
Upon Aruj's death, his younger brother Jeireddín assumed command in Algiers and made an offer of vassalage to the Ottoman sultan Selim I, in order to obtain military and political support in exchange for integrating the corsair State as a province of the Sublime Porte. Although, before receiving a response, he had to reject a new Spanish attack "Second expedition against Algiers (1519)"), his diplomatic maneuver resulted in success: the sultan accepted his proposal, appointed him beylerbey—governor—and sent him a personal guard of 2,000 janissaries along with naval reinforcements.[19] The establishment of the Regency of Algiers and its consolidation as an Ottoman vassal have been the subject of discussion. academic about its integration into the historical discourse: Montojo Montojo (1994), following Fernand Braudel, maintains that these events were the initial milestone of the "great galley war" that would loom over the Mediterranean until the so-called "Turkish truces" of 1577-1584, while Velasco Hernández (2019), also influenced by Braudel, places the origin and development of the "first Corsican».[20][21].
During the first years of this alliance, the loss of Spanish control over North Africa - exemplified by the capture of the rock of Algiers in 1529 - was considered by Madrid as an acceptable inconvenience, as long as subsequent corsair incursions remained limited and sporadic, since the priority of the Spanish Monarchy at that time was in the Italian wars.[22] Spain adopted a defensive posture in Barbary, focusing on preserving the conquered places and providing support to dynasties opposed to the Ottomans, such as the Saadis of Morocco and the Hafsids of Tunisia, so that Hispanic military actions became fundamentally reactive, with exceptions such as the expedition of Charles V against Algiers in 1541, whose disastrous result did nothing more than expose Turkish naval supremacy.[23][24] This failure, together with the conflicts with France and The expansion of the Protestant Reformation accelerated the progressive abandonment of North African policy by the emperor, allowing Algiers to shore up its position as a maritime power while Jeireddin Barbarossa, invested as admiral of the Ottoman navy, extended his influence over the entire western Mediterranean, generating a climate of permanent fear on the coasts of Christendom with the exception of the French, whose king Francis I had allied himself with Sultan Suleiman the Magnificent.[25] Since his campaigns From 1534 - which included the conquest of La Goleta, Bizerte, Tunis and other cities belonging to the Hafsids - and 1538 - culminating in the Battle of Préveza - until the Ottoman defeat at Lepanto in 1571, Muslim maritime dominance was incontestable. The coastal populations of Spain and Italy watched with anxiety the arrival of summer, when the corsair expeditions began; many communities retreated inland or sought refuge in fortified enclaves.[26] Barbarossa granted letters of marque to sailors from the eastern Mediterranean, renegades, nationless pirates and Spanish Moors, demanding in exchange a percentage of the loot and contributions for port maintenance, while promoting the rise of other privateers, integrated into a taifa of the rais or guild of arraeces that operated under the orders of an arráez or captain subordinate to the beylerbey and the Diván "Diván (institution)."
With the coming to power of Hasan Pasha "Hasan Pasha (son of Jeireddin Barbarossa)", son of Jeireddin, in 1544, Algiers achieved efficient internal organization and notable economic prosperity. The Regency became a fully functional State, whose captains devastated the Christian coasts with hardly any opposition. After the death of Barbarossa in 1546, a momentary truce was established between the Spanish Monarchy and the Ottoman Empire, which was quickly broken by the actions of Dragut from his base in Los Gelves "Djerba (Tunisia)") and, more subtly, from Algiers itself.[29] The second half of the century saw increasing coordination between prominent privateers such as Dragut, Salah Reis and Uluj Ali with the Turkish navy, beginning a new offensive cycle that notoriously undermined Christian interests: in 1551, Hospitaller Malta lost Tripoli "Siege of Tripoli (1551)") and suffered the occupation of Gozo; Andrea Doria was defeated at the Battle of Ponza "Battle of Ponza (1552)") (1552); Corsica was subject to a joint Franco-Ottoman invasion (1553); and Spanish towns such as Vélez de la Gomera and Bugía fell in 1555, while Oran and Mazalquivir were subjected to siege in 1555-1556 and in 1558. That same year, Ciudadela de Menorca was sacked "Razia de Menorca (1558)") and its population reduced to slavery, and in May 1560, the Spanish expedition against Dragut's stronghold in Los Gelves ended in disaster before the fleet commanded by Pialí Pasha and his lieutenant Uluj Ali.[30] Between the decades of 1550 and 1580, from the accession to the beylerbeyat of Hasan Pasha until the death of Uluj Ali, Algiers experienced a new period of splendor, favored by the influx of renegades and the strength of its garrison of janissaries.[31].
The preponderance of the Corsican shaped a profound social and demographic change in the city. Since the beginning of the century, as a result of the first rebellion of the Alpujarras and the Pragmatic of forced conversion of 1502, thousands of Moriscos began to arrive in Algiers from the Iberian Peninsula. Although many had accepted to convert to Christianity to remain in their lands, the growing tension between old and new Christians translated into rebellions such as that of Espadán (1526), massive escapes to North Africa and active collaboration with the so-called "Moors of Allende" in the assaults on villas "Villa (population)") of the kingdoms of Valencia, Murcia and Granada, particularly in areas such as the Levante Almeria and the Marina Alta of Alicante.[32] During the leadership of Jeireddín Barbarossa, the evacuation of Moriscos became one of the priority objectives of the corsair fleets, and their participation in the naval enterprises of the Regency was constant and enthusiastic.[33] Within Algiers, these migrants were differentiated based on their origin: on the one hand there were the "Tagarins", from Valencia and Aragon, and on the other the "Andalusians", natives of the Kingdom of Granada. Although socially equated with the "baldíes" Moors, their contribution to the Regency was widely recognized until the general expulsion of 1609-1613, when their reception ceased to have the same support.[34] Their arrival was also a factor in the spectacular demographic growth of Algiers: according to Perez de Idiacayz, in 1536 alone there were already between 7,000 and 8,000 Moriscos residing in the city, and throughout the city. century, its arrival caused the population to triple, estimated at around 130,000 inhabitants around 1587 - compared to the 4,000 fogajes recorded in 1516 by Leo African or the 3,000 estimated by Nicolas de Nicolay in 1550 -.[b][41] However, this increase not only responded to sustained Moorish immigration and the political rise of Algiers as the provincial capital. Ottoman, but also to the development of a system of production and distribution of wealth based on plunder and the slave trade.[42].
Cartagena before the birth of Corsicanism under Ottoman protection
At the beginning of the century, Cartagena played a critical role on the Mediterranean coast of the Iberian Peninsula. Its port was considered the main bastion of the Kingdom of Murcia and of the entire coastal strip between Alicante and Almería, to the point that, in 1521, the warden of the Concepción castle, Alonso Vélez de Guevara, described it as the "key to this entire Kingdom of Murcia and up to Toledo."[43] Its proximity to North Africa - about 180 nautical miles from Algiers, a distance that could covered in just over a day of sailing with favorable winds[44]—, along with a coast dotted with coves and islands, made it especially vulnerable to corsair attacks.[45] At the same time, the city began to establish itself as a key logistics center for the military campaigns of the Hispanic Monarchy, serving as a supply and shipping port to the Maghreb and Italy. From Cartagena, for example, the unsuccessful expedition "First expedition against Algiers (1516)") was launched to take from the Barbarossa their newly acquired fiefdom of Algiers in 1516, as well as successive relief to the North African prisons of Oran (1517, 1529, 1555, 1556, 1558, 1563, 1576, 1581) and Bugía (1529, 1554), and contingents destined for European settings such as Portugal and Flanders. Álvaro de Bazán the Elder's campaign against Hunaín in 1530 and part of the imperial operations directed against Tunisia (1535) and Algiers (1541) also set sail from this port.[46][47].
Contemporaneous with its growing military projection, Cartagena experienced an incipient demographic takeoff throughout the century, favored by political and administrative factors. Its return to royal jurisdiction in 1503, together with the disappearance of threats from the Granada and Aragonese borders, allowed the city to capitalize on the privileges accumulated during the Late Middle Ages to attract new settlers. This set of circumstances led to a sustained increase in its population between 1500 and 1530, a period in which it went from 1500 to 2500 inhabitants. However, this process was limited by structural factors such as the periodic incidence of epidemics and supply crises derived from the constant movement of troops, which disturbed the economic and social stability of the city.[48] From 1525-1530, Turkish-Berber military pressure began to manifest itself more frequently, with corsair squadrons stationing themselves a short distance from the port, awaiting the arrival of cargo ships from the Atlantic or saetías from the Mediterranean.[49][50] Sometimes, they remained hidden for weeks in the surrounding area, completely paralyzing commercial activity. As a direct consequence, Cartagena suffered interruptions in the supply of essential goods, especially cereals, which triggered acute episodes of shortages and aggravated the hardships of its inhabitants.[50].
From a military point of view, Cartagena suffered from significant deficiencies in all aspects: human resources, wall infrastructure and artillery capacity.[45] This situation was generalized in the Kingdom of Murcia, which had the most precarious defensive system in the southeast of the peninsula:[51].
• - Unlike the kingdoms of Granada and Valencia, it lacked a permanent system of "atajadores" - mounted forces dedicated to patrolling and sounding the alarm in coastal areas - and "requeridores" - in charge of transmitting warnings to captains of urban militias and wardens of fortresses. Instead, prevention against possible incursions fell to a small number of "coast guards", residents responsible for surveillance and reconnaissance from the most strategic promontories of the coast.[c] Towards the middle of the century, this body consisted of about thirty men in Cartagena, organized in groups of two or three and distributed in eight "stays" or coastal watchtowers, although this number could be increased in situations of special danger. Coordination was carried out by two "overguards" on horseback, in charge of inspecting the watchtowers and transmitting the notices to the Council "Council (history)") and the military authorities.[51] The system used smoke signals during the day and fire signals at night, also extending to points in the interior to warn the rural population.[53].
• - The castle of La Concepción - an old Andalusian citadel rebuilt in the century and reinforced during the time of the Catholic Monarchs with the bastion of Gomera - was the main place of refuge in Cartagena, it issued visual signals towards Murcia through intermediate towers and housed a permanent garrison "Guarrison (militia)") of twenty to twenty-five men under the command of a warden, all of them paid by the Crown.[53][54].
• - Active defense depended on forces such as the territorial militia, the temporary garrison companies and, above all, the urban militia. Until 1550, the residents of Cartagena were distributed in groups - seven in that year -,[d] later becoming organized into companies according to the number of inhabitants: three in 1575. Each company was led by a captain and a sergeant appointed by the Council. amount »—,[e] while the others were required to possess at least a pike "Pike (weapon)"), spear, harquebus, shotgun or crossbow, along with protections such as a morion and breastplate "Pike (armor)").[6][55].
• - During the season of greatest risk - between the end of spring and the beginning of autumn - temporary garrisons of between 200 and 400 soldiers were deployed in Cartagena,[f] and in case of emergency, the city received aid from inland towns such as Murcia, Lorca, Mula "Mula (Murcia)"), Totana, Alhama de Murcia, Aledo and Librilla. Among all of them, Murcia stood out as the main source of aid due to its demographic, economic and political weight, having a militia organized in eleven parishes "Parish (civil)") that allowed more than six hundred infantry to be mobilized in a matter of hours.[60].
• - In the naval aspect, Cartagena did not have a permanent navy dedicated to the protection of its coastline during this period,[45] although it did intermittently have the presence of Spanish galleys and, on occasions, squadrons from allied powers. Although El Puerto de Santa María was the main naval base of the Crown of Castile, the effervescent corsair predation in the Mediterranean motivated the naval forces to prolong their stays in ports in the southeast of Iberia, especially in Malaga and Cartagena. The latter frequently served as a wintering anchorage, which provided seasonal reinforcement of its defenses.[61].
Starting in 1540, the fear caused by the Franco-Ottoman alliance, together with the recent sacking of Gibraltar "Sacking of Gibraltar (1540)") and the visit of Charles V to Cartagena upon his return from the Day of Algiers in 1541, promoted a fortification program promoted by the magistrate Andrés Dávalos.[g] With the support of the Crown, the construction of the town was undertaken. wall of the Dean, the House of the King, the House of Gunpowder and the bastions of Cautor and del Mar, which were armed thanks to the pressure of Pedro Fajardo y Chacón, Marquis of the Vélez. Likewise, the defensive system of the Kingdom of Murcia was reorganized, assigning responsibilities to the Marquis of Vélez as major advance and coordinating efforts with the council militias of Cartagena, Murcia, Lorca and the manorial ones of the marquisates of Vélez and Villena.[65][66] Around 1540, the Council of State "Consejo de Estado (Spain)") determined that the permanent garrison of Cartagena was to be made up of 205 men and two artillerymen, of which thirty would be assigned to the castle, adding to the twenty-five "coast guards" already existing.[67] By the end of that decade, Cartagena had become one of the safest places in the southwestern Mediterranean, a security even more noticeable when the imperial galleys wintered in its port. However, as time demonstrated, these defenses continued to be weak, inconsistent and insufficient against a hypothetical attack by the Turkish-Berber navy, composed in the best times of Barbarossa by more than 110 galleys and 40 galley boats.[68].
The war pressure on the coast of Cartagena also had a strong social impact on the city. Starting in 1516, with the transformation of Algiers into a corsair base, the raids against the Spanish southeastern coast multiplied, and already in 1519 the Council warned the king that "the danger has doubled" due to the understanding between the Turks and the Berbers. organization of "rebatos" or assemblies "Assembly (touch)") of militia and "rides" or departures of urban companies by sea or land in pursuit of the enemy. Although Cartagena represented a secondary objective for the Barbary sailors due to its small population, its distance from the main Moorish centers and its proximity to Oran - which facilitated the reception of their notices -, the pressure on the city was constant. shortage of weapons, he had ordered the accumulation of stones on the roofs as an improvised defense method against a potential assault.[71] To guarantee security, the institutions established rigorous requirements for the settlement of new inhabitants, such as the commitment to reside in the city or in its countryside for more than ten years, have their house inhabited with a wife and children and assume the obligation to participate in the "rebates" in case of threat. In situations of danger, all the inhabitants of the countryside were obliged to take refuge in the walled area, night traffic was prohibited, fishermen - considered especially exposed - were ordered to return to port and pick up their boats, and the five gates of the city were closed. The protocol also included the general mobilization of the neighbors and the organization of the militia, the repair of the weakest sections of the wall and the supply of weapons and ammunition.[72] The situation had the result of inciting a climate of distrust towards the Moorish and Free Berber communities, who were prohibited from residing in the urban center of Cartagena through a royal provision issued after 1532, although its application was irregular in the practice.[73].
The post-Barbarossa corsair climb on the coasts of Cartagena (1546-1560)
During the period between the decades of 1540 and 1560, when the epigones of Barbarossa emerged, Cartagena was experiencing a notable demographic expansion—continuing the trend of the previous period—which was only truncated between 1551 and 1560 due to a chain of crises. Firstly, the city suffered a supply crisis caused by a series of bad harvests that affected the Kingdom of Murcia for five years, in turn triggering a subsistence crisis among the Cartagena population. Added to this situation was the outbreak of a plague epidemic in 1558-1559,[h] which severely hit a society weakened by food shortages. Furthermore, Cartagena saw its economic and human resources diminished due to the war needs of the Spanish Monarchy: in 1555 financial contributions were required to support the ill-fated defense of Bugía, and in 1557 young men were demanded for the war against France. This scenario was further deteriorated by a resurgence of corsair attacks, which exerted greater pressure on an already exhausted community.[75] Despite the virulence of the plague, which according to the estimates of Torres Sánchez (1994) caused the death of at least 801 people - which represented a mortality of 18.2% compared to the statistics calculated for 1551 - the demographic recovery was unusually quick.[76][77] The Neighborhood Survey of 1560 recorded 895 "neighbors",[i][79] and for 1563, Torres Sánchez (1987) places the number of residents between 4,200 and 4,500 people, based on the Memorial of places, houses and people of the Bishopric of Cartagena.[80].
In response to the vicissitudes of the geopolitical context, defensive reforms and expansions were undertaken. Between 1555 and 1570, new bastions were erected—Gibel and Hortichuela, between 1560 and 1561—and repair work was carried out on the pre-existing fortifications. The intensification of raids between 1558 and 1561 raised special concern for the security of the Molinete and the new suburbs outside the walls, such as San Roque - adjacent to the Puerta de Murcia - and San Diego - close to the Puerta de San Ginés -, which were more exposed to possible attacks.[81] One of the most serious episodes of this corsair cycle took place in May 1550, when the Arráez Dragut organized a great expedition against the Spanish Levant. Coming from its bases in Los Gelves and Mahdía, it stopped in Algiers with a flotilla of 26 boats in mid-April of that year, where it was joined by about 300 volunteers, including Turks, Berbers, renegades and exiled Moors. To guarantee the surprise factor, he sent a whip to Palamós with spies in charge of obtaining information about the whereabouts of the Spanish galleys, who were to be picked up in Mazarrón during the passage of Dragut's squadron through the area. However, and despite the secrecy of the operation, his ships were sighted near Oran, which allowed the governor to alert the peninsular authorities about the approach of the privateer. On May 13, the news had already reached Murcia, where infantry and cavalry militias were mobilized to defend Cartagena. Lorca, for his part, began his enlistment two days later. On May 17, one of Dragut's spies was captured, corroborating fears of an imminent incursion. Three days later, his squad was detected at Cabo de Gata, later anchoring near Carboneras. On the night of May 22, the Mazarrón "coast guards" detected his presence, and everything indicates that Dragut arrived near Cartagena in the early hours of the 23rd. After anchoring presumably in the Algamecas, from where he would have prepared a stealthy landing, the escape of one of the galley slaves that made up the expedition allowed the alarm to be raised in the city. Although no documentation is preserved to confirm whether a landing took place, the truth is that the Spanish forces had entrenched themselves at the possible landing points, with the Cartagena militias under the command of their aldermen and the Murcian ones organized by their captains and the corregidor. The women and children were evacuated to the King's House. Thus, Dragut gave up the attack and turned towards the Kingdom of Valencia, where he did manage to wreak havoc: he first sacked San Juan de Alicante, bombarded Villajoyosa and assaulted Cullera "Sacking of Cullera (1550)") before attacking Pollensa "Sacking of Pollensa (1550)"), in the Balearic Islands, and later heading towards Sardinia, where his trace was lost.[82].
The raids continued during the rest of the period, and the most devastating attack on the municipality of Cartagena occurred on June 29, 1558, when eight galley boats landed some 800 soldiers at Cape Palos without being detected, given that there were no "coast guards" deployed in that sector. The assailants advanced to the village of Los Alumbres Nuevos "Alumbres (Cartagena)"), which was unceremoniously looted, and they reembarked in El Gorguel - a short distance from Cartagena - after capturing and killing some of its inhabitants, given the impotence of the local militias. Although the city had asked for help from inland towns, help arrived too late. Lorca, for example, did not send the 300 reinforcement soldiers until July 10, when the danger had disappeared, and they were finally quartered in Mazarrón. In May 1560, the disaster of the Christian expedition against the yerbí refuge of Dragut triggered fear throughout the Spanish southeast of an Ottoman counteroffensive. Both King Felipe II and Luis Fajardo de la Cueva, Marquis of the Vélez, urged the Council of Lorca to prepare a shock force capable of leaving where it was necessary as soon as it received notice. However, the Ottoman navy, after destroying Juan Andrea Doria's fleet, chose to return to Constantinople.[74] Corsair activity, however, did not cease. Taking advantage of the remission of the epidemic of 1558-1559, the Barbary ships resumed their operations. In October 1560, ten of his galley boats captured two Flemish urcas "Urca (ship)") off Mazarrón, and in March of the same year the presence of up to eighteen corsair ships had been documented prowling the port of Cartagena, an indication that a new attempt on the city could be in the making.[83][84].
The assault against Cartagena
The Uluj Alí expedition and the preparations of the Marquis of the Vélez
The corsair expedition against the Spanish Levant in the spring of 1561 is an event for which a partial historical record is managed, since the sources analyzed by historiography exclusively reflect the Spanish perspective. Unlike the raid carried out by Dragut in 1550, this episode also lacks a comprehensive narrative, resulting in a fragmentary knowledge of it that prevents specifying aspects such as the exact date of departure from Algiers, the moment of arrival in the Iberian southeast or details about its journey along the Alicante coast. Despite this, the comparison with the usual patterns of privateer campaigns allows us to plausibly reconstruct its stages and characteristics. By 1561, the Regency of Algiers was once again governed by Hasan Pasha, son of Barbarossa, who had held the title of beylerbey since June 1557, after the death of his predecessor Salah Reis during the plague epidemic that had devastated Algiers since June 1556. Given that in the period 1561-1564 the Ottoman navy barely left port, the organization of this The raid exemplifies the wide degree of autonomy that the Algerian sailors enjoyed with respect to Sultan Suleiman.[85] The most favorable time for an expedition was the period between late spring and early autumn, taking advantage of the favorable weather conditions and reserving the rest of the year to winter the ships and commission maintenance work by caulkers and shore carpenters—mostly Christian slaves—along with specialized Moorish workers.[86] The The main objective of the company was to capture any ships that accidentally crossed paths and carry out raids on inhabited areas near the coast to capture the largest possible number of Christians and supply with them the lucrative slave market of Algiers, without ruling out the looting of urban centers or the evacuation of Moors.[87] As for the theater of operations, it was divided into two areas: "Western", which included the Iberian Peninsula and the Balearic Islands; and "Levante", which corresponded to Sicily, Corsica, Sardinia and the coasts of the Tyrrhenian and Adriatic Seas. During the beginning of the war season, almost all of the 12,000 soldiers in the Algiers garrison embarked, leaving only a small detachment on guard.[88]
In 1561, the expedition to "Western" fell under the direction of the arraeces Uluj Alí and Yusuf Rais,[j] the latter a figure practically unknown outside of the chronicles related to this campaign.[3] Uluj Alí, baptized as Giovanni Dionigi Galeni, was approximately 41 years old and was a renegade of Italian origin born in Calabria—Kingdom of Naples—, in The bosom of a Christian family made up of his father, the fisherman Birno Galeni, and his mother Pippa de Cicco. and changing his name to Uluj Alí - "Alí the Renegade". Over time, he managed to acquire a stake in a privateer brig, the performance of which brought him significant financial benefits. He was thus able to climb socially in Algiers, marry the daughter of his former master and obtain a marquee license, and since then he has carried out successful attacks on the Italian coast, in which his new name was phonetically deformed to "Occhiali". during the decades of 1540 and 1550. In 1560 he placed himself under the orders of Piali Pasha in the destruction of the Christian navy that had threatened Dragut, and the following year, while his partner counterattacked with a campaign against "Levant" in which he would subject the port of Naples to a naval blockade "Blockade (strategy)"), Uluj Ali would launch an attack towards "Western".[91]
The number of ships that made up the corsair squadron is a cause of dissension among the sources, because although the original notice from Oran numbered 44 ships of the expedition, the chapter minutes of the councils of Lorca - based on reports from the Council of Mojácar - and Cartagena, written during the occurrence of the expedition or in the days immediately following, include statements in which 26 ships are listed, the preferred figure. by Montojo Montojo (1987) and Velasco Hernández (2019).[5][92] Further numerically and temporally is the scholar Francisco Cascales, who raised the number of Uluj Alí vessels to 36 in 1621.[8] The majority of preserved records do not specify the type of ship used by the corsairs, with the exception of those related to the final sacking of Sóller: in that sense, Joan Binimelis in his account of 1595 and the anonymous parish report published in 1888 coincide in stating that they were mostly galley boats accompanied by some galleys, in contrast to Vicente Mut, who describes "galleys and other rowing vessels" in his chronicle of 1650. Christian use, its design sacrificed size and tonnage by virtue of greater speed, making it ideal for quick surprise attack and subsequent escape with the least possible risk. Their artillery was reduced to a larger piece in the bay "Crujía (nautical)") and two others on its sides, in addition to some grinders "Emeril (artillery)") on the sides, and its lightness was enhanced by the fact that only what was strictly necessary was carried on board: provisions, liquid, weapons and ammunition - which is why they needed to frequently make water. The average crew of a twenty-bank galley boat could amount to about 160 men or more, half of them rowers and the other half soldiers and sailors.[96].
The usual route of the Barbary expeditions included, once they set sail from Algiers, stopovers in Cherchell, the Habibas Islands or the Chafarinas before crossing to the Iberian Peninsula. Velasco Hernández (2019) assumes that Uluj Alí must have passed through the area of Cabo de Gata in the last days of April, linking it with an incursion documented by Cabrillana Ciézar (1982) on the field of Níjar on those same dates. on the way, to then go to attack a town in the Balearic Islands. It was common for them to look for a sheltered spot where they could be safe from winds and storms and from where they could wait in ambush for the transit of a merchant ship, including the Gata and Cope capes, the port of Portmán or the Grosa and Tabarca islands.[99] Generally, these campaigns rarely exceeded 50 or 60 days, a limit imposed by supplies, and they did not go more than five or six miles inland to avoid the risk of being intercepted by reinforcements from the interior and, above all, facing cavalry.[100] Military intelligence was a key resource for the Algerian arraeces: they knew of the importance of Cartagena as one of the main anchorages of the Spanish Navy, and therefore it was common for them to send spies to ensure the whereabouts of their galleys. Dragut had sent several spies before his attempted landing in 1550, and everything indicates that this practice was also resorted to in 1561.[101] In fact, in 1560 a spy had been captured in Mazarrón with instructions to reach Cartagena and investigate the presence and number of galleys.[102] This was not the only method of obtaining strategic information, however, since the privateers often interrogated the captains of ships from Cartagena that they captured at sea, and there was news that some renegade from Cartagena had come to offer to guide the corsairs in a raid against Mazarrón or the suburb of San Roque, in Cartagena.[103].
Counteracting these tactics was precisely the purpose of the firmly established Spanish warning system: the "double presidio" of Oran and Mazalquivir quickly dispatched a brig with the warning to Cartagena as soon as enemy squadrons were sighted, and from there the news spread by land to the coastal towns to the north and south of the city.[104] This happened in the spring of 1561, when thanks to the timely warning from Oran the leaders of the Kingdom of Murcia learned two weeks in advance that a Turkish-Berber fleet had headed towards the Spanish coast. The following movements of the expedition are known thanks to the minutes of the Council of Lorca, which record the receipt of several letters related to it. In the first, on April 24, the Marquis de los Vélez reported the sighting of the Algerian fleet near Oran, "and because they could soon do damage in the city of Cartagena and throughout this coast, [in] especially in the area of Maçarrón, there was no help that could resist it," he ordered the militia to be prepared to leave. On the 30th of the same month, a letter from the Mojácar Council, dated the previous day, warned of the presence of 26 privateer ships in its waters, and therefore begged Lorca for help from 40-50 harquebusiers. It is this letter that allows Velasco Hernández (2019) to conjecture that the expedition had passed Cabo de Gata shortly before that date. On May 2, a new letter from the Marquis of Vélez orders Lorca to send a troop of 200 infantry and 30 cavalry to Mazarrón — where he himself was located — but the next day, when the army was about to march, a final letter was received from the Marquis annulling the previous order, indicating that their movement was unnecessary for the moment, in what Velasco Hernández (2019) considers "a mistake." in bulk" given that that same day at night the corsair expedition had arrived near Cartagena.[8][92].
The Marquis of Vélez, named Luis Fajardo de la Cueva, was approximately 53 years old when he held the position of Major Advance and Captain General of the Kingdom of Murcia in the name of King Philip II in 1561, and was an aristocrat born in Murcia or Vélez-Blanco—Kingdom of Granada—, son of the also aristocrats Pedro Fajardo y Chacón, Marquis of Vélez, and Mencía de la Cueva and Toledo. Married to Leonor Fernández de Córdoba y Silva in 1526, Luis Fajardo was a veteran military man who during his youth had served in the wars of Charles V against the Ottomans in Hungary (1531), against the French in Provence (1536), and against the Turks and their Berber partners in Tunisia (1535) and Algiers (1541), being recognized for a bellicose personality that authors such as Cascales highlight. and Ginés Pérez de Hita.[1][8][105] Regarding the exercise of countermeasures against corsair raids, Fajardo had extensive experience that dated back to at least 1543, when he had served as advance lieutenant in the absence of his father in the Kingdom of Murcia. At that time, it had been known about the possible approach of the Ottoman army from the north after having intervened in the siege of Nice "Siege of Nice (1543)") in favor of its French allies and wintering in Toulon, which is why Luis Fajardo, invested with the authority delegated by the Marquis of the Vélez, toured the Murcian kingdom calling for levies in Lorca, Murcia and in his family manors, where he faced some resistance. in Mula. When the Turkish fleet finally appeared, in November, it was to disembark to slaughter some flocks that were grazing in the countryside of Mazarrón, being rejected by the Velezan lordly militias and the Lorca councillors, led, now, by the Marquis of Vélez in person.[106] Having inherited the marquisate - along with the associated responsibilities - upon the death of his father in 1546, the Marquis de lo Vélez's ability to inspire obedience was tested again in 1551, when rumors spread about the possible arrival of a large Turkish navy to the southeast of the peninsula. The then Prince Felipe then requested the Marquis of the Vélez to move his residence to Campo de Cartagena and warn the lordly and council militias of the Kingdom of Murcia. By September, 1,500 men had been gathered to garrison Cartagena, which, however, were mobilized in vain as it became clear that the alarm was unfounded, so that in November of that year the majority of the soldiers were discharged.[107] Finally, allusions of a laudatory nature are recorded to a combat that would have taken place in Portmán on an imprecise date, in which the marquis, accompanied by the leadership of his led by his half-brother Juan Fajardo de Silva and his son Diego Fajardo y Córdoba, would have repelled a privateer landing and inflicted heavy casualties on the adversary contingent, of which "more than fifty", supposedly, would have occurred at the hands of the marquis himself.[1][8].
opposing forces
Regarding the troops deployed by the Ottoman corsairs under the command of Uluj Ali, the existing documentation shows a substantial divergence both in the calculation of the number of troops and in their nature, just as happens with the ships. The chapter minutes of the Council of Cartagena examined by Montojo Montojo (1987) record a landing force composed of 1,800 soldiers, a figure that has been accepted as credible by that author and by Velasco Hernández (2019), who, recognizing that the contingent "was quite numerous", highlights the quantitative similarity with the cadres used in Sóller a week later, estimated by the Spanish sources between 1600 and 1700 men.[l][4][5][94][95][109] The alternative comes from the hand of Cascales and Pérez de Hita, who deviate from the proposed figure with "more than nine hundred" for the first and "more than two thousand" for the second.[1][8] The classification and origin of these soldiers thrown to the ground by Uluj Alí are also difficult. to ponder based on the available sources, given that the corsairs were a very heterogeneous group that included renegade European, Turkish, Moorish and Moorish elements.[28] The Cartagena capitular minutes describe the attacking force as composed of "Turkish marksmen, riflemen and archers", which, given that the word "Turk" was defined as any Muslim subject of the sultan Ottoman, it could be a characterization pars pro toto.[5][110] Velasco Hernández (2019) introduces a nuance by considering that these combatants must have been janissaries "for the most part."[100] Bover de Rosselló (1856) states the same thing when discussing the attack on Sóller, while the parish report published in 1888 refers to them undoubtedly as "janissaries and Turks."[94][108] The widespread presence of this elite unit in the crews of the Regency of Algiers was a certainly recent phenomenon, since at first they were vetoed by Jeireddín Barbarossa. This circumstance changed after a series of revolts between 1561 and 1568, when the janissaries began to be admitted by the arraeces on their ships and, in exchange, the renegades gained access to the Algerian militia.[111].
In the Spanish counterpart, the primary sources are even more sparse about the forces that the Marquis of Vélez had at the time of facing the corsairs, which must be distinguished from those that finally participated in the battle. The minutes of the Council of Cartagena briefly indicate that, when the time came, the marquis "went out with some people on horseback and on foot", since Cascales, somewhat more illustrative, states that "the marquis then left with his people, and those he could get out of Cartagena, leaving the city with a good guard." With this "people" of the marquis, reference is made to the militias from the manors that the House of Fajardo owned in the Kingdom of Murcia, which included the towns of Mula, Molina de Segura, Librilla and Alhama de Murcia. contemporaries to resort to the study of complementary documentation to indirectly reconstruct the military mobilization that had to be carried out. In this way, according to the data collected by Velasco Hernández (2019), the body of cavalry that attended the "rebatos" usually consisted of between fifty and one hundred horsemen, although it could be increased to over 150 with those from Lorca and Murcia - in the register of volunteer gentlemen with weapons from Murcia and Lorca carried out in 1598, those registered with horses and weapons were 106 in Murcia and 52 in Lorca. In that sense, Velasco Hernández concludes that around a hundred horse soldiers must have been present in Cartagena, since the Lorca units did not participate in the relief of Cartagena.[113] The council militias must have constituted the bulk of the defensive effort in the spring of 1561. In the case of the Murcian militia, Chacón Jiménez (1979) records a recruitment of more than 3,000 men, even though it had been carried out during the night and Murcia was at that time isolated by an overflowing of the Segura River. The author himself highlights it as significant "despite the hyperbolic", while Velasco Hernández judges it exaggerated and, relying on the capitular minutes of the Huertano council, suggests that the Murcian relief would have consisted rather of about 200 harquebusiers. 1,251 troops distributed in three companies.[6] The defense device was completed by the 20-25 soldiers of the permanent garrison of the castle of Concepción under the command of its warden and, in the case of being actually present—since it was usually activated at the end of spring—the temporary garrison with its 200-400 men.[114].
The battle
The historiographic understanding of the Battle of Santa Monica is based on four written sources, all of them individual accounts that respond to different interests:
• - Firstly, we would find the chapter minutes of the Council of Cartagena, documents of an administrative nature and internal use that record the deliberations and agreements of the municipal corporation, and where the details of the assault emerge reflected together with the provisions adopted on the occasion of it. Montojo Montojo (1987) was the first historian who offered an exhaustive narrative of the conflict based on these minutes, and it is on his interpretation that Velasco Hernández's (2019) analysis of the passage of the Uluj Alí expedition through Cartagena rests, which he accepts as reliable.[3][5].
• - The next resource, following a temporal order, is the Book of the population and exploits of the very noble and loyal city of Lorca, written by Ginés Pérez de Hita under commission from the Council of Lorca in 1572 but not published in its entirety until 1929.[115] Despite the fact that its song —«Of the battle that the Marquis of the Vélez had in Cartagena with the Moors of Africa»— offers the exhibition most detailed of the facts, its reliability as a source has been systematically questioned by historiography, considering that in this book Pérez de Hita does not aspire to historicity but to provide Lorca with his own epic inspired by the Trojan cycle, for which he resorts to a fabled story that contains "serious inaccuracies" and chivalric episodes with a factual background but "of a fictional nature inspired by legends local».[116][117][118].
• - The Book of Lorca, as it is commonly abbreviated, served as a draft for the magnum opus of Pérez de Hita: the History of the civil wars of Granada, in the second part of which, published in 1619, the battle of Santa Mónica appears referred to in a succinct introductory passage about the figure of the Marquis of the Vélez.[1][117] Although the first part, set in the struggles between Zegríes and Abencerrajes of the century, is configured as a historical novel, the second, set in the Alpujarras War of 1568-1571, can be considered more "a fictionalized story of medium quality" in the words of Bunes Ibarra (1983), in which Franco Llopis and Moreno Díaz del Campo (2019) appreciate that "the literary artifice is replaced by a greater concern when narrating the events and in which there is less concession to fantasy."[119][120] However, Carrasco Urgoiti (1981) points out the lack of objectivity of Pérez de Hita when he describes the actions of the Marquis of the Vélez: "It is evident that for Pérez de Hita the stately prestige of the great Andalusian houses has not been extinguished, but only when he has a personal relationship with them is he interested in exalting their exploits. This occurs to an eminent degree when it deals with the Marquis of Vélez, Don Luis Fajardo, under whose flags the author served and in whose manor lands he spent part of his life. The exaltation that it is the object of in the book should be attributed, more than to historical facts, to such circumstance and personal knowledge.
Repercussions
Resumption of the corsair expedition
The frustrated assault on Cartagena had consequences that were immediately felt, both in the reinforcement of the urban defenses and in the itinerary of the privateer fleet. In the city, authorities implemented a series of urgent measures aimed at preventing new attacks. Thus, it was arranged that two pairs of horse guards would tour the walls every night and inspect the "coast guards." The Puerta de San Ginés was narrowed so that only one rider could pass through at a time, and a sentry box with capacity for four or six soldiers was erected above it. In addition, the blocking of the Puerta del Mar, located in the Arenal area, was ordered, along with the houses that faced the Plaza de la Pescadería. The Murcia council militia received instructions to remain in Cartagena until the definitive departure of the corsair expedition was confirmed. Finally, the obligation was established for all residents to spend the night within the walled enclosure, without leaving it until dawn and in broad daylight, with failure to comply with this rule being punished with six days in prison and a fine of one hundred maravedis.[129].
For its part, Uluj Alí's squadron landed on Grosa Island, both to give its crew a rest after having hastily set sail from the Algamecas and to stalk potential prey. Although there is no evidence of the corsairs' subsequent crossing of the Alicante coast, it is likely that they tried to plunder some other coastal enclave. On the other hand, the incursion of Sóller —Mallorca— on May 11, 1561, just a week after the failed attempt on Cartagena, is documented. As was usual in Barbary expeditions, Uluj Alí had first looked for a point to supply himself with drinking water, finding it on the island of Ibiza. However, this stopover revealed their presence to the warning system of the Kingdom of Mallorca, which allowed Lieutenant General Guillem de Rocafull to alert the captain of Sóller, Joan Angelats, and the neighboring towns of Buñola, Santa María del Camino and Alaró, which he urged to prepare to provide aid. Despite the precautions, the Algiers Regency squadron managed to anchor in a nearby cove and disembark around 1,600 troops without the "coast guards" detecting it. The invading forces were divided into two columns: one advanced directly towards the port, while the other made a detour and attacked Sóller from the north, obtaining considerable loot. The Sollerico militiamen, who had initially concentrated in the port, found themselves cornered between both corsair contingents, so they decided to launch a counterattack on the group that occupied the port and, after recovering it, they awaited the return of the second party, which returned loaded with the proceeds of the looting and numerous captives, mostly women and children. Seeing themselves pursued, the assailants fled towards the cliffs, where they abandoned part of what they had stolen and executed many prisoners before managing to reembark.[130].
This constituted Uluj Ali's last campaign against the Spanish coasts. After the new disaster in Sóller, his fleet headed towards Algiers, where in September 1561 a period of political interim was inaugurated, sparked by the dismissal and transfer of Hasan Pasha to Constantinople to stand trial. During this interregnum, the government of the Regency fell successively to four provisional beylerbeys - Hassan Agha, Cuça Mohammed, Ahmed Pasha and Yahia - whose administrations lasted barely a year, until the return of Barbarossa's son in September 1562, once exonerated from the accusations. That same year, the Ottoman Sultan Selim II summoned Uluj Ali to the imperial capital and entrusted him with command of the Alexandria Guard, a position that accredited him as de facto vice admiral of the Ottoman navy, subordinate to Piali Pasha. In 1565 he intervened in the ill-fated siege of Malta "Siege of Malta (1565)"), where his friend Dragut perished, although this setback did not cut short his career: in 1566 he personally commanded the Ottoman naval forces in a raid through the Tyrrhenian Sea, devastating several towns in Corsica and Sardinia.[131]
In 1568, Uluj Ali assumed the beylerbeyato of Algiers, beginning a mandate marked by two events: the second rebellion of the Alpujarras (1568-1571) and the preparations for the overthrow of the Hafsi dynasty in Tunisia. During the Granada conflict, he authorized privateers—mostly Moorish in origin—to join the insurrection, to which he also provided logistical support. However, its main strategic ambition focused on the weakened Hafsi sultanate of Abu al-Abbas Ahmad III, whose vassalage to the Spanish Monarchy had undermined its legitimacy among its Muslim subjects. Through a combined offensive by sea and land, backed by the surrounding Kabyles, Uluj Ali conquered Tunisia in January 1569, proclaiming himself bey of the city and unifying the two main regencies of the Maghreb under his aegis, a feat that only Jeireddin Barbarossa had previously accomplished. In 1571, the sultan claimed him to participate in the great expedition against the Holy League "Holy League (1571)") that led to the battle of Lepanto. Despite the Ottoman defeat against the forces of John of Austria, the privateer managed to save thirty ships and return to Constantinople, where he was received with honors and invested as commander of the Ottoman navy in the process of reconstruction, with which he would carry out raids in 1572 and 1573. That last year, the victor of Lepanto recovered Tunisia "Conquest of Tunisia (1573)") for Spain, causing a Uluj Ali's swift reaction: at the head of more than 250 galleys, he reconquered "Conquest of Tunis (1574)") both the city and its port of La Goleta in the summer of 1574. Between 1575 and 1577 he established himself in Constantinople, away from significant war actions, but in 1578 he set out to sea with 50 galleys to quell a revolt in Cyprus. The following year he was assigned to the Black Sea as part of the war effort against the Safavid Persians, in what would be his last relevant mission in the service of the sultan. At more than seventy years old, he retired from active life and died in 1587.[132].
Consolidation of Cartagena as a stronghold
The attempt of 1561 made Cartagena's defensive vulnerabilities evident and left a lasting mark on the collective consciousness of its citizens, generating an environment of insecurity that lasted for years. In the following months, any rumor about a possible return of the privateer fleet was enough to induce the exodus of entire families along with their most precious assets. At the end of May, the false news that the Ottoman and Algerian squads were preparing a new assault against Cartagena caused panic and triggered a mass flight, forcing the Council to act:[133].
Three years later, in 1564, the council minutes continued to include references to the frustrated landing, among them the conviction among the councilors that its primary objective would have been the looting of the San Roque suburb.[129] The Turkish-Berberian pressure remained constant throughout the decade: in 1562 forty ships were seen - far exceeding the force of the previous year - prowling the port, while in Mazarrón intercepted a spy sent to find out how many galleys were anchored in Cartagena; and the naval harassment would continue, to a lesser extent, in 1563, 1565, 1566 and 1567. The Cartagena defense device even received a setback in 1573, when the mayor Pedro Monreal was ambushed and captured while practicing a "ride" in La Manga del Mar Menor against the corsairs, who obtained 1000 ducats "Ducado (currency)") for their rescue.[134].
The attack of 1561 highlighted that, although Cartagena within the walls enjoyed relative security, its periphery continued to require urgent improvements.[135] The suburb of San Roque, lacking wall protection and crowded with flimsy and low-rise homes, was identified as a critical point because it made it easier to overcome the walls in the Puerta de Murcia sector. The Council decreed its abandonment during the first years of the decade 1561-1570, but it continued to be inhabited and received new grants of licenses to build on plots between 1567 and 1591, coinciding with the period of demographic growth that would lead the city to reach 9,500 inhabitants in 1600.[81][129][136] The second rebellion of the Alpujarras provided the definitive stimulus for a fortification program more ambitious than all the previous ones. In the spring of 1570, Philip II sent the military engineers Vespasiano Gonzaga and Juan Bautista Antonelli to Cartagena to direct the modernization of the defensive framework, a project that this time had significant financing and manpower. the reinforcement of the gates of San Ginés and the Dock, as well as the construction of a new fence that complemented the wall of the Dean. Towards mid-1571 the works were practically completed, at which time Cartagena was considered fully fortified.[138][139] The notable improvement in the defenses was reflected in the words that Leonardo Donato addressed to the Venetian Senate, at the end of his term as ambassador of the Republic of Venice in Spain (1573):
Rebalance of powers and decline of the "great galley war"
At the beginning of the 1560s, the Hispanic Monarchy faced a period of naval reconstruction and gradual restoration of its warlike capacity in the Mediterranean, which was not cut short even by disasters such as the Los Gelves expedition (1560) or the multiple shipwreck of La Herradura (1562). In 1563, the Beylerbey of Algiers, Hasan Pasha, mobilized the resources of the Regency to undertake the conquest of the square of Oran, but had to lift the siege due to the arrival of a relief force composed of ships from Genoa, Spain and Naples under the command of Andrea Doria, and whose preparations in Cartagena had been assisted by Luis Fajardo, Marquis of the Vélez.[8][150] The process of Spanish maritime recovery continued to bear fruit with the reconquest of the rock of Vélez de la Gomera in 1564 and with the transcendental intervention in the relief of Malta in 1565, actions that preluded the victory of the Holy League in Lepanto, in 1571.[150][151].
The outbreak of the second rebellion of the Alpujarras in 1568 represented a parenthesis in this impulse, by modifying the military priorities of the Monarchy and forcing it to divert a large part of its naval resources to guard the coasts of the Kingdom of Granada, to prevent Turkish-Berber support. This strategic reorientation implied the neglect of other fronts and facilitated the fall of Tunisia into Ottoman hands in 1569.[151] For their part, the rebellious Moriscos were unable to capture any port that would allow them to receive foreign aid on a sustained basis, although they besieged several cities on the Almeria coast for that purpose. The first effective response of the Monarchy came from the Marquis of the Vélez, who gathered a contingent of 5,000 infantry and 300 cavalry from the militias of Lorca, Murcia and Cartagena to assist the governor of Almería, García de Villarroel, against the insurgent threat. However, the marquis' campaign was hindered by desertions and violent looting committed by his insubordinate troops, to the point of suffering a personal attack when he tried to reestablish discipline. Finally, Governor García de Villarroel was able to see the pressure on his city relieved thanks to the approach of the Murcian army and the sending, in January 1569, of six frigates loaded with men and supplies from Cartagena, which committed so many troops to land and naval relief that it was practically unguarded, requiring Murcia to send 266 men to ensure its own defense.[152].
That same month, the episode known as the "Inox business" took place, in which the Almeria militias and the crews of the Cartagena ships captained by Gil de Andrada captured more than 3,000 Moriscos on the rock of Inox who were awaiting transport to Barbary by corsairs, being reduced to slavery; Of them, 333 women and girls were destined as loot to Cartagena. The limited progress obtained by the campaigns of the Marquises of Vélez and Mondéjar aroused the dissatisfaction of Philip II, which motivated the appointment of his half-brother, Juan de Austria, as captain general of Granada.[153] Fajardo thus ended, demoted in the chain of command, his last service to the Crown, before dying at nearly 66 years of age in 1574.[105] Meanwhile, Granadan emissaries had tried to persuade Uluj Ali to take an active part in the uprising, assuring him that, after the Moorish uprising, those of Aragon and Valencia would follow, and that they would give him the port of Cartagena as the nerve center for an invasion of the Iberian Peninsula. The Beylerbey chose, however, to focus his efforts on Hafsi Tunisia, although in January 1569 six Algerian galley slaves landed artillery, ammunition and reinforcements near Almería, in contrast to the inability of the Ottoman navy, which was engaged in the "Turkish-Venetian War (1570-1573)" conquest of Venetian Cyprus. In Spain, Philip II ordered Gil de Andrada to patrol the coast and requested naval support from Genoa, Naples and Sicily, which resulted in the interception of numerous privateer ships, although by the spring of 1570 it was estimated that there were some 4,000 Turkish and Berber volunteers fighting in the Alpujarras. Given the intensification of hostilities, the Cartagena militias were mobilized repeatedly to continue integrating into the forces in charge of quelling the rebellion.[154].
References
[1] ↑ Aunque el episodio ha sido cubierto por la historiografía contemporánea española desde que Escobar Barberán (1929) recopilara por primera vez el relato de los hechos contenido en las obras de Pérez de Hita y Cascales,[9] y que Montojo Montojo (1987) publicara el informe relativo a lo acontecido presente en la documentación original del Concejo de Cartagena,[10] no sería hasta Gómez Vizcaíno y Munuera Navarro (2002) cuando la contienda recibiría una denominación específica, alusiva a la onomástica del día en que tuvo lugar el enfrentamiento: el ataque del día de Santa Mónica.[11] Pérez Adán (2021) se hizo eco de esta designación, adaptándola como «batalla de Santa Mónica».[12].
[2] ↑ Al margen de los moriscos, la población argelina del siglo XVI presentaba una singular heterogeneidad, estructurada en los siguientes grupos:
[3] ↑ Entre 1526 y 1542 estas «guardas» se disponían, desde Cabo de Palos a Cartagena, en Cabo de Palos, Juncos, Portmán, Escombreras, la Dargeta –de localización desconocida según Grandal López (1986)[52]–, cabezo de San Julián y en las «puntas» del puerto, llamadas Cala Cortina y de los Peces. Desde Cartagena a Isla Plana lo hacían en las Algamecas, Roldán, El Portús, La Azohía e Isla Plana. La «guarda» responsable de avisar a los habitantes del campo era la del cabezo de la Atalaya, mientras que las de comunicación con Murcia estaban en las torres del Albujón y del Castellar. En 1556-1557 se colocaban también en Moscas, El Gorguel, Algameca Grande y Chica, el cabo Roche y Lomas del Cedacero.[53].
[4] ↑ Compuesta cada una de ellas por 25 o 50 hombres según Montojo Montojo (1994),[55] o por una cifra oscilante entre 65 y 130 de acuerdo a Velasco Hernández (2019).[56].
[5] ↑ La «caballería de cuantía» fue un modelo de milicia ecuestre instaurado por las Cortes de Alcalá de 1348 como sucesor de la caballería villana, hasta su disolución en 1619.[57] En Cartagena, a diferencia de lo ocurrido en Lorca o Murcia, su continuidad se vio entrecortada por las persistentes maniobras políticas de los regidores del Concejo, quienes abogaban por su supresión alegando una presunta ineficacia de la caballería en el accidentado relieve de la costa cartagenera. Montojo Montojo (1991) contempla dicho argumento como un subterfugio de la oligarquía para coartar la movilidad social que podía derivarse de la incorporación de mercaderes y letrados a esta milicia.[58][56].
[6] ↑ La horquilla es aportada por Velasco Hernández (2019) en referencia al periodo 1532-1562. A partir de la década de 1570, el fin de la «gran guerra de galeras», el viraje de la política hispánica hacia el Atlántico –que consumía gran parte de los recursos de la Real Hacienda–, la expulsión de los moriscos del Reino de Granada y la gradual repoblación de la costa del sureste fueron difuminando la necesidad de las guarniciones temporales.[59].
[7] ↑ El corregimiento era una institución político-administrativa castellana que fue introducida en el municipio de Murcia en 1394, agregando en la misma demarcación a Lorca en 1475 y a Cartagena en 1503, tras reintegrarse la ciudad portuaria en la jurisdicción de realengo. A partir de entonces, Cartagena, Lorca y Murcia compartieron un único corregidor, residente en la capital del reino, hasta 1645. En aquel año, Lorca accedió a un corregimiento propio, una vicisitud que replicaría Cartagena en 1706.[62][63][64].
[8] ↑ El brote epidémico se había originado en Valencia en abril de 1557, desde donde empezó a propagarse, primero a Cataluña y después al Reino de Murcia, para extenderse posteriormente a Andalucía Oriental.[74].
[9] ↑ En los recuentos de población del Antiguo Régimen de España –enmarcados en la época preestadística–, «vecino» refería al cabeza de una unidad familiar. En ese sentido, las averiguaciones de vecindades tenían el propósito de actualizar la lista de contribuyentes obligados al pago de alcabalas.[78].
[10] ↑ Escobar Barberán (1929) especula que el responsable de la expedición pudo haber sido el corsario Kara Mustafa, quien operó desde el peñón de Vélez de la Gomera hasta su reconquista por la Monarquía Hispánica en 1564, tras haber sido ocupado por los otomanos desde 1522.[89].
[11] ↑ El término turco otomano ʿulūj –en turco moderno ʿuluç; procedente del árabe 'ildj–, con el cual se designaba a los renegados, se traduce literalmente como «bárbaro» o «extranjero», en el sentido de persona originaria de un contexto cultural cristiano.[90].
[12] ↑ Cabe señalar que, en el caso de Sóller, únicamente Bover de Rosselló (1856) se aparta de estas evaluaciones al situar la cifra en 1300.[108].
[13] ↑ Velasco Hernández (2019) considera muy probable que tuviera lugar en las Algamecas el desembarco corsario de 1502, que avanzó en dirección a Cartagena hasta ser repelido por el alcaide del castillo de la Concepción en las proximidades de la rambla de Benipila. El mismo autor indica que la expedición de Dragut en 1550, en la que sospecha que estuvo presente el propio Uluj Alí, habría seguido ese mismo patrón en su aproximación a la ciudad, aunque no exista certeza sobre si llegó efectivamente a desembarcar. Esta familiaridad con la orografía cartagenera respondería a la colaboración de renegados y moriscos de la zona con los corsarios.[123]
[14] ↑ Este «raso» era una llanura situada al noroeste de Cartagena, en un camino paralelo a la rambla de Benipila –cuyo cauce original, hasta que fue desviado por las obras de construcción del Arsenal en 1731, desembocaba en el mar de Mandarache– desde las Algamecas.[12][125][126] En el entorno de esa llanura se encontraban unas salinas operadas por el Concejo, que habían empezado a explotarse entre 1529 y 1541 precisamente por la imposibilidad de utilizar las de Cabo de Palos por la amenaza corsaria.[127].
[15] ↑ Esta supuesta fama del marqués de los Vélez entre sus enemigos es explayada por Cascales, quien afirma que había retratos de Fajardo «armado con una lança en la mano y en la punta de la lança una cabeça de un turco» expuestos en la residencia del beylerbey en la ciudadela de Argel, en el palacio de Topkapı en Constantinopla y en la casa del regidor Nicolás Garre de Cáceres –citado como «Nicolás Garri»– en Cartagena.[1] Muñoz Rodríguez (2005) da por cierto que un retrato así existiera en el domicilio de Garre de Cáceres, atendiendo a que su familia mantenía una relación clientelar con la Casa de Fajardo.[128].
[16] ↑ Esta aparente presencia de un contingente lorquino en Cartagena durante los días 3 y 4 de mayo de 1561 parece contradecir la información proporcionada por las actas capitulares del Concejo de Lorca. Según estos documentos, resultaría irrefutable que las milicias lorquinas, aunque preparadas para movilizarse, permanecieron en su ciudad al recibir el 3 de mayo una comunicación del marqués de los Vélez que revocaba una orden previa de desplazamiento hacia la costa amenazada.[92].
[17] ↑ a b c d e f g h i j Pérez de Hita, 1915, p. 44.
[18] ↑ a b Chacón Jiménez, 1979, p. 471.
[19] ↑ a b c d e Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 215.
[20] ↑ a b c d e f Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 219.
[21] ↑ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n ñ Montojo Montojo, 1987, p. 73.
[22] ↑ a b c Gómez Vizcaíno y Montojo Montojo, 1993, p. 327.
[23] ↑ a b Chacón Jiménez, 1979, p. 169.
[24] ↑ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Cascales, 1874, p. 22.
[25] ↑ Escobar Barberán, 1929, pp. LII-LVI, 139-150.
[26] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1987, pp. 73-4.
[27] ↑ Gómez Vizcaíno y Munuera Navarro, 2002, p. 138.
[36] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 491, 493-494, 511.
[37] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 62.
[38] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 13, 162.
[39] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 494.
[40] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 47.
[41] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 24, 47.
[42] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 46-47.
[43] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 50, 81.
[44] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 24.
[45] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 47, 198.
[46] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 494-495.
[47] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 199-200.
[48] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 24, 91.
[49] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 44.
[50] ↑ a b c Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 52.
[51] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 87-88.
[52] ↑ Cresti, 2008, p. 436.
[53] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 51-52.
[54] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 52, 88.
[55] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 51, 84, 200.
[56] ↑ Cresti, 2008, p. 417.
[57] ↑ Cresti, 2008, pp. 412, 417, 436.
[58] ↑ Cresti, 2008, p. 437.
[59] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 491.
[60] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 20.
[61] ↑ a b c Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 497.
[62] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 39.
[63] ↑ a b Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 548.
[64] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1993, pp. 23-24, 27-28.
[65] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1993, p. 27.
[66] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 68.
[67] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 138.
[68] ↑ Grandal López, 1986, p. 6.
[69] ↑ a b c Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 525-526.
[70] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 140.
[71] ↑ a b Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 522.
[72] ↑ a b c Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 141.
[73] ↑ Guerrero Arjona, 2019, pp. 115, 122.
[74] ↑ Montojo Montojo (parte 3), 1991, pp. 52-53.
[75] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 142-143.
[76] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 141-144.
[77] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 143.
[78] ↑ Tornel Cobacho, 2001, pp. 172, 250.
[79] ↑ Martín-Consuegra Blaya, Muñoz Rodríguez y Abad González, 2009, pp. 26-27.
[80] ↑ Membrado, 2020, p. 52.
[81] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 503, 530.
[82] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 190.
[83] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 193.
[84] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 128, 190.
[85] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 41.
[86] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 499-500, 519.
[87] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 128.
[88] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 67.
[89] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 516.
[90] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 213-214.
[91] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1993, pp. 32-36.
[92] ↑ Torres Sánchez, 1994, p. 76.
[93] ↑ Montojo Montojo (parte 1), 1991, pp. 58-59.
[94] ↑ Montojo Montojo (parte 1), 1991, p. 107.
[95] ↑ Montojo Montojo (parte 1), 1991, p. 59.
[96] ↑ Torres Sánchez, 1987, p. 249.
[97] ↑ a b Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 530-531.
[98] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 203-205.
[99] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 214.
[100] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 504.
[101] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 211-212, 215.
[102] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 100.
[103] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 97.
[104] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 87.
[105] ↑ Escobar Barberán, 1929, p. LV.
[106] ↑ a b Benzoni, Gino (1998). «Galeni, Gian Dionigi». Diccionario biográfico de los italianos (en italiano) 51. Instituto de la Enciclopedia Italiana. Consultado el 28 de noviembre de 2025. - [https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/gian-dionigi-galeni_(Dizionario-Biografico)/](https://www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/gian-dionigi-galeni_(Dizionario-Biografico)/)
[107] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 216.
[108] ↑ a b c d Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 218.
[109] ↑ Mut, 1841, p. 584.
[110] ↑ a b c Anónimo, 1888, p. 1155.
[111] ↑ a b Binimelis, 2014, pp. 193-201, 619-627.
[112] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 96-97.
[113] ↑ Cabrillana Ciézar, 1982, p. 168.
[114] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 101-102, 215.
[115] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 102-103.
[116] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 130.
[117] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 116.
[118] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 507.
[119] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 129, 226.
[120] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 101.
[121] ↑ a b Vázquez de Prada, Valentín. «Luis Fajardo de la Cueva». Historia Hispánica. Real Academia de la Historia. Consultado el 28 de noviembre de 2025.: https://historia-hispanica.rah.es/biografias/16266
[122] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 182-183, 185-186.
[123] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 206-207.
[124] ↑ a b Bover de Rosselló, 1856, p. 46.
[125] ↑ Mut, 1841, p. 526.
[126] ↑ Bunes Ibarra, 1988, p. 69.
[127] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 87, 200.
[128] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 182.
[129] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 218-219.
[130] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 140, 142.
[131] ↑ a b Escobar Barberán, 1929, pp. 139-150.
[132] ↑ Carrasco Urgoiti, 1976, p. 80.
[133] ↑ a b Mimura, 2006, p. 167.
[134] ↑ Fernández Rubio, 2019, pp. 226-227.
[135] ↑ Bunes Ibarra, 1983, p. 28.
[136] ↑ Franco Llopis y Moreno Díaz del Campo, 2019, p. 189.
[137] ↑ Carrasco Urgoiti, 1981, p. 60.
[138] ↑ Centenero de Arce, 2005, pp. 71-75.
[139] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 156, 204.
[140] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 207.
[141] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2023, p. 65.
[142] ↑ Conesa García y García García, 2003, p. 93.
[143] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1983, p. XXXVI.
[144] ↑ Muñoz Rodríguez, 2005, p. 60.
[145] ↑ a b c d Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 220.
[146] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 215, 220-221.
[147] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 216-217, 221.
[148] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 217-218.
[149] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 219-220.
[150] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 507, 504, 510.
[151] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 510.
[152] ↑ Gómez Vizcaíno y Munuera Navarro, 2002, p. 126.
[153] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 532.
[154] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 498.
[155] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 140, 245.
[156] ↑ García Mercadal, 1952, pp. 1213-1214.
[157] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, pp. 498-499.
[158] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 245.
[159] ↑ Gómez Vizcaíno y Munuera Navarro, 2002, p. 157.
[160] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 537.
[161] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 245-247.
[162] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 138-139, 245-247.
[163] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 227.
[164] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 227, 230-231.
[165] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 549.
[166] ↑ a b Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 199, 223.
[167] ↑ a b c Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 495.
[168] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 231-236.
[169] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 233.
[170] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 234-236.
[171] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 92-93.
[172] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 238-239.
[173] ↑ Montojo Montojo, 1994, p. 511.
[174] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 239.
[175] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, p. 244.
[176] ↑ Velasco Hernández, 2019, pp. 20-22, 24-25.
• - Finally, the clash is also referred to in the panegyric dedicated to the House of Fajardo as part of the book Historical speeches of the very noble and very loyal city of Murcia and its kingdom, the work of the scholar Francisco Cascales and published in 1621.[8] The Discourses are presented as a chronicle, but also in this case they are crossed by a conflict of interest, since, as Centenero de Arce (2005) highlights, there was a relationship clientele between the scholar and Luis Fajardo de Requeséns y Zúñiga, Marquis of the Vélez, who had personally interceded for Cascales to win the competition for professor at the Seminario Mayor de San Fulgencio, an institution financed for the most part by the Fajardo family. In this way, Centenero de Arce emphasizes that Cascales' work has "a marked political character" and that its appearance is part of the image campaign undertaken by the marquis after his dispute with the Crown for the titles of advance and captain general of the Kingdom of Murcia, which had passed to the Crown in 1581 as a result of the death of the marquis and the then minority of the . It would thus be "a discursive construction that justified" the role of the House of Fajardo "through the virtue that arose from the service of arms provided directly to the king", with "a strong antecedent in the work of Ginés Pérez de Hita and which would become a kind of myth justifying the house."[122].
The comparison of the statements collected in the council minutes of Cartagena with the writings of Pérez de Hita —limited to the History of the civil wars of Granada— and those of Cascales allows us to establish a sequence of events that begins on the afternoon of May 3, 1561, when the Marquis of the Vélez, who was supervising the defenses of Mazarrón, was able to observe how the corsair fleet ignored the town and continued its sailing towards the east. Convinced that his prey was therefore Cartagena, the marquis set out for said city, where he arrived around ten at night and was received by the mayor and mayor Diego Sánchez de Carvajal.[2][8] Not much time passed until Uluj Alí's ships arrived in the vicinity of Cartagena, under the cover of night and still without being detected.[92] In the early hours of May 4, the The corsairs decided to approach the coast to carry out the landing, choosing for this a place well known to both the corsairs and the marquis: the Algamecas, two small inlets of the inland sea - inlets - inserted in the mountainous landscape that makes up the coast to the west of Cartagena, and that protects its bay. coast" located in the surroundings of these Algamecas, being the only one of the four stationed that night that would have reacted appropriately.[5][8].
The "guarda" managed to successfully transmit the warning to Cartagena, and at two in the morning a "rebato" call was ordered in the city. Once the troops had gathered, the Marquis of the Vélez organized the defense, leaving a garrison to protect the urban center, while he left the walled enclosure in command of his lordly militias along with some others, in a force composed of both cavalry—with Fajardo at the head—and infantry. The first stages of the fray occurred when the marquis located the janissaries on the "Aljezar plain",[n] halfway to the city, and engaged in combat with them.[5][8] Pérez de Hita relates that the marquis carried a spear of such considerable dimensions that he required the assistance of a servant to carry it resting it on his shoulder, but that once the confrontation began, however, "The marquis shook it as if it were a thin reed."[1].
After a first contact, the Ottomans retreated towards a nearby elevation - the Sierra de Pelayo or the Mount de la Atalaya - where the Spanish horses could not advance, and they regrouped to launch three consecutive attacks against the marquis's positions, with as many skirmishes taking place. cavalry more easily, but Uluj Alí realized the stratagem and did not fall for the provocation.[5] In the heat of the battle, according to Pérez de Hita, the figure of the marquis—whom Cascales points out enjoyed a reputation as a "brave warrior, and so feared that only his name amazed the Moors"[o][8]—was identified by a renegade, who would have exclaimed to his companions, so loudly that everyone present could hear him, "Here is the Marquis, we cannot sack Cartagena."[1] Finally, and aware of having lost the element of surprise in their attempted assault on Cartagena, the Janissaries withdrew towards the Algamecas to reembark.[5] In the meantime, the council militia companies had left Cartagena, but by the time they arrived at the battlefield they found that Uluj Ali and his forces had already abandoned the place. The balance of the day showed a balance of up to thirty corsairs and one resident of Cartagena dead, with an unreported number of wounded by both sides. strong breastplate, he would be dead».[1][8].
The song from the Book of the population and exploits of the very noble and loyal city of Lorca, which takes the perspective of the Marquis of Vélez and the Lorca soldiers who would have served under his command in Cartagena,[p] presents a dramatized and divergent version of what happened. After a narrative preamble, the action begins when the marquis spots the corsair fleet heading towards Cartagena, which prompts Fajardo to come to the city's aid, covering seven leagues of crossing through the mountains "in only two and a half hours." After his arrival "two hours into the night," he harangued his men with a speech in Homeric style:
The words inflamed the spirit of the hosts while the Ottoman forces, in an unexpected way, began their landing. Using the darkness of the night and the collaboration of renegades who knew the terrain, the attackers sent spies who reached the surroundings of the Puerta de Murcia, where they were sighted and raised the alarm in Cartagena. In response, the marquis dispatched two gentlemen—who Escobar Barberán (1929) identifies as implicitly from Lorca—on a reconnaissance mission. They managed to locate the corsairs, ambushed waiting for the Spanish troops, producing a brief confrontation after which the horsemen managed to retreat and report their discovery. At dawn, and having secured the city, the marquis set out to meet the enemy under the command of thirty horse soldiers and eighty marksmen—among the latter, thirty of Lorca origin. The story of the subsequent encounter emphasizes both the spectacular nature of the armed clashes and the individual exploits of the Marquis and the Lorca people. The operations would have included artillery fire against the "Turkish" positions, carried out both from a ship anchored in the port and from the Gomera stronghold. The confrontation culminated with the retreat of the corsairs towards their ships, in complete disorder and harassed by the victorious militias of the Marquis of the Vélez.[115].
The academic assessment of the battle has been reflected in the opinions of Montojo Montojo (1987), who, considering its impact on Cartagena, described it as "the worst moment the city went through [...] possibly" in response to the corsair raids, and in that of Velasco Hernández (2023), who described it as "the most dangerous action of the entire century against Cartagena."[5][125] In addition, Velasco Hernández (2019) highlighted in their analysis that the action of the Marquis of Vélez's cavalry was apparently decisive in containing and rejecting the carefully planned incursion, in the absence of both the Cartagena and Murcia militia. In that sense, he expressed his skepticism that a contingent of approximately one hundred cavalry could successfully confront an attacking force of around 1,800 Ottoman soldiers, as preserved sources indicate.[4].
Despite these advances, important deficiencies persisted. The new walled perimeter continued to encompass only the urban space between the hills of Concepción and Molinete, depriving the protection of its enclosures to the suburbs of San Roque and San Diego, and the entrance to the Algamecas, so exposed to enemy landings, remained completely unprotected until the end of the century, when Pedro Manuel Colón of Portugal, Duke of Veragua, planned the installation of a coastal battery with four pieces of artillery in the nearby Podadera mountain.[142][143].
Simultaneously, the global protection of the Kingdom of Murcia was reconsidered through a construction plan of up to 36 coastal surveillance towers, originally conceived in 1550 but resumed in 1570. The execution, however, progressed with notorious slowness: by 1580 only those in Cabo de Palos and Santa Elena in La Azohía had been erected, to which Portmán was added in 1596, built at the initiative of the Cartagena Council. Of the 36 towers planned by Gonzaga and Antonelli, those of Águilas, Cabo de Palos, La Azohía, Terreros Blancos and Testa de Mazarrón ended up being built, complemented by others promoted by the councils: El Cargador —pre-existing, renovated to add a final finish— and Los Caballos in Mazarrón, and Cabo Cope in Lorca.[144][145] Of Italian inspiration, it was robust structures that could house a garrison of three guards and a warden, while storing enough artillery, ammunition and provisions to withstand a brief siege. Its location was due to tactical considerations: control of bays, coves and water wells, protection of fishing areas - almadrabas - and control of access to ports. When equipped with cannons, they constituted an effective deterrent against privateer fleets.[146].
The actions of the Spanish Navy were equally decisive for the transformation of Cartagena into a first-class stronghold. Between 1560 and 1575, the intensification of the conflict with the Turks and the Berbers forced an increase in the frequency of stops at its port, with stays that allowed the Council to withdraw the expensive "coastal guards" - except in Cabo de Palos and La Azohía - and delegate the custody of the city to the crews, although their eventual departure made Cartagena perceive itself in a situation of extreme vulnerability. In 1564, Admiral García de Toledo Osorio "García de Toledo Osorio (1514-1578)") proposed to the Council that part of his squadron spend the winter in the city, in exchange for the Cartagenians providing 500 crossbowmen to patrol aboard the royal ships up to a maximum of 20 miles from their port, along with an adequate supply of meat and drinking water for the crews. For this last purpose, a raft was built on the side outside the Murcia Gate, near the Mandarache Sea, which was completed in April 1565. However, this naval presence had no stability - the Council would reiterate its request in 1574 - or regularity, going from eleven galleys in 1564-1565 to seven in 1566-1567.[47][147] The galley stay It lasted at least until 1575, favored both by the Alpujarreño rebellion and by the perennial corsair scourge. Expeditions as transcendental as the one that rescued Malta (1565) and the one that fought in Lepanto (1571) set sail from Cartagena, which resulted in an important "cleaning" of enemy vessels on the surrounding coast. Although in 1581 a band of galleys was ordered to move from El Puerto de Santa María to winter in Cartagena with a supplier officer, the wars against England "Anglo-Spanish War (1585-1604)") and the United Provinces, together with the economic difficulties of the Monarchy, frustrated Cartagena's aspirations to permanently host a considerable naval force - and, therefore, to see its defense guaranteed -.[148] The The definitive shoring up of Cartagena as a galley station would not occur until 1670, when the closure of the "Barra (relief)") of the Guadalete in El Puerto de Santa María sentenced the transfer of the naval base to the city, reinforcing its role as a port for the organization and departure of expeditions and as a supply center for navies and borders.[149].
The insurrection ended in 1571 with the defeat of the Moorish cause, which led to the exodus of a good part of this group to North Africa, where many refugees were employed in the Cherchell shipyards at the service of the privateers. The Moors who had remained in the Kingdom of Granada were dispersed throughout different peninsular territories, and from then on the focus of collusion with the Barbary Corsican shifted to the Moorish communities on the Valencian coast, particularly those settled in the Marina Alta.[155] The news of the Christian victory of Lepanto was received with demonstrations of joy in Cartagena, Murcia, Lorca and Orihuela, where processions, masses, displays of banners and flags, artillery salutes and fireworks and decoration of the cities with luminaries were held. Lepanto, however, had a modest impact: the rapid material recovery of the Turkish navy and the premature dissolution of the Holy League prevented capitalizing on the Allied triumph. The Spanish occupation of Tunisia in 1573 proved short-lived, as it was irreversibly recovered by the Ottomans in 1574, and although the enthronement in Morocco of Abu Marwan Abd al-Malik I in 1576 caused concern due to his vassalage relationship with the Sublime Porte, his death in 1578 and the succession by Ahmad al-Mansur - who sought to put a stop to Ottoman influence - substantially mitigated the problems. fears of Madrid.[151][156].
The Ottoman retreat in the western Mediterranean was formalized with the "Turkish truces", agreed in Constantinople for the first time in 1577 and extended in 1580, 1581 and 1584. This peace process was favored by the circumstance that the Ottoman Empire was fighting in parallel a war "Ottoman-Safavid War (1578-1590)") against the Safavids, while the Spanish Monarchy was immersed in another war against the English and Dutch. This brought an end to the "great galley war", eliminating for Spain the danger of the large Ottoman fleets although not that of the Barbary squadrons, which were reorganized without the direct support of the sultan but with the sponsorship of the Regency of Algiers.[157][158] Exhausted by the simultaneous war effort in the Mediterranean and Flanders, the Spanish Crown drastically reduced its galley stocks, going from 146 units at the height of the Habsburg-Ottoman wars to just 73 in 1598, compensating for this decrease with the system of coastal surveillance towers.[159] At the beginning of the century, the arrival in Algiers and Tunisia of Dutch and English privateers - known as "Anglo-Turkish piracy" -, equipped with high-board ships, revolutionized the predatory model: it allowed expand their radius of action to the Atlantic, they changed their naval combat tactics, expanded their period of operation and were able to annul their dependence on slave rowers. The Maghreb regencies reached a new peak at this stage, which in the Iberian southeast was expressed in continuous seizures of merchant ships and prolonged blockades of ports such as Alicante or Cartagena, although landings and raids on land decreased until they disappeared at the end of the century. Moorish complicity with corsair activities in Spanish territory, however, persisted until the expulsion of 1609-1613, during the reign of Philip III.[160].
• - Finally, the clash is also referred to in the panegyric dedicated to the House of Fajardo as part of the book Historical speeches of the very noble and very loyal city of Murcia and its kingdom, the work of the scholar Francisco Cascales and published in 1621.[8] The Discourses are presented as a chronicle, but also in this case they are crossed by a conflict of interest, since, as Centenero de Arce (2005) highlights, there was a relationship clientele between the scholar and Luis Fajardo de Requeséns y Zúñiga, Marquis of the Vélez, who had personally interceded for Cascales to win the competition for professor at the Seminario Mayor de San Fulgencio, an institution financed for the most part by the Fajardo family. In this way, Centenero de Arce emphasizes that Cascales' work has "a marked political character" and that its appearance is part of the image campaign undertaken by the marquis after his dispute with the Crown for the titles of advance and captain general of the Kingdom of Murcia, which had passed to the Crown in 1581 as a result of the death of the marquis and the then minority of the . It would thus be "a discursive construction that justified" the role of the House of Fajardo "through the virtue that arose from the service of arms provided directly to the king", with "a strong antecedent in the work of Ginés Pérez de Hita and which would become a kind of myth justifying the house."[122].
The comparison of the statements collected in the council minutes of Cartagena with the writings of Pérez de Hita —limited to the History of the civil wars of Granada— and those of Cascales allows us to establish a sequence of events that begins on the afternoon of May 3, 1561, when the Marquis of the Vélez, who was supervising the defenses of Mazarrón, was able to observe how the corsair fleet ignored the town and continued its sailing towards the east. Convinced that his prey was therefore Cartagena, the marquis set out for said city, where he arrived around ten at night and was received by the mayor and mayor Diego Sánchez de Carvajal.[2][8] Not much time passed until Uluj Alí's ships arrived in the vicinity of Cartagena, under the cover of night and still without being detected.[92] In the early hours of May 4, the The corsairs decided to approach the coast to carry out the landing, choosing for this a place well known to both the corsairs and the marquis: the Algamecas, two small inlets of the inland sea - inlets - inserted in the mountainous landscape that makes up the coast to the west of Cartagena, and that protects its bay. coast" located in the surroundings of these Algamecas, being the only one of the four stationed that night that would have reacted appropriately.[5][8].
The "guarda" managed to successfully transmit the warning to Cartagena, and at two in the morning a "rebato" call was ordered in the city. Once the troops had gathered, the Marquis of the Vélez organized the defense, leaving a garrison to protect the urban center, while he left the walled enclosure in command of his lordly militias along with some others, in a force composed of both cavalry—with Fajardo at the head—and infantry. The first stages of the fray occurred when the marquis located the janissaries on the "Aljezar plain",[n] halfway to the city, and engaged in combat with them.[5][8] Pérez de Hita relates that the marquis carried a spear of such considerable dimensions that he required the assistance of a servant to carry it resting it on his shoulder, but that once the confrontation began, however, "The marquis shook it as if it were a thin reed."[1].
After a first contact, the Ottomans retreated towards a nearby elevation - the Sierra de Pelayo or the Mount de la Atalaya - where the Spanish horses could not advance, and they regrouped to launch three consecutive attacks against the marquis's positions, with as many skirmishes taking place. cavalry more easily, but Uluj Alí realized the stratagem and did not fall for the provocation.[5] In the heat of the battle, according to Pérez de Hita, the figure of the marquis—whom Cascales points out enjoyed a reputation as a "brave warrior, and so feared that only his name amazed the Moors"[o][8]—was identified by a renegade, who would have exclaimed to his companions, so loudly that everyone present could hear him, "Here is the Marquis, we cannot sack Cartagena."[1] Finally, and aware of having lost the element of surprise in their attempted assault on Cartagena, the Janissaries withdrew towards the Algamecas to reembark.[5] In the meantime, the council militia companies had left Cartagena, but by the time they arrived at the battlefield they found that Uluj Ali and his forces had already abandoned the place. The balance of the day showed a balance of up to thirty corsairs and one resident of Cartagena dead, with an unreported number of wounded by both sides. strong breastplate, he would be dead».[1][8].
The song from the Book of the population and exploits of the very noble and loyal city of Lorca, which takes the perspective of the Marquis of Vélez and the Lorca soldiers who would have served under his command in Cartagena,[p] presents a dramatized and divergent version of what happened. After a narrative preamble, the action begins when the marquis spots the corsair fleet heading towards Cartagena, which prompts Fajardo to come to the city's aid, covering seven leagues of crossing through the mountains "in only two and a half hours." After his arrival "two hours into the night," he harangued his men with a speech in Homeric style:
The words inflamed the spirit of the hosts while the Ottoman forces, in an unexpected way, began their landing. Using the darkness of the night and the collaboration of renegades who knew the terrain, the attackers sent spies who reached the surroundings of the Puerta de Murcia, where they were sighted and raised the alarm in Cartagena. In response, the marquis dispatched two gentlemen—who Escobar Barberán (1929) identifies as implicitly from Lorca—on a reconnaissance mission. They managed to locate the corsairs, ambushed waiting for the Spanish troops, producing a brief confrontation after which the horsemen managed to retreat and report their discovery. At dawn, and having secured the city, the marquis set out to meet the enemy under the command of thirty horse soldiers and eighty marksmen—among the latter, thirty of Lorca origin. The story of the subsequent encounter emphasizes both the spectacular nature of the armed clashes and the individual exploits of the Marquis and the Lorca people. The operations would have included artillery fire against the "Turkish" positions, carried out both from a ship anchored in the port and from the Gomera stronghold. The confrontation culminated with the retreat of the corsairs towards their ships, in complete disorder and harassed by the victorious militias of the Marquis of the Vélez.[115].
The academic assessment of the battle has been reflected in the opinions of Montojo Montojo (1987), who, considering its impact on Cartagena, described it as "the worst moment the city went through [...] possibly" in response to the corsair raids, and in that of Velasco Hernández (2023), who described it as "the most dangerous action of the entire century against Cartagena."[5][125] In addition, Velasco Hernández (2019) highlighted in their analysis that the action of the Marquis of Vélez's cavalry was apparently decisive in containing and rejecting the carefully planned incursion, in the absence of both the Cartagena and Murcia militia. In that sense, he expressed his skepticism that a contingent of approximately one hundred cavalry could successfully confront an attacking force of around 1,800 Ottoman soldiers, as preserved sources indicate.[4].
Despite these advances, important deficiencies persisted. The new walled perimeter continued to encompass only the urban space between the hills of Concepción and Molinete, depriving the protection of its enclosures to the suburbs of San Roque and San Diego, and the entrance to the Algamecas, so exposed to enemy landings, remained completely unprotected until the end of the century, when Pedro Manuel Colón of Portugal, Duke of Veragua, planned the installation of a coastal battery with four pieces of artillery in the nearby Podadera mountain.[142][143].
Simultaneously, the global protection of the Kingdom of Murcia was reconsidered through a construction plan of up to 36 coastal surveillance towers, originally conceived in 1550 but resumed in 1570. The execution, however, progressed with notorious slowness: by 1580 only those in Cabo de Palos and Santa Elena in La Azohía had been erected, to which Portmán was added in 1596, built at the initiative of the Cartagena Council. Of the 36 towers planned by Gonzaga and Antonelli, those of Águilas, Cabo de Palos, La Azohía, Terreros Blancos and Testa de Mazarrón ended up being built, complemented by others promoted by the councils: El Cargador —pre-existing, renovated to add a final finish— and Los Caballos in Mazarrón, and Cabo Cope in Lorca.[144][145] Of Italian inspiration, it was robust structures that could house a garrison of three guards and a warden, while storing enough artillery, ammunition and provisions to withstand a brief siege. Its location was due to tactical considerations: control of bays, coves and water wells, protection of fishing areas - almadrabas - and control of access to ports. When equipped with cannons, they constituted an effective deterrent against privateer fleets.[146].
The actions of the Spanish Navy were equally decisive for the transformation of Cartagena into a first-class stronghold. Between 1560 and 1575, the intensification of the conflict with the Turks and the Berbers forced an increase in the frequency of stops at its port, with stays that allowed the Council to withdraw the expensive "coastal guards" - except in Cabo de Palos and La Azohía - and delegate the custody of the city to the crews, although their eventual departure made Cartagena perceive itself in a situation of extreme vulnerability. In 1564, Admiral García de Toledo Osorio "García de Toledo Osorio (1514-1578)") proposed to the Council that part of his squadron spend the winter in the city, in exchange for the Cartagenians providing 500 crossbowmen to patrol aboard the royal ships up to a maximum of 20 miles from their port, along with an adequate supply of meat and drinking water for the crews. For this last purpose, a raft was built on the side outside the Murcia Gate, near the Mandarache Sea, which was completed in April 1565. However, this naval presence had no stability - the Council would reiterate its request in 1574 - or regularity, going from eleven galleys in 1564-1565 to seven in 1566-1567.[47][147] The galley stay It lasted at least until 1575, favored both by the Alpujarreño rebellion and by the perennial corsair scourge. Expeditions as transcendental as the one that rescued Malta (1565) and the one that fought in Lepanto (1571) set sail from Cartagena, which resulted in an important "cleaning" of enemy vessels on the surrounding coast. Although in 1581 a band of galleys was ordered to move from El Puerto de Santa María to winter in Cartagena with a supplier officer, the wars against England "Anglo-Spanish War (1585-1604)") and the United Provinces, together with the economic difficulties of the Monarchy, frustrated Cartagena's aspirations to permanently host a considerable naval force - and, therefore, to see its defense guaranteed -.[148] The The definitive shoring up of Cartagena as a galley station would not occur until 1670, when the closure of the "Barra (relief)") of the Guadalete in El Puerto de Santa María sentenced the transfer of the naval base to the city, reinforcing its role as a port for the organization and departure of expeditions and as a supply center for navies and borders.[149].
The insurrection ended in 1571 with the defeat of the Moorish cause, which led to the exodus of a good part of this group to North Africa, where many refugees were employed in the Cherchell shipyards at the service of the privateers. The Moors who had remained in the Kingdom of Granada were dispersed throughout different peninsular territories, and from then on the focus of collusion with the Barbary Corsican shifted to the Moorish communities on the Valencian coast, particularly those settled in the Marina Alta.[155] The news of the Christian victory of Lepanto was received with demonstrations of joy in Cartagena, Murcia, Lorca and Orihuela, where processions, masses, displays of banners and flags, artillery salutes and fireworks and decoration of the cities with luminaries were held. Lepanto, however, had a modest impact: the rapid material recovery of the Turkish navy and the premature dissolution of the Holy League prevented capitalizing on the Allied triumph. The Spanish occupation of Tunisia in 1573 proved short-lived, as it was irreversibly recovered by the Ottomans in 1574, and although the enthronement in Morocco of Abu Marwan Abd al-Malik I in 1576 caused concern due to his vassalage relationship with the Sublime Porte, his death in 1578 and the succession by Ahmad al-Mansur - who sought to put a stop to Ottoman influence - substantially mitigated the problems. fears of Madrid.[151][156].
The Ottoman retreat in the western Mediterranean was formalized with the "Turkish truces", agreed in Constantinople for the first time in 1577 and extended in 1580, 1581 and 1584. This peace process was favored by the circumstance that the Ottoman Empire was fighting in parallel a war "Ottoman-Safavid War (1578-1590)") against the Safavids, while the Spanish Monarchy was immersed in another war against the English and Dutch. This brought an end to the "great galley war", eliminating for Spain the danger of the large Ottoman fleets although not that of the Barbary squadrons, which were reorganized without the direct support of the sultan but with the sponsorship of the Regency of Algiers.[157][158] Exhausted by the simultaneous war effort in the Mediterranean and Flanders, the Spanish Crown drastically reduced its galley stocks, going from 146 units at the height of the Habsburg-Ottoman wars to just 73 in 1598, compensating for this decrease with the system of coastal surveillance towers.[159] At the beginning of the century, the arrival in Algiers and Tunisia of Dutch and English privateers - known as "Anglo-Turkish piracy" -, equipped with high-board ships, revolutionized the predatory model: it allowed expand their radius of action to the Atlantic, they changed their naval combat tactics, expanded their period of operation and were able to annul their dependence on slave rowers. The Maghreb regencies reached a new peak at this stage, which in the Iberian southeast was expressed in continuous seizures of merchant ships and prolonged blockades of ports such as Alicante or Cartagena, although landings and raids on land decreased until they disappeared at the end of the century. Moorish complicity with corsair activities in Spanish territory, however, persisted until the expulsion of 1609-1613, during the reign of Philip III.[160].