After World War II, the United States maintained the four Iowa-class battleships in the U.S. reserve fleets. Navy and on several occasions reactivated these battleships for naval gunfire artillery support. The United States Navy has maintained its battleships for a long time afterward. The cost and advent of aviation and precision-guided munitions led other nations to scrap their battleship fleets. The US Congress is largely responsible for this.
Lawmakers argue that battleships' large-caliber weapons have useful military destructive power as smaller, cheaper and faster U.S. cruisers and destroyers lack these weapons. The Navy, which views battleships as too expensive, is working to persuade Congress to allow it to remove the Iowa and Wisconsin from the Naval Registry by developing extended-range guided munitions and a new ship capable of meeting US Navy and Marine Corps requirements for artillery support and shore bombardment.
The US Navy's plan to extend the range of 127 mm weapons on destroyers and guided missiles from the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers (USS Arleigh Burke (DDG-51) "USS Arleigh Burke (DDG-51)") to USS Ross (DDG-71) "USS Ross (DDG-71)")) with extended-range guided munitions that would allow the ships to fire precision-guided projectiles near 40 km from him. This program was initiated in 1996 with a preliminary cost of US$78.6 million; Since then, the cost of the program has increased 400%. The results of the program have been disappointing, with the original planned operational date from 2001 to 2011. These weapons are expected to not meet the Marine Corps' requirements for range.
The result of the latest effort to design and build a ship as a replacement for the two battleships is the Zumwalt-Class destroyer, also known as the DD(X) or DDG-1000 "USS Zumwalt (DDG-1000)") (referring to Zumwalt's hull number). The DD(X) is to mount a pair of advanced gun system (AGS) turrets capable of firing specially designed long-range shore strike projectiles about 60 miles inland.
The US Navy hopes that sufficient numbers of DD(X) destroyers will be ready to help fill the gap left by battleships by 2018 at the earliest.
DDG Zumwalt 1000 is being developed by the US Navy to serve as the backbone of the surface fleet of the future providing a wide range of capabilities that are vital to supporting the global war on terrorism and major combat operations.
Zumwalt's multi-mission warfighting capabilities are designed to counter not only today's threats, but also potential threats over the next decade. On March 17, 2006, the Secretary of State of the US Navy deregistered the Iowa and Wisconsin from the Naval Registry, thus clearing the possibility of both ships being donated for use as a museum ship. The US Navy thus has the guarantee that the battleships will not be used in any future war, thus turning its attention to the development and construction of the Zumwalt destroyer, the next generation of guided missile destroyers.
This movement has drawn fire from a variety of sources familiar with the subject; Among them are dissident members of the United States Marine Corps, who feel that battleships remain a viable solution to naval fire support, members of the United States Congress who remain deeply concerned about the loss of naval surface fire support that battleships provided, and the number of independent groups such as the United States Naval Fire Support Association (USNFSA) whose ranks frequently include former service members and armed fans of the battleships.
Although the discussions presented by each group differ, all agree that the US Navy does not in good faith consider the potential of reactivated battleships for field use, a position that is supported by a 1999 report from the Government Accountability Office regarding the US Navy's fire support program. In response, the Navy has pointed to the cost of reactivating the two Iowa-class battleships to their unarmed capability.
The Navy estimates costs in excess of $500 million but this does not include an additional $110 million needed to fill powder for the 406 mm guns because a recent survey found the powder to be unsafe. In terms of schedule, Navy program management estimates that reactivation would take 20 to 40 months, given the loss of corporate memory and the shipyard's industrial base. In summary, the committee is addressed that the Navy has given up the battleship's long-range fire support capability, has given little cause for optimism regarding meeting short-term development objectives, and appears unrealistic in planning to support expeditionary warfare in the mid-term. The committee views the Navy's strategy to provide naval surface fire support as high risk, and will continue to monitor progress accordingly of the United States Navy's naval surface fire support program in the National Defense Authorization Act of 2007.
Reactivating the battleships would require a wide range of battleship modernization improvements, according to the US Navy's program management office. At a minimum, these modernization improvements include command and control, communications, computers, and intelligence equipment; environmental protection (including ozone-depleting substances); wastewater alterations; alterations in safety and women at sea; fire protection; a team of modernized sensors (air and surface search radar); and new combat and self-defense systems.
The US Navy's program management office also identified other issues that would discourage the idea of reactivating and modernizing the battleships. For example, the personnel required to operate battleships would be excessive, and the necessary qualifications may not be available. Other issues include the age and unreliability of the battleships' propulsion systems and the fact that the Navy does not maintain the capability to manufacture 406mm artillery components and systems.
Although the Navy strongly believes in the capabilities of the DD(X) destroyer program, members of the United States Congress remain skeptical about the effectiveness of the new destroyers when compared to battleships. Partly as a result the US House of Representatives has requested that the battleships be kept in optimal readiness in case they are needed again.
Congress has requested that the following be taken to ensure that, if necessary, Iowa and Wisconsin can return to active duty:.
These four conditions reflect the original three conditions that the Nation's Defense Authorization Act presented in 1996 for the maintenance of Iowa and Wisconsin while they were in the reserve fleet. These conditions are unlikely to prevent the current plan to convert the Iowa and Wisconsin into museum ships.