Deformation in shells
Introduction
The concrete shells also called concrete caissons are laminar structures resistant by shape, thin enough not to develop appreciable moments, but with sufficient thickness to support axial and shear loads; so they are ideal for construction with reinforced concrete.
History
The development of shells occurred with the appearance of reinforced concrete and the development of analysis methods: in 1874 Aron published the first theory in this regard, and as a consequence of this, examples of shells began to appear from this time.
Despite this, it is in the 1920s when there is a real increase in the number of shell-type structures built. This is because the formulation of the shell theory was simplified: for spherical shapes by Geckeler, for cylindrical shapes by Finsterwalder, etc. In addition, new forms appear: elliptical paraboloids (Freyssinet), and the hyperbolic paraboloid, magnificently developed by Candela. On the other hand, at this time new construction techniques also appeared that allowed this development: gunite and rigid reinforcement (similar to the Jena planetarium), prefabricated elements (Nervi), the use of reinforcing cables and the appearance of prestressing.
It is important to note that only anticlastic forms, such as the hyperbolic paraboloid, truly belong to the modern era. Its initial success was due to the need to cover large areas with efficient and cheap methods, without having to build large scaffolding structures. The efficiency of these structures can be verified with the radius thickness ratio of the domes built in history:
In the previous table, it can be seen that the thicknesses are limited by construction considerations: placement of reinforcement, etc.
Shell Action
With the shell action, the main internal forces that develop in response to the loads are in the plane of the surface, being in the form of axial forces and without forming significant moments. This is the type of stress that occurs, for example, in a soap bubble, and is what allows it to have such reduced thicknesses.
It is important to note that this action is the result of the interaction between the loading conditions and the shape of the structure, so not all surfaces that present curvature will work in this way. Some good examples are spherical shapes and hyperbolic paraboloids.