Salary and work
El salario es el precio pagado por el trabajo "Trabajo (economía)"). Los salarios son todos aquellos pagos que compensan a los individuos por el tiempo y el esfuerzo dedicado a la producción de bienes y servicios. Estos pagos incluyen no solo los ingresos por hora, día o semana trabajada de los empleados manuales, sino también los ingresos, semanales, mensuales o anuales de los profesionales y los gestores de las empresas. A los ingresos regulares pactados en los convenios colectivos hay que sumarles las primas y las pagas extraordinarias, las primas por riesgo, nocturnidad, índice de peligrosidad u horas extraordinarias, así como los honorarios de los profesionales liberales y la parte de los ingresos percibidos por los propietarios de negocios como compensación por el tiempo dedicado a su negocio.
Labor theory of value
The labor theory of value (TVL, also labor theory of value) is a theory that considers that the value of a good or service depends on the amount of work "Work (economy)") that it incorporates.
Adam Smith considered work to be the exact measure of quality to quantify value. For him, value was the amount of labor one could receive in exchange for his merchandise. Goods could increase in value, but what always remains unchanged is work. This original theory had some problems: 1) in the market it is not possible to know how much embodied work a commodity has 2) if labor is the source of value of merchandise, when the value improves the worker should be the one who benefits - something that did not happen. In order to explain the concepts of profit and income, he developed a second theory called Theory of production costs. David Ricardo developed a theory of labor-value incorporated in his work Principles of political economy and taxation (1817). Continuing with Smith, he adopts the first of his two theories of value and tries to explain how profit works in capitalist society. In addition, he criticizes the definition that Smith gave about the invariable pattern that was work. The value of work, he explains, also varies. As stated by Adam Smith, goods vary in value but work does not, work being a waste of energy, the increase or reduction in costs of subsistence goods would require more work to satisfy needs.
Karl Marx's labor theory of value is different from the classical one. Its definition is found in his work Capital, and would be part of the fundamental basis for understanding the capitalist mode of production. For Marx, the labor theory of value is historical and social - not historically permanent. It would only apply to market economies - the capitalist economy is a type of market economy, so it also applies to it. For Marx, labor is not 'value' by nature, it is what produces value exclusively by the social organization in which it is employed. An intrinsic characteristic of work is to produce, create, transform, but the fact that the value of commodities is measured by the length of the working day spent on them is due to the social structure and social relations of production of capitalism.
Historical evolution of productivity and per capita income
Productivity is defined as the relationship between the quantity of products obtained by a production system and the resources used to obtain said production.[21].
The increase in productivity is associated with economic growth, although diminishing returns significantly affect the use of labor, both in its number -employed population- and in its dedication -working day-.[22] In this context, the salary not only has a direct relationship with the value of work but with consumption and therefore with aggregate demand.
Historically, the increase in productivity is what has allowed the reduction of the working day due to a lower requirement for labor and the need to increase consumption and demand by increasing salaries to dispose of surpluses. In countries that export raw materials, usually with low productivity, productivity is renounced in exchange for more population; In industrialized countries, high productivity is achieved with little labor, which institutionally and individually promotes greater control of population growth.[23].
The increase in productivity is a consequence of the development of technology, the increase in so-called physical capital and the improvement of human capital: mechanization, industrialization, implementation of information and communication technologies; improvement in human resources management; of the increase in professional qualification and training of workers as well as the implementation of the quality management system and the intensification of capital that reduce the need for intensive labor.[24][25][26] Joseph Stiglitz considers that an increase in hours worked as a result of demographic growth that does not result in an increase in productivity will impact the standard of living because the higher income will not have a real consumption value due to the lower quantity of goods or services produced, according to the formula (i of Production growth = i of increase in hours worked + i of increase in productivity). In this sense, in a context of higher productivity, to maintain growth levels of total production at equilibrium values, it is necessary to reduce the working day, since it is economically unnecessary to exceed said levels of stable growth, in accordance with a trend towards sustainable development, and in a context of demographic stagnation.[27].