Architecture for diversity
Introduction
Postmodern architecture is known as an architectural trend that began in the 1950s, and began to be a movement in the 1970s,[1] continuing its influence to this day. Postmodernism is said to be heralded by the return of "ingenuity, ornament and reference" to architecture, in response to the formalism caused by the International Style of the modern movement. As with many cultural movements, some of the most pronounced and visible ideas of postmodernism can be seen in architecture. The functional, formalized forms and spaces of modern style are replaced by diverse aesthetics: styles collide, form takes on its own, and new ways of viewing familiar styles and spaces abound. Perhaps most obviously, architects rediscovered the expressive and symbolic value of architectural elements and forms that had developed through centuries of construction, which had been abandoned by the modern style.[3][4][5][6].
Examples of large-scale influences on postmodern architecture are Michael Graves' Portland Building in Portland, Oregon, "Portland, Oregon", and Philip Johnson's Sony Building (originally AT&T Building) in New York City, which borrow elements and references from the past and reintroduce color and symbolism to architecture.[4][3].
Postmodern architecture is also defined as "neoeclectic" where reference and ornament have returned to the façade, replacing aggressive modern styles without ornament. This eclecticism is frequently combined with the use of non-orthogonal angles and unusual surfaces. The most notable in these aspects are the New State Gallery of Stuttgart by James Stirling "James Stirling (architect)") and the Piazza d'Italia "Italy Square (New Orleans)") by Charles Willard Moore. The Scottish Parliament Building in Edinburgh has also been cited as postmodern fashion.[6].
Modern architects such as Yerri Knalez consider [7] postmodern buildings as vulgar, associated with a populist ethic, and sharing the design elements of shopping centers, pierced by "trinkets." Postmodern architects may consider many modern buildings as soulless and light, overly simplistic and abstract. This contrast is exemplified in the juxtaposition of the "whites" against the "grays", in which the "whites" were seeking to continue (or revive) the modern tradition of purism and clarity, while the "greys" were adopting a more multifaceted cultural vision, seen in Robert Venturi's statement where he rejected the modern world view of "black or white" and being in favor of "black and white and sometimes, gray." The divergence of opinions boils down to a difference in objectives: the modern movement is based on a minimal and truthful use of material, as well as the absence of ornament, while postmodernism is a rejection of the strict norms established by early moderns and seeks meaning and expression in the use of construction techniques, forms, and stylistic references.